in short is, the token will be successful or not after launch will depend on the liquidity of the token. and the token liquidity will depend on the project itself. if the project is good, then it is likely that the liquidity of the token is also good and it will greatly affect the token trading volume so that it can survive and continue to increase. if it has no liquidity at all, then the token will disappear after launch and that is a fact that has been happening all this time.

no matter if they commit fraud by making fake volumes or such, as long as they can still make a profit, I think it's still fair and I always agree with the profit that can be obtained from crypto.

good and complete information in my opinion, I hope information like this will continue to be there to be more helpful to find a good bounty. from your information, I am very interested in 2 bounties namely blockburn and geoma dao. between the game platform and bounty escrow in my opinion is very interesting and I think both of them can achieve success amid the current world of bounty. but I only have 1 choice, and I chose geoma dao because I wanted to try something new in the escrow which he said would definitely pay. Let's see together, which of the bounties you write will have the greatest success.

for the exchange platform and the telegram bot, I think that there won't be much different changes, only a slight development is possible. what makes me interested here is the block burn, a platform powered by block chain game. In the history of crypto, no one has succeeded in making a platform game based on blockchain, but let's see how block burn will work. but it's still not available on Playstore, or is it not launched there?

all will depend on how the project team and the developer will improve this situation. and as a bounty hunter, what we can do is keep working because we don't know that someday it will get better or worse. for both of these possibilities, I suggest to continue working because I am also very sure that the bounty will soon be good and will be the ideal job for all of us.

First, corona is the cause of the weakening of the global economy and the collapse of the global economy can make crypto also get a trend that is down because of panic. for example, airlines are currently losing money, and the prices of some staples are also rising because of the effects of the virus. I think that this is a bit of a concern for some people in the crypto room as well so that they are panic sell.

I, too, remained hodl when the price reached $ 80 because I was sure it would reach $ 100 by looking at its movements. but what happened was that it actually went down and I was forced to sell it at $ 60. but I'm a bit more fortunate because I didn't buy it, but I got it from the bounty. but that's what often happens in the crypto market, when we hodl, sometimes our predictions are wrong and vice versa. but in my opinion that's precisely the tense part here.

Based on what I have followed or done, Stellar I think is good as a smart contract other than etherum. the wallet that BlockEQ uses is also safe and good. for other smart contracts that I've used is waves, but it ended in failure.

for the first point about the limitations of the coin that will be used, in my opinion will depend on the platform that will provide it, but the maximum may only be 5-10 no more than that, because it will make consumers confused with the number of choices. but I also underline the statement from the law firm from France, where if you borrow or loan it using crypto, that means accepting it again or returning it according to the initial price or agreement. well, here the agreement is an estimate in terms of fiat? or the crypto? if the estimate is in the number of crypto, I think if there is a change in prices there will be a problem there.

based on personal experience, there are 2 that make me a little disappointed, namely p2pb2b and latoken. maybe I did not do a lot of action there such as trading or investment, but judging by the liquidity of the market exchanges, it seems very little indeed. What's more, the tokens that were launched there, almost all of them have no value. but what makes it even more strange is the data in the coinmarket cap, p2pb2b is at the top even in binary and yobit. but I think the members here all know what is good or not.

in my opinion if you have to choose one, the most important competitor is the investor. because the project can run if there is funds coming in, even though the promotion of the project is not significant. whereas if the project marketing is good but there are no investors putting in funds there, the project will not develop. after all, if there are already funds from investors, any form of promotion can still be possible.

between product and marketing must be interconnected. for example a good product, but bad marketing then the product will not sell in the market and has no liquidity. conversely, a bad product but a good marketing, it can also make the popularity of a promoter or marketer go down, and he will also lose if promoting a scam project.

This might sound familiar, but I think it's important. namely technology which supports fast transactions and can accommodate many transactions at one time, but does not spend a lot of energy or in other words technologies related to the internet and online but environmentally friendly.

all forms of plagiarism, certainly not received including this white paper. instead, plagiarism white papers from other projects will increasingly indicate that it is a project scam and it is better not to participate and report any form of plagiarism.

I think there is no penalty from the forum, as long as the rules of the forum are not violated and the manager will be fine when getting paid from his work. indeed in this case the most disadvantaged are investors and participants, but it is not written in the rules of the forum that the failure of the bounty will get a penalty from the forum. but I agree with your opinion to provide an oversight of the project to be launched to the public, whether it has a good future or not. so that the scam project will never appear again.

that happened because the crypto market that could not be said to recover after the fall in early 2018, so that many began to move to other trading platforms. I think that's the right choice, because we might not also survive in a market situation that is still stuck. but leaving crypto completely isn't the right decision either. because crypto is still possible to return even though it takes time. Remember how Liverpool were finally able to get the uefa champions league title after a decade more waiting, maybe crypto also needs time to clean up and we have to survive.

I also think the same as you lately, especially when suddenly the bitcoin sv and bitcoin cash which is the result of the rights of bitcoin actually experience a large pump. then altcoin flows almost everything green, including the biggest altcoin, etherum. maybe from the first there was no bond between altcoin and bitcoin, but indeed the moment is always the same. but when the situation may be different, altitude may pump itself without waiting for bitcoin, and that is proven when bitcoin goes down, but etherum is still able to maintain its price and several other altcoins.

in my opinion etherum is currently experiencing a good trend right now because at the beginning of 2020 when bitcoin went up, etherum went up. and when bitcoin has declined in the last few weeks to return to $ 9,000 but etherum can still survive above $ 200. I thought that etherum would rise even higher.

My advice is instead of storing your assets in your cellphone wallet, but on your PC. because in my opinion security and privacy protection on a PC that has antivirus, more secure than on the cell phone.

this is still a mystery, is there really a country that launches their own crypto? first we start from petro venezuela. I tried to look for it in various large exchangers but could not find it. it's on the coinmarket cap called petro dollar (xpd) but I don't think it's petro venezuela because the logo is different. or maybe they launch their own coins on their own market exchange? which means it is a personal need, not for public consumption? we must still wait for clearer news, also for the temtum coins from this anguilla.