The block explorer seems to lag behind the network by a bit. Not sure it's always been the case, but it is definitely what happened just now.
If you search the transaction id on the block explorer again, it now has 3 confirmations, so I'm guessing it's reached your wallet by now 

I believe this to be a good time to remind the public of the little known fact that both fluffypony and smooth have a history of scamming.
It's nearly a year now, that I got scammed out of a winning auction position by force of insider outbidding!

The full facts list and irrefutable evidence is forever recorded in the bitcointalk history books:
Pizzagate - The Monero Scandal

^{* Disclaimer: the inferior comedic skills of the author entitle you, the reader, to reflect upon the present post with a moderate-to-absent smile. Giggles not permitted.}

Looks to be working alright then uplodex. You'll need a better CPU (or better yet, one to many GPUs) for higher hashrate.
Perhaps the pool owner can step in and say a word about lowering the minimum difficulty. That would get you to submit shares more frequently.

It does look that your CPU is hashing something.
Please post your full launch string (the full batch file miner command). This should help clear it up for good.
Also: do you get any "boos" or "yays" when the miner eventually finds a share?

There's a bunch of different versions, both x86 and x64, and specific to the various CPU architectures. 
You need to find which version is adequate for your CPU & OS, then fire it up with the necessary parameters added (pool info, worker, etc).

If it still doesn't work for you after these steps, at minimum, it will help your case if you post the exact error message that you get, perhaps screenshot of the app crashing, and the exact launch string... 

Tough & busy times are keeping me from participating much here on IRC, but whenever I get a chance, I read up the chatlogs and what not.
Just stopped by to say - damn - you guys look to be having way too much fun 

Wait long enough, and I have a chance of dragging my ass back in 

Even though I don't have a stake here at the moment, I'll be following progress. If things don't move forward too fast, I'll have a shot at claiming a position again! Meanwhile, best wishes all around for this project. 

https://github.com/Thirtybird/cpuminer/releases

minerd.exe -a scrypt-jane -o <pool> -u <user.worker> -p <password> -t <threads> --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388949883

Cheers!

A few seed words had been replaced in a recent update IIRC. Could this possibly have caused you to be creating/importing a new account instead of opening your old one at MyMonero? Fluffy & Co will know best... I'm certain that you'll get a faster resolution hopping on #Monery @Freenode IRC.

Good luck!

1. Wow. Those are some incredible features, virtually impossible to replicate. This coin is way ahead of its time... Shut up and take my money already!!!

2. Sure... The majority of large wallets have not moved their coins since the fibonacci scam. Ready, set, pump...

3. An old coin. Perhaps one of the oldest. Old is good. Old is awesome. Nothing tops 'Old'. Did you take my money already?

Note: I have nothing against vertoe taking over and reviving the coin. I am not claiming that his intentions are good or bad. There is certainly a case to be made for the positive aspects should someone take on a coin revival.

I truly have no stake here. Wishing you the best of luck!

@vertoe:
I do hope that if you chose to make something out of cache, that you somehow figure out how to do it without rewarding the fibonacci scam crew for the cachecoins that they should still hold. In my mind, this coin should be left dead for good. 

@Newbies to cache:
This coin was used as one of the major pump/funding sources for an ASIC project scam that never delivered.
A very large portion of the existing coins are presumed to be held by a criminal group, and legal action is in motion. The previous developer has sold his bitcointalk account, after numerous posts claiming that updates were in preparation. Needless to say, these updates never saw the light of day.

For further reading on the fibonacci scam, you can start here:
https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=2702.0

For details on the legal action, some info is here:
https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=22912.0

Exercise caution, do your research...

Very nicely described previous-poster-whos'-nick-I-forget !

One question has been on my mind for a while, and impacts how long I might go on ZRC:
What's the state of merchant support (or expectations) for Europe?

Cheers!

Oh, yup. Volume just didn't ever build up on Polo for some reason, and likewise not much action at Craptsy either.
It's really Bittrex that consistently has the most Sapience trading activity, you'll find you can part with your BTC "in no time" there 

What do you mean crowetic? It's much cheaper today than it was two months ago.
While I'd be happier with a higher valuation (as I hold a quite few), I think the current order books are showing a pretty good entry point, no? It's always nice when people dump into one's buy orders just before value shoots up, but that doesn't happen all the time  

Edit: Oh well, if you're serious about it, I can mediate an OTC deal for you, should you be interested let me know via PM.
I don't hold enough Sapience/XAI to afford selling any of my own, but I can reach out to other fellow investors.

cryptonite =! cryptonight 

I'm actively reading both here and @ IRC, so I don't make it to your statistics. Well, not until now, I did bite as I write this reply...
Much like myself, there's probably a lot others that do the same, taking idle work time to catch up on the threads and chats.
Take it easy there... 

Looks to be correct LiteBit. The majority of PoW coins will only be mined in a few years (PoW rewards will be increasing with each block for a very long time). This large percentage should concern the premine, which I understand was created as "unspendable" until reaching a certain date. That's one of the interesting innovations with ZRC btw (the time locked premine).

I'd expect that ZWGuy or someone from their team should step in to clarify decisively.

What really matters in this case, is memory bandwidth. The GPU miner runs a shitload of threads, and 2MB fits a single thread. I don't think the GPUs would be doing much hashing if running in single thread mode in order to use the cache exclusively, as opposed to using the much slower GPU RAM and executing a very large number of concurrent threads.

That is also why cryptonight CPU mining, you run X threads based on how much cache the CPU has. A CPU with 6MB cache, runs optimally with 3 threads, a CPU with 8MB cache, runs optimally with 4 threads, and so on.

@matthew1820:

I suggest you get onto Freenode IRC #ccminer, and ask around there for compilation help.
If you're not an IRC regular, you can just use this link:
#ccminer webchat
 
You'll find the author of that particular branch is frequently around, as are other miner developers. 

There is a rich list available here:
http://www.blocktree.io/richlist/XQN

Cheers!