The luckycoin scapegoat is so unbelievably pathetic.

Compare:
https://github.com/alerj78/lucky7coin/blob/master/src/irc.cpp
https://github.com/OriginalBatCoin/BatCoin/blob/master/src/irc.cpp

This is how many early coins found their peers.

Not only did BigVern rip everyone off, he used such a pathetic excuse which he knew everyone who can't code would believe.
Its hype like this, from people repeating 'fings they herd' - that has ruined cryptocurrency.

You're a fucking moron.
This is how many early coins found their peers.


Compare:
https://github.com/alerj78/lucky7coin/blob/master/src/irc.cpp
https://github.com/OriginalBatCoin/BatCoin/blob/master/src/irc.cpp


Not only did BigVern rip everyone off, he used such a pathetic excuse which he knew everyone who can't code would believe.
Its hype like this, from people repeating 'fings they herd' - that has ruined cryptocurrency.

er..

Share accepted at diff 0.17633333/4.99010133 by barrystyle []
2016-01-10 22:00:21 [Pool]      [litecred] (Thread 2) Share accepted at diff 0.17633333/0.37060678 by barrystyle []
2016-01-10 22:00:23 [Pool]      [litecred] (Thread 2) Share accepted at diff 0.17633333/1.76495807 by barrystyle []
2016-01-10 22:00:23 [Pool]      [litecred] (Thread 2) Share accepted at diff 0.17633333/0.35607046 by barrystyle []
2016-01-10 22:00:24 [Pool]      [litecred] (Thread 2) Daemon instance 0 rejected a supposedly valid block

still in PoW phase, so whats going on? charity scripts?

(posted this on another thread, i dont care)

Hi all,

Out of curiosity, performed a whois against bitebi9.com (cant believe something this simple hasnt been done yet):

Domain Name: BITEBI9.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1956688119_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.enom.com
Registrar URL: www.enom.com
Updated Date: 2015-08-31T19:33:25.00Z
Creation Date: 2015-09-01T02:33:25.00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2016-09-01T02:33:25.00Z
Registrar: ENOM, INC.
Registrar IANA ID: 48
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: BAO LUO
Registrant Organization: BAO LUO TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED
Registrant Street: XINGHAI SQUARE
Registrant City: DALIAN
Registrant State/Province: LAONING
Registrant Postal Code: 116000
Registrant Country: CN
Registrant Phone: +86.15524596808
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax: +1.
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: Email Masking Image@PROJECTINVESTORSINC.COM

Anyone else, feel free to find a whois service and do the same.
Notice the registrant email (domains@projectinvestorsinc.com) - copy paste modifies this from the whois engine i used.

barrystyle

Hi all,

Out of curiosity, performed a whois against bitebi9.com (cant believe something this simple hasnt been done yet):

Domain Name: BITEBI9.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1956688119_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.enom.com
Registrar URL: www.enom.com
Updated Date: 2015-08-31T19:33:25.00Z
Creation Date: 2015-09-01T02:33:25.00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2016-09-01T02:33:25.00Z
Registrar: ENOM, INC.
Registrar IANA ID: 48
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: BAO LUO
Registrant Organization: BAO LUO TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED
Registrant Street: XINGHAI SQUARE
Registrant City: DALIAN
Registrant State/Province: LAONING
Registrant Postal Code: 116000
Registrant Country: CN
Registrant Phone: +86.15524596808
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax: +1.
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: Email Masking Image@PROJECTINVESTORSINC.COM

Anyone else, feel free to find a whois service and do the same.
Notice the registrant email (domains@projectinvestorsinc.com) - copy paste modifies this from the whois engine i used.

barrystyle

Actually withdraw mate, everyone can get to that screen

Probably not worth the bother guys, ICO over but can't withdraw from the exchange to wallet.. HEY YOBIT I HERD U LIEK STAKE

Withdrawal for such currency is temporary off.

Gridseed Blades (40 chip); look sideways at them and either the regulator hardware will burn out or the MCU will die.

seems our little buddy luke-jr isnt such a good christian..

block 388365 - f2pool (and to be fair f2pool actually processed tx for a change)
block 388366 - eligius (1 tx - 25btc)

have at it guys; red-handed..

Check nicehash's github repo; supported there..

Forgive me if i'm wrong; but Antpool appears to be doing the same thing (found block, not submitting straight away,  mining on header of found block, submitting both in quick succession).. standard behaviour from them?

Blocks 387005 and 387006..

just ran into a similar issue, hope it helps.. assume you're using python-stratum instead of mpos (as a dropin), what is your USE_COINDAEMON_DIFF and DIFF_UPDATE_FREQUENCY set to?

i find when USE_COINDAEMON_DIFF is enabled, with DIFF_UPDATE_FREQUENCY set quite short - will result in symptoms you've mentioned. mining starts fine, but you can see while it checks for blocks, its like no work is being submitted.

> 1. Too many coins are crushing the price. # has to be decreased to below a billion or this coin is doomed.

I can't see anyone going with this as they will lose out.
How is the coin doomed with too many coins?

2. Find a way so New York coins can exchanged for subway Fares on MetroCard (the payment method for the New York City Subway)

Keep it in reality man.

3. Dump the PoW and go with PoS or at least a hybrid PoW/PoS as most are losing interest in spending more on electricity and mining equipment than what the coin is worth.

This isnt such a bad idea, but how will it affect existing holders who will just clear up with the PoS weight they'll have? It will just put them in a better position. Personally I do not see any need to change NYC.

Thats not inflation, thats dilution of the currency.

build a linux or windows standalone host and leave it running the wallet all day; that would be enough support for the 'community' itself, theres nothing wrong with the code.

what new and innovative plans would you like to see NYC with?

Litecoin is an Scrypt algorithm coin; while most of the offerings at Minergate are CryptoNight.
You'll find that you are probably hashing at 56h/s with Cryptonight, not 56kh/s.

As with Scrypt, any available Cryptonight currency's difficulty has skyrocketed making it GPU (Videocard) only territory.

Tadblt: don't feel compelled to reply to every post you can see.. just makes you look stupid(er)

Scrypt has been dead on GPU for years now, however take a look at nicehash/westhash and see if your card manages any profit on the other algorithms.

I love the amount of 'insight' in this set of posts, the basic fact is - if 42 only had 42 coins total, people would dump it all to BTC and stop mining it. Community? Get real.. New coin arrives, people mine/buy and sell, rinse and repeat - don't keep spewing fiction.

It wasn't a miscalculation of total coin-base - the dev just didn't have any conditions set for when supply exceeded 42.

Lets look at https://github.com/fourtytwo42/42/blob/master/src/main.cpp:
862:    if(nHeight == 4242424)
863:    {
864:       nSubsidy = 0.00042 * COIN;
865:   }
866:    if(nHeight >= 990382) 
867:    { 
868:       nSubsidy = 0.00;
869:   }
870:    return nSubsidy + nFees

Lines 866-869 were only added 5 months ago; so mining would only receive the fees (tiny) hence making it worthless. Cryptsy has decided to ignore the new code (because they do what they like basically) - so 42 will most likely go on forever.

Least the dev has a sense of humour:
846: if(nHeight == 420) // yay its 420 Time for a smoke
847:    {
848:      nSubsidy = 0.00042 * COIN;
849:   }

Basically, put this behind you - keep trading all your scrypt to BTC like everyone else, and dont read into the hype.

The last block halving of Dogecoin was in February this year, with no real noticeable effect on its value.
Don't be a tool though, trade your mined Dogecoins to BTC like everyone else and move on - don't pretend DogeCoin is anything more than a worthless alt.