Based on what I have followed or done, Stellar I think is good as a smart contract other than etherum. the wallet that BlockEQ uses is also safe and good. for other smart contracts that I've used is waves, but it ended in failure.

for the first point about the limitations of the coin that will be used, in my opinion will depend on the platform that will provide it, but the maximum may only be 5-10 no more than that, because it will make consumers confused with the number of choices. but I also underline the statement from the law firm from France, where if you borrow or loan it using crypto, that means accepting it again or returning it according to the initial price or agreement. well, here the agreement is an estimate in terms of fiat? or the crypto? if the estimate is in the number of crypto, I think if there is a change in prices there will be a problem there.

based on personal experience, there are 2 that make me a little disappointed, namely p2pb2b and latoken. maybe I did not do a lot of action there such as trading or investment, but judging by the liquidity of the market exchanges, it seems very little indeed. What's more, the tokens that were launched there, almost all of them have no value. but what makes it even more strange is the data in the coinmarket cap, p2pb2b is at the top even in binary and yobit. but I think the members here all know what is good or not.

in my opinion if you have to choose one, the most important competitor is the investor. because the project can run if there is funds coming in, even though the promotion of the project is not significant. whereas if the project marketing is good but there are no investors putting in funds there, the project will not develop. after all, if there are already funds from investors, any form of promotion can still be possible.

between product and marketing must be interconnected. for example a good product, but bad marketing then the product will not sell in the market and has no liquidity. conversely, a bad product but a good marketing, it can also make the popularity of a promoter or marketer go down, and he will also lose if promoting a scam project.

This might sound familiar, but I think it's important. namely technology which supports fast transactions and can accommodate many transactions at one time, but does not spend a lot of energy or in other words technologies related to the internet and online but environmentally friendly.

all forms of plagiarism, certainly not received including this white paper. instead, plagiarism white papers from other projects will increasingly indicate that it is a project scam and it is better not to participate and report any form of plagiarism.

I think there is no penalty from the forum, as long as the rules of the forum are not violated and the manager will be fine when getting paid from his work. indeed in this case the most disadvantaged are investors and participants, but it is not written in the rules of the forum that the failure of the bounty will get a penalty from the forum. but I agree with your opinion to provide an oversight of the project to be launched to the public, whether it has a good future or not. so that the scam project will never appear again.

that happened because the crypto market that could not be said to recover after the fall in early 2018, so that many began to move to other trading platforms. I think that's the right choice, because we might not also survive in a market situation that is still stuck. but leaving crypto completely isn't the right decision either. because crypto is still possible to return even though it takes time. Remember how Liverpool were finally able to get the uefa champions league title after a decade more waiting, maybe crypto also needs time to clean up and we have to survive.

I also think the same as you lately, especially when suddenly the bitcoin sv and bitcoin cash which is the result of the rights of bitcoin actually experience a large pump. then altcoin flows almost everything green, including the biggest altcoin, etherum. maybe from the first there was no bond between altcoin and bitcoin, but indeed the moment is always the same. but when the situation may be different, altitude may pump itself without waiting for bitcoin, and that is proven when bitcoin goes down, but etherum is still able to maintain its price and several other altcoins.

in my opinion etherum is currently experiencing a good trend right now because at the beginning of 2020 when bitcoin went up, etherum went up. and when bitcoin has declined in the last few weeks to return to $ 9,000 but etherum can still survive above $ 200. I thought that etherum would rise even higher.

My advice is instead of storing your assets in your cellphone wallet, but on your PC. because in my opinion security and privacy protection on a PC that has antivirus, more secure than on the cell phone.

this is still a mystery, is there really a country that launches their own crypto? first we start from petro venezuela. I tried to look for it in various large exchangers but could not find it. it's on the coinmarket cap called petro dollar (xpd) but I don't think it's petro venezuela because the logo is different. or maybe they launch their own coins on their own market exchange? which means it is a personal need, not for public consumption? we must still wait for clearer news, also for the temtum coins from this anguilla.

after reading the article, it makes little sense that etherum is basically similar to fiat in terms of total unknown supply, to a value that does not depend on a particular monetary policy. that is, it underlines that fiat prices will depend on the state of the world or global economy or the country itself, which means the same that etherum is also determined by the trading volume of the etherum itself, whether there is inflation or deflation. it's clear that it's different from bitcoin whose supply has been determined. I think that's the basis that there is a similarity between etherum and fiat.

You are right, paying attention to market cap, volume, and also market trends are very important before buying or investing. I just realized that when the tokens that I got from the bounty campaign could not be sold. and when I checked, it turned out that the trading volume was very small and that meant that the token did not have high liquidity in the market and caused the token to be hard to sell and also the biggest impact was the price would always go down. and it has been proven from month to month, prices are falling. I think to change the worst possibility (dead coins / tokens) is the team must work out how to increase the token liquditas so that volume can increase and prices can also be pumped.

I think this is just hype in the middle of this corona virus case, but it never hurts to try.

Corona Coin:
price: US $ 0.00185192
volume: US $ 23,731
capitalization: unknown, which means unlimited supply at this time.

market exchange: eTORO, Bithumb Global, and CREX24.

for p2p transactions, I still don't understand whether there is support for these features for this corona coin.

Thanks

I think celebrities already know about crypto, but there are still very few celebrities who know about ico as a whole, from the team, to the project, to funding, to the final destination. perhaps because of that factor that made the ico team take advantage of the situation where celebrities became promotional advertisements to get funding. and worse, the artist certainly did not know about it and he only received a commission.

really sad, in the midst of a falling crypto market and also the ico / ieo industry which is in a big problem of trust, there are still teams that do things like that. I agree if the SEC is part of the ico oversight body because in this case it is certainly very helpful to prevent the next scam.

buying at the bottom is one way to get big profits when prices rise later. but it also depends on the liquidity of the token because that will be the main factor as the trading volume increases and the price can also go up. some success, but some failed because they did not get a good trading volume and eventually just died.

actually a lot of gliding airdrops, whether it's from special airdrop sites or from exchanges such as binance or yobit. of exchange, airdrop rules are trading certain tokens. for those from the airdrop site in general do use referrals. yes, in the midst of this bad market if you are diligent in collecting airdrops of little value, maybe it will be valuable.

I know it's hard, and the reality that happens on the ground right now is that the bounty hunter can't wait to get paid while the team always has a reason behind the pending, I'm sure. I think as long as the team still provides clear communication and confirmation to the participants, I think they can still be trusted. yes, although it's a little bad with this situation because bounty hunters really want to get paid immediately and with a good price or exchange rate too. so, just respect each other's work and don't occasionally spam and scam so the bounty industry never dies.