This thread is not self moderated, so people can actually express their opinions! AMC is selling shares for at least 1 BTC with a 0.01 btc early bird special.  Net Estimated Revenue/Year/Share 0.00708687 BTC That is 0.7% a year if you buy it for 1 BTC. Developing their own "Fast-Hash-240" miners Asset issuer ran a company that has being administratively dissolved Topic is self moderated Did not need the company an more, check the [Bitfunder] tread for why if you are interested. Wrong we are selling ~8,000 shares at .01. What is the return if you buy it for .01 BTC, yes 100X that which you can do now, when unfroze. Investors get all of the .01 BTC back before I get anything. Not wrong. You specified that future shares will be only sold for at least 1 BTC. Are you even planning to sell the shares at 1 BTC or is that simply to mislead investors in thinking they can quickly flip them? |
|
|
|
Ian may have sold shares to raise capital for growth and maintenance.
May be. We won't know until he comments. Last time, he had taken a loan when 20BTC was short to purchase the 2nd Avalon - instead of selling growth shares. You'd expect growth and maintenance shares to be held (for the dividends) so they can keep growing in the future instead of growing once.. |
|
|
|
This thread is not self moderated, so people can actually express their opinions! AMC is selling shares for at least 1 BTC with a 0.01 btc early bird special. Net Estimated Revenue/Year/Share 0.00708687 BTC That is 0.7% a year if you buy it for 1 BTC. Developing their own "Fast-Hash-240" miners Asset issuer ran a company that has being administratively dissolved Topic is self moderated Did not need it any more. Thinking about re registering it. I can't get over how you managed to screw up a web hosting template up for axs.net |
|
|
|
|
What happened to your former venture and why was it administratively dissolved?
|
|
|
|
He still expects to have more than 51% of the network hashpower? |
|
|
|
Even though the bitfunder summary states that "AMC is made up of a team of dedicated Bitcoin mining professionals with over 30 years of combined experience in Computer Programming, Hardware Design, System Design, and System Administration" - I doubt that they have ever mined before.
More worrying is that nowhere in that skill-set/experience list is "managed a business" or "can do basic math". Personally I'm pretty sick of all the IPOs that claim to have experienced teams but never identify them. If IPOs can be that vague then why not cut them right down to the minimum - and have them just give a share price and send back whatever they feel like. At least that would be honest and cut down the reading time for us. Deprived you are right I should of listed my business experence of 42 years and the fact that I created a nationwide Internet Service Provider (Active Internet Communications) on the domain axs.net. "Active Internet Communications" has being administratively dissolved. (Also, 7 posts in a row?? Really in a hurry to get your post count bumped up..) |
|
|
|
This thread is not self moderated, so people can actually express their opinions! AMC is selling shares for at least 1 BTC with a 0.01 btc early bird special. Net Estimated Revenue/Year/Share 0.00708687 BTC That is 0.7% a year if you buy it for 1 BTC. Developing their own "Fast-Hash-240" miners Asset issuer ran a company that has being administratively dissolved Topic is self moderated |
|
|
|
What's about the asset loan to Bakewell? Which assets did you lend him and how do you make sure that he will return them?
Lent: 5906 BTC-BOND 59 bASIC-MINING 7,737 G.SDICE Ian Bakewell was available on skype (he didn't completely disappear) - his project involves using his carpentry skills offline which explains the lack of activity on bitcointalk & etc. |
|
|
|
|
I think there is a noteworthyness criteria, which definitely need to be better defined.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the current half coin colors are enough already.
|
|
|
|
already registered if thats ok
1FxkxwMEwBqUV3f9rdXG8SFcjFXRRTA4oE
Sorry but if you already registered you can't participate. Thanks! |
|
|
|
I have to say I'm not a fan of the new affiliate system.. because it's so easy to gamble with it and lose  |
|
|
|
As said, I'm not the kind of player who will play 1000$ on 50%.
Hey, don't diss the people that lost 125 BTC on 48.8%  |
|
|
|
|
Sure, 10 btc loan application fee, pay to 13VXUBDBd6Jwsz7euG59BmanHEMA5EkcA1
|
|
|
|
|
You are hungry. A hamburger costs 3.89 mBTC. What do you do?
> Wait four months when deflation reduces the price to 3.88 mBTC
> Buy the hamburger now and not worry about small amounts of deflation.
But people will pay via fiat! Or that only applies to necessities!
You want this shiny new game that's released. It costs $60
> Wait six months before it costs $30
> Enjoy the game now and pay $60
We can see a "deflationary environment" in League of Legends. Champions costs more the first week that it is released (or something, I don't care, I'm using it as an example). People still pay for it because they want it now and slow but predictable deflation won't significantly impact spending.
|
|
|
|
|
Server not found. Hopefully not when someone deposited 50 btc or something and the site owner ran.
|
|
|
|
|
This would be cool if pyramining paid out higher returns.
|
|
|
|
|
Can we get back on topic and stop discussing chargebacks?
This isn't possible because of double spending. The reason why you wait for confirmations is to reduce the chance that the main blockchain contains an alternate transaction sending the inputs to another output.
Let's look at the hold concept.. which is a transaction. When you send a transaction, it is a hold on that inputs, to the peers that have heard of this transaction. Peers will reject transactions using the same inputs if there's already one in their memory pool.
Summary: Your coins are already "held" when you make a transaction, but no it can't be used for instant confirmations, because you don't know which one will make it into a block. And the miner is always free to include a TX / hold that has never being broadcasted to the network in his block.
|
|
|
|
There is a simple way to make sure that txn fees are passed on users: check for fund availability in sendfrom should include transaction fee. (I.e. forbid negative account balances.)
Not a straightforward change - after checking the account has enough balance, it just calls pwalletMain->SendMoneyToDestination(address.Get(), nAmount, wtx); which calculates the fee and pushes the TX. |
|
|
|
|
Anyone interested in lending money out so someone can buy a Avalon should buy it themselves instead.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
