The odds are in your favor if you quit early...for life.
The odds are never in your favor no matter what That depends on your objective. If your objective is to double your money, then you are correct, the odds are never in your favor. If your objective is to profit, then the odds are in your favor. |
|
|
|
|
The odds are in your favor if you quit early...for life.
|
|
|
|
Can I use it to promote services for alt coins (payment gateway, Android faucet, Android wallet) - not an altcoin itself?
If so I bid BTC0.03
Which alt-coin? You can PM me if you don't feel like posting it here. My concern about alt-coins is mainly regarding the intent of its developers. IPO/ICO-type alt-coins and those that seem to scream "get rich quick" or "use this to buy drugs" are the ones I'd like to avoid. I develop services for any crypto-currency such as payment gateways and Android faucet. It can work for any coin. I'd like to promote my services for altcoin creators to hire me. Yes, that's fine. EcuaMobi is current high-bidder at BTC0.03 |
|
|
|
Can I use it to promote services for alt coins (payment gateway, Android faucet, Android wallet) - not an altcoin itself?
If so I bid BTC0.03
Which alt-coin? You can PM me if you don't feel like posting it here. My concern about alt-coins is mainly regarding the intent of its developers. IPO/ICO-type alt-coins and those that seem to scream "get rich quick" or "use this to buy drugs" are the ones I'd like to avoid. |
|
|
|
.02 to leave it as-is
You mean to keep my current signature? Okay lol. Blazedout419 is current high-bidder at BTC0.02 |
|
|
|
Do you have any plans or intentions to remain away from the forum any more then you have been in the last month?
if not then I will start at .01 BTC
Quickseller is current high-bidder at BTC0.01 |
|
|
|
Do you have any plans or intentions to remain away from the forum any more then you have been in the last month?
if not then I will start at .01 BTC
No plans or intentions to do so, no. If something comes up that necessitates a significant leave of absence from the forum, I would contact the winner and work out something. But the black-and-white rule is that I am making no guarantees about post count. |
|
|
|
A few questions: - When does your auction end?
- Are you able to offer any kind of guarantee that you will make a certain number of posts throughout the month?
- How many posts have you made on average over the last few months?
Auction ends 24-hours after the time the thread was posted. No guarantee regarding post count, but if it means anything I will remain cognizant that the winner wants to have their advertisement seen. I made ~114 posts in the past month, since Feb. 14, if that helps. |
|
|
|
|
Description: This is an auction for use of my signature space for 30-days
Starting bid: BTC0.01 (or LTC/XRP equivalent); please bid in increments of BTC0.01
Buy it now: BTC0.50
End date and time: 24-hours after initial thread-posting
Payment methods accepted: BTC; LTC; XRP
Additional information:
- Payment due up-front
- Use as much or as little space as you would like
- Advertisement may run longer than 30 days, but never less than 30 days. Previous users of my signature space can attest that, in several instances, advertisements have remained there far longer than the time paid for (sometimes many months longer).
- Not available to newbies
- No negative feedback accounts
- Accounts suspected of scamming or illegal behavior during advertisement period will have their advertisements terminated without refund (at my discretion)
- No scam sites or alt-coin promotions (at my discretion)
|
|
|
|
The Big Bang doesn't explain everything anyway. ...Big Bang believers have turned the Theory into a religion, simply by believing it is fact when it hasn't been proven to be fact.  Oh, now this is interesting. So, by your own words, religion = believing in a theory as fact when it has not proven to be fact. And, by your own words in previous posts, you are a Christian, and of course Christianity is a religion. So, you are saying that you believe in Christianity, a religion that has not been proven to be fact. |
|
|
|
Science NOT unlocking all the mysteries of the cosmos yet does NOT = GOD DEFINITELY EXISTS.
There is no evidence that a divine creator exists.
There is a ton of evidence that no divine creator exists.
Most things human beings believed about the world around us 1,000 years ago have been proven to be false. Beliefs were developed and held because we were simply too ignorant to know the difference so we 'blamed' things that lacked scientific explanation on a divine being so powerful our puny little minds couldn't comprehend them.
We still have puny, uninformed minds compared to everything going on in the Universe but we are in way better shape than our ancestors were. We now know for example, that eclipses are not the hand of god, they are a predictable, natural phenomenon.
I don't get why some people (okay LOTS of people) have not naturally come to realize that god was a superstition (sorry There Will be Blood) invented BY man to explain that which defied explanation.
The idea of god did not exists before man, and would no longer exist were man removed from existence.
You think the dinosaurs sat around wondering if the day they spent eating the uncooked entrails of some random creature while it was still alive pleased god?
Ohh....that's right I forgot, the dinosaurs weren't real!
"Science NOT unlocking all the mysteries of the cosmos yet does NOT = GOD DEFINITELY EXISTS," is quite accurate... just like "Science unlocking all the mysteries of the cosmos does = GOD DEFINITELY EXISTS," is accurate as well. For proof that God exists see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. EDIT: Since dinosaurs are/were part of God's creation, they definitely are evidence for His existence. Nice backwards logic. Way to prove dinosaurs are part of God's creation before proving God exists or created anything. |
|
|
|
This is the paper by Hawking that those two 'news' pieces are based on: http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5761It's called "Information Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holes". When you look at the weather forecast, especially the 10-day forecast, it changes about 4 times a day, except for areas that everybody knows what is going to happen anyway, because it is so regular. That's approximately the same kind of predicting we can get for black holes. So, you're saying it's a pretty good approximation, then? I'm guessing you don't wear shorts when the forecast says it will be below freezing. It's nice to see you acknowledging (albeit indirectly) that your interpretation of what Hawking said was dubious. It's about as close as I've ever seen you acknowledge your misunderstandings. Before, you were just going to go with "there are no black holes," and here you are confirming that you believe they exist. Any weather prediction is good, if some kind of weather happens. This is because nobody knows anything about the future, even 1 second into the future. Correct, we aren't wizards. It seems we agree on something. So, since you just said you can't know anything for certain even one second into the future, then you must also believe that you aren't certain about who God will send to Heaven or Hell, or that anything in Revelations, such as Armageddon, is certain to happen, right? |
|
|
|
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons: 1. The thread title seems to ask the question; 2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death. God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to. Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me. Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well. Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything. Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg. Chocolate is good stuff  The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables. The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common. But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them. Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. The proof for the non existance of God can be found here: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionhttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earthhttp://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm. Sorry, those don't in anyway disprove God. Intelligent design is a theory about the nature of reality, not about phenotypical changes over successive generations, the age of the Earth, or how a planet took shape. In no way do any of these disprove intelligent design. The bible stats that the earth is around 6.500 years old, by proving its not we prove the bible is bullshit and since the bible is the only book that talks about God there you go. ( im talking about Bible God) Okay, well it seems you're making a distinction between Intelligent Design in general and the biblical description of intelligent design, so that's good. The three cases you mention in no way disprove Intelligent Design in general. Actually, if I wanted to get really nitpicky, the Earth may accurately be described as ~6,500 years old depending upon your location in spacetime. Approach the event horizon of a black hole and Earth's age will appear drastically different than the ~4.5 billion years we're familiar with. But, this is a pretty irrelevant consideration because we both know BadDecker would never present such an argument. |
|
|
|
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons: 1. The thread title seems to ask the question; 2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death. God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to. Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me. Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well. Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything. Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg. Chocolate is good stuff The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables. The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common. But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them. Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. The proof for the non existance of God can be found here: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionhttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earthhttp://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm. Sorry, those don't in anyway disprove God. Intelligent design is a theory about the nature of reality, not about phenotypical changes over successive generations, the age of the Earth, or how a planet took shape. In no way do any of these disprove intelligent design. |
|
|
|
Come on BADecker, bow to Sequoia!! What will you say when scientists look at Pinus longaeva when it dies, and there is NO proof of any flood previous to it's currently 5064 year old life? Nowt, cause you know not to. Oi, BADecker.. not speaking anymore? To scared to admit I got ya? By the baws, baw bag, now screeeeeeeam for your god.. you fuckin need him now huh? Just out of curiosity, how come I dont believe in god, but by your definition, he helped me to defeat those false prophet's like you? No? I guess your away picking on weaker, more gullable fools.. people that dont know not to get you started. Please, someone write to the vatican for an explanation of these tree's that are alive today, yet older than the oldest biblical personage.. BADecker, your credibility is now officially absolute 0.. all you do now is look a bigger fool than you did a second ago, and continue to do so. Why? Lack of evidence. It's not you I feel sorry for.. it's the billions that will suffer due to YOUR ignorance of the FACT's around you, keeping in mind, you are all in it together yeah? More proof of life: http://www.livescience.com/41191-ancient-microbe-fossils-found.html3.5 BILLION years old.. please, die very FUCKIN QUICK. However, I DO feel sorry for you... a little. Even if you believe in God for salvation, the fact that you continuously write as you do, shows that, if you have faith, it is waning fast. Unfortunately, when your faith dies (if you have any), you will die spiritually right along with it. And if you don't have any faith, you are already dead. That's probably most of the reason why your words mean very little. Only the dead in Christ can speak. So, why should I feel even a little sorrow for you? Either you are gone, and it is entirely useless, or you are almost gone, and nothing can stop you from going. I choose to feel happy in the lord, and joyful in His presence with me. So you avoid talking about the tree, interesting... Keep in mind that he spent about 10 posts rejecting the idea that the fallacy of induction also applies to him, and then I find out that he thinks I'm talking about fucking electrical superconductors. Yes but, the proof for the existence of God can be found at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, induction or no induction. Wanna talk induction? Why not start an induction thread? The proof at the link is dynamic proof. It doesn't have anything to do with induction. A person can accept anything or not, no matter how much evidence or proof is proffered. Lol make a thread about induction? By citing evidence as certain proof, you are using inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning *by definition* cannot possibly yield certain proof. How can you not understand this simple sentence? You can't inductively conclude God exists because inductive reasoning doesn't allow you to. It's. Not. Possible. You could have 1,000,000 pages of evidence, or 1,000,000,000, or even 1,000,000,000,000...and it would still be impossible. |
|
|
|
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons: 1. The thread title seems to ask the question; 2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death. God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to. Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me. Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well. Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything. Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg. Chocolate is good stuff The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables. The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common. But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them. |
|
|
|
Come on BADecker, bow to Sequoia!! What will you say when scientists look at Pinus longaeva when it dies, and there is NO proof of any flood previous to it's currently 5064 year old life? Nowt, cause you know not to. Oi, BADecker.. not speaking anymore? To scared to admit I got ya? By the baws, baw bag, now screeeeeeeam for your god.. you fuckin need him now huh? Just out of curiosity, how come I dont believe in god, but by your definition, he helped me to defeat those false prophet's like you? No? I guess your away picking on weaker, more gullable fools.. people that dont know not to get you started. Please, someone write to the vatican for an explanation of these tree's that are alive today, yet older than the oldest biblical personage.. BADecker, your credibility is now officially absolute 0.. all you do now is look a bigger fool than you did a second ago, and continue to do so. Why? Lack of evidence. It's not you I feel sorry for.. it's the billions that will suffer due to YOUR ignorance of the FACT's around you, keeping in mind, you are all in it together yeah? More proof of life: http://www.livescience.com/41191-ancient-microbe-fossils-found.html3.5 BILLION years old.. please, die very FUCKIN QUICK. However, I DO feel sorry for you... a little. Even if you believe in God for salvation, the fact that you continuously write as you do, shows that, if you have faith, it is waning fast. Unfortunately, when your faith dies (if you have any), you will die spiritually right along with it. And if you don't have any faith, you are already dead. That's probably most of the reason why your words mean very little. Only the dead in Christ can speak. So, why should I feel even a little sorrow for you? Either you are gone, and it is entirely useless, or you are almost gone, and nothing can stop you from going. I choose to feel happy in the lord, and joyful in His presence with me. So you avoid talking about the tree, interesting... Keep in mind that he spent about 10 posts rejecting the idea that the fallacy of induction also applies to him, and then I find out that he thinks I'm talking about fucking electrical superconductors. |
|
|
|
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons: 1. The thread title seems to ask the question; 2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death. God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to. Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me. Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well. Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything. Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg. |
|
|
|
This is the paper by Hawking that those two 'news' pieces are based on: http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5761It's called "Information Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holes". When you look at the weather forecast, especially the 10-day forecast, it changes about 4 times a day, except for areas that everybody knows what is going to happen anyway, because it is so regular. That's approximately the same kind of predicting we can get for black holes. So, you're saying it's a pretty good approximation, then? I'm guessing you don't wear shorts when the forecast says it will be below freezing. It's nice to see you acknowledging (albeit indirectly) that your interpretation of what Hawking said was dubious. It's about as close as I've ever seen you acknowledge your misunderstandings. Before, you were just going to go with "there are no black holes," and here you are confirming that you believe they exist. |
|
|
|
 Lol Jesus tap-dancing Christ! Haha thanks for making it obvious you never read my references. Lol an electrical transformer...resistance...superconductors. Please, PLEASE tell me that was a joke. The problem of induction is about the limits of inductive reasoning, you idiot! LOL! I'm getting to the point where I can almost predict your responses, and Decky's. LOL !  I'm envious of your talent. I've never, ever seen someone try to support their argument by laughing off their own misunderstanding of a word meaning before. Wow, I don't know how you did it. Police officer handcuffs you: "You've been charged with first degree murder." You: First degree murder? No way! All I dd was shoot the guy in the face! I planned it ages ago! I had to find the perfect gun." Officer: Sir, thank you for your confession. You: What are you talking about? I told you there is no way that I did it! Officer: But...you just told me that you shot him in the face and that it was pre-meditated. You: Yeah...so? Officer: Sir, first degree murder is premeditated killing. You: LMAO! Oh, you officers and your "laws." Don't you know those laws are changing all the time? Murder means hugging, duh! Officer: Sir...are you retarded? You: Hahahaha you know, Officer, I haven't laughed this hard in weeks. You know, I think I've figured you out. I see you standing there, and it makes me think that you must either be really, really old to be the only one who thinks the laws of man actually matter, or, you're probably handicapped. I'm guessing you're in a wheelchair. Probably a parapalegic. Officer: Sir...I just walked back to my car with you and placed you on the hood to handcuff you. It was only 30 seconds ago...I'm standing right here. You: You know, it's like I can predict exactly how you're going to respond!     |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
