These are basically the same people we'll be trusting our financial system to via Libra. |
|
|
|
Funny how things can mirror perceived reality isn't it? +1 WOsMerit I smell another physics discussion brewing |
|
|
|
Symmetrical triangle forming. Usually the break out is in the direction of the existing trend but with bitcoin there are no guarantees:  I guess we know how that turned out.  |
|
|
|
Bitfinex to introduce 100x leverage...
The Rogue Wave and coming nosebleed ATH and collapse of Core BitcOn (perhaps to ~$775 at the halving). So we all need to move our coins to legacy addresses? The downside to keeping hodl stash/cold storage coins in legacy addresses is that you'll probably have higher transaction fees when you finally move them. The upside is that you'd avoid any potential segwit based attacks on bitcoin, like if miners decide to take all the segwit coins. So, I guess you have to balance the estimated future fees for non-segwit transactions with the estimated potential for miner theft. Another set of downsides is that you are not supporting segwit, increasing the likelihood of a segwit attack through your nonsupport and supporting the FUD spreaders predictions by doing what they want you to do.. You can do what you want, but don't you find it a bit problematic to try to get others to do the same, especially when it remains a kind of attack on bitcoin's current direction involving segwit and based on incomplete information of BIGblocker FUD spreaders? So, if I keep my cold storage coins in a legacy address, how does the affect anyone but me? Attacking segwit isn't going to accomplish much at this point anyway. That battle was already fought, and the pro-segwit side achieved a decisive victory. I agree that any negatives about segwit will remain big blocker talking points, as they try to make BTC look weak. That doesn't mean there aren't still legitimate criticisms of segwit, and lightning, for that matter. I said my piece already, so no need to repeat further (at this time) and I will likely engage with anyone spouting out anunymint nonsense talking points.. so let's see where it goes. Hopefully, it is largely a dead topic, but I doubt it.. these kinds of nonsense anti-bitcoin talking points do seem to come back to life on a fairly regular basis.. like freddy krugger from nightmare on elmstreet or michael myers or jason in friday the 13th I don't feel like debating all that again either TBH. In other news: it's strangely silent here for a day where we've been poking up above $11K repeatedly. |
|
|
|
Bitfinex to introduce 100x leverage...
The Rogue Wave and coming nosebleed ATH and collapse of Core BitcOn (perhaps to ~$775 at the halving). So we all need to move our coins to legacy addresses? The downside to keeping hodl stash/cold storage coins in legacy addresses is that you'll probably have higher transaction fees when you finally move them. The upside is that you'd avoid any potential segwit based attacks on bitcoin, like if miners decide to take all the segwit coins. So, I guess you have to balance the estimated future fees for non-segwit transactions with the estimated potential for miner theft. Another set of downsides is that you are not supporting segwit, increasing the likelihood of a segwit attack through your nonsupport and supporting the FUD spreaders predictions by doing what they want you to do.. You can do what you want, but don't you find it a bit problematic to try to get others to do the same, especially when it remains a kind of attack on bitcoin's current direction involving segwit and based on incomplete information of BIGblocker FUD spreaders? So, if I keep my cold storage coins in a legacy address, how does the affect anyone but me? Attacking segwit isn't going to accomplish much at this point anyway. That battle was already fought, and the pro-segwit side achieved a major victory. I agree that any negatives about segwit will remain big blocker talking points, as they try to make BTC look weak. That doesn't mean there aren't still legitimate criticisms of segwit, and lightning, for that matter. |
|
|
|
Bitfinex to introduce 100x leverage...
The Rogue Wave and coming nosebleed ATH and collapse of Core BitcOn (perhaps to ~$775 at the halving). So we all need to move our coins to legacy addresses? The downside to keeping hodl stash/cold storage coins in legacy addresses is that you'll probably have higher transaction fees when you finally move them. The upside is that you'd avoid any potential segwit based attacks on bitcoin, like if miners decide to take all the segwit coins. So, I guess you have to balance the estimated future fees for non-segwit transactions with the estimated potential for miner theft. |
|
|
|
Don’t ever underestimate the power of greed. Those who bought and are holding at ranges 13-20k had the mindset of selling to recoup or even break even once price reaches those price points again. i have a feeling many of these peoples mindset will revert back to their pre purchase mentality. Hop on board and hodl as the eco system has changed and more belief in btc has come into fruition.
Those who bought in the ranges of 13k and above must have sold their bitcoins in loss. There might be very few people who have such a holding power and a mental strength to hold the coins for over a year and still not panic seeing bitcoin moving down to 3000$. I have a workmate so stupid he bought at 13k, has been holding all this time and tell everybody he will sell as soon as price is back to what he payed. Everyday he curses me aloud for suggesting him to buy BTC back in 2017, and gets triggered when I ask him why selling for the same price after an year if the odds now are that he can make at least some profit. He became a BTC hater. Another r0ach is born |
|
|
|
Males have higher birthrates, but also higher infant mortality rate, so it tends to balance out. It may be different now in 1st world countries.
Competition between males is good for the species. Incels are the weakest among us, so should not reproduce.
As far as I know, the industrial revolution ended much of natural selection because the weakest of humans used to all die in early childhood and now almost everyone lives through it. As for the word "incel", it's a very misleading term. People make believe like the word somehow signifies 'white nerd', but if you ever click on one of those Reddit forums, it seems like the majority of those posters are INDIANS and other brown ethnic groups. Then there will be some amalgamation of random mixed race people like half Asian and half something else like that Elliot Rogers guy. Indian males as a whole aren't world renowned to be the epitome of beauty or anything, but a lot of them will look like...mostly normal Indians. They could probably marry one of their own kind but seem to have been exposed to white civilizations and now view only white women as desirable or something. Same thing with lots of these blacks, arabs, and other racial groups. They're defacto incels because you have 3 billion brown people all seeking out the same few million age 18-25 white women. Multiculturalism is bad for us and bad for them. That's an enlightening new perspective on the incel phenomenon. |
|
|
|
That article was the dumbest thing I've ever seen so there's probably some sort of hidden motive behind it, like the fact that women as a whole are an enormous net tax burden on the state over the course of their lives while men are tax cows. Since lots of men are refusing to get married now, (((the state))) is probably trying to engineer men to forcibly marry so random fool men (trollgoossens) will carry the monetary burden of women instead of the state. Also, the natural male to female birth ratio is 105:100 respectively. You could say that 4.76% of the male population born each year are automatically incels even if the entire male population are clones of Fabio. That is, unless men are naturally designed to kill each other off and that's why the ratio is higher with 5 out of every 105 men being destined to be murdered by some other dude. Once you factor in like 90% of the freely circulating female population are morbidly obese now with an average weight of 170 pounds that no male will touch, with males also being naturally more abundant, this gives you a supply of like 10 dudes for every regular female and all kinds of problems. Males have higher birthrates, but also higher infant mortality rate, so it tends to balance out. It may be different now in 1st world countries. Competition between males is good for the species. Incels are the weakest among us, so should not reproduce. |
|
|
|
|
I've received a couple complaints of problems posting/thread locked. Anyone still having problems?
|
|
|
|
What ever happened to Adam?
From what I hear, he went AWOL and became a bcasher |
|
|
|
A lot of stuff happened while I was sleeping it seems.  I am leaving this here: The guy is a legend. Filbfilb masterrace. Maaterluc lost his mojo he is a common tradingview slut now. The price might not hit $11k with this pump (yet) but there is an upwards leg happened indeed. As I live and breath... Fiiiilb filb! The man. The myth. The legend. Don't tell me I didn't warn ya. The guy knows his shit. I guess I trust him more than my father now. I agree. He's become my favorite analyst over the last year of so. Well, maybe tied with PlanB. And of course he called the $20K top way before it happened, and called a ~$3K bottom well in advance too. Hopefully filbfilb updates his logarithmic regression chart soon. |
|
|
|
|
Ok. I sold a bunch of BTC in early 2013 for like $35
|
|
|
|
|
Dopamine's a hell of a drug.
|
|
|
|
|
What in the actual fuck? I just got online and it's up like $1K in a matter of hours. This is like late 2017 all over again.
|
|
|
|
Did you buy back into BTC? Do you have any BTC left? i got in @verage $50  weeee Plot twist: Gembitz turns out to be the biggest BTC whale here. |
|
|
|
His chart from December is still in play. He has us hitting ~$13-14K in July.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
