Also if the domain name is something worth it, I will buy and you can rent it from me for 50% of your income, is that a deal your interested?
@OP: Always own the domain yourself, you don't want it to be actually successful and have gweedo cash it out on a domain marketplace  (or halve your income) |
|
|
|
1. Register for a bitZino account with this link: https://bitzino.com/c/r325ay2. (Optional) Bet some coins! 3. Post a bitcoin address here. I will then send 0.01 BTC to a random address here, after 25 posts. BTC0.01 is tiny but I want to see how this goes and if I can pay out more  |
|
|
|
Threats aren't ok, I removed it. I don't care about the rest, for the most part.
so is that an official yes? hatred and verbal abuse is allowed? Depends. It can be trolling which I don't tolerate, it could also just be someone expressing their opinion, which is fine. Can I read the forum policy on when expressing ones opinion is considered trolling? lulz! What a joke that statement is. (Wonders if I will be banned AGAIN for "trolling") I thought you.might be kidding cause nobody could be that naive and oblivious, but then I remembered how many outright scams you've fallen for and how many tens of thousands of dollars you've lost, and I realized you really are. Pretty funny  . Smells like borderline trolling.. |
|
|
|
I just called my accountant and he confirmed this.  I am shutting down. Careful, uncle sam is going to arrest you  |
|
|
|
who is your favorite my little pony?
I can answer any questions regarding MSB requirements, state and federal.
I saw MLP, oops Well, now that you mention it, this is a much more important topic. My favorite pony is Rarity in reverence to the worst troll ever. I think you misspelt rainbow dash. |
|
|
|
|
Stop bumping this thread and let it die out.
|
|
|
|
Can you talk about the site and how it will make an income? Also if the domain name is something worth it, I will buy and you can rent it from me for 50% of your income, is that a deal your interested?
Yes, sell 50% of your income for $100. Great idea, not. |
|
|
|
|
Just like sublime, nobody cares about your thoughts on who is a scammer.
|
|
|
|
your accusing the wrong guy
You're. |
|
|
|
i have a feeling these guys are scammers > lightlord LOL |
|
|
|
c. De-Centralized Virtual Currencies
A final type of convertible virtual currency activity involves a de-centralized convertible virtual currency (1) that has no central repository and no single administrator, and (2) that persons may obtain by their own computing or manufacturing effort.
A person that creates units of this convertible virtual currency and uses it to purchase real or virtual goods and services is a user of the convertible virtual currency and not subject to regulation as a money transmitter. By contrast, a person that creates units of convertible virtual currency and sells those units to another person for real currency or its equivalent is engaged in transmission to another location and is a money transmitter. In addition, a person is an exchanger and a money transmitter if the person accepts such de-centralized convertible virtual currency from one person and transmits it to another person as part of the acceptance and transfer of currency, funds, or other value that substitutes for currency.
This is the important part. |
|
|
|
Hello,
Requesting a 3 BTC Loan for 3 Days, will payback 3.15 BTC once my Coinbase order goes through (Thurs, Mar 21 @ 7:00PM CDT). I do have collateral if needed (45 ASICMiner shares, can be confirmed via friedcat). Will even show the Coinbase Trans ID if requested, PM if interested.
Thanks
Edit: Raised interest rate from 3% to 5% to get a faster deal
Sure if you sign a MSG from your address holding 45 shares saying if 3.15 BTC isn't paid to [repay addr] by mar 23th you transfer 5 shares from that address to [my address]? |
|
|
|
Agreed and sent you a PM
I don't agree |
|
|
|
|
18 USC § 486:
"Whoever, except as authorized by law, makes or utters or passes, or attempts to utter or pass, any coins of gold or silver or other metal, or alloys of metals, intended for use as current money, whether in the resemblance of coins of the United States or of foreign countries, or of original design, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both."
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry but I substantially doubt that anyone will lend to you - this isn't targeted at you, but new users in general. Would you lend $1470 to a stranger on the street? Investing in mining is better done through assets like ASICMINER or successful investment funds - because you can start off with ~$35 for ASICMINER or ~$5 for btcinvest. |
|
|
|
Just a minor thing: You expose yourself to more risk if you don't trade the shares directly. burnside is trustworthy in my opinion, but it is still risk, and there are future management fees, and you need to judge if that is worth the easier share purchases, purchasing of smaller amounts or greater liquidity, etc. |
|
|
|
Not much point in I.P's mose scammers use TOR anyway, We need something else.
If we're dealing with identity theft do we not already have a solution for that with the signature function in the client? I thought that just ties up the client with a address, If an account is hacked, Could it not come from any client? Now I don't claim to understand the signature thingy completely, but the way I understand it it is possible to sign a message with the client. This signature depends on the context of the message and the wallet keys and can be checked for authenticity in another client. The following should then be possible: - Build a central repository of signatures for users (yeah, yeah, I know, centralization bad, but bear with me) - When a user requests a loan, have him sign that message with the client. - Now you should be able to check that signature against the signature in the repository via your own client and determine if the person is indeed who they claim to be. Someone correct me if I'm wrong here. I'm not good with the signature stuff, it breaks my brain, but this is how I would assume it works. Well I know less than you on this (and it shows how well used a feture it must be) But if I understand correctly, There is no way to varify a new user, As there is no "history" of the signature? So at some point someone has to take a first gamble? Which instantly make me think of shill acounts and fake build up, We have to keep using coins to keep the system alive, But the way things are going, Everyone will be to scared to spend them for feer of it not arriving to the person they wanted it to.  It's based on address - you know I have the address firstbits 1GLados (because I've traded substantially with it, eg buying asicminer shares, bitfunder public asset listings), and then you know whoever can sign a message from 1GLados has access to my private keys. There's still the risk of compromise, but less than just someone logging into a forum account without 2fa. |
|
|
|
Haha, no need to get persnickety. I know how much work it takes, ditto here on taking a month plus.  I do know you rushed it out in response though. Feel free to claim otherwise, but the obvious bugs in your implementation speak for themselves. Actually looks like the opposite considering that you were shown a demo of BF's options a few weeks back.. Whoever told you that outright lied. (and in fact, my requests for simple read-only API access were denied.) You've been manipulated. Unfortunate that whomever that is would put you in such a position. (edit/add: For the uninitiated, Ukyo and I have a bit of a history. Pretty obvious neither of us are going to be granting demo access to either side one way or the other...) I should have phrased it a bit differently - the demo was public weeks ago (you just needed a sandbox account on BF, and the demo was announced on irc channels). It's like your LTC-GLOBAL to BTC-TC release, except with BitFunder the sandbox version gets it weeks earlier to test instead of a day earlier with LTC-GLOBAL But enough about that, looks like someone written a call option already for ASICMINER on btct.co! |
|
|
|
Haha, no need to get persnickety. I know how much work it takes, ditto here on taking a month plus. I do know you rushed it out in response though. Feel free to claim otherwise, but the obvious bugs in your implementation speak for themselves. Actually looks like the opposite considering that you were shown a demo of BF's options a few weeks back.. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
