6 connections, syncing now. 

   Is anyone connected with the original wallet?  I'm only getting one connection, and it's only loading to block 2081 then stops.  Thought maybe it was the level of the wallet, re-downloaded the wallet from the OP and it's the same as the one I'm trying.  Tried connecting to the node given a few posts back, but same thing.  Anyone have a node that is up to date with the original blockchain?

   And you wonder why I'm confused and asking questions.  What wallet would you like us to connect with? the original?  The one post a few weeks ago? Another one?   

    The story goes, that he is still arbing BTC between exchanges to pay the investors.

  I have not followed BTC for awhile, but I think it's been pretty stagnant lately.  That might explain the delay in any payments.   

    Jahvinci,

    Believe me I follow this thread.  Once you got into mining for the coin, and things blew up I lost interest in that part.  I've been sitting on the side lines waiting for everything to settle down. 

   I got burned on another coin because I didn't speak up.  Just making sure it doesn't happen again.    OK, I'll wait patiently for an update.  I've been holding quite a bit of Mary Jane almost since day1. 

                     

    Jahvinci,

   There have been a lot of others trying to help and offering their advice and input and their understandings of what is happening.  I believe your now the official voice of Mary Jane coin, So if you could just give us a brief update at least once a week, that would help. 

   Don't answer if you are not sure.  Saying the wallet will be available in a week, and then not have it happen is more confusing then just saying we're still working on it.   I was lead to believe, my understanding of this thread, that there were several wallets all floating around in various states. 

   What is the wallet that was posted earlier.  Is that going to be the official wallet.  I believe it was you that said to download it and test it out.

How about putting the latest status in the op (original post #1) so we can look there for the official status instead of having to ask.  Sorry if this has been gone over before. 

     Build12 is working fantastic on JD....   Very few hangs, and all of the ones I've seen have been from my side.  The bot thinks it sent the bet, but it got lost internally and never makes it to JD.  That's a lot easier to correct (just do the bet manually).  And that only happened a few times when I had ill behaving wallet clients running.  It now runs for hours and hours, where in the past I was luck to get 2 hours straight, and usually around 20-30 minutes. 

   

Dararel,
   Thanks.  So for now, is any wallet actually working?  "testing a new wallet and correct the old wallet"  So will the old and new, work on the same blockchain?  Is the "new" wallet, the one posted a few weeks back?  I'm just trying to make sure I don't miss anything.    

   So what is the official status?  There was a wallet released for testing, is that still the case?  Can you make a section in the op with the latest official news?  Sometimes the chatter in the thread gets overwhelming, and I'm afraid I'll miss something. 

   Are we going to be using the original block chain, or will there be a coin swap? 

                     Thanks for the hard work.     

   Clams are POS (proof of stake) So to keep the network moving Wallets that have clams are able to stake those clams for stake rewards.  Each time a block is found a 1 clam reward is given to the finder.  Also the finder gets any fees from the found block.  The more clams you have the better the chance to stake, and get the reward.  So the staked clams are actually just part of the coins inflation.  1440 per day are created (1 minute block times).  This is a lot less then most coins.

    

   First you can type getinfo on the console in the clam QT wallet to get the active supply.

Currently there are 690K active.  Those are dug up, and staked clams that are in circulation. 
The total potential money supply is currently  15,147K 

   Now you know how many clams could be claimed, so are they now worth something? 

By your logic (not knowing the true money supply) all crypto is worthless. 

   Sorry, but maybe I took your comment wrong.  If you meant worth less then something else, and not worthless, as in having no value.  I apologize..     

As with anything in the world, clams are worth "what someone is willing to pay for them".   

   It was a way to create a custom ID, almost like a vanity address, but with the address hidden.  Should have made it easier to send and receive. 

IE. I could have made JohnnyWalker and people could send MaryJ to that ID. 

   I'm getting myself more and more confused.  Since the odds of staking are based the number of coins.  Some where that has to tie in.  Are larger outputs more likely to stake then smaller output?  I would guess yes?  But I could be wrong.  If that's the case then making my output's larger should give them more of a chance to stake more regularly. 

    Conversely,  if all outputs are equal then more output's equals more of a chance to stake.  So I could divide the output's up into smaller unit's assuming I have enough CPU power to hash them all.   
 
   My staking is all over the board.  From 1 per day to 10 and everything in between.  This is with 2.1K in my wallet. 

   Quick question.  For staking purposes, would it be better to have all outputs tied to one address, or does it not matter.  What if you had 100 clams divided into 4 clam outputs.  so 25 outputs all tied to one address, or 25 different addresses. 

   Bot stopped working.  Using build11 on Just-dice.  Bot hung as usual.  When I tried to get it going again, the bot seems to not be getting any replies from JD.  I tried a few manual bets from the bot, and a few on the JD website, nothing got it going again.  I tried shutting it down and restarting, and then rebooted the PC and started fresh, still no go.

   As an aside, I filled in my userid/password in the autologon panel.  I saved it, and it shows up when I look at the setting panel, but it doesn't seem to do anything.  
when I first start the bot, I get my JD site stats including balance, as if I'm logged in, but the bottom status bar on the bot says I'm disconnected the login panel is blank, and the login button is active.    Also the manual betting is inactive.  All buttons are greyed out.

   Are there any files that save any kind of state that might be a problem.  Something I can delete?  

In programmer mode, I can see that my program is getting control to init stuff prior to the dobet function.  The ninitial bet is placed, based on the JD website, but the dobet function is not called with the results. 

   I don't follow 10K, thought I was following the correct teeth thread.  Don't look at the main stuff in bitcoin talk, so things can bump all day and I would never see them.   

What question would I ask?  Whats happening with the exchange?  Since nothing was ever posted I don't feel it is up to me to pester developers every day, I'm happy to wait until things get sorted out.  In fact I think senseless questions are half the problem, with btct threads.  They tend to make things harder to follow.   

  I think my biggest gripe is the hard cut off for swapping coins.  It just doesn't sound very customer oriented.  What if I was in the hospital for 2 weeks and missed the exchange? 

  I take responsibility in so far as what I can change.  If I can get at least one person to wake up to what happened, then I've done my part. 

If you can't keep people properly updated, you shouldn't be expecting them to know everything. 

  I knew here was an exchange coming.
  I knew spots was banded from btct - thus the exchange could have been delayed. 
  I thought I was following the correct new thread.   

In hind sight there are a ton of things I could have done.   

But..  This would have been a non-issue if they
a) didn't switch the teeth thread.
b) clearly announced the switch (of threads) in the main Balls thread and or the original teeth thread (both would have been best)
c) announced the swap in all of the coin threads (I followed balls and MMXIV).

   

     
   

   Done, and thanks for offering this service. 

   I guess you didn't understand my rant.  That post originally pointed to
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1032287.0  

It was later changed to point to
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1032348

   I agree that BTCT probably alerted me that there was an update to a thread I am following.  
But when I looked at it and the only thing changed is a link, I could have very easily assumed BTC was just showing me garbage and ignored it.  

When the post was changed it should have been clearly updated to say this is a new link.  
I think spots made the change on the fly and assumed no one knew about the original link.   Not the case.  Once you hit post you have to assume someone is going to see it.  

  I added the original new thread to my watchlist..  I look at this stuff at least 3-4 times a day.  

http://gorillastake.com/media.html
   Has nothing about the swap starting.  Last update was 10K and Balls merging block chains soon. 

I can't use Twitter.  So I use BitCointalk. 

This is what happened to me.     

I was following Balls in the original Balls Thread.
 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=843495

The last post at some point pointed to the NEW gorillaTeeth thread Here.
   
[ANN] GorillaTeeth [TEETH] | Merged Blockchain of 10k and BALLS | GorillaEx Soon
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1032287.0

    This started off talking about the new teeth coin, and then just seemed to stop being updated.  At some point Spots was banned and I figured we were just waiting for his return.  In the mean time a new thread was created and the original link was changed, nothing else was updated.  No warning that the thread was changed.  NOTHING...   

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1032348

Post 2 says it all. 

"Sorry, messed up settings in the last thread. This is the one we'll use now"

This has all of the info.  To bad for me I was following the first thread. 

There are 4 hugh problems here. 
1) website media was never updated after the merge was announced.
2) New thread was never updated when focus was switching to a newer thread.
3) original thread was changed to point to a newer thread, but no indication was given.
   I may have been notified by BCT that an updated was made, but if I looked at the thread it would have looked
exactly the same as before.  I would have had to click the link to the new thread to see it was different then the one I was following. 
4) since this was effecting balls the original Balls thread should have been updated with a warning that the swap was happening. 

  I just happened to have MMXIV too, and learned the swap happened when that thread was updated.     

   WOW, does this piss me off.  If you can't do anything to make this right, I'll have to chalk it up to experience, remember who was in charge and try to avoid those situations in the future. 

Here is an example https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1032287.0