Will it be effective to sell several players who have large salaries at the club because they are important pillars currently under Xavi's tutelage. Releasing several important players can actually make the team unstable because they will lose players who have been united with their teammates. Likewise, regarding the championship title and what percentage Barcelona can win these two titles this season because there are many competitors who are much stronger, especially in the Champions League and La Liga.

Broadcasting rights and Jerseys will not provide much profit and may not be able to offset the high player salaries. The La Masia product wonderkids do not have the experience to face crucial matches and this can also cause problems because they are currently playing in the Champions League. Barcelona wants to recruit some experienced players to help the team become stronger and I think that's why they want Cancelo and Felix as permanent players.

Gamblers who often take the opportunity in every gambling they do will not make a victory of the responsibility and I am sure they will continue the remaining two matches. Of course anyone will be tempted by the previous victory, but when we put a small money continuing the match is the most likely choice. Back again as you say that it depends on how each individual responds to every possibility that will occur and can minimize the risk of defeat is also not wrong if you want to take cash from the previous victory.

If he is not an active gambler, maybe the opportunity to continue the remaining two matches is unlikely, but in accordance with the renewal he submitted has continued. I agree that active gamblers do not need to ask for advice to continue or withdraw cash because they know how to handle gambling. He also said that initially involved with small capital in gambling, only he was confused to continue or stop with a number of wins he had obtained. It was entirely the decision because we never knew how the real incident after he made a post and the picture taken.

Giving the luxury of life to their children is not wrong, but if parents do not teach them responsibility and give them more freedom over these luxuries it will be a big problem. When they are adults and have their own responsibilities, they will not easily respond to problems because they are not used to living under pressure. There are many children of rich people who, when their parents go bankrupt, experience big problems because they are not taught to be responsible for their own ability to earn income, so their lives are much worse when that happens.

Parents should be responsible for ensuring that their children's future is better and if luxury can make them lazy and forget themselves then they should need to be evaluated. Talking about our children's future, we may not be able to predict it accurately, but we can prepare carefully to make it better. The role of parents in supervising is quite important because if they ignore it, children will forget to learn to be responsible for their lives.

That is much better than some fans who are quite pessimistic about their club and I am also one of the people who still has high hopes for Man United qualifying for the round of 16 even though it is certainly impossible. But when it comes to football, nothing is impossible because things can go unexpectedly and I hope that Man United's performance against Bayern Munich can be much better and win the match with a slightly bigger score.

Man United doesn't need to think about how the other two teams will play and also doesn't need to wait for the results because the most important thing is that Man United has to win. At least if Man United can win the match against Bayern Munich it can make a number of fans feel satisfied compared to a draw like the previous match.

David Raya became the mainstay of Arteta this season, even though compared to Ramsdale's appearance, it was no less good but for some reason Arteta preferred to install David Raya even when facing a crucial match. Luton was able to look for opportunities even though Arsenal controlled the match and they could take advantage of every time there was an opportunity to score goals. The level of accuracy of the chance of scoring goals is much better Luton compared to Arsenal but still different quality makes Luton have to lose in additional minutes of time through Rice's goal.

The entry of Zichenko made Arsenal's midfield more alive and Rice's combination was also quite helpful. This victory feels so perfect because almost Arsenal have to lose two points when facing the lower -board team and Arteta needs to consider the Ramsdale goalkeeper in David Raya's condition who always makes mistakes.

If in the transfer market last summer Barcelona can use the free transfer player to be recruited, but for the transfer market now in my opinion it is difficult if you don't have money. Selling several popular players to cover the cost of purchasing Cancelo or wanting to permanent Felix is also not necessarily maximum because they need good players for the current team's needs. Unstable financial conditions can cause problems for the club because they have a number of players who receive large salaries.

The options for Barcelona may not be much but I'm sure they have a way to anticipate this problem. After qualifying for the last 16 of the Champions League even though the last match has not yet taken place, the team's needs will be far more important and they need several other players as supporters.

There are many people who don't have the ideas and money to build a business because the life they are currently living is so difficult. Not everyone can run a business because developing a business isn't just about ideas and money. Just look at how many people have money and ideas when building a business but competition means they have to close the business because it is not growing. If someone only has ideas and money to build a business, it doesn't necessarily mean it can develop because as I said, competition often makes people unable to adapt.

If we have the money to run a business, then first make a survey to find out what business is suitable for us to develop, because not all businesses are suitable to be developed in one place, not to mention talking about competition with other people. The market needs for the business we are developing are necessary because when we know we will easily reach the market in marketing the products we sell.

Of course it's good, but having to wait for him to grow up so he knows how to run it and saving bitcoins as a preparatory step for him is much better. Because when he can be responsible for himself then bitcoin can be used to achieve the goal of financial improvement for himself.

It's complicated because when you are not in bitcoin then there is no way to advise them and it is also quite difficult to teach children about bitcoin if we are not directly involved in it.

Every exchange requires KYC, which means that the children involved must be of sufficient age, unless you store bitcoin in a wallet that does not require KYC. Basically there is no age limit for people to get involved in Bitcoin, but it is impossible for young children to get involved in it

The upcoming transfer market will be the last opportunity for Mbappe to join Real Madrid and it also depends on how Real Madrid views the team's needs if they want to bring in Mbappe. Of course buying a striker like Mbappe provides a big advantage for Real Madrid because he is not the typical striker who waits for the ball to score a goal, so the arrival of Mbappe to Real Madrid will provide a much stronger quality squad. The problem is whether Florentino Perez wants to prepare fresh funds to bring Mbappe back to the Santiago Bernabeu because Mbappe previously betrayed them in the previous transfer market.

I see that there are a number of other strikers who also have the potential to become the best strikers at Real Madrid, such as Haaland, Jonathan David and Victor Osimhen. These three strikers are also suitable to play at Real Madrid because they have good quality and perhaps talking about the price, only Haaland is slightly more expensive, while Jonathan David and Victor Osimhen may still be standard enough to buy.

It is the same as hoping for luck because the certainty of making money consistently is still quite risky and uncertain. Gambling sites do try to advertise their services through several influencers or more precisely artists who have a large number of followers on social media. This method is believed to be quite effective and very appropriate for finding a market to attract sympathetic users because they try to play promotional strategies with some of the evidence provided.

A number of people even often say this, when you want to make money consistently then become a bookie or owner of a gambling site because if you intend to be involved in gambling to make consistent profits it will be far from possible. If we are involved in gambling ten times for example and if we count the winnings no more than 4 times and the rest we lose or lose and most likely offset the capital.

That means we can say Arsenal's defense is much better than a number of other strong teams this season. Arsenal are already two goals ahead through Saka and Odegaard, I think this will be an easy match for Arteta to get full points and in the first half the match also looked so easy because Arsenal were able to control the match quite dominantly.

I don't think it will be easy for Newcastle to win the match this time because a number of players have returned to the team so they will be a little stronger in the defensive area. The presence of Luke Shaw and Bissaka can provide a different color because both of them are also diligent in helping attacks through the wings. I think a draw is much more likely because we are talking about competition in the standings so Man United will definitely not let Newcastle win the match easily. It seems like Liverpool fans haven't seen how Man City has been able to overtake Arsenal in the last 10 matches last season so they see Arsenal more as a competitor now .

I tried re-reading the posts made by him and he was only involved in gambling on a slightly smaller percentage, so letting him continue the remaining two games would not make him lose any big money considering the use of a small budget. The decision is still based on confidence, but if I were faced with the choice I would let the remaining two matches continue because even if a bad scenario occurs or suffer a defeat, it actually won't result in too big a loss.

Most active gamblers will probably choose the continue option because they will think about risking their winnings completely even if they end up losing and losing some of the money from their previous winnings. Satisfaction for gamblers is usually to finish the game with any result and we will continue even though the initial bet has won, at least that's what I've experienced in gambling for some time.

Gamblers like me are usually not very active or can be said to be less addicted because when they decide to gamble they definitely have extra money after meeting their family's living needs. Usually we will only gamble on football because we like watching it and also place small bets as a complement. We definitely never calculate the percentage because the gambling we do is only for small needs as a complement to watching football.

If you use other money it may not have an impact on you, but what is worrying is that if someone is addicted to both types of gambling then he is using the money he earns irresponsibly. If you lose in a row it will affect your daily and monthly needs because you will run out of money to gamble. This is where many people involved in gambling make the mistake of not separating their gambling budget from their living expenses.

Eddie Howe's squad is more balanced and unselfish when playing so its performance is quite stable even though there are several injured players. However, compared to last season I prefer to see it because the consistency of playing even after the club was taken over by the new owner developed quite rapidly. This week's match will be proof because Newcastle is below Man United in the standings and even though in the previous match Man United had to suffer a humiliating defeat at home, now it will be much different because Man United is a little more stable.

Erik Ten Hak always tries new strategies when his team is leading so that in the end they have to draw like when they faced Galatasaray in the Champions League. Taking Ambrabat out was a problem because the midfield was no longer able to control the match and I was also quite confused by Erik Ten Hak's strategy because he seemed to want to try a new strategy in every match.

There is no one plus one two multiplication formula in gambling, which is why people believe that gambling cannot provide consistent profits. I don't necessarily agree with what you say and everyone has been involved in gambling so they have their own ideas every time they respond to a post. Gambling can make money, but not consistently as you are talking about and if today you win, it could be that tomorrow you will lose.

There is no way to make money consistently in gambling where we win today and lose tomorrow and so on. If you think there is gambling that can produce consistent profits, let's discuss it and show us what gambling you mean? Because if we only discuss assumptions, it's the same as discussing wildly and without references.

To see all this really depends on what gambling you are playing because usually we can increase or double the bet if we find a table with players who are not very professional at poker. But it is also not certain that we can win all the rounds because there are times when we experience bad times even though we are facing players who are much more beginners in the poker game. I think there is always no certainty in gambling and we can never predict the final result even if we get a winning streak at the start of the gambling we do.

The most important thing is that we have to have control because if we have won several times we should leave the game. It's more about maintaining the flow of funds in the account because when we persist for a longer period of time it is feared that we will lose all the bets and that's where we learn how to gamble responsibly.

If you are in doubt about the remaining two games then taking the money is a much better option than continuing but possibly losing. The decision is in your hands because it is actually your own beliefs that determine the choice and I am also not sure about the opinion you are asking for because this is gambling where there is always no certainty. If you are confident that you can win the remaining two matches then you must continue to get a full victory so you can take all the bets you place.

From what I read you have knowledge of football having won several matches previously so it only took two matches to take full victory. The final decision is yours and if in doubt it is better to take what you have won rather than risk continuing.

It seems that I am also one of those people who gambles on small percentages but never calculates the total amount. I gamble when I have extra money and never use money from work and usually I use bonuses from work or overtime if I want to gamble. I've heard about the strategy of 1% to 5% of the budget used for gambling but I don't know how they keep the flow of funds in the account.

When I decide I want to gamble then I look at the percentage of money placed in the account and usually I prefer to bet on football or slot games. I'm also not an active gambler so it doesn't matter much about the allocation of gambling funds that I use because I usually use more A little than I earn from work.

People who are just starting out will definitely have little time with their children and family, at this stage parents will spend more time outside developing their business and come home late at night when the house is quiet. I have seen a number of parents like this in my environment and children are more dominantly taught by circumstances, so that when the mother neglects to educate the child has a good chance of going down the wrong path. Previous parents may have had little wealth influence on their children but they spent more time with their families.

Parental control will be much greater than the environment because when parents can look after their children, no matter how bad their environment is, it will not be affected. Remember one piece of advice, that most fish in fresh water cannot live in salt water and vice versa, we apply this parable to children.

Even though no one has the right to dictate to anyone in the forum, is there any adjustment to what they tell? I mean we don't need to try to explain to other people how to approach buying in bitcoin because the real proof is not in what we talk about but how they can prove their own consistency in bitcoin and other people just discussing with each other.

It's a shame that not many beginners speak according to the facts, for example selling a car, house or land to invest in bitcoin. Imagine when they try to sell other assets to invest but they don't understand the investment strategy, is it possible for them to dare to take that risk?

Land is just as good as an investment in Bitcoin because as the years go by land also has quite an expensive selling price. If this step is chosen, in my opinion it is not appropriate because selling land and buying bitcoin with all the budget you have will pose a big risk for those who have no experience in investing. There are also quite a lot of uses for land and now there are contractors who are willing to build shops on our land with a profit for two, for example if you can build 10 shops on your land then the contractor will divide 5 shops to the land owner.

Isn't this much more profitable because half of the land we own is still ours and the shop can be rented out and every year we have income from tenants. This phenomenon happens a lot in my area and land prices are getting more expensive day by day so owners can make big profits if used properly.