Hello. Auctioning Casascius 1 BTC Brass 2013 (ungraded, unredeemed) coin. Location: EU Shipping paid by buyer. Shipping to EU is around 5-10 EUR. Shipping to USA is around 10 EUR. No sniping. Bids in the final hour will add maximum of 1 hour more time to the auction. Starting bid is 1.3 1.25 BTC. Minimum increase is 0.01 BTC. Auction ends at 29th Sept. 22:00 (10 PM). Pics:    |
|
|
|
.51BTC
Congratulations! PM me for details and be very careful. |
|
|
|
0.80
Congrats! PM me please, and be very careful of scammers! Apparently this user "naila19" has removed his/her bid and is not going to honor it. Due to this, I am extending the auction to end at 18:00 UTC today, so roughly 6 hours from now. Current highest bid is 0.51 BTC by owlcatz. |
|
|
|
0.80
Congrats! PM me please, and be very careful of scammers! |
|
|
|
|
Current highest bid 0.8 BTC. The auction is set to end today, or 24 hours after the final bid.
|
|
|
|
|
Bump. Highest bid is currently 0.51 BTC.
|
|
|
|
Gotta say it all feels a bit 'Coin Telegraph' to me if you're not going to discriminate between obviously shady operations wanting to leach off your good reputations and legitimately trustworthy businesses and services.
That 'Legends of Tomorrow' you're currently wearing reeks of scam. They talk a huge game about not needing any investment funds and how all deposits will remain in their deposit address, only for them to then move the money they had there with some excuse about how they used it for trading!
If I recall didn't somebody like OGNasty recently get in a kerfuffle over refusing to remove a scam signature because he said he'd been paid for it and so was going to wear it until the paid period had ended, right? Well if you receive money to advertise a service which you then learn is shady as fuck, you are perfectly entitled to remove that advertisement without reimbursing the scammers. So I don't understand the logic of his refusal to do so in that case and in this case I don't understand why you're so willing to sully your own names for a clearly shady operation.
By choosing the morally-bankrupt 'CT' standard of advertising you just end up becoming mired in one scandal after another with people who lose money blaming you for encouraging them to trust in the shady operation you were promoting which ended up running off with their bitcoin.
You'd be far better off operating on the principal that any valid concerns raised about a service you are advertising needs to be objectively countered by the operators of that service or you will remove the signature until they offer up a sufficient degree of proof they are running a legitimate and trustworthy service.
This way the value of your signature space as a group will increase exponentially as it will be far more trusted than most.
It's win-win for you.
We've not found them to be a scam. Nobody has complained to us, or to anyone, that they're a scam. Let me know why you think they're a scam and please try to show some evidence or good reasoning. A warning about Legonds of Tomorrow was posted in the ACE thread a long time ago, however my post was promptly deleted by Lauda Your post was offtopic, as you very well know. |
|
|
|
|
I think this would grade at least MS-64. Tarnish isn't "bad quality".
|
|
|
|
|
This deal looks like buyers would earn better by just buying the bitcoins rather than investing in this.. But who knows. I just don't see this is worth it as there are all kinds of risks involved in addition to the question if this even ever ROIs.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you checked Storj.io? I don't know which of these is the best, but that's one more to check out. I think Storj is pretty near to release..
|
|
|
|
|
Basically it's just you wearing a signature for some advertiser, and then posting. The advertiser pays you for advertising. There's a sub forum in services. Sig campaigns are usually there, check it out.
|
|
|
|
|
How much would you be asking for this?
|
|
|
|
I was wondering, how come do you value the 5 BTC S2 significantly higher than the S1?
The S2 is also my favorite of the two, since I like the holo more, but they have close to same population.
The S2 is priced a bit higher, because of the rarity (449 active) vs S1 (590 active). According to spotcoins.com, there are roughly 30% more S1's active than S2's. Also I like the holo more.  |
|
|
|
Winners:
MARIO: Rmcdermott927 @ 0.32 BTC
ZELDA: Anduck @ 0.25 BTC
Congrats to the winners. Send payment to 168WXhArv7Fasqvi2xm5MQMfLhG18jifMe and let me know where to ship. Thanks! Sent payment and PM. |
|
|
|
Sounds like a rarity, has any of these been sold previously just to have a grasp on the price?
I've bought and sold these (Cas 1 BTC brass w/ Error) at prices between 1.5 and 3 BTC. They used to sell at 4-5+ BTC. |
|
|
|
|
Hox seems to be doing pretty well with that 2, only 2 blocks away from 4th.
|
|
|
|
|
Just.... Shutdown the computers, ok? Forget that the trust system exists here etc. Also Vod can't you just ignore him instead of shitposting?
|
|
|
|
This whole feedback system is a load of crap. Theymos should remove this 'feature' or should I say cancer of the forum and everything will fall into place. No more circle-jerking and green trust whoring by anyone. Wouldn't it be wonderful?
Also remove the shitty signatures as well. I bet this will cause a natural culling of all simpletons here. Darwin's law in action.
I totally agree that this feedback system sucks. So much drama because of it.. The sig thing is a fun one, and actually gives an incentive for people to participate here. People who post content get paid for it. Bitcoin kind of uniquely enables this sig system to actually work like it does here. |
|
|
|
|
You can easily count how often this happens statistically. Say the odds to lose are 50%. The formula is 0.5^X where X is the amount of loses in a row, and the result is the probability. (0.5^X)^-1 is the amount of rounds between these streaks. For example, a lose streak of 15 happens with a probability of 0.5^15 = 3.05e-05 = 0.00305%, or in other words every 32768th game.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
