bittrex or polo doenst matter as long one of them list it
I think it's very good if ARK listed on exchanges Bittrex / Poloniex .. What would you think if ARK added in https://mercatox.com/ exchange to exchange it later ?? There are many other exchange as well but Poloniex is best if you want it to grow in price.Poloniex has many bigger buyers who can push up the Ark price. I do not mind, but if we look to the future not hurt to expand exchanges in the stock exchange Merca for exchanges ARK, although we know Merca is a new exchange site, but we can see it, how they add so many coins are renowned in their exchanges .. I think new exchanges are a good thing. I know Poloniex is king right now for altcoins but they started from somewhere and many of us old timers gave them a chance when they were nobodies in the industry. Good luck to any brave souls willing to navigate the cryptocurrency market and take on the big boys like poloniex. |
|
|
|
@cannabanana What are u doing here??
Are u ARK fan or LISK fan?
not sure if you know this, but most people can do more than one thing at a time. You might think crypto is dog eat dog or all teams for themselves but the real supporters of cryptocurrency don't just dismiss everything at face value. This is not a sporting event, we are not at war with each other. Your greed makes you battle other coins so that the ones you've already invested in will hopefully get better results. Just because I am part of the ARK Crew doesn't mean I can't also do other things in crypto. Very narrow minded of you. Most likely you are trying to start shit for your own greedy team who doesn't give a shit about causing trouble to make money. |
|
|
|
This is a follow up on my recent post with some more details. I will also later do another post in reply to some of the recent responses that were given. As is documented here I was voted out of GDT https://electionbuddy.com/elections/37932/results/ud2fkynx7 . The reasons were that I had not voted one particular candidate with my personal holding, and that allegedly I wrote negative words about GDT in my transparency report. In the first weeks of January the Slack channels of GDT were given some bots for vote tracking (made by Hagie) that could indicate if a member of GDT had not given votes to another one. This bot was then played several times by a new member with name Hagie (who I did not know then) in order to make his cause that I would have to vote him. This came also with a threat from other sides that if I do not vote as they want there will be head-rolling by Jan. 15. It was then unclear to me why Hagie was in GDT and on what criteria he was selected. From what I found out he came into the Slack channel on invitation in the role of observer for another new member. From this status he gained permanent access to the Slack channel, and finally was declared a member from above. It then also came to my attention that he obtained many outside votes from the Robinhood pool where he was presented as “mentor”, through running a scheme that required to vote Hagie for getting a higher payout. Besides that, Hagie acted very bossy, was pressing for votes, calling me with the a-word and became the key-figure in establishing a totally new regime at GDT. There were many more red flags for me then (and even more later) for why I would not vote Hagie for personal reasons (more details can be provided). There was also the issue that at that time GDT had brought in many other new members based on their voting weight without requiring them to make a significant distribution or contribution for the benefit of Lisk. This was the reason for my comment in the transparency report. Then there was also the issue that GDT was never interested in choosing certain qualified delegates. For instance I previously had made the proposal to support some developers from Shift. As many might not be aware of, Shift is developing an ambitious project based on Lisk https://www.shiftnrg.org/newsletter. Some developers from Shift also work on the code for Lisk, while Shift is much worse funded. I also made the proposal to consider a candidate who had a background as cryptographer and was one of the winners for his delegate proposal (he even had some voting power). There was also the issue that they ignored certain other candidates who could claim some trajectory in Lisk based on early participation. In the months that I participated in Lisk a number of developers showed up in the chat and forums, but there were no visible attempts by GDT to acquire valuable human resources. The concept of high block rewards actually attracts qualified developers, but GDT is preventing it from how it could work. If some might want to know why I was in GDT. The answer is that I previously was in a different group that was merged with GDT, without me personally consenting to it and being left with no other choice. At that time it also appeared that GDT was in a new beginning. Some might recall that I had posted a critical comment about the governance of GDT on the Lisk forum in May, pointing out that the list of members is created by a single individual, Vega. The short outline above is a summary of my experience with GDT. In addition, I would like to be explicit on why I see GDT as a scam and a threat: - GDT is centralizing delegates, as basically a single individual is doing the list of delegates. GDT has no statute or real democratic organization.
- GDT is a cartel. They are not just a group of some mutual voters. They deliberately seek to maintain a number of 80+ members in order to seize all forging rewards and prevent competitors.
- GDT is a buddy scheme. Everything goes if it is to the liking of the leadership.
- GDT is undermining the consensus mechanism and is practicing collusion. With most recent conduct there is direct enforcement of the voting of its delegate members.
- GDT has no benefit for Lisk. GDT is not operating in a way that it seeks to return a surplus for Lisk from forged LSK. In particular it is not attempting to acquire valuable developers for Lisk projects as it was envisaged for the forging rewards.
- GDT is not preventing whales, or the “rich from getting richer”. Recently they rushed in many high stake holdings, even some of those they had previously labeled as their adversaries. The members of GDT themselves are striving to amass a holding from forging awards that would make each a whale.
- GDT is not a better alternative to pools. In fact, GDT is associated with pools, used them for pushing some of their members, and members even proposed to launch GDT pools.
- GDT is not essential for the operation of the testnet and the mainnet. While in fact a lot of work was contributed to this, most work on scripts, applications, snapshot servers, real feedback on testing etc. is done by only a relatively small number of participants.
https://carolinaliskdelegate.wordpress.com/I don't really like posting here but this kinda ... What a pathetic loser you are. Guys, Do listen to MrPresident and Cannabannana. So please vote the trustworthy part of this GDT.*parts have been snipped I love how you leave out everything important between the two quotes that I wrote. If you can edit my whole post to make it sound bad, I can do the same for yours. See. |
|
|
|
This is a follow up on my recent post with some more details. I will also later do another post in reply to some of the recent responses that were given. As is documented here I was voted out of GDT https://electionbuddy.com/elections/37932/results/ud2fkynx7 . The reasons were that I had not voted one particular candidate with my personal holding, and that allegedly I wrote negative words about GDT in my transparency report. In the first weeks of January the Slack channels of GDT were given some bots for vote tracking (made by Hagie) that could indicate if a member of GDT had not given votes to another one. This bot was then played several times by a new member with name Hagie (who I did not know then) in order to make his cause that I would have to vote him. This came also with a threat from other sides that if I do not vote as they want there will be head-rolling by Jan. 15. It was then unclear to me why Hagie was in GDT and on what criteria he was selected. From what I found out he came into the Slack channel on invitation in the role of observer for another new member. From this status he gained permanent access to the Slack channel, and finally was declared a member from above. It then also came to my attention that he obtained many outside votes from the Robinhood pool where he was presented as “mentor”, through running a scheme that required to vote Hagie for getting a higher payout. Besides that, Hagie acted very bossy, was pressing for votes, calling me with the a-word and became the key-figure in establishing a totally new regime at GDT. There were many more red flags for me then (and even more later) for why I would not vote Hagie for personal reasons (more details can be provided). There was also the issue that at that time GDT had brought in many other new members based on their voting weight without requiring them to make a significant distribution or contribution for the benefit of Lisk. This was the reason for my comment in the transparency report. Then there was also the issue that GDT was never interested in choosing certain qualified delegates. For instance I previously had made the proposal to support some developers from Shift. As many might not be aware of, Shift is developing an ambitious project based on Lisk https://www.shiftnrg.org/newsletter. Some developers from Shift also work on the code for Lisk, while Shift is much worse funded. I also made the proposal to consider a candidate who had a background as cryptographer and was one of the winners for his delegate proposal (he even had some voting power). There was also the issue that they ignored certain other candidates who could claim some trajectory in Lisk based on early participation. In the months that I participated in Lisk a number of developers showed up in the chat and forums, but there were no visible attempts by GDT to acquire valuable human resources. The concept of high block rewards actually attracts qualified developers, but GDT is preventing it from how it could work. If some might want to know why I was in GDT. The answer is that I previously was in a different group that was merged with GDT, without me personally consenting to it and being left with no other choice. At that time it also appeared that GDT was in a new beginning. Some might recall that I had posted a critical comment about the governance of GDT on the Lisk forum in May, pointing out that the list of members is created by a single individual, Vega. The short outline above is a summary of my experience with GDT. In addition, I would like to be explicit on why I see GDT as a scam and a threat: - GDT is centralizing delegates, as basically a single individual is doing the list of delegates. GDT has no statute or real democratic organization.
- GDT is a cartel. They are not just a group of some mutual voters. They deliberately seek to maintain a number of 80+ members in order to seize all forging rewards and prevent competitors.
- GDT is a buddy scheme. Everything goes if it is to the liking of the leadership.
- GDT is undermining the consensus mechanism and is practicing collusion. With most recent conduct there is direct enforcement of the voting of its delegate members.
- GDT has no benefit for Lisk. GDT is not operating in a way that it seeks to return a surplus for Lisk from forged LSK. In particular it is not attempting to acquire valuable developers for Lisk projects as it was envisaged for the forging rewards.
- GDT is not preventing whales, or the “rich from getting richer”. Recently they rushed in many high stake holdings, even some of those they had previously labeled as their adversaries. The members of GDT themselves are striving to amass a holding from forging awards that would make each a whale.
- GDT is not a better alternative to pools. In fact, GDT is associated with pools, used them for pushing some of their members, and members even proposed to launch GDT pools.
- GDT is not essential for the operation of the testnet and the mainnet. While in fact a lot of work was contributed to this, most work on scripts, applications, snapshot servers, real feedback on testing etc. is done by only a relatively small number of participants.
https://carolinaliskdelegate.wordpress.com/I don't really like posting here but this kinda blatant Lies and Bullshit is so overly retarded I had to say something. So your other group doesn't make the rich richer? You ARE the Rich mother fucker with 400k Lisk! 25% of the GDT were allowed into the group with ZERO Lisk because they supported LISK with their time and effort. Are you sure GDT has no benefit to Lisk? I'm pretty sure you're just mad and talking shit cause we've done a lot for lisk already. Let's do 100% pools, I bet you we can make more off of pools than single delegates if this is your dumb argument. the people you are talking about who make the scripts.....they're all in the GDT so the GDT was in fact the one that made lisk stable with their code. SHOW me One fucking script or thing your group has done for Lisk and I'll show you 10 that GDT has done but I bet you can't even explain ONE fucking thing your group has done for the success of lisk. while I've only seen you here the past month, the people in the GDT were here since day fucking 1 even WITHOUT Forging. If GDT left right now, packed up and went home. Lisk would crash fast as fuck. GL forging coins that never get to hit the next block and be sure we'd take all our scripts and code with us. What a pathetic loser you are. Some of the most disgusting behavior ive seen here in this thread and there's a lot of turds floating around in this punch bowl. Are you sure you are an adult? |
|
|
|
ahhh design results that I lost, and I've struggled  op hopefully appreciate the contestants here,  congratulations to the winner of the last dont worry dude, we are extending the contest until mainnet launch. Keep'em coming! how do I determine the winner in the design contest is ARK? whether through voting or based on the judgment of the jury / admin own thank you it seems you should see cannabanana in number (5), he posted saying that the winner of the design contest announced ARK through a vote rather than by a jury or team determines that all is clear.   actually these ones that I picked had very high levels of support on our slack. It's not like I willy nilly picked these designs. |
|
|
|
Don't forget the community meeting guys at this week!
^i created a new account so i'll be there  *i'm looking forward to it!*  your boys got some talent ^you know how we do it here in Cali ! *he a truly down for the cause~* <<imho ask him to sell me a copy for ARK when we launch |
|
|
|
Don't forget the community meeting guys at this week!
^i created a new account so i'll be there *i'm looking forward to it!* your boys got some talent |
|
|
|
ahhh design results that I lost, and I've struggled op hopefully appreciate the contestants here, congratulations to the winner of the last dont worry dude, we are extending the contest until mainnet launch. Keep'em coming! |
|
|
|
is thats true about postpone its sad to hear it, can devs say more specific what of that is true?
dont wanna wait more for mainnet and exchanges:/
Yes sadly that part is true. We are delaying a bit to work out some things that were discovered in the legacy code but the thing about us not having any exchanges is false. We will be listed at well known exchanges at launch and will have details on an upcoming partnership soon with another well known project. Stay Tuned. Personally I hope you will be listed on Poloniex, bittrex seems an easy game for giant project-ark. One more word, ARK to da moon, ARK best community! Dreams, dreams.. Back to the life... Polo cant list Ark funny, first talk shit in lisk thread and now you for the first time come here and talk shit about ark? Don't start this shit here unless you want me to get fucking mad. Some of you Jerkoffs have no damn Integrity |
|
|
|
Shit article from delegates for delegates. All delegates go away! We need only pools in top 101. If only there were a democratic process that would determine who is at what rank... oh, wait! Wait... People will understand who is who, and will vote for pools, they throw delegates out. You do realize that if there were 101 pools, the lisk whales would earn x5-10x more lisk putting their weight into all 101 pools than if they were forging one node themselves right? makes me wonder how you guys survived so long without math. |
|
|
|
is thats true about postpone its sad to hear it, can devs say more specific what of that is true?
dont wanna wait more for mainnet and exchanges:/
Yes sadly that part is true. We are delaying a bit to work out some things that were discovered in the legacy code but the thing about us not having any exchanges is false. We will be listed at well known exchanges at launch and will have details on an upcoming partnership soon with another well known project. Stay Tuned. If mainnet will be launched at the end of February, meaning the case ARK will be traded in the month of March, Is it true that I am thinking about it will happen ?? Yes, as soon as ARK launches, you should have a places to trade at. The project is disappointing. The team doesn't keep the promises. Delays, problems.... but this is developers' problem and not investors'. So we won't wait for anything good any more. The discharge of the price is guaranteed.
the level of patience some of you have is disappointing. If passed the test mainnet later, whether it will be no more delay in the trading market ARK ?? If true, where the exchange to be traded by a team of ARK, whereas you say ARK already registered for the famous exchange ?? What, you mean it, it exchanges bittrex / poloniex .. I know the NDA thing is played out for the exchanges pre-launch of most cryptocurrencies but for real. NDA. there should be little to no delay after mainnet launch for the topic of being on exchanges. |
|
|
|
disappointed with the delay in launch...Hope to see launch by march 1st
You may see it at the end of July at this rate. You could have been funnier if you put 2018. |
|
|
|
is thats true about postpone its sad to hear it, can devs say more specific what of that is true?
dont wanna wait more for mainnet and exchanges:/
Yes sadly that part is true. We are delaying a bit to work out some things that were discovered in the legacy code but the thing about us not having any exchanges is false. We will be listed at well known exchanges at launch and will have details on an upcoming partnership soon with another well known project. Stay Tuned. If mainnet will be launched at the end of February, meaning the case ARK will be traded in the month of March, Is it true that I am thinking about it will happen ?? Yes, as soon as ARK launches, you should have a places to trade at. The project is disappointing. The team doesn't keep the promises. Delays, problems.... but this is developers' problem and not investors'. So we won't wait for anything good any more. The discharge of the price is guaranteed.
the level of patience some of you have is disappointing. |
|
|
|
is thats true about postpone its sad to hear it, can devs say more specific what of that is true?
dont wanna wait more for mainnet and exchanges:/
Yes sadly that part is true. We are delaying a bit to work out some things that were discovered in the legacy code but the thing about us not having any exchanges is false. We will be listed at well known exchanges at launch and will have details on an upcoming partnership soon with another well known project. Stay Tuned. |
|
|
|
ok  Congratz Mjbmonetarymetals! You are this weeks winner for the design contest! 5K ARK coming your way after mainnet launch! |
|
|
|
Mainnet won't launch in February as promised. Launch postponed until further notice
Bounty won't be distributed via TEC but manually and upon request
So far no exchanges has agreed to trade, not until mainnet is launched and a valid wallet is compiled
I will leak news as they become available. Stay tuned
[🅰nonymous insider]
not all 100% correct but...  |
|
|
|
|
fixcrypt wants the release of mainnet to have a baseline of changed features. Some delays happened in our timeline and we may need to push it to mid/end of FEB just to be sure. Fix is adding a lot recently to the core and wallet to get things ready for a really good core for mainnet.
It's much better to delay a bit and get a stable core at the beginning than to rush out some funky code too early and got to be trying to bandage everything for the next year.
Fix has recently changed address handling so we can have features like offline transaction signing for our card/hardware system and also made changes to the wallet that allow for easy switching from mainnet wallet to testnet wallet without leaving the wallet itself.
|
|
|
|
I attended ark signature campaign, you know when coins will be distributed, and any news about which exchange is expected?
around mainnet launch is when we will distribute the ARK bounties. At first we were thinking of distribution through the TEC website which may still be a possibility but we may also distribute manually some of the bounties. we had to spend too much time on refunds and issues related to refunds from other systems, so basically it comes down to code the TEC site for bounties or work on ARK Core for mainnet launch. DJSelery is already in contact with exchanges, more to come soon from him. |
|
|
|
I have a question  The way to be a delegator is same with lisk ? From wan. yes, but voting is different. your vote is more rare in ark. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
