I also feel that, it will definitely hurt when a project fails and the most blamed in this case is the bounty manager. just because the bounty manager is in charge of managing the bounty program, does not mean that full control of the bounty is held by the manager. so in the case of a project failure, I don't think the manager is to blame, but the team behind the project.

yes, crypto prices are now slowly starting to rise, starting bitcoin, etherum, sv bitcoin, bitcoin cash, showing a significant pump earlier this year, in my opinion this could be a good start for long-term investment.

most of them are similar to scams, interests or profits from investments that are invested are required to do the task to get it. and sometimes tokens are not yet registered, and I'm a little doubtful about that. not pessimistic, but I prefer to invest in bitcoin or etherum which can clearly be seen in the market and without doing the task, just hold it until the price goes up.

I think BNB is one of the new coins that has a very strong market cap and has a bright future. with a limited total supply, coin binance must only do the way or development of how their coins will get high liquidity so that the volume increases and the price also rises.

there is some speculation that say we should sell now, while still having a rising graph, because the possibility of hype is also large and crypto will only go up in a short time and then dump again. but we don't know either, if this is the beginning of a higher increase.

The way to stop this or at least to reduce it is by research before it is finally launched to the public. Apart from research, supervision must also be needed to prevent a scam, and maybe the person or team that will make the new ICO will think twice, instead of just investing.

Is it true? with what coins the game pays for and with what wallets and exchanges are used.

I once played a relaxed game and there was a tournament, because actually it was part of the ico project. but unfortunately the project died and all the players and participants did not get anything.

something that is centralized is not good for crypto, because centralized control can actually cause FUD or even hacked as it had before. centralized coins also suffer the same fate, although not about hacked or fraud, centralized coins show less signi fi cant strength compared to decentralized coins.

in my opinion, crypto will not become a currency or turn into a currency to replace fiat. because the price of crypto is very volatile, of course it will be difficult to determine the buying and selling prices of commodities, so crypto really has no intrinsic value.

in my opinion this is a good thing for neo to continue to compete, this is actually a good momentum for neo to continue to develop and increase its value, because in the midst of a market situation that is still in a negative trend, the existence of neo with its development and also the pump, will certainly be a breath of fresh air .

The WPP project only focused on funds that were targeted by their hard cap. it's proven from what you write, where they partner with lesser-known companies, that means the exchanger certainly isn't high liquidity either, right? so we can also see that the volume of WPP is only 648 USD. very low value, and chances are you don't have a promising future. my advice, if it's already listed on the market exchange, it's better to just sell it before it falls lower again. because with only 648 volumes, it is apparent that tokens do not have liquidity and it is difficult to get demands from investors or traders.

so, if the situation is like that, the price may fall even more and the number 1 USD is just a dream.

we did see a very significant price movement from bch and bsv during this week, where both were pumped and almost everyone was shocked by the pump. but remember, etherum also experiences a continuous increase. so in my opinion etherum will still be above bch and bsv because in terms of market cap etherum is also superior, and maybe in terms of liquidity, etherum is also more waiting than both of them even from year to year. it could be between bsv and bch, only pumps that occur in fast time then only hype. but it is true that we should see how the three altcoins are fighting over second place after bitcoin on the market.

I also always think about this, and furthermore pay the cost of electricity and water bills using crypto. because electricity and water are also unavoidable daily necessities and that is certainly every month. if crypto becomes a medium for these payments, then automatically everyone in the world will use crypto, because no one can avoid these two bills every month.

I also chose bitcoin and etherum for investment, both for the short term or the long term. because I think the two coins always get a high market cap, which means the liquidity of bitcoin and etherum is higher than other coins, and that can make bitcoin and etherum very potentially to go higher.

I think it's almost the same, nothing is much different. I think trading at the beginning (IEO), also can not be sure that the token will end well at the end of the Iso period and officially launched to the public. isn't that almost the same as the ICO method? that determining which token will be valuable or not, is after its release to the public. so in my opinion, the two methods between IEO and ICO are just as good, but the most important thing is the team's effort to get liquidity on their tokens at the start of the launch will get high volumes, not only from their investors, but everyone in general so that prices can pump up .

That makes sense, this article makes sense. because of course the price increase also begins with the volume rising as well and the volume increase is also influenced by the liquidity of the coins which means that many coins are bought. and in this BSV is different, because of its low volume, but shows an increase of more than 100%. this indeed makes everyone surprised and surprised. is this manipulation? it could be, as has been written in the article that there might be an attempt to determine their own prices so that the price of coins can be pumped up.

yes, it is impossible because crypto and fiat are clearly different. fiat has intrinsic value, whereas crypto does not. besides that, crypto is also very volatile and very different from fiat, and crypto will be difficult if used as a primary payment. I think crypto is more suitable for use as an investment asset or a secondary commodity.

for the crypto market as a whole, I think there is no big impact on the market charts. because we know, that centralized coins will be difficult to get more attention even though it is supported by large companies or banks, just call it like a ripple case. but on the other hand, for China itself this is a new breakthrough in their finances, where they have a fiat in the digital itself. this is good for the adoption of the next crypto adoption, I strongly support this.

I think it is a new form, rather than suggesting medicine for disease prevention, exercise is the most effective activity for that. maybe in the future, mangocoinz can explore more to get liquidity from their tokens. not only mining on foot or jogging (sports) but also making products that support sports products that help in doing the sport. I think it will be more effective and can be synchronized with each other.

we don't know if it's hype or not. clear, we see the fact of the strong rise of BSV. maybe you are right, it is just a hype and will end in a big dumping, or maybe this is the beginning of a higher increase. we can't decide 100% what will happen to the next BSV, and I don't think it's wrong to start investing in BSV either.