New pool up! Link is in my sig.
you are the first time setting a scrypt stratum pool? please set the diff 2048 ,thanks Port 3512 for starting diff 1024: stratum+tcp://mine.altpooler.com:3512 thanks for you pool now , dont know what happened to the official pool
|
|
|
New pool up! Link is in my sig.
you are the first time setting a scrypt stratum pool? please set the diff 2048 ,thanks
|
|
|
LOL
{ "blocks" : 4829, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 494.12305245, "errors" : "", "generate" : true, "genproclimit" : 4, "hashespersec" : 0, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false }
i got no nodes .. :-( holy shit fucking premine , dev you actually launch it 2 days ago?
|
|
|
No Pre-mine No Ninja Launch No Bullshit
|
|
|
We need a relaunch ASAP,otherwise this coin is not legit.
For what reason? Plenty of people have been mining this successfully, including myself. The binaries are fine (although they could be improved) and the miner source is there too. The only thing missing is the wallet source, and there is a legitimate reason for not releasing that yet. The first 24 hours appears to have gone pretty well and the early forking issues have been resolved. All in all, a pretty fair launch. Comparing the total supply is 100million till now less than 0.1m coins has been mined . There will be plenty of time for mining i think.
|
|
|
The orphans came from someone who had most of the network computing power while difficulty was low.
This happens with any crypto-currency. Block Chain is stable. Secured with checkpoints every 60 minutes [yeah I know, I need to sleep]
I think I might be needing to build a pool sooner than expected. This will help the small miners against the big miners. This is always the case when difficulty gets high.
Fun Fact: It takes 83 hours to find a prime cluster of difficulty 4.0 on one core, this is from the data I gathered while developing the Prime Channel. This is why blocks are scarce when you only have a couple CPU's.
And now for sleep. Viz.
whats the main chain then? im on 549 ,forked again? cant mine anymore , forked every 10-20 minutes , wait the stuff to be fixed 122.226.165.11 it seems this ip got huge hashingrates , got forked by him at least 5 times
|
|
|
got forked several times , what the fuck is that? mined several blocks and all orphaned
|
|
|
well, its not a perfect launch but considering its not a coin halving like the hell: 0-500 : 10000 500-1000 : 5000 1000-2000: 2000 2000-5000: 1000 so , its time for tonights TVshow and i will keep on mining for a long time dev , you gotta take some tea i suppose
|
|
|
i think the diff is too high to mine at the very beginning
|
|
|
Let's put in some constants and swap the last variable to 1 since block time won't vary that much on this coin...
Block 120 (2 hours): Miners: 50*e^(-0.0000011*120)+3 = 52.99 Dev: e^(-0.00000059 * 120) + 0.1 = 1.09
Block 525600 (1 year): Miners: 50*e^(-0.0000011*525600)+3 = 31.04 Dev: e^(-0.00000059 * 525600) + 0.1 = 0.83
Block 2628000 (5 year): Miners: 50*e^(-0.0000011*2628000)+3 = 5.776 Dev: e^(-0.00000059 * 2628000) + 0.1 = 0.312
So you start taking roughly 2%, rising to 2.7% after a year, and 5.4% after 5 years.
Unsure what to say, that's a horrible unfair greedy amount to try and take, and to try and mask using relatively complex equations.
You are forgetting the Coinshield Channels, and that value per block does not mean higher value overall in exponential decay: Block 120 (2 hours): 1.09 / 67.07 = [1.6% per block]Miners: 50*e^(-0.0000011*120)+3 = 52.99 Channels: 10 * e^(-0.00000055 * 120) + 3 = 12.99 Dev: e^(-0.00000059 * 120) + 0.1 = 1.09 Block 525600 (1 year): 0.83 / 42.36 = [1.9% per block]Miners: 50*e^(-0.0000011*525600)+3 = 31.04 Channels: 10 * e^(-0.00000055 * 525600) + 3 = 10.49 Dev: e^(-0.00000059 * 525600) + 0.1 = 0.83 COIN SUPPLY, 1 YEAR: 28,545,067Total Mined: 21,801,631 [76% to miners]Total Channel: 6,231,778 [21% to traders]Total Dev: 511,658 [1.7% dev]Block 2628000 (5 year): 0.312 / 11.438 = [2.7% per block] Miners: 50*e^(-0.0000011*2628000)+3 = 5.776 Channels: 10 * e^(-0.00000055 * 2628000]) + 3 = 5.35 Dev: e^(-0.00000059 * 2628000) + 0.1 = 0.312 COIN SUPPLY, 5 YEARS: 74,341,701Total Mined: 50,888,959 [68% to miners]Total Channel: 21,850,548 [29% to traders]Total Dev: 1,602,194 [2.1% dev]Block 5256000 (10 year): 0.145 / 6.845 = [2.1% per block]Miners: 50*e^(-0.0000011*5256000) + 3 = 3.15 Channels: 10 * e^(-0.00000055 * 5256000]) + 3 = 3.55 Dev: e^(-0.00000059 * 5256000) + 0.1 = 0.145 COIN SUPPLY 10 YEARS: 96,156,860Total Mined: 61,077,806 [63% to miners]Total Channel: 32,935,024 [34% to traders]Total Dev: 2,144,030 [2.2% dev]This graph is from the modeling program I used to design the equations. EDIT: As you will notice, the channels do increase in [%] over time. This gives them more longevity. ~Videlicet Long long journey to go Only got one block so far (1.25coin) , so little comparing the total coins suply is 100m Ok , its time for supper
|
|
|
06:32:07  [ { "addr" : "69.195.149.114:9323", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1411511528, "lastrecv" : 1411511529, "conntime" : 1411510011, "version" : 10100, "subver" : "Coinshield Core[vv0.1.0.0]/ DB [0.1.1] PROTOCOL [v0.1.1]", "inbound" : false, "releasetime" : 0, "height" : 0, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "204.27.62.226:9323", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1411511529, "lastrecv" : 1411511529, "conntime" : 1411510012, "version" : 10100, "subver" : "Coinshield Core[vv0.1.0.0]/ DB [0.1.1] PROTOCOL [v0.1.1]", "inbound" : false, "releasetime" : 0, "height" : 0, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "104.131.122.25:9323", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1411511511, "lastrecv" : 1411511528, "conntime" : 1411510571, "version" : 10100, "subver" : "Coinshield Core[vv0.1.0.0]/ DB [0.1.1] PROTOCOL [v0.1.1]", "inbound" : false, "releasetime" : 0, "height" : 0, "banscore" : 0 } ] are these the seednodes? yup, it seems i got a block not orphaned but only 1.25coin , am i forked or what , lots of orphans
|
|
|
Viz is fixing this last issue. Give him a bit. He will post shortly guys.
take your time then
|
|
|
Does not work on linux , i got about 70 blocks(not from the right genius one i guess) then forked , this seems to be a broken seednode
|
|
|
a bit better but still appcrashed , the exact same situation like former one while Linux is OK , you did it with Mingw?
Interesting, because I have the reverse: Linux crashes, Windows works. I'll keep getting to the bottom of this, at least that check is off the list. Thank you for your results.Holy shit is this really going to launch?
Yes it is, running my final tests before Main Net launch [guess there's time later to sleep] Activation Timestamp is: 1411495200Viz.Im currently using ubuntu 14.04 more often than windows but i think most of people here(except coder) are using windows 7/8 , so the win-miner is also important for launch thongh its time to abandon the microsoft in my opinion , long live the OpenSource!
|
|
|
jorneyflair,Thank You And hey, just don't ever give up and you'll be able to do anything. Viz.edit: I made some minor tweaks to the miner attempting to weed out the segmentation fault, binary is Here. Let me know if you have better results with this version. I also pushed this version to my Github for Linux users. a bit better but still appcrashed , the exact same situation like former one while Linux is OK , you did it with Mingw?
|
|
|
jorneyflair,
Try this batch script, it will automatically restart the miner if it crashes [with 7 threads as per your request].
:BEGIN miner.exe 127.0.0.1 4447 7 GOTO BEGIN
The commandline arguments are IP PORT THREADS TIMEOUT. The issue with the miner is an access violation [segmentation fault]. This will be fixed soon, currently making sure the Coinshield Core is tuned properly before launch above fixing that issue.
Viz.
Thanks dude , i would help to the nvminer code if i were not at the last year in college. wish you a success
|
|
|
the windows miner will crash in no more than 30 minutes, how do you set 7 threads running while you got 8 ? -t 7 does not work i tried
|
|
|
Source ?
"we don't want others pool. We are ready to set up others servers if there will be the needed in future." did you see it?
|
|
|
Actually, I spent quite a bit of time designing the multiple channels to only recieve 50% of the total supply, CPU miners get exactly half, GPU miners get exactly half. This should reduce the impact any private GPU miners could have on the everyday CPU miners, the second factor will be a continually updated public GPU miner. Making some final touches, will be releasing launch binaries tonight with a time-lock for tomorrow at noon. Depending on the level of GPU miner development, I will have a time-lock on the GPU channel [for a given time post-launch, hopeful for the time-lock to be tomorrow] which will reject all GPU blocks until that time. Once the channel becomes active, the CSD Released Reserve will be given to that channel in pieces for the time it was dormant, or in other words: no matter when the GPU channel launches, GPU miners will receive the same amount of CSD from the Main Net Time-Lock as the CPU Miners, and this will be broken into ~63 CSD chunks for wider spread distribution. Viz.we need to think in terms of practically fair any bounty for a opensource gpu miner?
|
|
|
its time to make huge profit with private gpu miner? its another "cpu" algo coin , you know it
|
|
|
|