is adam here or does he have a thread in the counterparty forum? could not find it regarding the ltbcoin. do not want to spam this thread with meta/network coins.
anyway I think this idea of creating a coin (well basically it is a stock isn't it) is quite powerful, I am with cryptos because the it gives completely new ways of allocation. I think that it is what he is referring to with that this can change how we can value the creation of new content.
a second very powerful spot is the transparency given by this technology of the blockchain/public ledger. I have a question regarding that: Do you think it is possible that not only the money outflows as explained in your videos can be allocated by the coins but only the money inflows. So imagine I am a holder of LTBcoins, LTB gets money due to advertisment/whatever, is it possible that this money is directly allocated on the ledger belonging to the ltbcoin, without any intermediary?
Assuming that you use counterparty, this sounds possible doesn't it? - A person pays 1 BTC for the advertisement in your show, the money is directly send to the ledger belonging to ltbcoin, the holders can directly see the money inflow/outflow?
In general I think it was never possible before to give that level of trustless transparency to stock holders. If you plan doing that count me in, as stock holder. Because I think what you are doing here in general is really really big.
check www.ltbcoin.com for how LTB coin will be distributed.[ thanks for the link, what I am referring to is not the distribution. it is the point when the show/project starts getting money (I know that nxt paid quite a massive amount for advertisement on that show). Is the money inflow directly, without any intermediary, linked to ltbcoin? Just imagine I am holder of ltbcoin and I am interested in the dividend I am getting for holding, the dividend is obviously in some way connected to the money inflow, can I see the total amount of money inflows on the blockchain? |
|
|
|
|
is adam here or does he have a thread in the counterparty forum? could not find it regarding the ltbcoin. do not want to spam this thread with meta/network coins.
anyway I think this idea of creating a coin (well basically it is a stock isn't it) is quite powerful, I am with cryptos because the it gives completely new ways of allocation. I think that it is what he is referring to with that this can change how we can value the creation of new content.
a second very powerful spot is the transparency given by this technology of the blockchain/public ledger. I have a question regarding that: Do you think it is possible that not only the money outflows as explained in your videos can be allocated by the coins but only the money inflows. So imagine I am a holder of LTBcoins, LTB gets money due to advertisment/whatever, is it possible that this money is directly allocated on the ledger belonging to the ltbcoin, without any intermediary?
Assuming that you use counterparty, this sounds possible doesn't it? - A person pays 1 BTC for the advertisement in your show, the money is directly send to the ledger belonging to ltbcoin, the holders can directly see the money inflow/outflow?
In general I think it was never possible before to give that level of trustless transparency to stock holders. If you plan doing that count me in, as stock holder. Because I think what you are doing here in general is really really big.
|
|
|
|
Many burners are too lazy to install all the dependencies to sell their coins. Therefore, the web wallet may attract buyers slowly in long term, but bring a lot of sellers immediately.
Pretty much and besides, the web wallet would have already been priced in. Expecting cheaper XCPs in the near future. Yes, but at the current prices we are at 25% market cap of Mastercoin. A very attractive valuation. that is the decisive point: either msc is massively overvalued or xcp massively undervalued, with respect to all other altcoins I have an opinion regarding that. |
|
|
|
|
posted it a few days ago - this review is overall brilliant and the part of counterparty especially
|
|
|
|
That is amazing, keep it up with the good work  great to see lightwallet coming |
|
|
|
|
i do not think that dorian is satoshi- or he is really keyser soze.
but one thing from his perspective does not add up for me: how likely do you think is it that your name is dorian satoshi nakamoto and you never heard of bitcoin? as a tech savvy educated/academic person? do you reallly think she is the first person who confronted him with bitcoin?
|
|
|
|
|
cannot put in words how much i hate them for publishing that
|
|
|
|
|
common guys donate
did the same yesterday - send 50XCP to Jah for the wallet.
it is really simple for the burners to donate and extremely motivating for the developers. that is probably even more important than the amount you are sending
|
|
|
|
crosspost from nxt community. this chapter is by far the best explanation on 2.0 crypto I have read, it almost has scientific quality. The part on counterparty.co is extremely positive. |
|
|
|
well xcp offers function despite from send doesn't it? if these functions offer value for the cryptoworld why shouldn't the prices rise? this argument holds true for maybe 4-5 altcoins, xcp is definetely one of them.
Yes, there are only about 4 to 5 second coins that bringing some innovation to the table (out of field of 150) and XCP is definitely a strong contender in that space. Its much like what coin markets will later adopt, open source non hype coin what have show strong development potential already in first few month or some of others hype coin what i think have really strong marketing campaigns later I'm not a fan of the anti-marketing sentiment that I've seen in this thread over and over. Aggressively marketing, pushing for listings on exchanges, reddit campaigns, media involvement will grow the community, increase trading volume, increase XCP price, and attract asset issuers to the platform. Nobody cares how technically advanced or well developed a crypto is if no one is trading it or using it. +1 DaFockBro. Nobody gives a fock abt techy stuffs. Need more number of people to use it. DaFockBro, trading volume is not low, its dead. Trading volume is still same/more than mastercoin have its not important now. Even BTC no have success yet and i dont mean now few computer shop around of world. If real world markets will adopt BTC then coins like XCP get own big markets. This is like i see situation where we are now, maybe i can wrong too.. and trading volume is so low because it is only on poloniex which was closed due to a non-xcp-related hack. i also think that marketing is neccessary, and the developers told that there will be a coordinated marketing once the web-wallet is released - so no need to get nervous, even thought days in crypto feel like months in real business  |
|
|
|
|
I think you could easily sell shares by creating a company selling assets in xcp/counterparty protocol?
|
|
|
|
|
well xcp offers function despite from send doesn't it? if these functions offer value for the cryptoworld why shouldn't the prices rise? this argument holds true for maybe 4-5 altcoins, xcp is definetely one of them.
|
|
|
|
|
great a good whitepaper is pure gold
|
|
|
|
I am expecting a dump after the airdrop, but I like the idea.
maybe the concept would work out vice versa, first the airdrop after that releasing it to the markets...
Supply would outweigh demand so you would never see this kind of market cap in reverse. same will be true after the airdrop. there will be 10 million additional coins with a marketcap of 1 billion dollar, and the people get them for free. don't you think they will sell at least parts of their auroras? |
|
|
|
|
I am expecting a dump after the airdrop, but I like the idea.
maybe the concept would work out vice versa, first the airdrop after that releasing it to the markets...
|
|
|
|
|
lifetime is long so we do not know
the idea behind the protocol for economics - probably yes
|
|
|
|
|
the second comment under the article is one of the most important points regarding valueation of bitcoin in special and cryptocurrency/finance in general.
i can tell you as economist it is extremly complicated to classify bitcoin: it is not a real currency (I personally like his argument on that, much better than the argument of non-stability), it is not a real corporation due to the lack of getting revenues
but all of that does not disqualify bitcoin or cryptofinance: to keep it simple bitcoins are scarce and they fulfill functions - this will give them a price.
economist still do not have parameters to classify cryptocurrencies, that will change within quite a short timeframe, trust me
|
|
|
|
Could it be this address, 15vA2MJ4ESG3Rt1PVQ79D1LFMBBNtcSz1f?
I don't know the address. It's inside the exchange. Only busoni can know his address. I don't so, it does not appear that way from the transaction history. Lets not speculate. not completely sure but i guess it is the adress of the exchange. i think probably some burners are simply selling for a price they are fine with to freeroll or something. you should keep in mind that this is a seller market due to the (wanted) lack of marketing in the early days. at current prices "only" around 7000-8000 xcp were traded in the last 24 hours. |
|
|
|
hahahaha Read every second word. brilliant |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
