Oh, are we going to mine litecoin next? Because I'd be up for that.
Shhhhh
|
|
|
Hate to bump an old thread, but I'm setting up a pool and I have everything working. My shares are being counted an all, but the only problem is my hashrate isn't being reported on the site at all. Any help?
|
|
|
Well, somebody with a big ltc investment might want to also buy a fuckton of EC2's and defend the blockchain. Just a thought
|
|
|
Well I guess the last thing we have to do is switch to solo/private pools and hope for the best.
|
|
|
BCX You really shouldn't harm litecoin like this, if you do I doubt it will recover, and I've been investing a lot of my time working with it lately.
|
|
|
51%ing is not a challenge. It's undermining the safety of the network. Cryptocurrencies have enough trouble catching on as it is, and here comes an asshole who has nothing better to do than to challenge to fuck it up. In cyrptocircles this is a serious crime. It's the ultimate crime. Scammer tag should be applied just for this statement.Of course I hope you fail and lose tons of money.
Not too familiar with my success rates on hitting alt chains are you? I would be a scammer if I made a promise and didn't deliver, I will. Sadly I actually protected LTC in the early days with a huge amount of hash power to fend off 51% attacks by the Solidcoin crew. Over the course of the last year I've bought a couple thousand BTC of LTC to bump it up ahead of SC and keep prices stable. But hey, looks like the LTC community needs an attitude adjustment. ~BCX~ What happened over in btc-e that set you off? I've been trying to keep the peace for days
|
|
|
I have libmysqlclient-dev (mysql-devel) installed, but I am still recieving this error: server.c:106:2: error: #error ("No valid database engines defined") make[1]: *** [server.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/tittiez/pushpool' make: *** [all] Error 2
Any help? Edit: Nevermind I had to configure again.
|
|
|
There might not be enough info in opencl to do this from cgminer. What does cgminer.exe -n report on these cards?
[2012-07-23 17:43:40] CL Platform 0 vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [2012-07-23 17:43:40] CL Platform 0 name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing [2012-07-23 17:43:40] CL Platform 0 version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (938.1) [2012-07-23 17:43:40] Platform 0 devices: 2 [2012-07-23 17:43:40] 0 Barts [2012-07-23 17:43:40] 1 Juniper [2012-07-23 17:43:40] GPU 0 AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series hardware monitoring enabl ed [2012-07-23 17:43:40] GPU 1 ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series hardware monitoring enabl ed [2012-07-23 17:43:40] 2 GPU devices max detected
Why? What do you mean? I'm mining right now.
|
|
|
I'll take all your litecoins if you, uh, don't want them.
|
|
|
My new highs: 6850: 262kh/s cgminer --scrypt --worksize 128 --gpu-engine 900 --gpu-memclock 500 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 7680 -g 1 --intensity 17
5770: 207kh/s cgminer --scrypt --worksize 256 --gpu-engine 885 --gpu-memclock 1235 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8000 -g 1 --intensity 18
|
|
|
Am I misunderstanding, I thought it was supposed to select the best values? It selected 8192 for both of them.
Yeah, I'll stick with my settings that are supposed to produce invalids but aren't. My 6850 runs at 6144 and I can take it up 15+ in intensity. My 5770 running at 3584 and I push intensity 18 on it without any invalids.
No it wont pick the best. Read again. It will pick the largest. Then find the multiple of your shaders less than or equal to that and YOU set that manually. That's why I put that list of shader counts below... 6850 is 960 5770 is 800 Therefore you should try tc of 6850: 7680 5770: 8000 OH. I read wrong, thank you for clarifying. And those actually pull better numbers. Now I can give my friend (and anyone else) better number to try too. Awesome.
|
|
|
Finally, a sub-forum for Alternate cryptocurrencies that I can support!
I honestly can't tell if that is sarcasm or not.
|
|
|
Anyone using cgminer on a 6770, 5830, or 6950 have any recommended settings? My friend wants to mine and we got about 150kh/s from his 6770, 228kh/s from the 5830, and 356kh/s from the 6950. But I'm wondering if any more is possible.
I know there is room for improvement for the 5830.
|
|
|
When will more shares be added? I missed them when I was on vacation, I'd love to buy a few...
I got 27
|
|
|
LOL in a few months watch BBQ coin go away...lol
You litecoin huggers, you don't understand bbqcoin will be the future of cryptocurrencies around the world someday. Just you wait..
|
|
|
good information
Great! I'll rebuild it all, I just woke up. Edit: Well I started it up with no settings like you said, my result? Top is 6850 and bottom is 5770. Am I misunderstanding, I thought it was supposed to select the best values? It selected 8192 for both of them. Yeah, I'll stick with my settings that are supposed to produce invalids but aren't. My 6850 runs at 6144 and I can take it up 15+ in intensity. My 5770 running at 3584 and I push intensity 18 on it without any invalids. And the win32 build that includes the latest 4 commits: http://www.mediafire.com/?7yg352cu8mxwnuw
|
|
|
P.S. shares difficulty set to x256 in comparison with minimal difficulty.
What does this mean? Ive noticed i submit hardly any shares now. What gives? In fact ive noticed i submit no shares now, thats why ive switched pools, i assumed something else was wrong with your pool. Previous few rounds i submitted 20-30 shares per round, now nothing. kind regards Shares are harder to mine, and each share is worth much more.
|
|
|
Someone should sell bbq chicken for bbqcoins.
|
|
|
|