Not solely for rich ones but for sure they would be having bigger chances to win especially if they would be able to manage the risk and the amount of their bets, proportionate to what they can afford losing. Gambling is not only for the wealthy individuals; as we all know there are 'regular gamblers' who managed to win big time from gambling industry.

With luck, yes it is a huge factor in gambling however there are things we should consider as well such as strategy, analysis, and overall bankroll management to lessen your losses at least than to end up with nothing and just choose to give up and quit.

If gas or transaction feed would be higher in the future to the extent that it would be more expensive than with FIAT by that time, then yes. The prinary use of this blockchain is as a digital currency. Logically speaking, this is meant for transactions such as purchasing of goods and wants. If things would be expensive why would it still be preferred by its users and consumers? The only thing we wouldn't be able to trading this technology is due to anonymity with big transactions and also with taxation of goods. If it won't be serving its purpose of a faster and cheaper transaction, might as well move to other mode of payment to be more practical.

Random optimism for this technology?
Be realistic; poor ones won't prioritize investments and assets simply because they need to provide for their daily expenses which is practical. Whether it is South East Asia or other regions of the globe, as long as people themselves are not interested to engage not because of its popularity but circumstances and capabilities of the people on those areas believed to be struggling in terms of financial aspect. Everyone's free to invest but no one is required especially if there are other things needing the fund such as food in the table. Economic issues will never be resolved by this industry's token.

Indeed if the security of the device where your wallet is logged would be enough as long as you are being responsible with the platforms or things you are accessing it with. Only those who are anxious are the ones to check it frequently. But in reality, the more you do not access it with platforms or networks which could infect the mother device, won't give you any problem on the long run. Just be sure to keep the copy of where it is written in order to make sure that no one else would have access into it and that if there would be anu problems then you could make an action with it.It is our money in the first place which should be enough to push us to be more cautious of its linkage and to avoid things get into worse.

If it is general possibility then any price could be reached as long as demand would allow to do so. As we all know, everything's market value which is dependent with demand, shows no limit. Problem is lack of assurance that all of the displayed market prices would be met for that year. The market prices of crypto are not consistently increasing which could make it or not, or whether how long would it take to be achieved. So what's your move as an investor? Simply hold still if you are capable to so. If you don't have yours then at least find a good entry point then do the same thing which is to sell once you're okay already. Next uear is when Halving is expected to happen which could create enough demand for this industry in general and that includes dramatic increase with crypto's market prices.

Bunch of alike stories and given that we are all anonymous in this forum, it would be hard determining which user is telling the truth or whether stories or topic are legitimate or not.

For sure we are all aware here; hold and just continue to do so until satisfactory. However there are indeed people having difficulties with their decision despite of awareness on what to to. Factor to consider is the investor's life circumstances. Everyone for sure wants to hold but not all could endure market price changes.

Choose what you think is best for you. I get the point that you want to contribute to this technology but since it is still young, we should accept that forcing the adoption won't do us good. You want to support a business to contribute to the advocacy but if it will sacrifice your urge to do things on your will, then you would be wasting your time. Regardless if you continue this advocacy of yours, if governments won't adopt it first as well as big companies, then nothing would change. Let things happen on its own. Right now more people are acknowledging this technology which means it would be better to let its progress be. And for us investors, focus on your holdings.

Better term I guess is outlet for enjoyment. I tend to socialize with my friends and play Basketball during mu free time and whenever I am not feeling the urge to gamble especially when my luck seem to be running out. If ever mu parents would be the one to tell me to quit gambling, I think it is where there would be a difference 'coz they see you as a problematic gambler. Gambling is indeed entertaining and is just leaving a bad impression with people who finds it hard to control themselves.
Indeed some people tend to force their luck while chasing their losses. A domino effect; frustration would make you more exposed into it.

No such thing. Gambling is gambling and there's no such thing as "pro" here unless you would be playing in a tournament otherwise you are just a gambler yourself. Having a winrate won't be absolute. Try tracking your gains and losses to see whether you are a profitable gambler or not; these are the only categories. Certainty is lacking in gambling. You could win most of the time in some days but there will always be times wherein you'd lose for days or weeks or even longer. You could bet as many times as you want but for sure only our winnings would tell whether we are good or not. You could lose a thousand time but once you hit the jackpot, you could get back what you have lost but that would only show how much is your progress for a long period of time.

Maybe it is a bit of greed given that you're aware of how big the profit already was and you still chose to hold. Your cited experience also support the title which is referring to struggles of holding. From big profit to huge loss. If you picked the right project then you shouldn't be hopeless right now even for a bad market situation from the previous all time high. Think of those people who bought early and still earning at this point; althroughout they encountered loss, then profit, the loss, then profit. If it is long term holding they you shouldnt mind monthly price  ceilings and focus only with annual growth in its price. Things won't happen in an instant so if you are in regret then you should have picked the easier catch.

Also, there are people in there; you just cannot throw away their "shelter" simply because you are interested to an investment. If that's the only concern he should atleast compensate another shelter to still  be lived by his family members. Also, if the property is not solely under his possession. Indeed there are players who succeeded from doing such thing, it shouldn't be a normal thing to do. Putting all of the proceeds into 1 bucket won't be much ofan advised one. If you have the chance to do so then that would be better of course. Do not be too blinded of this itechnology's assurance of profit 'coz there's no such thing as an easy way to do so.

Every crypto has its own risk whether it is a memecoin or not sinply because cryptos' market price are volatile by nature. But with meme tokens as concerned for long term investment, I'm not quite sure whether it would be best for such investment technique given that most of the meme tokens has no utility to sustain the demand for it. Also token supply is huge which could also be a factor to lesser demand. But this is not to close the door for memecoins. If there will be further developments tackling issues and potential problems, then for sure it would become a better option than its current image. Right now, memecoins are no doubt good for short term investment due to high volatility in its price.

Financial knowledge and academic knowledge are related. However it is a different matter if it is success which is being talked about. The statement is valid; no correlation between  academic success and with financial status. But both are important. Not all graduates are more successful than ones who chose to stop and vice versa. It'll depend on the individual but atleast if you would succeed academically, you will open bigger and faster opportunities to lead you towards financial success, more than those who did not and would be needing to do Trial and Error with what they are investing themselves with.Circumstances as well would matter always when it comes on "success".

In the long run, holding would generate a more efficient profit than with DCA and partial trading. Well, day trading could make more money than with just waiting and holding for a period of time however you won't always be winning given that its market value is lacking stability and that there are sudden market price changes whenever there are news or anything which could affect the demand in this technology. But since we all have our own preferences on how would we maximize our assets, eitherway would be valid.There's really no shortcut to success and even if this technology have created an impression of a quick way to get rich, we should still base on daily progress.

Individual differences.
In my opinion, the only skill a gambler develop which could be beneficial is risk management but this is only evident to those who practice such thing since as we all know, not everyone in this industry are responsible of their gambling activities. Also, when a particular skill or characteristic is being used to two or more different settings then the result would and could not be as effective as it was with the setting of origin. Perhaps with the mentioned skill of socialization, wherein if it would be used in profession, then that would be different 'coz we have roles in a company or with any working environment unlike in gambling games wherein we are all equal as bettors.

Likewise with most of the gamblers in this forum, it is unusual on my end to engage with gambling site advertisements especially out of nowhere. Reputable ones are the platforms which I trust. But I do get why those ads are interesting; rewards and bonuses for sure. However, there are times wherein things on the ads are not really existing once you register on their site. Sometimes those offers are just to catch the interest of their audiences. I also tend not to click on those 'coz there are tendencies for a virus or malware if we won't be cautious of it. If you are looking for a new platform to engage with, I would only choose among the known platforms in this industry unless you're an experienced bettor.

Unfortunately there are countries wherein gambling is really prohibited but due to taxation, some gambling providers and lotteries are considered to be registered under the government. The only downside is being taxed with a higher percentage and amount than with countries which are also implying such rule; but that's just normal 'coz tax percentage depends on which country you are living.

But going back, one reason for sure why we are gambling in cryptospace is avoiding tax. Actually I'm fine with paying tax over my gambling profit in fiat especially 'coz it allows me to gambling freely but if the percentage is that big, then that's why gambling in web 3.0 is more preferred.

Indeed, playing will not always yield to addiction 'coz it is dependent to what kind of a person you are. To any kind of game, greed will be the underlying factor towards addiction. If they are playing cricket betting and they happened to be profitable in such way, the it would be fine adopting such habit especially if the individual to learn such behavior is no longer a minor; therefore he already has is own decision with almost everything. But if it is somehow a negative activity to ones who are doing it first, then I see no reason why it should be passed down to younger ones.

Not all people expected its value to be as high as it have reached. Being in regret won't do us any good if such thing happened on your end. There are several stories which showed how low its potential have been assumed. Remember the guy who boight pizza using Bitcoin? that's one. But if we would base on real time, we cannot blame them from being ignorant of their bitcoin holdings. Same idea goes with people not buying or investing when Bitcoin reached $20k market value before it reached its ATH. We are all afraid to lose money which pushes us either away or towards this technology. And with giving importance of private keys? that's a bare minimum and that is simply being irresponsible losing them simply because you cannot see the potential of it being profitable.

Asking him why he wants to gamble would be best I guess. If his reason is to earn money then there are other means to do so. Sometimes support doesn't need to be in accordance to the person who needs the help, there are times wherein it could be in contrast and what's important is whether it would be for his betterment or not. It is like giving a drug addict money to continue what he's doing 'coz he struggle if the presence of substance is lacking, rather than bringing him to professionals for proper treatment (if you have the capability to do so). Sometimes not supporting them literally is a kind of support.  The question only becames tricky if you'd let your emotions and attachment to the person as the bottomline and not the objective.