Yes, but is for sure a tool. If you are just saving then at least it would be better than not having anything at all. What I meant with 'saving as a tool to achieve wealth' is to eventually use it to an investment. In investments, bigger capital would most likely result to bigger profit, but with bigger risk as well. Saving will never be a bad thing. Investments are indeed a good option to create bigger income or cashflow than with saving which is more stagnant and dependent with the amount you are keeping. However, not all investments are profitable, right? Risk will be the thing you would avoid and with savings, that would be self-discipline in accordance with consistency. Saving won't give you wealth in an instant, but it would be a huge thing to help you achieve wealth, no doubt.
It just depend on one's risk appetite. Some peopl are better living with savings alone simply because they are afraid to take the risk. They're more into assurance with situations or times they will be needing the money they are saving than to risk making it double or just more with investment.

Indeed, personally I do think that bullrun won't be happening this early. Price have entered and stayed on the overbought area for months already and a price correction will always have a tendency to take place. However, given that there's no assurance of what will be next whether it will be a continuous pump with crypto market prices or a sudden crash before the halving. The anticipated event for the bullrun is halving and given that it is not yet happening, therefore we should be careful of our decisions. Buying at this point would be okay as well but expect that you'd be quite on edge since prices are about to breakthrough without assurance. If you plan to make an entry be sure to set a stoploss.
Problem is not having the assurance or to not be guaranteed of a continuous price increase. Market price charts from previous halving, bullrun took place after months since occurence. However, again, that won't make things certain. What's best to do is to know your risk appetite; if you can afford seeing no matter what direction it goes after your purchase, then you'd be good to go.

Not yet having one but logically, if you are a gambler and happened to have a children, you will either have less time to gamble due to your parental duties or have huge drive to take more risks, if it is the worst which is anticipated. Of course individuals are different from one another; some people are still fine with their gambling habits despite of having a child. They could manage their time well if they just really want to. In some instances, parent gamblers are not betting that much because they are being practical of their child's daily needs. A gambler regardless of having a child or not, will be either responsible or not, but that is not because of the added family member but rather, just him/her making decisions for himself.
But there's this tendency that lacking a job would be resulting to less exposure in gambling because they won't have enough resources to bet in the first place. But indeed, that depends on the individual. There are indeed people who spends their time in gambling because they don't have a job which is a bit ironic; they gambler their luck to get through their daily needs which is never a good thing.

Well, on my end, I am doing random bets to somewhat calibrate my luck although it has no valid basis but it somehow ease my mood whenever I am losing continuosly. What differs from the main discussion is that I am happy as long as it is a winning bet regardless if I planned things out for that bet or not. A winning bet won't usually be seen on a daily basis and that's pure luck.Well, we can't really help it. And that's fate right there being displayed. Nothing's consistent in the first place. You might win in both analyzed and randomized bet but that won't be continuous. We just tend to react and be a bit frustrated because we did not go all out in those instances we would be lucky. However, for sure it would be a different reaction if that random bet turned to loss as well. Analysis do still work, no doubt that it increases your chances of winning however, nothing's just guaranteed with gambling, no matter how we wish for the outcome to happen.

First one is the best. Betting everything in a single bet will never be advisable. It creates bigger risk than with a normal bet. You'll never assure the outcome no matter how confident you are; gambling is gambling. You are just simply testing your luck and losing will be always a part of the probability. With being consistent with betting amount, frequency of betting and such, those are subject for changes depending on circumstances; there'll be times you'd be up for betting bigger amounts than your usual but as long as it is tolerable on your bankroll then it would be fine still. With frequency of bets and gambling acts, it depends to you as a gambler. If you have other things to do then obviously you won't be able to do it on a regular basis and another factor is simply your betting budget on how many times you would be able to bet.

Haney really has proven himself for being undefeated on his 31 matches. Ryan on the other hand is more of a power puncher in this match. Will be really interesting and I think I would be going for Ryan with this one. Other leopl say that he became different after his fight with tank but that's a normal thing. If I'm not mistaken he never  had a match after that to prove this assumption. And logically, he should be more hungery of winning after his first loss. He should also learned  from that match with Tank. I do think that haney won't give his title easily but the fighter with a bigger drive will be advantageous. I guess this won't also be an absolute exchange of punches and that this is more likely to end with decision instead of a knockout.Ryan won't step in the ring without preparation. His team anticipates how Devin would perform in the square; they're the challenger in the first place. Same with Haney who for sure knows what Ryan is capable of given his power as proven by his 20 knockout victory. Ryan is the underdog indeed but anything could happen and only the match itself could dictate who will be the winner.

Isn't it just a display of impulsiveness and being unaware of his bankroll? I can't call it addiction 'coz the information is lacking also there are other factors to consider such as pushing too much or having huge desire to gamble despite of being aware of his bankroll. Greed on the other hand also requires a drive to continuously bet wanting to win more and it is more likely to be frustration rather. Also, this only happens with live betting or in physical casinos which has a dealer. You can't gamble with online platforms without actually placing a bet. The only instance which is a bit alike with this scenario is betting an amount outside my alloted budget for gambling on that day. Perhaps my alloted budget was $100 for that day, and after consuming it, I still continue betting, which crosses the line, and that's an unwanted decision on my end to avoid being too addicted of it.

First of all, who won't be mad? It is a normal response in the first place and this is not exclusive to gambling alone, but with everything; you cannot lose or spend all of your money at once without any back up plans. But if this happenes on my end, I would be also mad but not enough to file a divorce. In this scenario, we are married and not just a typical couple. Every problem should be discussed between and within the relationship itself first. Give chances and considerations. However, there are just times this is evident in repetition which is a problem to resolve with the help of professionals. If my partner will insist not having herself treated, then that's the time divorce will be considered. Addiction is something not to be tolerated indeed but the person who does the act, should be always given a chance.

There are just times you would be a bit pushy and greedy but indeed betting ALL is on a different level of drive to gamble. No matter how much you wish of winning, things won't be in favor of your desire and hope if you're unlucky. It will just appear as an act of foolishness. If it is easy to secure a winning bet then we should all rich by now.

That's how gambling works; you either win or lose. First of all there's no definite consistency in gambling. If you are winning expect that losing could take place, and same thing goes with losing; luck will take place. However, would you be persistent enough until your luck "arrives" in your gambling career? Would your funds be stretched that much until you win? Problem is not having any contro with betting outcome. No matter how much you wish of winning, it won't happen unless you have your luck on you. Now, if you plan to bet continuously, until things "pay off" would you still be playing by that time? It is a matter of staying when that time comes but it happened that bankroll is needed once that moment take place. Gambling indeed pays, and on the same context, woud it be enough to cover your loss as you continue playing despite of negative gambling outcomes? These are the things a gambler should consider if he considers betting until his luck "make" things happen.

Well, there's no such thing also with race, gender, except with age wherein a gambler should at least be 18 as we all know. But if it is social strata or socioeconomic status then there's no such thing as restriction as long as you have the money to bet. However, consequences are equal to every gambler; we are all prone of losing. Now, if you are on the category of average salary earners, then could you shoulder the loss without affecting your daily expenses? Or without struggling on a daily basis? More likely you would which is why gambling is more convenient with high salary earners. They might lose huge amount but they can replace the amount through their salary which will aid the possibility of struggling after a negative betting outcome. Bottomline is, everyone is welcome to gamble however loss is not for everyone to take the burden with.

Lucky indeed! I'd be glad for her even as her child. But if this discussion boils down if I woud be demanding an amount from her, then personally I won't. What does a typical mom do with her money? Most of the time she just uses it wisely. And if she's one of the few who is a bit responsible with money, then as a child I wil just advice and give suggestions on where it should be used. There are also instances that she could be keeping it for herself and personal interest and eitherway I have no rights of it. Depends really on what kind of a person she is. Best eay to do with huge amount of money is to turn it to an investment to make its value bigger or to avoid just consuming all of it at once. Such opportunity won't come in a daily basis which is why we should really make use of it wisely. Indeed not all investments would be profitable but if it is a good one, then for sure it won't be an instant loss. Indeed, not all peope will do the same thing. There are those "one day millionaires" who would be recklessly spend all of it in a single da to buy the things that they want. And this is why financial literacy and self discipline is important.

If it is loan then yes, but if it is a debt without any papers or contract involved then it's a no and things will be settled through agreement. But this will fall under the term of debt and there's no need to specify gambling as an activity because in any form, debt is debt. There are also instances wherein loans are done through unregistered online loaning applications and in any aspect they cannot force the person in debt to pay them but they often send threats ( evident in my area but I'm not sure if same scheme exists with the others, also a different story or discussion).

This is evident only with properties bought through financing in my country, again it will always depend on the contract. Familiar with this law which for me is a bit unfair on their end. They could also sue "estafa" on the loan takers end  but amounts will not stil be paid in an instant. However, there are a few instances that a gambler dies upon taking a loan which is also another angle of this topic. In most instances, they suffer from the consequences lf their actions which is taking a loan and not being able to pay it before the due. Interest wil just become bigger as the time passes by, making it a bigger burden as well. This is why such action wil never be advisable.

Football. Well I'm not that familiar with the teams and I don't really play this sport on the actual unlike with boxing and basketball that most of us are aware of how things are going. For me, it is important to know how the game itself works 'coz in such way you'd be able to create a more organized analysis of what team or fighter is more likely to win. On my personal point of view, it is fine to bet with gambling games or teams in sportsbetting you are not that familiar with especially if you're just up with entertainment and not profit. If you are chasing for profit then it would be better to know things to check if you're being read on. The reason why I often bet in these games is to calibrate my luck with the games I actually play with.

Indeed odd is a factor. Sometimes if you are not familiar with things, then numbers are the main basis of your bettinf division. If it is a premium league then there'll be no need to remind the personnel. I really hope yhat you should be fine fo accept things.

Having feelings of regret is a normal thing but indeed it won't mean a thing. If you have used it with gambling then you simply hope for that moment to win. If you are just after into holding then it is better to just focus with crypto investment. Betting has different expectancy than with investing. Imagine just holding it for a long period of time waiting for profit; that's not how things work in gambling. In gambling, there's an instant expactation of profit which I guess creates a difference with motives. If you are one who would regret the act of using your crypto holdings in gambling, then isn't it the same thing with spending some of your holdings to buy things that you want? That's simply utilizing things. You won't also have such feeling of regret at that time you consumed it in gambling. There's just this regret at the present 'coz you saw how much it is now worth. Same idea as well with early investors in particular with that one who paid a couple of Btc for a pizza, wherein at that time it was justifiable.

No longer a surprise with technological advancement. We already saw it. Gambling before was only done thru peer to peer interaction, then casinos came, then there's online gambling a the present. If it is with VR technology then I can't say that this is not close to reality. There could be another changes as well as improved peer to peer betting, such as with esports among players. If it is just possibilities, then there's a lot to come for sure, also, advancement never stop; there could be more possible changes with this industry in general as we saw with web3.0 and crypto adoption.
You will never be good at gambling, you could just be good at managing your funds with the amount you bet and instances that you will. The idea of not betting an amount we can't afford losing is simply common to all of us. It is just hard to allow our emotions do the act of betting; frustration and greed. And if it is development concerning this aspect, I am guessing that there will be betting suggestions in the future as guide for the players depending on their bankroll or simply additional ways to remind gamblers not to bet that much.

It's been two years since I started gambling in web 3.0 but I was already playing gambling games since I was 16 years old, in many forms. In this forum section, I got to encounter topics I am interested with, when it comes on things related to gambling, new platforms, scam related activities. I do still play in Fiat based gambling sites especially with parlay betting in NBA which is a service rarely being offered with crypto based  sites.

I experienced winning a decent amount and I also experienced losing my 1 month salary in a single day because I was too greedy to make up with the loss. During such time, you'd be frustrated to continue playing despite of loss and likewise with whenever you are in profit that you would want more. Main thing is involvement of money, an enough drive to trigger our emotions. And if it is recommending this activity to non-gamblers, then I won't. If they are interested, allow them to see things for themselves. Allow them to have the initiative to engage and embrace risk.

Well if it is in this forum section, it is almost enough if you wonder how web 3.0 gambling works; site suggestions, things to avoid, strategies, game recommendations and such. The interaction between users do really help especially new ones in this industry.

But in this forum, gambling addicts are more likely absent. Why would they waste time interacting in this platform if they are being obsessed of actually playing? People here are simply players who wants to discuss about gambling activities and that includes what's good and not in this industry. For sure everyone knows how dangerous it is to allow oneself be too hooked or attached with gambling but why do some people still fall in such situation? Greed and gambling ideologies.

Unfortunately, gambling is often misunderstood as a way to get rich quickly. We all know how fast money moves in this activity. You could earn thousands of bucks in a single game if you're lucky. Problem is being "lucky". No one has control of their luck and fortune and this fact is often being disregarded pushing people to live in this industry.

When to gamble and not? I'd say never gamble if you can't bear with the reality behind gambling. If you are still one of those who has ideologies of how gambling could make you rich then it is better to stay away from it as early as possible. Fact check: If being rich in gambling is an easy thing to achieve, why are many people losing huge amounts of money, properties, or even themselves on their journey? It should be an enough warning to all of us.

Not really quite sure of it. But there are articles showing that it may be up to $500k or more. There will be people to be paid to basically run it and maintain it, developers and programmers, licensure or registration fees and more. Although it may vary on the people who will compose the platform. If you are a developer yourself then it could be lower, as if you will lessen the people you will be paying to have one. Also it depends on the game or services you will offer. Might not be the best answer you are seeking but I hope this will somehow be of any help. Most likely, if you are hoping to get your platform registered, then it would be making the capital bigger, which is what happens not only with gambling related sites, but also with other industries. However, given that restriction with gambling activities is more common in many countries, I assume that it is a factor to consider with the overall budget.

Try going back to the reason why you implied and made that rule for yourself, and that would be the answer. Glad that you are doing well with your gambling expenses but gor sure there's a reason. As we all know how gambling works; things are not consistent. You might be winning nowadays  which is obviously a good thing, even if you broke your self-moderated rule, but how long would you continue? Consistency will be best if you are restricting yourself. Again, you won't do it in the first place if you aren't avoiding anything to happen. And for the same reason,  I suggest just securing the profit and to stick with the rule you impose. Do not wait for profit to turn into loss eventually. Keep in mind that losing is more certain  and we just tend to be lucky sometimes if we are winning on a rally. It will obviously and more efficient to be preventive of huge loss than to test your luck with continuous gambling activities. It won't always be holidays on our gambling careers. Not maintaining or following such rule we created will just more likely create a problem afterwards. Self discipline is a virtue.

Wait, how was it redirected to gambling? Indeed it is suspiscious of the husband to not offer his wife's account given that it's her who needs the help but to give benefit of the doubt, he might have no access of it however he should have explained himself than to just leave jist because his preference was not chosen. On the other hand, it may indeed be used to unwanted acitvities or things or it is just a make up story. Asking for proof on the giver's end would be valid in this case. It is a bit off also that the husband didn't say a single word rather than to please the person who was about to help, if he's being serious.

But going back, isn't it judgement that  the guy was thought of using the money on gambling? I hope the story is  more detailed 'coz it is really confusing. Possibility of bad intention is indeed there but why would it be assumed to be related in gambling, in an instant? If nothing will be ellaborated, this will just be one of the stereotypes of how bad gamblers are with handling money.