1) Ebay alone wouldn't be the reason for BTCitcoin value to spike all the way up to the $1000 mark in case they would allow only BTCitcoin as means of payment. 2) Most people from the darknet markets already know BTCitcoin well enough.
One thing that could improve the situation and help BTCitcoin rise and be an empire on this particular category, would be to improve it's lack of adaptability among all available online merchants for maximum exposure as this is what holding back BTCitcoin.
|
|
|
I noticed a while ago that the following user keeps on posting on some of the local sections of this forum and luckily he posted on two of the local sections that I'm involved and understand (Philippines and Iran) together with some other local sections. The problem is that his using a translation tool in order to do so as the language is completely broken and clearly something like google translator have been used in posts he did on all the local languages (aside for the Philippines in which he used english). So I'm here looking for answers if he could be reported as mostly my reports that were involved in local sections, are the one's that brought my accuracy down a bit and want to know what punishment would be given to this guy? Rule he have disobeyed:27. Using automated translation tools to post translated content in Local boards is not allowed. His profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=728812His post history: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=728812;sa=showPostsWhat punishment should be given to this guy? Update:Hello. In these cases it is best just to report 1 or two of their posts explaining the situation. There is no need to open up threads in particular. I have already deleted his spam from various local section (more were deleted before) and he will be punished. Please close the thread if you don't have any other questions.
~Lauda.
Hello, thanks for the response. I didn't report his posts this time because of the reason of reports involved in local sections had a negative effect on my report accuracy so wanted to be sure first. I'll be closing this thread now, thanks for the answer.
|
|
|
Well to start, BTCitcoin doesn't have a total anonymity and as a matter of fact, it's pseudonymous and once someone gives a name to their addresses, it could be traced easily and be identified meaning there's a higher chance for criminals that use BTCitcoin to be caught than those who use fiat itself so as result BTCitcoin isn't a perfect tool for criminals after all.
|
|
|
I like were this article went all the way until the end although Lindholm showed the problem that most businesses face while using BTCitcoin here, but it wasn't completely a negative one as their attempting to consider BTCitcoin like any other fiat and actually try to ease it's use (hopefully) so looking forward for this bill to get accepted.
|
|
|
The only reason for this is mainly due to the fact that PayPal has been around 10 years more than BTCitcoin has been so far and it's well known among merchants and almost every one accept it but BTCitcoin is still relatively new to the whole world even though has been around for some years. The moment others realize BTCitcoins payment, they will most likely switch to it and stop this trend as it is.
|
|
|
I always send many transactions to different sites and it would never show up instantly even after it gets confirmation on the blockchain network as most have a limit set before each transaction shown as result in account history of each site (mostly they have 3 limit confirmation before showing and some I've encountered 5 confirmations before it's shown or rather get's reflected on your account).
|
|
|
A lot of Businesses would be affected too and more expenditure as result since they have to switch to the traditional ways of monetary exchanges and also all the other alt coins would disappear long before BTCitcoin would which I doubt it happens as BTCitcoin is improving day by day. Many would suffer in which BTCitcoin is their only means of online payment (including me).
|
|
|
For me, the acceptable one would be if someone pays few people to engage in a topic he created, as long as whatever they put into each post, is true and valid but it's not acceptable if participants get paid for posting fake result that would trick others into trusting that certain service as a whole.
|
|
|
~Snipped~
Hello, sorry, the last guy got the last spot, you were a tad late, were full again
|
|
|
~Snipped~
Sent you a PM
|
|
|
Harizen: I've sent the amount to your 2nd address (same where marco sends you the payout for bit-x) 1 Open spot left
|
|
|
This is very interesting and after reviewing the site as well, as you mentioned it's still early and some modifications should be done as some of the pages give error 404 content instead of the real content but I've got the idea and will try to use it in the near future and will give an update regarding my experience here.
|
|
|
I think Cameron is right on this one as I can't see what's the purpose of working or even being in a country in which you can't speak the language and have poor communication skills at that's the number one factors into establishing a good relationship with those you work for nor those you try to talk to.
|
|
|
I wouldn't trust them, just not yet since their a little over a month old and it's a Pakistan base exchange which the website has been paid for a year only. Registered contact email address / Technical contact email address and Administrative contact email address is all a free one so it's fishy and lastly communications are not encrypted since their don't use http as any information you provide will be at risk since it's not secured.
|
|
|
I would like to add one for #8 which is not included in the unofficial rules thread but it's forbidden: 8. Don't hijack thread for the sake of whatever you would like to promote in someone's else thread. I see a lot of those posts specially in service section.
|
|
|
|