forrestv, memory and bandwidth: this bandwidth cannot be sustained on a home connection, this is a HDSL line with 3Mb up/down cap and not a standard ADSL. look at this http://p2pool.soon.it:9332/static/graphs.html?DaySomething went wrong and memory jumped from 200MB to 1GB overnight. spiccioli ps. $ uname -a
Linux fedora 3.6.7-4.fc16.i686.PAE #1 SMP Tue Nov 20 20:51:24 UTC 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
|
|
|
|
la carta è off shore, americana ,non è anonima, viene richiesta una scansione dei vostri documenti personali, per arrivare ci mette un sacco di tempo ma arriva.
A me è arrivata e dopo qualche giorno che la hai attivata ti mandano una email dove ti danno i dati un conto corrente USA , che è intestato a te e che puoi collegare ad un conto paypal per i prelievi, e funziona!
Quindi avrai una carta offshore ed un conto americano!
potrai ricaricarla fino a 10000 usd e prelevare fino a 5000 usd giornalieri o usarla per fare acquisti.
Scusa, e a cosa servirebbe? Hai dato i tuoi dati a quello che e' uno degli stati che piu' hanno a disprezzo la privacy e il diritto internazionale, uno stato che ha autorizzato l'assassinio dei suoi stessi abitanti senza alcun processo, uno stato che ritiene suo diritto uccidere chiunque/ovunque senza alcun processo e hai una carta i cui movimenti saranno tracciati non solo dallo stato italiano (quando la carichi), ma anche da quello americano quando la scarichi... Io me ne terrei ben alla larga, fossi in te.  spiccioli spiccioli |
|
|
|
Questo post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=117003.msg1524972#msg1524972 fa osservare una cosa interessante (almeno per me ) A parte un errore, l'autore dice: considerato l'indice dei prezzi al consumo americano, 1 USD di oggi vale (ha lo stesso potere d'acquisto di) 4 centesimi del 1900. Oggi 1 BTC vale 25 USD ergo, oggi un BTC ha lo stesso potere d'acquisto di un dollaro di 113 anni fa col quale gli americani di allora vivano tranquillamente. In altri termini, cio' che a noi, oggi, pare una moneta sopravvalutata, solo cento anni fa era la norma! spiccioli ps. poi l'autore dice che la diffusione, aumentando la velocita' del denaro, abbassera' (o manterra' costante il suo cambio) cosa che non so commentare, ma sarebbe spunto sufficiente per un altro post  |
|
|
|
And I have not received even such a letter...  2 orders, the first was confirmed (!) on February 3, about the second I have only the assurances Walletbit, that everything is OK. Same here, I've opened a ticket on support.avalon-asics.com the they of the mess, they answered me quickly, but I got no order number no other kind of confirmation apart from a "your order is ok" spiccioli |
|
|
|
- Password (by testing it against all wallets)
If you have any of these then i'm sure it can be found, knowing the approximate time and date the wallet was created also helps. Urca, quindi se due utenti hanno la stessa pw e uno dei due 1000 BTC nel suo wallet... non voglio pensare cosa possa succedere spiccioli |
|
|
|
Perfettamente d'accordo. Non riesco a capire cosa stia capitando, ma a differenza dell'altra volta in cui c'è stato un aumento di 300% in una settimana questa volta la salita sembra più regolare (per quanto possa essere regolare un 70-80% di aumento in un mese) e con la possibilità che duri più a lungo, e soprattutto che la prossima caduta (che ci sarà di sicuro) sarà frenata molto prima. T
beh, a esempio, l'altra settimana e' uscito un articolo sull'espresso... ora, quanta gente legge l'espresso? se uno ogni 100 decide di comperarne un po'... oppure, prima di natale col bitcoin saldo intorno agli 11 eur/btc ho fatto diverse transazioni in persona e non su localbitcoins e su bitmit (e su bitmit erano tutte transazioni di acquisto, ovvero gente che li vendeva a me), ora da piu' di un mese... zero! secondo me perche' chi li ha non li vende piu', aspettando che salgano ancora, e quindi riduce l'offerta e di conseguenza fa salire ancora piu' in fretta il prezzo per quelli di cui al primo esempio. oppure, ci sono circa 10 mil di btc prodotti, e mezzo milione di indirizzi btc con movimenti recenti, non ricordo i numeri esatti, ma e' solo un esempio e gli ordini di grandezza sono (dovrebbero essere) rispettati che succede se uno o due milioni di persone si aggiungono, vuoi per worpress, vuoi per mega, vuoi per qualsiasi altro motivo e tutti vogliono qualche btc? oggi noi siamo, secondo me, come era facebook sei o sette anni fa... non lo conosceva nessuno o quasi! poi, dalla sera alla mattina... BOOOM! e oggi sono in un miliardo (o piu') ad avere un account. il giorno che arriviamo a un miliardo di utenti, a quanto sara' il btc? 1000 EUR? 5000? la morale, secondo me, e' che se il btc funziona il suo prezzo andra' sempre piu' salendo, a volte piu' in fretta, a volte piu' lentamente, ma pensare che aumenti la base di utenti (cosa che mi sembra incontrovertibile), ma si riduca il prezzo del singolo btc mi pare difficile. spiccioli |
|
|
|
Ok clearly something is going wrong since the hash speed estimate is negative. (Hs=-6.210501e-10) Travelling back in time I've tried it on my Icarus and of course not had the problem ... I've only got 2 Icarus so it probably needs more hardware to see it happen. Most likely it's that your computer isn't handling hashing that many devices stably ... or it's busy doing other stuff at the same time. The timing code does depend on reasonably reliable code CPU performance (as it says in the FPGA-README), since it is using the performance to estimate the hash rate. My computer is sitting mostly idle, it is a headless low cpu unit, this is true, being a HP 5530 thin client, but cgminer 2.9.7 hasn't this problem on the same hardware with the same number of CM1 boards. It is something that has changed since 2.10.4, so, for the time being I'll keep using 2.9.7. Thanks for the explanation on the way it works. spiccioli |
|
|
|
The only other option is they faked the ASIC and its a bulky front end to a Fpga farm somewhere on the net.
Jeff's box is just a dummy terminal connected to Hashpower, isn't it?  still makes jeff a happy customer :p however, it is a little worrisome we havent seen any further news or deliveries in the past.... 2 weeks? Didnt they mention something about shipping 12 a day? It seems to me they said they were assembling 12 a day, not shipping them... spiccioli |
|
|
|
Mi diresti il prezzo che fai per 25/30 btc nei tre modi che dici? Se vuoi anche in privato
Ciao Arjel, scusa non avevo visto prima il tuo messaggio. Il prezzo lo vedi andando su localbitcoins.com, nel momento in cui ti sto scrivendo il prezzo e' a 18.5 per BTC se paghi con postepay. Nell'ultimo mese il prezzo del BTC e' salito molto e di continuo, quindi il prezzo varia quasi ora per ora. spiccioli. |
|
|
|
Hi, I have a problem with cgminer > 2.9.7 when using it with my CM1 boards (icarus emulation). I start it as cgminer -S /dev/1st-board -S /dev/2nd-board -S /dev/and_so_on --fix-protocol --failover-only --icarus-timing long -o http://rpc.hhtt.1209k.com:8337 -O 1Xyz..._128
so I'm running with difficulty 128. With 2.10.4 and now 2.10.5 board hashing speeds are insane, I reach Pethashes and I get tons, I mean tons, of HW: errors I stop it, restart 2.9.7 with the same parameters (I'm using a script, btw) and all works as it should. Are there problems with --icarus-timing long or icarus boards ? spiccioli Do you only have CM1 boards or do you have other devices also? Also, rather than 'tons' give a screen shot or an API output. API stats/summary/devs output would be helpful (stats shows the icarus-timing stats) I haven't used icarus-timing for a while, so I've no idea if I've caused any problems with it recently I'll check it after I've has a chance to look at you screen dump and the API stats/summary/devs Aside: The Icarus driver is the last of the serial-USB drivers, that I'll get around to updating some time in the ... future ... to use direct USB But I'm now a bit short on time due to going to visit BFL on the 17th for a week so it may be a while before I update the Icarus code. Hi kano, there are two BFL but they're managed by a different instance of cgminer. anyway, here it is a screenshot after half a minute since restart with 2.10.5 cgminer version 2.10.5 - Started: [2013-02-08 12:36:49]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):1.120E (avg):801.4Ph/s | Q:482 A:0 R:0 HW:99 E:0% U:0.0/m
ST: 0 SS: 0 DW: 1 NB: 1 LW: 2 GF: 0 RF: 0 WU: 96.9
Connected to rpc.hhtt.1209k.com diff 128 with LP as user 1..._128
Block: 00d9ec7e48042357... Diff:3.27M Started: [12:36:49] Best share: 87
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
ICA 0: | 268.3M/172.2Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:7 U:0.00/m
ICA 1: | 299.8M/161.4Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:7 U:0.00/m
ICA 2: | 236.2M/210.2Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:1 U:0.00/m
ICA 3: | 251.4M/237.0Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:2 U:0.00/m
ICA 4: | 381.7M/253.0Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:1 U:0.00/m
ICA 5: | 996.4P/400.7Ph/s | A:0 R:0 HW:6 U:0.00/m
ICA 6: | 159.7M/155.6Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:8 U:0.00/m
ICA 7: | 250.0M/232.5Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:9 U:0.00/m
ICA 8: | 378.7M/321.8Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:3 U:0.00/m
ICA 9: | 195.2P/133.6Ph/s | A:0 R:0 HW:7 U:0.00/m
ICA 10: | 260.4M/156.2Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:7 U:0.00/m
ICA 11: | 711.7M/439.0Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:3 U:0.00/m
ICA 12: | 284.5M/182.0Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:6 U:0.00/m
ICA 13: | 1.684E/534.3Ph/s | A:0 R:0 HW:6 U:0.00/m
ICA 14: | 278.5M/241.1Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:1 U:0.00/m
ICA 15: | 273.2M/174.7Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:9 U:0.00/m
ICA 16: | 330.7M/253.1Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:3 U:0.00/m
ICA 17: | 890.1M/457.4Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:3 U:0.00/m
ICA 18: | 150.4M/170.3Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:6 U:0.00/m
ICA 19: | 554.0M/319.4Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:5 U:0.00/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2013-02-08 12:38:54] ICA11: invalid nonce - HW error
[2013-02-08 12:38:55] ICA1: invalid nonce - HW error
[2013-02-08 12:38:56] ICA15: invalid nonce - HW error
[2013-02-08 12:38:57] Icarus 2 Re-estimate: Hs=7.223040e-10 W=6.352486e-01 read_count=36 fullnonce=3.738s
[2013-02-08 12:38:58] ICA7: invalid nonce - HW error
[2013-02-08 12:39:01] ICA19: invalid nonce - HW error
[2013-02-08 12:39:02] ICA3: invalid nonce - HW error
[2013-02-08 12:39:02] Icarus 3 Re-estimate: Hs=-6.210501e-10 W=2.930369e+00 read_count=1 fullnonce=0.263s
[2013-02-08 12:39:02] ICA12: invalid nonce - HW error
[2013-02-08 12:39:04] ICA13: invalid nonce - HW error
[2013-02-08 12:39:04] ICA7: invalid nonce - HW error
[2013-02-08 12:39:05] ICA16: invalid nonce - HW error
[2013-02-08 12:39:06] ICA10: invalid nonce - HW error
[2013-02-08 12:39:07] ICA15: invalid nonce - HW error
[2013-02-08 12:39:10] ICA10: invalid nonce - HW error
[2013-02-08 12:39:11] ICA8: invalid nonce - HW error
See ICA 5/9/13 for example. Thanks. spiccioli |
|
|
|
Hi, I have a problem with cgminer > 2.9.7 when using it with my CM1 boards (icarus emulation). I start it as cgminer -S /dev/1st-board -S /dev/2nd-board -S /dev/and_so_on --fix-protocol --failover-only --icarus-timing long -o http://rpc.hhtt.1209k.com:8337 -O 1Xyz..._128
so I'm running with difficulty 128. With 2.10.4 and now 2.10.5 board hashing speeds are insane, I reach Pethashes and I get tons, I mean tons, of HW: errors I stop it, restart 2.9.7 with the same parameters (I'm using a script, btw) and all works as it should. Are there problems with --icarus-timing long or icarus boards ? spiccioli |
|
|
|
By the way, where's its button start/reset? On the PSU spiccioli |
|
|
|
hi jgarzik, did you try http://hhtt.1209k.com/ ? it is a variable diff pool with very low fees for high diff shares, but no stratum. best regards spiccioli That pool is fixed difficulty share (32), vardiff adjusts the difficulty every x minutes for incoming shares based upon your hash rate. hi tacotime, no, 32 is default difficulty if you don't ask for a different one. you use a bitcoin address as username and suffix it with desired difficulty, for example an address like 1....._512 asks for 512 difficulty shares. _NNN is the difficulty you're asking, with 66 GH/s you can use 512 or 1024 without too much variance. spiccioli |
|
|
|
hi jgarzik, did you try http://hhtt.1209k.com/ ? it is a PPS variable diff pool with very low fees for high diff shares, but no stratum. best regards spiccioli |
|
|
|
|
I've just received a mail from WalletBit, the order has been acknowledged and I'm waiting for a confirmation from Avalon team/Yifu.
Thanks WalletBit for the quick reply.
spiccioli
|
|
|
|
I think that walletbit was a poor choice as a payment processor on Avalon's part for the reason above. Also because the site fell over under load, and also because it asks one to "blindly" send payment to a bitcoin address, without generating an email, or even providing so much an an order ID, payment ID, or any other kind of token aside from the bitcoin address itself.
Boo. Walletbit--
True, I've recovered the url store.avalon-asics.com used to call wallet bit, it is in my browser history. I can confirm that my email was correctly spelled, so they could have sent an email confirming the transaction and the bitcoin address used. spiccioli |
|
|
|
If your payments were made from an address you don't control (ie MTGox) please get in contact with WalletBit support. All incomplete orders will be refunded and we want to make sure they are processed correctly. Please make sure to include your order and payment details.
Once again - IF YOU DO NOT CONTROL THE BITCOIN ADDRESS YOU MADE PAYMENT FROM PLEASE CONTACT WALLETBIT SUPPORT
bittenbob, I've sent an email to support@walletbit.com but it got bounced saying it was spamming!!  Please get in touch with me, I've written a personal message to you here. spiccioli. |
|
|
|
Lets all relax and let them work through these issues. Support at Walletbit was quick to get back to me and I have a pending ticket at Avalon. That is what people should use so they can get an organized list of all the issues and questions. They are likely overwhelmed as well and when dealing with Bitcoins is like cash, make a mistake and you can take real losses.
Dalkore, where did you open a ticket at Avalon? In their store even after login there is nothing which resembles an issue tracking form/button/email... Thanks. spiccioli |
|
|
|
As many of you are aware there were some issues with the Avalon sale earlier today. As a result, many orders were processed at unrealistic rates. Only a very small number of orders were actually processed at the correct price. This has prompted us to make the following decision:
All orders for incorrect amounts will be fully refunded.
WalletBit will return these funds to the Bitcoin addresses they were sent from. These units will be restored to the sales queue. At a time of Avalon's choosing they will re-open sales for these remaining units. All orders processed at the correct exchange rate will still be honored.
We apologize for any inconvenience this has caused.
bittenbob, this is my payment for two units http://blockchain.info/tx-index/6b698d60124ca67f5b5d81643a0f5f65dab2c12b152f95bcc41f1f7d1c6be7e4did you receive it correctly? Are there any issues? Why didn't I get any confirmation? I've paid in guest mode, but my email address was correctly filled in. Any info _truly_ appreciated. spiccioli |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
