Yes indeed, long live the congenial sharing.

Three of us already did. 

Third time unlucky 
As a matter of interest (pardon the pun) what's your default % on loans?

I don't understand any of that logic.
Being in Default Trust and red tagging newbies because you find them
is not the way to go. IMO.

Yes.
 

International as in non-American?
Why's that?

Having scanned the post history, I'd suggest it's for overuse of full stops.

Anonymity is no more an intrinsic value of crypto than Swiss deposit boxes are of fiat.

What threads are you operating on at the moment?

Only where appropriate.

It wasn't "cherry picking" in order to distort, it was a suggestion of a course of action you might contemplate taking, that's if you don't want to come across as a whingeing and self righteous moaner who doesn't know when to shut up.
Not the best of impressions for a would be project developer to leave.

Good.
You don't appear to have learned anything, having just posted another content free bump on your main thread <~4 hours after your previous post.

It wasn't a general subjective perception of inactivity that I was referring to.
My original point was that it seems, as things stand, that in order to qualify for DT a member must have been active in the 72 hours before the unknown time that Theymos chooses to revise the list in the future.


If a previous member of DT is excluded solely because of that "3 day" rule, then all their presumably valuable feedback becomes default invisible and their place in the interconnections that constitute DT qualifications now also vanishes.
Sometimes people take a short break from online life (maybe not often enough) without becoming inactive long term.

Tl,dr; Unless I have misunderstood, I think Theymos should consider changing that stipulation to something like

What credibility is that, did he ever have any?
Just another irrelevant old American hustler who has hitched his wagon to crypto and whose net effect is probably negative in terms of its general perception. He can be funny, but that's all.

It's a bare faced ponzi no doubt, but it makes no attempt to pretend to be anything else and it's listed in the correct Russian dedicated HYIP sub forum.

I read your original thread and appreciate that you have put thought into your project and wish you well.
It's not completely clear to me whether your long post was in an existing thread titled ""Cryptocurrency Needs a New Direction" which has been nuked, or was that thread started by you with that post?
Whichever, it's clear that mods are generally deleting threads which have the potential to become spam magnets on generic psuedosubjects and I guess they thought that qualified as such.
On reading your main thread over the last few days I did notice that you were breaking the no bump rule by regularly adding small posts within the time limits allowed.
So, I'd suggest that your multiple deletions have two reasons; the majority of them for bumping and the long post for being in a generic thread, as is indicated by the times of deletion.



I can understand that you are upset, but don't get paranoid.


Good luck.

So much nonsense signature spam.

BINARY OPTIONS ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TO TRADITIONAL OPTIONS.

Read the fucking link BEFORE posting

LOLOL.

You got it right there, most of the replies have their own logic/ethical reasoning.
I found myself in a similar situation a long time ago, working for people with very dubious ethics and practices, and terminated the contract early, keeping what I had earned and been paid for.
What to do with an overpayment like in this case didn't come up, although if there had have been I would have returned the balance to them solely for personal safety reasons, as those particular Project1 people were gangsters.
I started paying more attention to actual contracts and proper due diligence after that.