I think what op meant in his post is that if nobody sells, bitcoin will reach a price of one million dollars per bitcoin one day.
Not that there are people out there, stupid enough to pay a million per bitcoin today.
Op's theory is that we dictate the price by not selling.

Those are somehow the same thoghts I have.
The actual price is good for the coins I already have... but somehow I would like to have more.
And of course I would like to get them a little cheaper than the price is at the moment.
But who knows. Maybe in a few months we will remember this time as the time where bitcoin was still cheap...

I don't see a chance that it will be possible to regain your wallet.
Even if you made just a fast formatting of your hard drive (a complete formatting writes zeros all over your hard disk, so there is nothing to recover under that circumstances), you installed a new windows on it and it's relatively sure that you put some data on your computer as well. That will have overwritten parts of your old wallet most ceratainly.
Of yourse you can try it with a program (the one I know is named recuva, it's for free), but I would not have any hopes if I were you.

I don't see the price increase dramatically in March.
Everybody is expecting an increase with ETF approval, but I think we have already witnessed that increase.
I expect the price to stay stable for a few weeks now. And after that, who knows...

I think it will be more like the speculation before the halving.
Everybody expected a price increase after the halving, but nothing happened. Instead the real price increase happened before the halfing.
I suppose it's the same with the price increase we are watching now.
Nothing is going to happen after March 11th.

I do not think that bitcoin has what it needs to become a main currency.
First of all, I think that the process of decision making is way to slow in the bitcoin system.
A currency must have the capability to react on circumstances of the economy, and I do not see that is given with bitcoin.

I think as well that confirmation time and the amount of fee might become a problem within the next few years.
Hopefully we will see a decision here cause otherwise the wealthy and the speculants get a hold over bitcoin.
And for a currency that is meant for  everybody, that is not a good thing.

Bitcoin transactions are anonymous if you move your coins from one wallet to another one.
In exchanges, you convert bitcoin into fiat or other crypto currencies. That is something different.
Most countries have laws that exchange owners have to get some form of ID from their users if fiat money is involved.
This is some sort of protection against fraud and money laundering I totally agree with.

I have just read about this guy Jiang Zhuo'er.
From What I could find, he is the owner of mining farms in China and apperently against the activation of segwit.
Am I the only one who finds it strange that he asks the authoity how bitoin price can be controled via exchanges?

I think one reason why many people do not want to pay taxes is that they think the taxes are not used in a correct form.
In many countries taxes simply disappear in deep pockets or are applied for useless stuff.
Curruption itself is the biggest problem, unfortunatelly bitcoin itself with its anonymity can be used for exactly that.

I have read a lot about the ban of bitcoin.
But is there really a country out there where the posession of bitcoin is declared to be illegal by the government?
I have just found this statement from the bangladesh bank: "anybody caught using the virtual currency could be jailed under the country's strict anti-money laundering laws".

I don't think as well that the rapid growth of bitcoin price is good.
It attracts too many investors who want to make quick money. As fast as they are in, they are out again.
That creates an uncertainty that is not necessary.
To me a slow and steady growth in price is still the best option to make bitcoin great...

I suppose this is some kind of spam effort, and not a natural growth of bitcoin transactions.
Maybe somebody is trying to bring the bitcoin price down by delaying the confirmation times.
Or a segwit supporter tries to show the importance of the segregated witness soft-fork.

Just because the file has bitcoin in its name, it does not really have to do anything with it.
But I have noticed that the malware is located in the java folder.
Personally I would say that it's not wise to let java store any kind of files on a computer (there is even the question if she needs java at all).
I would really change the settings in the java controle panel so that it does not store any temporary files on the computer anymore, deactivate java in the browser content and empty the cache folder as well.

I think that no rules here are aginst that.
But I think as well, if you have more accounts your post quality will suffer from that.
Due to the amount you would have to write, most of your posts would be useless stuff (because the writing itself bores you).
And low quality posts are not appreciated in signature campaigns. That can quickly get you a ban of the signature campyign you participated.
My advice would be to use one account and fill that one with quality posts.

I don't think bitcoin could help me with financial problems.
My bitcoins are either bought from money I already have, or earned by a sig campaign.
The earnd coins ar not enough to be of any help, and the bought ones come from money I already have.
To me bitcoin is more of a hobby, and hobbys usually cost more than you can make profit out of it.

I think as well that declaring bitcoin to be illegal is going to bring the bitcoin price down for a longer period of time.
A lot of people would want to sell quickly, without coming back later.
And to me the chances of that scenario becoming realistic is getting more likely every day.
Somehow I can imagine that the new president wants his cityzens to use the us dollar.

To me there is not much influence of bitcoin on daily life.
I make some payments of digital goods with it online, and have some bitcoin savings in case of a price explosion.
But that's it. Where I live most things simply can't be bought in bitcoins. So there is not much room for a big influence.

Honestly I don't know how the term mass adoption would be defined.
Bitcoin is mainly an online currency and a few million people all around the globe use it already.
From that point of view you could say that a mass of people has already adopted it.
But will a majority of the people use bitcoin one day?
I don't think so. People like their fiat, and for most of them there is no need to go into bitcoin.

I don't think that there is a government that supports bitcoin.
Some goverments make it harder for their people to deal with bitcoins than others do.
But the real support for bitcoin must come from the people and the industry by using it.
I think that in countries where the population is more conservative the support for bitcoin is not that strong.