Bitcoin Forum
July 02, 2024, 03:20:08 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 ... 193 »
741  Local / Other languages/locations / Re: Pakistan on: February 23, 2019, 07:21:32 PM
Excellent.. but be careful since crypto currencies and any trade in crypto currencies is still illegal in Pakistan.

Buying and selling cryptocurrencies is not illegal in Pakistan. Please don't spread lies  shahzadafzal
742  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Multisig issues with electrum on: February 22, 2019, 06:20:14 PM
You can convert extended keys using the Electrum cli now. For example:

Code:
electrum convert_xkey xprv9zKZ5h5h2rxxvA3edftPEgJJUXTWgWHsJL4vqKH7nFxQqMRKVTH1LgPQefDNBizWi3uB7D3iBFbgh3AHmcg9CHjdq6FT8sngyw7R3RuJ2rk p2wpkh

Run `electrum help convert_xkey` for more info.  

You can't change the derivation path though. I wrote a script that lets you do that. It uses electrum functions for everything. Example:

Code:
electrum getmasterprivate | xprv -m - -d "m/0'/0" -c pw2pkh -p 
743  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Multi Sig Wallet - Importing addresses. on: February 21, 2019, 04:43:52 PM
Use the same command on the cosigners' wallets. Actually the below one is safer:

Code:
wallet.change_gap_limit(900)

You put enter this on the console tab (view menu > show console)
744  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum 3.3.4 on Ubuntu16.04 LTS (i386) crashes on: February 20, 2019, 07:47:15 PM
If you're not able to use the appimage and you're not willing to update your OS then your only option is to use electrum 3.2.4. Just don't follow any links in error messages.

Best to update the OS. pyqt5 is probably compiled against the python version that came with the OS and that's why it won't work with python 3.6 that you installed from the 3rd party repo.
745  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum 3.3.4 on Ubuntu16.04 LTS (i386) crashes on: February 19, 2019, 03:42:12 PM
Use the app image. Here's a script for downloading it.
746  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: What private key format to use to import a Bip-38 paper wallet into Electrum? on: February 14, 2019, 05:00:59 PM
WIF keys are the only ones you should use. The uncompressed (begins with 5) and compressed private keys (K or L) correspond to different addresses. Look them up on a block explorer to find out if any coins were sent there and then import the corresponding priv key.

WIF keys have a checksum in them that detects typos. The reason you couldn't import the uncompressed priv key is because you made a mistake copying it or copied extraneous characters. That's why the next button was greyed out.
747  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: SyntaxError: invalid syntax Electrum-3.3.4 run_electrum on: February 14, 2019, 11:24:15 AM
Edit: OP use the app image version they are now offering. It contains all the dependencies: https://electrum.org/#download
748  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Unable to 'save' transaction in watch-only wallet. (for cold storage) on: February 12, 2019, 05:30:25 PM
AFAIK tails has less than 3.2 so that's why you couldn't sign a transaction created by it with a 3.2.3 offline wallet.

In the OP you said you had 3.2.3 on your online system too. You shouldn't have said that if you weren't sure.
749  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Transferring BTC from Electrum That Has Not Been Updated? on: February 12, 2019, 10:31:23 AM
so to use electrum i have to trust other softwares?

Yes starting with your BIOS and OS. You also have to trust your hardware manufacturer.
750  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Transferring BTC from Electrum That Has Not Been Updated? on: February 12, 2019, 10:29:58 AM
Here's a guide to verifying the gpg sig. I suggest you update your electrum from electrum.org. That way the only problem you might face is difficulty spending bitcoins at which point you can simply switch servers and try again.
gpg4win has a signature to verify file? Or how to verify gpg4win?

They use code signing. More details here: https://www.gpg4win.org/package-integrity.html
751  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Transferring BTC from Electrum That Has Not Been Updated? on: February 11, 2019, 09:42:44 AM
Here's a guide to verifying the gpg sig. I suggest you update your electrum from electrum.org. That way the only problem you might face is difficulty spending bitcoins at which point you can simply switch servers and try again.
752  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Unable to 'save' transaction in watch-only wallet. (for cold storage) on: February 11, 2019, 09:14:42 AM
OP says he used export button.

edit: offline signing works fine on testnet.

edit 2: OP you installed 3.0.1 on both the offline and online systems? I ask because transactions generated by 3.2.3 can't be signed by 3.0.1. They changed the format for saved transactions in 3.2.0 https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/blob/master/RELEASE-NOTES
753  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: How to find real Electrum? on: February 11, 2019, 09:02:21 AM
But developers can post hashes of files here on bitcointalk. Or in twitter. In second source. It's 99.9% secure!
Why not to do this?
This section consist of million threads, where people complain about electrum wallet phishing

This would be a pointless exercise. Do you even know how people end up installing fake electrum versions? Most of them google electrum and follow a link in an ad to the fake electrum site. Others are falling prey to the phishing messages in old electrum versions. Non of these people frequent this or any other community forum. If they did they would know better and would only download from electrum.org.

Now consider what happens when people who have fallen prey to fake versions come here and complain. They never visited this forum before but when they need help they seek it out. What are we to tell them? Would it serve any purpose to ask them whether they verified the hashes? The fake sites have hashes for the fake versions so there is no point in verifying hashes. As HCP pointed out hashes alone do not let you authenticate the source of the software. A digital signature of the maintainer is required for that.

Why are you and other users so resistant to learning how to verify digital signatures? It only takes a few minutes to learn how to do this. Here's a guide if you're interested.
754  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Unable to 'save' transaction in watch-only wallet. (for cold storage) on: February 10, 2019, 06:46:06 AM
I have tried the 'export' and the QRcode options, but when I open these on my raspberry its gives 'status:signed' and transaction unrelated to your wallet.

You use the export option in the preview window on the send tab not on any other transaction from the history tab. I'm guessing you exported an incoming transaction instead.

You export the unsigned tx to file, transfer that to the cold wallet, sign it, transfer the signed tx to the online pc and then broadcast it. You may be able to use QR codes to do some of this work instead but the idea is the same.

If the above is not working I suggest starting over by creating the watch only wallet again via file > new/restore, enter unique filename and click next. Proceed as before using your cold wallet xpub.
755  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Funds lost = Bitcoin address not found in wallet addresses on: February 10, 2019, 06:39:39 AM
Did you run electrum from a usb flash drive? Was it the portable or standalone version? I ask because you've mentioned both above

You have the same wallet on multiple devices and the other addresses in the wallet match?
756  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: how come electrum addresses dont work? on: February 09, 2019, 01:23:43 PM
there is no such thing as a basic wallet. what characters do your addresses start with? bc1, 1, or 3?
757  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Funds lost = Bitcoin address not found in wallet addresses on: February 09, 2019, 01:22:16 PM
what happens when you go to the addresses tab, press ctrl+f and paste in that address?
758  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: How to find real Electrum? on: February 08, 2019, 02:51:02 AM
yes, I know about sig https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105901.0
But I want to check file (hash of exe).

ThomasV, today I have found 3 more threads about "hacked" electrum and phshing. Could you, please, post everywhere (here in pinned thread, in twitter) MD5 / SHA-1 / signature of real Electrum 3.3.3 ? not only sig, but also MD5 / SHA-1 of files.
In will be secure, to check this info in 2 sources (download on official website and check hashes of .exe's here and in twitter. Really more secure.
Because I don't know till now, where is real electrum.

Electrum doesn't publish hashes because even fake websites can publish hashes. Digital signatures OTOH cannot be faked. So take the time to learn to verify the digital signature. It'll serve you well in the future.

electrum.org is the correct site btw.
759  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Submitting CPFP transaction with zero-fee parent on: February 07, 2019, 10:39:33 AM
some mining pools will mine your transaction for you if you pay them. viabtc has this service. it takes tx id as input thought. you could try broadcasting via the tool on their site. it may accept zero fee transactions. if it does it'll return a tx id which you can use.

another one is btc.com: https://pushtx.btc.com/
760  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Tails electrum wallet payment problem on: February 06, 2019, 11:10:12 PM
It would be easier if you simply used the latest version of tails instead of attempting to upgrade electrum on an old version of tails.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 ... 193 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!