.2 to start to test adresses
SO .2 for 850 XEL
XEL address XEL-SF3R-82FZ-VJLT-9TWRH
Have sent, will update with transaction info ASAP
EDIT
tx id a21540d29da42c07c40027086315c2781f0bdfb1f4b5327a19f2878b3cb4edb6
Got it -- sent 850 XEL Tx: 1524021823869980598 TX ID d8380c41c55d7211a0f9e8bea10dbff6138c8e2e6f1853aa60959f0a713f6241 Sending .6 for 2550 XEL XEL address XEL-SF3R-82FZ-VJLT-9TWRH Will update with transaction ID I see it. I will wait for confirm and send. Sent 2250 XEL Txid 922866344505067357 Sent 300 XEL Txid 14325951309502718556 .25 btc for 1100 XEL remaining. Sending now will update with transaction ID TX ID 2d2b26a3922cda1255ee1a98ac0e519579c2d43bc2760640c0810f2c1a832e18 Sent the last 1100. XEL Txid 893351496242941999 Nice to use some trust in the trustless world. |
|
|
|
.2 to start to test adresses
SO .2 for 850 XEL
XEL address XEL-SF3R-82FZ-VJLT-9TWRH
Have sent, will update with transaction info ASAP
EDIT
tx id a21540d29da42c07c40027086315c2781f0bdfb1f4b5327a19f2878b3cb4edb6
Got it -- sent 850 XEL Tx: 1524021823869980598 TX ID d8380c41c55d7211a0f9e8bea10dbff6138c8e2e6f1853aa60959f0a713f6241 Sending .6 for 2550 XEL XEL address XEL-SF3R-82FZ-VJLT-9TWRH Will update with transaction ID I see it. I will wait for confirm and send. Sent 2250 XEL Txid 922866344505067357 Sent 300 XEL Txid 14325951309502718556 |
|
|
|
|
Does anyone think this could work and be success?
|
|
|
|
.2 to start to test adresses
SO .2 for 850 XEL
XEL address XEL-SF3R-82FZ-VJLT-9TWRH
Have sent, will update with transaction info ASAP
EDIT
tx id a21540d29da42c07c40027086315c2781f0bdfb1f4b5327a19f2878b3cb4edb6
Got it -- sent 850 XEL Tx: 1524021823869980598 TX ID d8380c41c55d7211a0f9e8bea10dbff6138c8e2e6f1853aa60959f0a713f6241 Sending .6 for 2550 XEL XEL address XEL-SF3R-82FZ-VJLT-9TWRH Will update with transaction ID I see it. I will wait for confirm and send. |
|
|
|
.2 to start to test adresses
SO .2 for 850 XEL
XEL address XEL-SF3R-82FZ-VJLT-9TWRH
Have sent, will update with transaction info ASAP
EDIT
tx id a21540d29da42c07c40027086315c2781f0bdfb1f4b5327a19f2878b3cb4edb6
Got it -- sent 850 XEL Tx: 1524021823869980598 Sending .6 for 2550 XEL XEL address XEL-SF3R-82FZ-VJLT-9TWRH Will update with transaction ID Great. I wait. |
|
|
|
How can I redeem my ICO coins?
I've been asking the same question. hello devs, can we please get some help here? thanks. When exactly did you buy into this ICO and from where? ICO has been over for a long time I bought using FIMK holdings at last stage. I've PM'd dev earlier, but he didn't have working OSX wallet, so I defered. I've emailed support @ heatledger.... no reply ANyone help? |
|
|
|
What's the point of this? Don't get it.  |
|
|
|
.2 to start to test adresses
SO .2 for 850 XEL
XEL address XEL-SF3R-82FZ-VJLT-9TWRH
Have sent, will update with transaction info ASAP
EDIT
tx id a21540d29da42c07c40027086315c2781f0bdfb1f4b5327a19f2878b3cb4edb6
Got it -- sent 850 XEL Tx: 1524021823869980598 |
|
|
|
|
BTC please. Address is 16Taag5cLJh6Z5qbLn7KjH2jS8q2kZjrX7
Pick a chunk size to send and pate me your XEL address.
|
|
|
|
How can I redeem my ICO coins?
I've been asking the same question. hello devs, can we please get some help here? thanks. When exactly did you buy into this ICO and from where? ICO has been over for a long time I bought using FIMK holdings at last stage. I've PM'd dev earlier, but he didn't have working OSX wallet, so I defered. I've emailed support @ heatledger.... no reply |
|
|
|
|
WTS ~30K XEL at 30k sat btc
Check my trust and history.
|
|
|
|
|
SELL XEL @ 32k sat (looking for 9 BTC total)
Want to make the trade in small chunks without escrow.
|
|
|
|
!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!
Just an FYI, the NVO thread now has full-on censorship. My response to nemgun's uninvited insults got deleted. Which only proves that something is really-really fishy about NVO. A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
I feel that you are really limited, you try to make the clever for nothing by giving definitions that everyone knows. I'm going to explain what a blockchain is, it is like a database, and I'll save hash in that database.
So when the smart contract will be hashed in sha256, it will serve as an id.
Now A wants to make a trade, it leaves coins for sale and goes offline, how the database will call its smart contract? She will call it using using the hash.
I will help you learn a few things, when you read definitions ask yourself what are they for, you will be able to understand them better, so after the definitions, it is the functions.
I've tried my best to stay objective and unbiased, as all I ever wanted was to get clarity on the claimed security of the validator's private key signing the smart contract, and I very well appreciate the language barrier (btw, English isn't my first language either). Why was I trying to get that clarity? - Because I wanted to be sure that I'd be making a sound investment. But throughout these almost two weeks, I kept seeing a lot of smoke and mirrors. You know, it's totally understood when a given mechanism is just a trade secret and the author doesn't want to disclose that information so early. But then it would make perfect sense to just state it as-is, instead of going in circles but never actually delivering a consistent and clear picture of the intended implementation. The direct undeserved personal attacks and baseless name-calling is very inappropriate, especially when the respondent themselves is well aware of the problems with the language barrier and Google Translate. I don't feel like I need to embark on a defense line here, because what I've been told speaks more about the person saying that than it does about me. But anyone interested in verifying my professional experience which is only 25 years too late to be "limited" is more than welcome to PM me and obtain a link to my LinkedIn profile. So, I pass on this one. Good day all! And good luck! |
|
|
|
SELL XEL @ 30k sat (looking for 10 BTC total) Want to make the trade in small chunks without escrow. Have just sold to user "fudge", as reference ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1979400) Keep it to small amounts if you don't trust me yet. |
|
|
|
WTB 2250 XEL for 4.14 eth, please confirm
You want buy more? I will sell @ 30k sat. |
|
|
|
I've got some XEL and will sell at 27k sat (looking for 10 BTC total) Want to make the trade in small chunks without escrow. Have just sold user "fudge" XEL, so perhaps we will vouch for me ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1979400) Keep it to small amounts if you don't trust me yet. |
|
|
|
Dear mister smart,
People are confused because you are calling hashing operation a "double sha256 encryption".
There is a strong language barrier present, which makes it extremely difficult to express himself especially when nemgun has to combat a lot of trolls native to English. I have notified him of his mistake. He will correct it once he is around. The problem is that these are technical terms that are not confused. In any language everyone knows hashing is NOT encryption. The fact that someone running an ICO, taking millions of dollars, confuses these two well-known distinct terms is unsettling for investors. Something is amiss here. It was also unprofessional to call the person who picked up on this "limited". He's actually quite attentive. And he's right. The fact he was called "limited" was condescending and tells a lot about the organizer. Not a good indicator. |
|
|
|
This forum is flooded with false escrows. Easy to get confused. Look at my history. It could be safer to trade with someone directly who has a history of trust. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
