yes and then no
yes - we have been going up in the past few days at first 1-2% per day then 3-4% now 10%.
this is not being driven by any real news but by ourselves just punting it up so it may well gone on for a while at even higher % increases
so yes we may well go to $500, $700 or $1000.
but then at some point we will collectively loose our nerve and be down to $200 ish in a few months after the ath.
its what happened when we hopped on the willy bot train and it will happen here again.
and long before willy bot there was a period when we rocketed to $31 and crashed to $2.
rinse and repeat
Nice try you bitch ass shorters! http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/03/bitcoin-to-be-6th-largest-reserve-currency-by-2030-research.html
Sixth ?  Try 1st. |
|
|
|
Do you have a better explanation? I don't see any news or rumor that could explain it.
I just posted the explanation Stolfinator. When something like 70% of coins have been mined, price has already hit the bottom as evidenced from the last year, and the upside potential is listed below, we haven't witnessed anything close to a bubble yet: Incoming $163,000,000,000 market cap and $7700 coinshttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1235466.0Well, six months ago 68% of the coins were already mined. Why wasn't the price ~$340 back then? Didn't investor know then that, within six months, 70% of the coins would be mined? Whatever the cause for the rally, one thing you should keep in mind: every penny of profit that a bitcoin investor makes can only come from the pocket of another bitcoin investor...Like money right? |
|
|
|
I never specifically stated that it was for these six points, I was referring to the article as a whole. I just do not think it is productive calling someone a petulant child and a liar in terms of having a productive discourse.
Strictly speaking, it's irrelevant, as these offensive words do not render the arguments he presented invalid. That's why I asked if these 6 points (actual arguments/statements) contained fallacies. I think the ad hominem term is used too loosely these days, and is being applied where it really shouldn't be. as it goes with cens0rshiiiiip ^^ I certainly do not agree with hdbuck however, censorship is not a term that is being used to loosely today. The trend of censorship in the Bitcoin community has been concerning, at least the response from most people has been reassuring. I think that most of us here do believe in freedom and that through Bitcoin we can pursue and obtain more of that state, whatever that means. TL;DR  |
|
|
|
I never specifically stated that it was for these six points, I was referring to the article as a whole. I just do not think it is productive calling someone a petulant child and a liar in terms of having a productive discourse.
Strictly speaking, it's irrelevant, as these offensive words do not render the arguments he presented invalid. That's why I asked if these 6 points (actual arguments/statements) contained fallacies. I think the ad hominem term is used too loosely these days, and is being applied where it really shouldn't be. as it goes with cens0rshiiiiip ^^ speaking of it looks like the self-proclaimed exiles are back en masse. i see names like rocks, Adrian-x popping up in threads like nothing had ever happened knight22 is making pump threads in Speculation forum when 3 weeks ago he was proclaiming Bitcoin dead because block size only waiting for Lebron James' decision now |
|
|
|
Title says it all.
Buckle up.
I thought Bitcoin was dead because block size |
|
|
|
resistance  So we're just about getting ready to blast through it, and that's not to say of what is going to happen when China wakes up. Do we have an upper bound target then master? |
|
|
|
And just like that Finex hits 372  |
|
|
|
How is trollfi explaining this one? Has the MMM ponzi also reached finex & stamp  |
|
|
|
what's the E-wave count that says we're going to $700-$800 very soon? that one is probably the right one
 If I am reading this accurately, it looks to be following the yellow count quite well and the rally should end around $400? Yes with 100$ around August 2016.....  then crazy ride after! if we've learnt anything from this past month, is that when BTC goes up, it does it in style! I don't see any conceivable way we reach sub 200$ btc during the halving but hey... if that works for you.... |
|
|
|
what's the E-wave count that says we're going to $700-$800 very soon? that one is probably the right one
If I am reading this accurately, it looks to be following the yellow count quite well and the rally should end around $400? Yes with 100$ around August 2016..... |
|
|
|
Great article by Mike Hearn, everyone should read this. Jesus christ....are you cypherdoc's little brother by any chance? You realize you have absolutely no credibility left and only serve to amuse us? |
|
|
|
Market doesn't care Bulls are Core supporters |
|
|
|
What a disingenuous little prick of a whiner this guy is The whole thing reeks of desperation. Looks like it might be time to take the gloves off with this guy, he has become toxic. Definitely, dude deserves to be ostracized from the ecosystem. Some will claim him as a martyr of the XT jihad, oh well... I don't adhere to their religion so I couldn't care less |
|
|
|
Violence How did you ever manage to become a mod on this forum anyway |
|
|
|
yep, still it's a message that in few minutes arrives at the top of Reddit, just before being censured  Yes, at 6:51AM Eastern Time, certainly that has nothing to do with vote-brigading or bots heh |
|
|
|
What a disingenuous little prick of a whiner this guy is The whole thing reeks of desperation. |
|
|
|
Merchants accepting it, stand ups utilizing it.
Recently newegg that implemented i think increased the price a bit. Then there is the g2a which sells game keys and other game stuff. Dell also accepts bitcoin for a long time now, and hope one day amazon and ebay will implement the bitcoin. Amazon is what so many people are waiting for. The current blocksize issue is what potentially holds Amazon back. If they accept Bitcoin payments, then most likely each block will be full. ...that's non sense. No one is rushing to buy bitcoins because merchants accept them but it could start a chain in some way, this is a possibility, it will then cause a huge dump from amazon and the price will be levelled in any case, but with a major correction for the value the problem is that 99.9% of people around the world are fine with fiat Exactly, which is why greed and speculation drives adoption. Not "merchant acceptance". |
|
|
|
nothing is done yet, it seems that they are waiting for the limit to be broken and then increase it, there was a time limit for increasing it around january-march 2016, maybe by that time...
you will do something that you think it's not necessary, only when it's too late already
Too bad they are waiting on something that they know will become a problem to actually be a problem before handling it... Although, the code has probably been written already, so not that bad. Blocks filling up is not a problem. |
|
|
|
Neither the thread itself nor Veritas's post history show that quote bolded by brg44. Veritas did not say that.
Of course he didn't. He is much too politically correct to say such things |
|
|
|
I disagree, I'm a very well off European with very cheap internet access and I personally don't think it is inconvenient nor expensive to run my node. Third-world problems are not my problems.
The highlighted quote was not made by me. Brg444 has unethically and falsely used my name in a quote which I am not responsible for, it was most likely written by him. To do this is wrong, it is fraud, libel and slander. I have requested that he ceases to falsely quote me yet he continues to do so. dude stop playing the victim, i saw that post on the thread posted under your name, for once admit you just wrote something and anyway you know thay you are the only one posting more then the others? Let's not get carried away here. It was indeed me who imagined these lines and stuck them under one of his posts' header so as to present what I thought would be his likely answer to a certain argument. Of course subsequent posts from him proved my prescience and was the source of quite some lulz  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
