I believe that the recent dump matches precisely the amount of XQN (148K) that was held by that account earlier reported to have stolen XQN from a few holders (when some shithead posted a malware wallet and a couple of people fell for it). This address was commented on the Blocktree.io explorer, and it is not on the richlist anymore. If my understanding is correct, I think it's all the better that he/she/they dumped now. Rather sooner than later, and the coins go back to people that care and recognize the value. Not a dull moment in crypto, heh...  I bet this is the reason they disabled the wallet on Trex |
|
|
|
Try sending something to it I actually trade,it work,wallet mark deseable but everything work.. Im really start to think they just try to panic market to get more volume,so more fee... thats wrong. Shake out the weak hand ! You may be able to buy and sell what is online, but you cant send anything new in |
|
|
|
Try sending something to it |
|
|
|
|
Looks like they disabled the wallet on Trex
|
|
|
|
As a top 10 richlist XQN holder, I knew XAI and XQN would grow, my intentions are to hold into the long term while staking. I'm glad both coins are getting the attention it needs to grow.
Although I would like to see more volume on XQN, XAI seems to be getting the attention. I still feel XQN will be price corrected (increase) in the upcoming days.
I personally release a small amount every day, but not more than I stake in a day The more people(volume) we get on the boat the better You may inch up that rich list a little fatser, but those of us who have been here from the start will be throwing a big party soon. P.S. You are buying the drinks! Its awesome to see innovation and a real developer at work! |
|
|
|
|
Why not just create an incentive for people to hold a certain amount of coins long term.
I am thinking make wallets that have less than 20 coins not stake
Have the stake percentage scale with the amount of coins the person holds
Rewards could be something like the following
0-19 No stake
20-30 coins 20%
31-40 coins 30%
41-50 coins 50% etc etc up to max % reward
This creates value for holding coins and is a good way to give everyone a chance to reach the max stake percentage while discouraging dumpers.
This also encourages wallets to be online and staking along with long term investment to reach the max reward
I am interested to hear thoughts on this
|
|
|
|
|
I vote for Magi also, its a cool long term project with high value regardless of coin value
|
|
|
|
|
How is the testing going with the Nvidia video cards?
|
|
|
|
So... make sure there's very few GPU miners, and everything should be okay - assuming they are NOT farmers.
I am not meaning that.  I very much dream one day that every one mines XMG; no superb miners in this scene. People are free to go with this argument, but to me no guarantee. As I said, read (carefully) the recent hardfork post and the paper, and then come back figuring out what's the best course one should take. Simply don't go straight the way of mining in general. I believe people in this crypto scene now should / have to get smart, before taking any action / investment. There is no guarantee at all as to ROI, even bitcoin can't keep that promise. I guess I am speaking too far away. What I am saying is trying to reduce one's cost as much as possible (e.g., electricity or something else) by sending this heads up. If one is thinking of investment and getting a quick profit, that's just unlikely, not just in the crypto but everything else. Be smart. As I mentioned and particularly, Mining XMG could not be as profitable as you imagine giving a superb miner. Every one is in the network, what you get is up to what others are doing (situation might change in every moment).You are, of course, correct. But as long as there is a minimum block reward, you can profit via overwhelming hashrate. A way to combat that would be to increase the POS rewards as hashrates get higher. Say if a few people had really high hashrates the reward would drop for POW and increase rewards for everyone who is doing POS. A high hashrate would then distribute rewards more evenly and defeat the intentions of a few people trying to gain an advantage. The reward could even be a certain number divided evenly among all those who have their wallets open and staking. This would make it so that everyone who is participating gets something regardless of the size of the wallet they have. Hopefully this will get people thinking about ways to make things more fair and environmentally friendly. |
|
|
|
Anyone think we should put together a community bounty fund for an improved GPU miner?
I'd rather pay for a true CPU only solution. Impossible. What you CAN do, is make GPU simply not worth it. But it's a really stupid idea - botnets will then dominate the hashrate if your coin has any value. EDIT: Shit, what am I saying, I'm better at CPU dev than GPU dev. Disregard my last. Cpu is the way to go and I can think of one really good example of this with drops on rewards when hash rates get higher. Its really a "magi"cal idea! That's actually a stupid idea, because if many more miners join, it will also lower the reward. Also, everyone will mine at full power, hoping everyone else is stupid enough to lower their own hashrates. Sure I would agree with that short term, but I think the guy or gal who throws up a single CPU to mine long term will have a better result. Anyways I hope this can get people thinking about new ways to do things. |
|
|
|
Anyone think we should put together a community bounty fund for an improved GPU miner?
I'd rather pay for a true CPU only solution. Impossible. What you CAN do, is make GPU simply not worth it. But it's a really stupid idea - botnets will then dominate the hashrate if your coin has any value. EDIT: Shit, what am I saying, I'm better at CPU dev than GPU dev. Disregard my last. Cpu is the way to go and I can think of one really good example of this with drops on rewards when hash rates get higher. Its really a "magi"cal idea! |
|
|
|
word of warning to all, i have noticed that volume has slipped along with the price....if we want to maintain trading at bittrex, we need to at the very LEAST up the volume, even if some numbskull wants to drop the price.....buy it up or we all lose out!
This is to be expected with a high POS coin and will continue until the Dev releases features and updates the community. Once we have something that differentiates us from other cryptos we may have a chance. For now hopefully more and more people will become interested with the new lower prices. |
|
|
|
|
Put a cap on the hash rate and drop the reward to zero if it is over a certain amount.
Problem solved, if the big farms get the rate up high enough the reward drops to zero.
Many smalls guys are basically mining for zero at the moment so that would level the playing field.
Added benefit is we use less energy, save resources and distribute the coin more evenly.
We need to use technology to save energy and solve problems, not create more.
|
|
|
|
I mined ~9000SPR so far and last 3 days I wanted to buy as much as I could while price was 30k but I got all my BTC stuck at god forsaken Bitstamp  Damn you Bitstamp!!! Hey, arnt you the guy i spoke with about mining SPR, and then you went on to mine the coin i told you about? HA! Nice stash btw! Tnx, I was allready mining it when we spoke  Are you getting anywhere near the 0.09 Per day you expected? More? with current price around 0.125 BTC/say What's your average mh/s to get that if you don't mind me asking? 80MH/s I have 47x750ti +130MHz OC I get around 1730kh per card I love my 750ti cards! Have you looked at the gtx 970 or 980? The 980 gets about 3 times what the 750ti will |
|
|
|
When you type getinfo in the console is the money supply correct?
Yes it is. It might confuse people that it has no decimalpoint and is expressed in satoshis. But it is correct. That explains it, my mistake Thanks for getting me back in line! |
|
|
|
|
When you type getinfo in the console is the money supply correct?
|
|
|
|
|
I hear that if you bend over and grab your ankles your staking and mining can be like four to five time more effective!
|
|
|
|
|
I remember in the past we had optimal stack sizes.
What would be the optimal stack sizes for say 500 clams or so?
|
|
|
|
Cedric said in IRC the other day that it would come with the new wallet release.
If that truly is the case, I am sure the official announcement will be made here when he is ready with the new wallet. |
|
|
|
I'm a big fan of XQN, but I seem to be having some problems with the wallet... When I'm playing a game online, I get serious lag and rubberbanding, making most of the games I play completely unplayable (Call of Duty series, Battlefield 4, Titanfall, Path of Exile, etc.) unless I close my wallet. I can still have half a dozen other wallets running with no impact (I spent the last two weeks trying to figure out why my games wouldn't play anymore). Has anyone else had this problem? Does anyone have any ideas of how I may be able to fix it?  Thanks! This is probably because the Quant tab auto-updates every 2 minutes in the background, and it is doing drawing operations to update the graphs. Next update there is a checkbox to turn off the auto-update just like on the profit explorer tab, and that will probably solve it for you (just uncheck it before playing your games). That is most excellent news! I'm looking forward to it! Thanks for the reply and all your hard work! Been testing it letting it run continuously the past few days and it is running smooth with no more popups and no issues. You are going to make quite a few people very happy with this! Thank you! When can we test it out? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
