Why Amazon? we offer the same return policy as Amazon through eBay or if you prefer, our own website https://www.419mining.com/. As others can attest, we stand behind our products and customer service. I have a ton of amazon gift cards  |
|
|
|
Feedback is not moderated and cannot be removed (besides by the person who left it).
that is so stupid. this guy went out today alone and left like half a dozen fake negative feedbacks all saying we asked for a loan - the account is an alt for another user who amazingly everyone he left negative feedback for was blasting him for backing out of a deal where the buyer had already paid escrow and had to get a refund because the dude wouldnt provide proof of shipment. I am new here and trying to build a good reputation and this asshole is lying. look at what he did just today.... User Date Reference Comments riverdip 2019-06-11 Tried pming me asking for an unsecured loan watch out!! Steamtyme 2019-06-11 Tried pming me asking for an unsecured loan watch out!! inrockitrust 2019-06-11 Tried pming me asking for an unsecured loan watch out!! Stryfe 2019-06-11 Tried pming me asking for an unsecured loan watch out!! WhyFhy 2019-06-11 Tried pming me asking for an unsecured loan watch out!! |
|
|
|
|
what can we do about people who leave false feedback? claiming we attempted to scam them???
Per the feedback left today by user jrc209 - he claims I pm'd him about getting an secured loan - he there is no pm of this. Are there admins that can see pm's and verify?
I would like to have this feed back removed!
User Date Reference Comments
jrc209 2019-06-11 Tried pming me asking for an unsecured loan watch out!!
|
|
|
|
|
sounds good! I will keep an eye out for them on amazon.
|
|
|
|
patrike -
thanks! it does now show the hash rate and thus the estimated revenue/profit for the BW L21 now - the only other thing I notice is that the pool that shows is the pool #2 - it does not show what pool the miner is actually on. for example, if I put one pool in - it shows nothing. If I put two pools in, it shows the second one, even if the miner is mining on the first one.
I do understand your point here. The priority of the first pool has a higher number (crazy high as in 16842752) when reported from the ASIC miner, when it in fact should be priority 0. The second pool has priority 1. For this reason Awesome Miner will consider the second pool to be active. This is another case where the BW L21 ASIC doesn't report correct information, but I will adjust Awesome Miner to consider very high priority numbers to be 0 instead. Priority 0 is the current active pool. ahh understood - they kinda just did their firmware so different than everyone else's lol |
|
|
|
If you notice the listing itself, the 8 is 8 AMPS from the power brick. I see up in the info header it lists 8W so that's definitely wrong.
yes, I gathered that. My initial post about the matter was purely sarcasm - I think that gets lost in text. But for noobs in mining or people that dont understand that 8 watts is impossible, it is slightly misleading. I simply point it out so someone can fix it. I actually am waiting to see them again on amazon and will prolly pick up one or two - just so I can have one in my office for showing people an "ASIC Miner" --- the regular asics are too damn loud, most people unfamilar with them start getting bug-eyed when we approach my mining building - some even decline to enter due to the noise lol Actually, that is with the asicboost enabled I can see the "+" behind the BM1387:12
ahh gotcha - I thought it said it bumps up to 950 gh/s with asic enabled. |
|
|
|
It is missing a zero probably LOL, actually on mine, I can see around 81 watts draw @ 1.25A for 815 gh/s (600 mhz)
even that is not bad - that would be 810 watts for 8,150 gh/s or 8.15 th/s with 10 of them - but I think more if the asic boost is enabled, right? |
|
|
|
Either the listing is wrong or you are reading it wrong. First post of this thread has accurate efficiency info.
Just what the eBay ad said - I was sure it took more power than that, I was just commenting that if the ad was right - damn, I want a bunch of em lol for reference though, see the ad below where it says: Power Use (W): 8  |
|
|
|
|
950 gh with 8 watts? am I reading that right? the ebay posting states power as 8 watts. if you can get near a th for 8 watts... I need like 300 of these lol would only be 2400 watts
|
|
|
|
seems amazing that while the seller seems ticked that the deal is being reversed and buyer is being refunded - even to saying that they have shipped the item the day before but still never posted something which would simply validate the statement - a tracking number... also funny that on the same day they are posting & complaining about another seller not getting back to them... oh and did so on the date they claim they had no internet... i been pming about s9 over and over
i been pming about s9 over and over
I would be willing to escrow for you and op. Thanks lets get this done This is not going to be escrowed by me as seller wants
gold
bank transfer or
Usdt
yep and im out also i doubt anyone gets what they pay for here made the three posts above last night about trying to purchase miners - but could not post a tracking number for their own sale because: The item has shipped we were without internet all last night wtf? I guess ill just recall it and eat the shipping.........................................
Phil - this is a perfect example of why there are escrow services such as yourself. have you ever heard of recalling a shipment as i previously posted? Why would i give the tracking to the buyer after he has been refunded when he can simply have the item held by fedex for his pickup and not pay? Your not very smart. I am not smart? you recalled it after Phil was cancelling and after you said you had no internet all night - yet that same night you had no internet, you were here posting about buying 100 miners from someone else... we here are not as stupid as you keep calling us. when you were making the post about not having electricity, you could have posted the tracking number at that time or at the times during the night prior when you were posting about buying 100 miners. phil did not refund the btc until after you said you were recalling the package.... you wasted everyones time here. edit*** not to mention - posting the tracking - even if recalled would still prove it was shipped - tracking numbers do nothing but show where a package is at...where it came from...where it is going... oh and when it was sent... the lack of providing one does nothing but show you to be a liar. buyer already did his part. you did nothing but post excuses - many of them false - and provably false. In both this post and in other posts. Until you prove yourself, you have zero credibility here. all the people you are insulting have done what you have not done - establish credibility... |
|
|
|
now i am a scammer? wow so professional
you may want to re-read what he said. he said that he feels that 25% of deals that go bad are from scammers. he never said you directly. |
|
|
|
|
patrike -
thanks! it does now show the hash rate and thus the estimated revenue/profit for the BW L21 now - the only other thing I notice is that the pool that shows is the pool #2 - it does not show what pool the miner is actually on. for example, if I put one pool in - it shows nothing. If I put two pools in, it shows the second one, even if the miner is mining on the first one.
|
|
|
|
seems amazing that while the seller seems ticked that the deal is being reversed and buyer is being refunded - even to saying that they have shipped the item the day before but still never posted something which would simply validate the statement - a tracking number... also funny that on the same day they are posting & complaining about another seller not getting back to them... oh and did so on the date they claim they had no internet... i been pming about s9 over and over
i been pming about s9 over and over
I would be willing to escrow for you and op. Thanks lets get this done This is not going to be escrowed by me as seller wants
gold
bank transfer or
Usdt
yep and im out also i doubt anyone gets what they pay for here made the three posts above last night about trying to purchase miners - but could not post a tracking number for their own sale because: The item has shipped we were without internet all last night wtf? I guess ill just recall it and eat the shipping.........................................
Phil - this is a perfect example of why there are escrow services such as yourself. |
|
|
|
So the miners are currently sold out. I will write if we get any more.
Thank you, the whole community, for the wonderful experience!
Yeah we did power through this. Now lets hope for ltc to break 150 usd a coin. I predict 190 by halving |
|
|
|
does AM properly support the bw L21 miners? my AM detected the miners and shows that they are mining but the stats are all wrong - no temps, doesnt show pool info, the accepted shares are in the trillions with zero rejected and zero hw errors - it also does not show the hash rate.
This miner is supported, at least previous revisions of it. Even in the past this ASIC has always reported crazy number for the total number or share and total hashrate. What Awesome Miner do is to detect that it's a miner of this kind and then recalculate everything based on each individual ASIC device to get numbers that are accurate. It might be that more recent revisions of this ASIC is a bit different and Awesome Miner isn't able to detect it correctly. Could you please send me the API report (toolbar: Tools -> API Report) via mail or PM and I will see what changes they might have introduced and how to do another workaround. Thanks! pm sent with the API log Perfect - thanks for the log! I had to make a small adjustment to get Awesome Miner to detect this miner as a BW-L21. Once that detection was updated, it shows up fine. nice! so in a future update? Yes, it will be included in the next release. eta on that update? just so I know when to use AM again for looking at profitability - it currently puts me in the red due to the 3 miners showing as using power but with zero hash rate. it doesnt even show the right pool - maybe thats why the hash rate is zero... hmm, let me try to delete the second pool. nope that does not work. down in the bottom area where the summary area is, if i click asic it shows them hashing, it just doesnt translate up to the top. the top area seems to want the second pools information. but i cant leave pool one blank . I will soon make a release with the BW-L21 updates. With the changes I do see hashrate, accepted shares and pools displayed correctly. awesome and thank you! |
|
|
|
does AM properly support the bw L21 miners? my AM detected the miners and shows that they are mining but the stats are all wrong - no temps, doesnt show pool info, the accepted shares are in the trillions with zero rejected and zero hw errors - it also does not show the hash rate.
This miner is supported, at least previous revisions of it. Even in the past this ASIC has always reported crazy number for the total number or share and total hashrate. What Awesome Miner do is to detect that it's a miner of this kind and then recalculate everything based on each individual ASIC device to get numbers that are accurate. It might be that more recent revisions of this ASIC is a bit different and Awesome Miner isn't able to detect it correctly. Could you please send me the API report (toolbar: Tools -> API Report) via mail or PM and I will see what changes they might have introduced and how to do another workaround. Thanks! pm sent with the API log Perfect - thanks for the log! I had to make a small adjustment to get Awesome Miner to detect this miner as a BW-L21. Once that detection was updated, it shows up fine. nice! so in a future update? Yes, it will be included in the next release. eta on that update? just so I know when to use AM again for looking at profitability - it currently puts me in the red due to the 3 miners showing as using power but with zero hash rate. it doesnt even show the right pool - maybe thats why the hash rate is zero... hmm, let me try to delete the second pool. nope that does not work. down in the bottom area where the summary area is, if i click asic it shows them hashing, it just doesnt translate up to the top. the top area seems to want the second pools information. but i cant leave pool one blank . |
|
|
|
final edit :/ it had old firmware, i updated to the newest, it is now hashing away.
Nice catch! That has to be a relief you dont even know lol I was cursing up a storm thinking I was going to have send it back yet again... the only positive thing about it was that the air blowing out the backside of the miner was cold - wish that happened while it was hashing lol |
|
|
|
|
holy toldedo.... I was in bed and got woken up by someone pounding on my door - needless to say I was about to shoot someone... it was damn UPS delivering my T15 --- so I am going to go set it up and get back to ramping up!
didnt fully ramp down in the 3 weeks I was offline... went from 23 th/s to 7.23 th/s so with the increased hash, it hopefully wont take 3 weeks to ramp back up and I hope the pool hash stays this high. its nice having larger payouts with a smaller pool but it is also nice to see more blocks, even if payout is a little less.
miner is set back up and should show up soon.
well maybe not... it wont start, all I can tell from the logs is that it cannot get temp readings from the board and keeps getting an error - CRC ERROR = 59541
and it just starts over... has done this 4 times... dandy....
well the error code changes but its basically the same result, it restarts and goes thru the process again... something to do with something being "unbalanced"
If I have to send it back again - I should not have to pay the shipping again...
2019-06-10 05:03:43 freq_tuning.c:1111:freq_tuning_wait_recv_nonce: ++++ CRC ERROR = 49748
2019-06-10 05:03:43 freq_tuning.c:1051:freq_tuning_check_domain_unbalance: Check domain unbalance.
2019-06-10 05:03:43 freq_tuning.c:1081:freq_tuning_check_domain_unbalance: chain[2] domain[7] core_domain[1] unbalance: domain_nonce_num(496) <= unbalance_threshold(1220)
2019-06-10 05:03:43 freq_tuning.c:1081:freq_tuning_check_domain_unbalance: chain[2] domain[9] core_domain[1] unbalance: domain_nonce_num(645) <= unbalance_threshold(1220)
2019-06-10 05:03:43 freq_tuning.c:1773:freq_tuning_single_pre_test_for_user_mode: Pre-test: unbalance happened.
2019-06-10 05:03:43 znyq.c:193:set_reset_hashboard: set_reset_hashboard = 0x0000fff9
final edit :/ it had old firmware, i updated to the newest, it is now hashing away.
|
|
|
|
|
nice! a second block by 16vV8! let's hope he gets a hat trick eh?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
