Most of the exchanges have a minimal trading fees of about 0.25%
I see many people discussing trading fees here and there and that how high the trading fees is.
Does 0.25% really make a huge difference if you are earning at least more than 2% ?
The percentage actually doesnt matter, but if we talk about dollar and trading with big money, some people wont' be willing to give $100 dollar as a fee no matter how big their profit is. It's all just about greed. |
|
|
|
Usually this is often referred to as price manipulation, so that the price of coins among other places of exchange has a price difference with a very falling distance and like this provides a trap for fooled traders.
These prices are different simply because bitcoin price in pair to USD is also different on each market. So altcoin rate to Bitcoin would be also different. Usually, the difference isn't too big, if anyone find a big difference on it then it could be a manipulation or even a scan |
|
|
|
|
Seems, everything here needs momentum. You can't make much money without it.
Look back at 2017, when everything was hyped, people can easily make money from their investment, shit project owner can reach their fund goal easily. But then on 2018, crypto lost its momentum. People leave crypto, investors no longer investing. Shit projects still coming but got no enough funds.
That's all.
|
|
|
|
Even though bitcoin is the only true cryptocurrency, it does not mean that gambling sites should not accept other coins. It is gambling business, owner of gambling business should open their eyes and mind about the opportunity to make profit. If there is a good chance to make profit from other coins then why they need to stick on the one and only (btc)?
I have seen many whales who play with altcoins, they are wagering huge amount of altcoins so it is a big chance for any owners of gambling business to make profit from altcoins.
Of course you are right, but if they have no plan for now to add other crypto, it means they have something more important than adding other coins at this time. Nothing to worry, once they think it's good to add new coins and the right time is coming, they will absolutely do it. |
|
|
|
It's actually not that hard to have 0.01 Bitcoin, it is just you making it looks hard by choosing the hard way to earn Bitcoin. Go get a real job and I'm sure you can buy 0.01 Bitcoin in less than a month. You can easily have it. Dude!
Actually, it is quite hard these days especially those good old days are over where we can easily get bitcoin from faucets and other sites where we use to farm bitcoin where time is just needed to earn something like 0.01 BTC or even more in a week or so. This situation is hard for new starting people who wants to earn bitcoin entirely free [/quote] Let me say that you are just too naive to choose your way to earn it. Again, get a job and buy Bitcoin, why so hard? Also, nothing is completely free in this world. If something doesn't make you pay with money, it would surely make you pay with others. |
|
|
|
Thank you very much for your continued discussion of this issue.
Our current focus is on perfecting Bitcoin direct betting services.
We value the feedback from the community and have been paying attention to the voice of the community.
By doing that means you are ONLY promoting Bitcoin in the current time, helping Bitcoin to be used widely as tool to bet on your platform. It means you are more bitcoin fan than most people. It's okay for now and just stay focus to grow your business, you know what need to be done! Cheers! |
|
|
|
Agree with rijaljun, brand Ambassador don't need to a celebrities. Some project more prefer if their ambassador have deep knowledge in blockchain technology and the project detail.
That's why the Ambassador usually is someone from their community that already join for certain period and follow the project development.
If someone can promote their projects through world popular celebrities then it would also good, not sure which one is better. By paying celebrities, no need to spread the business per country or area but the whole world at once. Unfortunately, there is no new project that willing to pay celebrity, cause they are not even sure with their own project. |
|
|
|
1. Bounty program pays with native tokens, every details are there.
2. EUB and IteamFX programs pays in BTC, USD, EUR.
Bounty program mostly pays with tokens, so it's okay. Try to post on Services section and you would probably get the ambassadors you need. brand ambassadors are normally celebrities. But seems like you are only interested in barely legal adults that have no idea about what the color of their own shit is.
Why? seems like you are looking for dumb ambassadors.. not brand ambassadors..
It must be about budget, and as long as it can reach the goals, why not? |
|
|
|
Just because some crypto coin utilizes the blockchain doesn't make it secure or popular---a lot of coins have been attacked because of how insecure their networks are. It's a massive single point of failure.
If it's not popular then people won't use it for their business, either their business is a scam or legit, this is also supporting your own words, that : Blockchain is a buzzword to help businesses and scammers attract capital. I have never liked the idea behind a whole blockchain industry. It's 95% hype and 5% utility. One day that hype will lose its momentum....
Scammers won't be able to attract people if blockchain doesn't look enough secure, popular or whatever it is Bitcoin is known for its immensely powerful network---security that helps maintain its data integrity. I haven't seen many people praise Bitcoin because of it being a blockchain. People value Bitcoin's network.
You are right, in this matter. Still, none of us can'r deny the fact that Bitcoin is using blockchain, Bitcoin has its on blockchain. |
|
|
|
Guaranteed income of 5% per day, thanks to decentralized technologies of smart contract Ethereum!
The project was created on October 4, 2019.
can you tell me me your business secret? how could a newborn project guarantees 5% profit per day while a lot of projects out there, that been existing for couple months or even years could not even do that. You must be very genius person  |
|
|
|
fake volumes
That is just one thing of many that I worry about when I see a new exchange opening up. Doubtless they inflate their numbers, but I worry more about losing my crypto to an exit scam. That's why I only trade on the big name exchanges. Big exchanges do have a possibility to exit scam too, like everything could be a scam at the end. Take a little time for yourself to find historical stories and everything that brought us here, you would know that every company has an end and it's all just the matter of time. |
|
|
|
2140 is a long way to go. Assuming this, it might be an end for miners because mining was their way of their profit, there will be a sudden shift here.
Are you trying to say that it would be okay for Bitcoin to no longer have miners? Then, people will just move from Bitcoin to other crypto? Such a pessimistic thought. |
|
|
|
|
This made me remember when my friend asked my which one is the more important, Bitcoin or Blockchain.
Without blockchain, Bitcoin won't be enough decentralized. Meanwhile without bitcoin, blockchain would never be known well by most people.
|
|
|
|
In 2140 the block reward resets to 50, meaning BTC's inflation continues growing indefinitely, forever.
Is this a previously unknown Y2K style bug or just a fond fantasy? I enjoy discussing problems that won't need solving until we're all dead. I wish more problems were like this. Imagining what will happen after we're all dead is interesting cause we don't need to predict it correctly but that guy seems gone too far from the railway. |
|
|
|
0.10% taker fees, but
-0.05% maker that means you're paid 50% of the fees the taker pays.
I think it's a great thing for big volume traders. Also with the XCM token, they said there will be further discounts if you hold it (like BNB)
(a lot of other utility with XCM too, every fee inducing trade = 10-50% XCM bought and burned)
After reading the website, you are right it's 50% of the taker's fee, will be a bonus for the maker. Big volume traders, or whales might have a bit interesting opportunity from this but they will eventually face the withdrawal fee, comparing to some exchanges it seems low but when you want to withdraw big funds, you'll be charged a little more expensive. |
|
|
|
It is OK to continue the discussion as we do not know why they do not have a plan to add altcoins as alternative payment method while almost all other bitcoin gambling sites accepts some different altcoins based on user's interest/suggestion.
This platform is new, and with system they have it looks like not easy to handle. Things will improve by time and not every suggestion should be taken as decision. It's normal to give suggestions, but let's don't force them to take our suggestions cause everything needs time. Everything must be done is the most compliance way and time, to ensure success. |
|
|
|
I think people here already have their own favorite exchange to trade on and looks like they are not interested at all to a new exchange with a fake volumes I suggest you to stop using that kind of strategy to attract new users for your exchange, it will just make your exchange looks like a scam. |
|
|
|
I hope someday the crypto exchange will include various national currencies, so it not only provides crypto exchange but also exchange money between countries.
What do you mean? crypto exchanges should be only for crypto coins, why bother to add fiat-fiat pairs. And in small chance, if that happens then it's no longer called crypto exchange, right? |
|
|
|
Taker fees: 0.10%
Maker fees: -0.05%
(Makers are those who place orders into the book. So if you place an order in the book and it gets filled, you get paid 0.05% of the fee..!)
Still not worth for me, unless it's 0.05% from amount I have placed. 0.05% from 0.10% is 0.0000005% I'd rather use other exchanges with zero reward and you better to keep this reward for yourself to increase ability to compete, create better security and promotions. |
|
|
|
I think that every miner is well aware that Bitcoins will be completely mined one day so there will be no surprises. So it's logocal, there will be no need for miners no more in that narrow sense but people still will be making transactions so their share of profit will be stll available for them
The question is, will it be enough for miners to make profit? That's completely assuming that both parties will be using a centralized wallet. People use Coinbase for the same function, instantaneous and fee-less off-chain transactions from Coinbase wallet <-> Coinbase wallet. But what makes you say that people will use the same kinds of wallets in the future? That's why we have 2nd layer solutions like the Lightning Network. LN transactions are almost fee-less and instant, but will still be settled on-chain in finality.
only IF that happens. Actually, there are two things I want to focus on this thread - We always want pay fee as cheap as possible, but miners won't be happy about that
- IF in the future there are a lot centralized companies and most of us would be using their services, there will be less transaction no matter how expensive Bitcoin and its transaction fee is, also miners won't be happy about that
This topic was discussed in this forum many times already just read the other threads the have been listed above... anyway, simple answer is if the last bitcoin has been mined the transaction fees will be the payment for the miners since there is no block reward left to mine. Anyway, 2140 is very far we are dead if the last bitcoin supply mined don't bother about it.
I knew it even before creating this thread and I have put the reason on my previous reply (take a look some previous posts, don't just focus on the first post)). I bet you also have replied all of those threads with similar answers. You don't need to reply this thread if you don't want to join the discussion. Oh, you are spamming your signature... aren't you? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
