MaGNeT, I've just connected through TOR from a VM, "out-of-the-zip" except for proxy. It worked. I think the local IRC server of lfnet that you get directed to is not behaving well.
Try going through addnode route and enable DNS.
Also, try disabling UNPNP (noupnp=1 in the config) as it tends to upset some routers (I know all "coins" with UNPNP fucked with a Dlink router I had to use yesterday big time)
|
|
|
[coinhunter_emulation=1]
Geist Geld is the new black!
It's more solid than solidcoin, because it has:
1) Even f4ster blocks! No blocks are faster then our fast blocks! Actually true - blocks are faster in GG
2) Even more secure, VITAL SECURITY HOLES PLUMBED AND PLUGGED !1! (actually, that is a fact, since GG is the first chain to fix a hole that allows a sufficiently massive attacker to "send blocks into the past" thus screwing with retargeting algorithms, though I can't claim credit for the discovery or the fix - all the credit goes to Art )
3) Both pool-friendly and pool-safe, which is at least twice more best than merely pool-safe (has no questionable asymetric retargets, but, thanks to very fast blocks, quickly recovers from even major swings in difficulty due to big boys arriving and leaving)
4) Allows for escrow transactions out-of-the-box! (It really does)
5) Has NTP that is at least bilionteen times better than that seen in i0coin ! (Fact)
[coinhunter_emulation=0]
Haha, this actually made me laugh More importantly, every statement can be demonstrated to be generally true
|
|
|
Getting an IRC recv failed:10060 error, doesn't work. Still getting this error. Downloaded the GeistGeld_new, changed user/pass for miner and can't connect to IRC channel (it seems?). Try turning on DNS in the config. Meanwhile, you can do addnode=<IP>:7769 with the following IPs if else fails: 173.238.168.52 205.185.188.37 90.176.64.166 I'm testing it once again "out of the box" on a vm through TOR right now EDIT: basically, the IRC server ain't not talking to you it seems. That's odd. Try turning on DNS and add a bunch of IPs above (with port, just to be sure)
|
|
|
Trying solo, i get a couple of accepts then straight to all rejects? anyone else?
What hash rate ? What hard and what soft ? What block number does "getinfo" display ?
|
|
|
[coinhunter_emulation=1]
Geist Geld is the new black!
It's more solid than solidcoin, because it has:
1) Even f4ster blocks! No blocks are faster then our fast blocks! Actually true - blocks are faster in GG
2) Even more secure, VITAL SECURITY HOLES PLUMBED AND PLUGGED !1! (actually, that is a fact, since GG is the first chain to fix a hole that allows a sufficiently massive attacker to "send blocks into the past" thus screwing with retargeting algorithms, though I can't claim credit for the discovery or the fix - all the credit goes to Art )
3) Both pool-friendly and pool-safe, which is at least twice more best than merely pool-safe (has no questionable asymetric retargets, but, thanks to very fast blocks, quickly recovers from even major swings in difficulty due to big boys arriving and leaving)
4) Allows for escrow transactions out-of-the-box! (It really does)
5) Has NTP that is at least bilionteen times better than that seen in i0coin ! (Fact)
[coinhunter_emulation=0]
Ooof, being coinhunter is actually pretty tough... I wouldn't want that as fulltime job...
|
|
|
Are you able to prevent the previous exploits? Is there anything to keep someone from overpowering the network again? I understand why you rebooted the chain, but if it is just going to keep happening then what is the point?
The answer to this question is yes. A "51%" attacker is still capable of doing what a 51-er is supposed to be capable of doing (double-spends, and, if huge enough, rewrites), but should not be able to arbitrarily manipulate difficulty to his advantage without invalidating blocks. Also, new adjustment limits make diff adjustment smoother, without random "spikes" that occasionally unnerved people in previous version, though the cost is somewhat less rapid response to large alterations in difficulty (don't worry, not as bad as namecoin a couple of minutes as opposed to tens of seconds) I'll take some too! Will post my address in two minutes.
Oky, standing by for addresses
|
|
|
I want some geistgeld! Can you reserve some for me untill i get home to find my address please?
Lol, sure thing, I'll set aside about half for you and half for whomever else claims and posts adress oke ?
|
|
|
Getting an IRC recv failed:10060 error, doesn't work. BTW, I am giving away the Geists I mined today (except for the bounty/laundry "fund" of course ) which is 1407 Geists. Hurry to be the first to apply, ^__^ Something must be awry... I have been successfully mining on my bitcoind and it says we are at 205 blocks. You'd have mined 201 blocks for those 1407 Geists... but I know that is not possible because of my own balance. When I started (about an hour ago) it was on block ~25. Am I on the wrong blockchain or what? Using the Linux compiled from GitHub and the bitcoin.conf in your recent "reboot" post. Strange, you might be on some chain fork or something (I did, however, change the magic numbers so old geists wouldn't talk with new ones so dunno where could that fork come from ) 200 something blocks were pre-mined (No 200 is a checkpoint), from the top of my head 201 (hence 1407 Geists) but if I actually pre-mined 205 (they could have been caught while I was reaching for the guiminer icon, lol) then I'll add 28 to the "forum fund" lol Try using the chunk of chain found in the "blockchain+conf" folder in git if oddity persists.
|
|
|
BTW, I am giving away the Geists I mined today (except for the bounty/laundry "fund" of course ) which is 1407 Geists. Hurry to be the first to apply, ^__^
|
|
|
Is there a pool yet?
Hopefully
|
|
|
Okay, the lead of "yes" group is obvious. Geist restart inevitable, stand by for more info
|
|
|
Well, from personal experience ArtForz is a very civilized and helpful individual who will gladly help out in tightening stuff up and patching vulnerabilities in Bitcoin.
Fixed it for you *Looks at new and improved Geist code* *Looks at Spacy* *Looks at new and improved Geist code* *Looks at Spacy* *Looks at new and improved Geist code* *Looks at Spacy* Um, dude... ...I think you're not supposed to smoke your giga-hashes
|
|
|
Well, from personal experience ArtForz is a very civilized and helpful individual who will gladly help out in tightening stuff up and patching vulnerabilities.
|
|
|
I'd like to remind everyone that Gavin, with all due respect, is not an angry deity and can neither drown people he vaguely disapproves of nor feed them to the lo(l)custs.
|
|
|
I like the term "poison namecoins"
Reminds me of those pesky poison critters from Half-Life games.
|
|
|
*Lolcust is away to make himself some BitcoinEXpress accounts on Solidcoin forums* :-P
|
|
|
Where in the code does it prevent the addition of bignums with OP_ADD?
ByteCoin
Now that's the spirit
|
|
|
Well, personally, I'd prefer to see flaccidcoin stepped on due to general grating attitude of "We fixed up MAJOR VULNERABILITY IN BITCOINSIZ, LOLZ" the SolidCoin dude demonstrated, but I guess it's too low hanging a fruit or something...
|
|
|
|