wtf did you guys do? ~1% stale rate on fast blocks?
that's unheard of. lol.
Well, I'm running GG with long-polling in the client. Once the RPC is sped up it should be less. Stales are still a bit high for my taste... GG you run includes full Joel suite, so it should include all the things that are there. However, I do have a lingering suspicion that some more corners can be cut to get stales lower. Anyways, for 15s blocks, not bad, IMHO.
|
|
|
We'll have two poolz ? Yo!
Don't forget that you will need specialsauce Geist running on ye pool.
It's in the github.
|
|
|
Up again. Probably noobs hitting it with GG
|
|
|
You keep saying that you're going to hire coders with the premined coins, but that you're also going to keep them off the market. Which part of " part is for coders and project-usefull stuffs, but the biggest part will be confined to a laundry buffer forever" do you find confusing ? [ANNOUNCE] Tenebrix2, a CPU-friendly, GPU-hostile cryptocurrecy with no premined coins Honestly, the name with 2 is lame. Ten0brix is funnier. Your chain would die within 48 hours. I can sort of relate to the distaste premining causes in some people (hence my agreement to voluntarily part with a solid chunk of Superfund and stuff it in an automatic dispenser for late adopters), but the "premining kills" argument simply does not correspond to what can be plainly seen.
|
|
|
Dunno. It definitely compiles for linux, even horrible linux such as CentOs (though that victory is not mine to claim, thx. Pidgeons for this )
When I finish messing with TBX daemon I will look into GG linuxcoin woes.
P.S.: I blame wxwidget dependency
Look into it.
|
|
|
There is no need for caution or humility in my statements, because I know I am right.
I stopped reading after that part. Go take a long walk off a short cliff. But I am right, Matthew. And I am Satoshi. Maybe if I will post it a million times it will get a million times more true, right ? You will not find anyone who practices Federal Law in the US that will give a qualified legal opinion contrary to what I have stated. Yes, because you can provide us with such a person's opinion, signed and in writing, right here ? You edited your first post after you restarted the blockchain. Hell, you edited it several times in between starts
Fortunately, moderatorz have all of them edits sitting in the DB, so you can PM them and settle this for good. You aren't Satoshi. This claim is problematic to prove or disprove Everyone can actually be Satoshi, nobody knows where he is or what he's up to. He has become a Spiritus Loci They do not deserve to spend time in a prison for your greed tho Worry not, they won't, because your opinion is not of a court or legal expert, and hardly of any merit (they should of course talk to a real attorney at law, that never hurts) Good day to you, sir.
|
|
|
Okay, I'll believe you for now. Thanks. Also, you may take a look at my other baby (it has blockexplorer and exchange, Geist Geld is the name) and observe a distinct lack of "lolcust scurries to sell off" It's just that one person owning a huge stash of TBX may be dangerous, not only because it reeks of centralization which goes against the principle of the Bitcoin and all the related forks, but because if that person were to lose his TBX somehow, that would be 7,700,000 TBX gone for good. Well, it does have a whiff of centralization to it, but so do blockchain lockins. If I accidentally destroy the encrypted thumbie I hold that wallet on, it will not cause the market to collapse since coins destroyed != coins sold. But that would of course impact my ability to run a laundry and hire coders So I keep it really, really safe I would suggest at least to spread them around a bit, so it wouldn't be one person with a huge stash of TBX, but few people with relatively huge stashes of TBX. (think, mining pool, faucet, misc. funding, et cetera.)
1) Faucet is decided upon, as above 2) Paying them coderz counts as spreading around, methinks 3) Paying "bounties" to exchanges and services also counts as spreading around I hope. I could start a twitter campaign to increase the spreading, but that reeks of spam, and I don't like that at all Preferably now is limited by my relatively humble capacity at fixin' up linux makefiles. Worry not, I have already called for backup.
|
|
|
Actually, botnets leave bitcoin alone and go here (making it easier for Gavin to establish bitcoin as a fair and law-abiding not-really-money-but-kinda-like-something-like-that payment thingie) Except when they have GPU-machines, then they stick with BTC
|
|
|
That's still ~97% of all the brix existing at the moment, so I don't think it's a huge overstatement.
the coins never enter the market, or they do by taking used coins off the market. The laundry is tenebrix's 'killerapp', it's what sets it apart from the other coins. Exactimundo! Also, the "non laundry" part ensures there is a "coder reward reserve" for quick response to issues, and allows me to give them exchange people "liquidity bounty" they demand (do note that I always work with the exchange that asks for smallest one) You know what, I've got a Linux daemon to fix so we can have a pool, a faucet and an exchange. I will donate 1.5 mils[EDITED: scratch that, let it be 2 mils] to the faucet so that my stash is no longer obnoxiously big and doesn't rub the eye of SEMH folks and "sport competitive" people so much. I hope that kills the premining crab.
|
|
|
That's still ~97% of all the brix existing at the moment, so I don't think it's a huge overstatement.
Again. Diamonds. DeBeers. Owners of mega-stashes have no interest in selling off because their stashes aren't just "big", they are MEGA. Besides, I need most of those moneys for the laundry buffer, not for hookers & blow (and I need a smaller portion of those money to hire better programmers than myself, and pay bounties to exchanges and such) I am perfectly okay with reducing my stash in a manner that will benefit late-adopters (faucet) and reduces the amount of distaste people have for the fund (since it will be, in effect, smaller), but methinks that destroying superfund completely is a mite questionable, due to system opportunity loss.
|
|
|
The problem with poll is that it is, by design, abusable by people who strongly dislike Tenebrix (for deploying a CPU-friendly Cryptothing with a premined fuckton before they deployed their CPU-friendly cryptothing with premined fuckton and honest to god racket built in ~__^)
I am still thinking about how to best go about it.
It's still better than one person deciding everything. "Everything" is a huge overstatement. Also, I doubt that a weak poll is necessarily better.
|
|
|
Glad yo found your Geists. Don't forget to remove the rescan thingie now that they are found, rescanning tends to hit performance a lot.
|
|
|
Just checked the Block Explorer - didn't found it. So I type -rescan in the control tab ?
Hm, no https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Running_Bitcoinshut down GG, add a line saying into the config, and start back up. Hopefully, your coins will get found in the BC
|
|
|
Yeah, silly me. Something else happened, my attempt to send last of my coins finished with crash to the GG client ( 15 minutes ago ). My coins are gone, but they're not in the exchange account yet . Hope they'll come eventually...
Hm. Check them up with GG blockexplorer. If they don't show up in blockexplorer, then all you need is to do a -rescan because the blockchain didn't "get" you.
|
|
|
Yes, the TBX generation will be infinite, but still doesn't warrant premining 7.7 million coins and keeping them for yourself, because simply having such stash of coins may demotivate people from mining How so, if I don't sell ? Does the DeBeers diamond megastash demotivate people from mining and refining diamonds to make a profit ? Do the goldbugs somehow demotivate gold-producing companies by their massive bullion hoards ? No sense, that claim makes. But I am, like I said, willing to move a portion of the fund out of my control and into a full-auto community-beneficial project, just to alleviate some of the distaste. However, since what has been done is done, you should just put up the suggested poll and see what should be done.
The problem with poll is that it is, by design, abusable by people who strongly dislike Tenebrix (for deploying a CPU-friendly Cryptothing with a premined fuckton before they deployed their CPU-friendly cryptothing with premined fuckton and honest to god racket built in ~__^) I am still thinking about how to best go about it.
|
|
|
Spirow, with "getaccountaddress <username_in_the_.conf_file" in the control tab. And one from me, I'm trying to send some GGs to the exchange, but I get the "type mismatch" error. I write : sendtoaddress <address> <ammount> in the Send_GG tab, right ? edit: got it. No need for "sendtoaddress" command... The whole point of SEND tab is to remove the need to type "sendtoaddress" That's why it says "Please input destination address AND ammount" when you use it.
|
|
|
check "listtransactions" and ensure you have incoming open.
Did you mine in pool or solo ? You'd better be using the GG pool (simplecoin.us) because diff is growing fasssst
|
|
|
Spacy=>smellsFish=>postsAssumption
Fixed it for you You forgot a space between <ass> and <umption>
|
|
|
Lolcust => startChain => premineMillions => promote => findStupids => Profit Spacy=>searchEvidence=>ifNotFound=>make claim
|
|
|
It's the guiminer. Some AV treat all non-whitelisted mining code as virii - many alts have that issue
|
|
|
|