Bullshit, bumping services are a plague and having tags for offering them...what are they to be "proudly worn"?.
I tag people with red, usually before they scam and irrespective if I'm in Default Trust or not, without having legal standard proof of them being scammers.
I reckon my retrospective accuracy rate is 99%. If people don't take any notice, that's their choice.

It comes with the "scam buster" territory.
I've been threatened a few times with "legal action" and worse, most notably by one of the biggest scammers of 2016 (he certainly had enough [of other people's] money) to do so, if there was any reasonable chance of it succeeding. But he didn't.

---

OP, your trust is a bit of a dent to your credibility.
 I don't particularly want to inspire a big self justification reply from you, (I certainly hold the ICO support services industry as culpable as the actual scammers for enabling them) but this was pretty dumb.....

AFAIK Bruno got his 7 day wrist slap for consecutive posting after being warned not to keep doing it.

Futures markets were originally designed for "hedging" commodity prices, so that producers could plan and lock in a profit and buyers budget for their material costs while the actual "real" goods were on a boat somewhere.
I wouldn't be surprised if Bitcoin miners have been hedging their production by shorting futures since the bear market started (and derivative crypto trading became easier) and then simultaneously closing the shorts and selling the "physical" bitcoins as they mine them.
As Bitcoin isn't a consumable commodity in that original sense, there aren't the counterparty hedge purchases being done, only speculative buying (or not).

The next few hours will be crucial.^tm

Given the weakness in equities, I'm a bit disappointed that there doesn't appear to be any "safe haven" hedging role for Bitcoin.

D'ya think? Looks like he lost his GSOH on the way, then.
Troll account?
Not really, more like a Bitcoin Skeptic account: that's allowed, isn't it?

So, at the bottom of your page it says

Safecap is/was part of Teddy Sagi's markets.com operation. They don't mention excoinet anywhere.

Then your "About" page says
Your embedded link is dead, but Thyregod appear to be a small Danish VC operation. They don't list you as a client/venture anywhere.

Where are you?
Your FB says
Your site says

And who is "Thomas Mcdonald, founder and CEO of Excoinet.com" and in what possible business plan is paying 10% over the odds for a widely traded asset a rational idea?

According to bgf's T&C's(which are a mismatched font cut and paste), bitgoldenfx seems to be a trading name of Lead Capital Markets Ltd

Lead Capital Markets Ltd, however, doesn't seem to list bitgoldenfx as a trading name anywhere I could find.
They have minimal web traffic 1,458 monthly web visitors. and Lead Trade Ltd, a trading subsidiary, last year renounced (or was it pushed?) its CySec authorisation and
This may be related to accusations of stealing clients money thru its Top Option.com subsidiary and/or some fuckery in Romania for which it was fined by CySec.
What all this means in the Great Scheme of Things is unclear (apart from the known fact that Cyprus is a financial slum), but there doesn't appear to a direct, externally provable link between BGF and LCM.
That, coupled with the unsubstantiated claim
and the fake testimonials indicate to me that there's absolutely no reason to use or trust Bitgoldenfx.

The most recent thoughts of our Esteemed Leader that I could find about DT were in reply to a proposal to include Level 3 by default setting (as I vaguely recall it being in the Old Days).
 

Well, the only logical way to do that would be to promote selected level D2's to D1, they in turn would bring their currently included DT3's into Level 2. It seems reasonable to think that, if you believe the overall system has value and integrity, that is the only way that any sort of quality control could be maintained.
How to select which current DT2 members for upgrade from the current 200 odd is another matter. Two choices that I can see: either those  currently included by the most DT1's, or by centralized dictat.


Yes. Apart from the hijack/hack danger, trust is dynamic not static.

Theymos confirmed that the satoshin@gmx.com address was compromised over four years ago, after he received this email from it
 
He (Theymos) suggests in that thread that the GMX address may have expired and been re registered, but there's no evidence to suggest that that's possible. I've had many GMX addresses over the years and don't think it is.

That was also the registered access address for the P2pfoundation account which Satoshi used and where the OMG what does it mean???
message was posted on 29th November.
The only marginally interesting aspect for me is that was where the " I am not Dorian Nakamoto" post was made, so it must have come from the hacker.
Someone ask Prof Faustus, he should know.....

Multi Level Marketing is ideal for only one thing, providing the opportunity for lying and misrepresentation of substandard or non existent products to profit from gullible "downline" investors, often family and friends.
It is unfit for purpose in today's communication world, far too expensive for legitimate product promotion, the only benefit being 'plausible deniability' of the endemic false claims of profitability made by the so-called independent marketeers.
Any crypto schemes that offer an MLM structure should be treated with even more caution than usual.

Rockminer.... that name certainly brings back memories for older members of the forum, and not necessarily good memories either.
But anyway, that AMHash drama was all a long time ago (in cryptoland time anyway), over three years.....
I thought the brand ROCKMINER would have been so toxic after that episode and the behavior of the principals involved so poor, plus the fact that Rockminer were broke and not making anything, that the name would have been dropped as useless.
The next time I heard of Rockminer being mentioned was when I was researching the Gainbitcoin cloudmining scam and the thief and scammer Amit Bhardwaj came out as having bought 40% of the Rockminer company, two years ago, thru his fraudulent company Amaze Mining..



Yes, only two years ago, within "2-3 months," he claimed that

(Which turned out to be 10% less than Bitmain's S9 chips).

Your own version of your timeline doesn't include Mr. Bhardwaj's investment though. Why is that?



In that short period of time, Rockminer claim to have built a huge business




What I find most impressive is that you have been able to build this huge conglomerate without the Internet noticing at all.
Google "Rockminer" and see what I mean.
Apart from the newly revitalized Rockminer.com site at the top, your first page is ancient reviews of 2014 hardware, not one single mention, not a press release, not a review, of all the massive expansion you claim into the realms of
Nothing apart from your Twitter account that is, which has a four year silence until this August.
When I say "without the Internet noticing" (further example, the Wayback Machine shows nothing for four years), I guess maybe that's what people mean when they refer to the 'Great Firewall': a Chinese company like Rockminer can bring itself back from the dead and grow into a major player in the Bitcoin world without the West knowing about it at all?

---

This seems to be a strange time strategically to be actively expanding cloud mining activity, when it's estimated that something like 500,000 S9's equivalent have stopped mining BTC during the recent price and difficulty drop.
Presumably you feel confident to be able to deliver a profitable service, seeing as you claim to be mining with
machines.
Which would they be, as you only list Avalon 841's as the most efficient on your shop page (insecure btw), and they are not 75W/T?

This was the only point of this thread, so that the newbie account could slip in this recommendation for his scam site as part of the "discussion".

Could someone explain to me what this means, in the context of the very small number of token holders?

It shows how shallow their initial comments were, just blind endorsements (for money, probably).
Also the recommendation to "get more advisors if you want to be successful"....
At best these self proclaimed experts and their views are not credible, at worst they are part of a corrupt self serving system.

Welcome to Bitcointalk v. 2 (paid spam)
Don't read shit, just churn out 80 words for a few sats.

The OP is a shining example of the shallow thinking going on in the UK right now, especially amongst the xenophobes and neocons circling the soon to be post Brexit UK carcass, all trying to work out how they can grub some personal advantage out of it.

This is a good example of the level at which the bar is being set here.
Anything you don't agree with (even though you haven't read it), is FUD. What is "random" about it, surely it's a carefully crafted part of the Conspiracy to Enslave Britain?
We're talking Trump Tactics here: if you don't like it, just yell "Fake News!"

I mean, c'mon, speak English.
You're saying that because the Governor of the BofE was born in a certain country, therefore economic modelling done by the Bank should...what?  

The "brexit scenario", what is the "brexit scenario"? How has the "brexit scenario" taught anyone anything in itself?
If that means you have been inspired to cherry pick some factoids to support your personal prejudices, then all you have been taught is not to be so ignorant in the first place.

Once again, empty rhetoric.
"Anything but"? That means "not at all".
If you make any deal, it's two way. If you're part of an organization of any sort, it's two way. Having an obligation to deliver your side is not loss of independence, it's rational self interest. Or are you talking about bent bananas and Daily Mail euromyths?

That's always a great basis on which to dismiss something. About on the level of my six year old who won't eat potatoes because they "look funny".

Ignoring the perils of just looking at headlines, why would it do that? There's always a bit of pain mixed in with gain, and if the UK is going to enter its second Golden Age when freed of the federalist EU blahblah shackles, then it will be a good test of that British Bulldog spirit which Made Us Great.

So it's not random FUD after all?

That's over a million more people out of jobs.
A million poorer customers for local shops and businesses.
A million more Universal Credit claims.

When their asset values collapse, borrowers default. When property prices fall, construction stops. There are 3 million jobs in the UK construction industry.

You "invest" money in a bank??
Interest rate rises are a bit further reaching in effect than just on your current account. Think deflation of the economy,


"strength of the banks"? Isn't that just more Bank of England random propaganda?
Systemic collapses are nonlinear. The reassurance that the banking industry has absorbed sufficient free QE "money" to survive certain modelling is meaningless in terms of the potentially huge societal impact of Brexit and related isolationist policies.
No-one "knows" what will happen post Brexit, no-one knows what sort of Brexit there will be: shouting fud and sticking your fingers in your ears is the best you can you?

10% a day?

Start with $1, reinvest your profit and after one year you will have

$1,283,305,580,313,384.50

Easy.
 

Something DeLoittes can audit, you mean?
Remember the DeLoittes audit?

Or if you look at the Big Picture, after the blip caused by the Industrial Revolution, normal service (Chinese world dominance) is being resumed..



note x axis compression.