^^^ There's a relationship between temperature and pressure, this means that cold air at high altitudes is more dense than warm air close to the surface.



edit:

Perfect Gas Law:

   "This law is a generalization containing both Boyle's law and Charles's law as special cases and states that for a specified quantity of gas, the product of the volume v and pressure p is proportional to the absolute temperature t; i.e., in equation form, pv = kt, in which k is a constant." -- https://www.britannica.com/science/perfect-gas

^^^ Just don't forget to mention refraction! That illustration is great at getting the point across but, it omits refraction and is in fact a variation on the original Eratosthenes experiment using more sticks. If you don't understand that, a shill can use real world observations to claim he's measuring a curve. The shill will be able to embarrass you while at the same time convince any observers that the globe has been proven. Be warned the illustration comes from the controlled opposition group The Flat Earth Society.

In reality refraction produces a lensing effect that causes image distortion. The distortion is at a maximum closest to the horizon and at a minimum directly above you creating a concave lens. After passing through this atmospheric lens the image of the Sun will project shadows that can be interpreted as proving a globe if, the lens is omitted (an act of deception) during calculation.

^^^ Thanks for the copy & paste, fucking retard.

A close small Sun with divergent rays over a flat surface yields the same results. You can add a 3rd stick but after refraction is factored in the results are consistent with a flat earth and falsify the globe.

Fuck, I just made multiple posts addressing this issue; it's the same aether drift as measured in the M&M experiment. This is what the fiberoptic gyro is picking up and just as documented in the M&M experiment it can't account for the missing displacement predicted by the Copernican model.

"The Experiments on the relative motion of the Earth and aether have been completed and the result decidedly negative. The expected deviation of the interference fringes from the zero should have been 0.40 of a fringe – the maximum displacement was 0.02 and the average much less than 0.01 – and then not in the right place. As displacement is proportional to squares of the relative velocities it follows that if the ether does slip past the relative velocity is less than one sixth of the earth’s velocity." -- Albert Abraham Michelson, 1887

The clowns behind the curve the movie are a bunch of Jews charging $9.99 on iTunes for the privilege of watching them slander the truth.




The difference is God isn't invisible just really tall, that and there's a barrier blocking the view. Dark matter on the other hand is made up bullshit to explain why observations don't match the predictions made by the current astronomical model.

Actually I've been tinkering with electro-mechanical machines, magnets and circuits for a long time now. The LHC is a big multi-purpose electromagnet. They do some experiment, apply some buzzword to centuries old fluid mechanic equations describing the aether and everybody is baffled by all the bullshit. They've got a facade of mathematical equations plastered to the output of two atoms smashed together; these guys are doing other shit with all that hardware.

^^^ How do you plan on proving that dark matter isn't comprised entirely of giant invisible pink elephants? You're a filthy animal rolling around in his own crapulence!

Science can't explain observations being made because they're actually pseudoscience muggles. They invent matter that can't be seen, and energy that can't be measured all while claiming they've made a new discovery. Of course the person who originally reported the inconsistency gets told to fuck off.

Not all of the "scientists" out there are retarded pseudoscience lolcows, some of them are very clever and well organized criminals who understand how things work. There's a correct version for the chosen people and some broken or fucked version for the goyim animals, that's how shit works.

An open reply to: https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucedorminey/2019/02/26/flat-earthers-and-climate-change-deniers-beware-new-book-has-your-number/

Dark Energy and Dark Matter aren't some kind of recent discoveries that deserve praise or honorable mention. They're pseudoscience claiming a giant invisible pink elephant is sitting on the scale they're using to weigh the lights in the sky. Get rid of the fucking Copernican model, patching it up with giant invisible pink elephants or more recently the "discovery" that the Moon is actually inside Earth's atmosphere is a joke.  

Honestly, you fags at Forbes seem to have trouble distinguishing between pseudoscience denial and science denial. I'm going to fucking deny there's giant invisible pink elephants in the sky, I'm going to deny their trunks are holding onto invisible black holes keeping them from flying apart! You guys give out financial advice with your heads that far up your own assholes, seriously?

Hey NPC's guess what, your programming has been modified! Check it out, your new orders are that the Moon is now within the Earth's atmosphere:

Hey Igor there's something else you should be aware of, the earth is flat and space is fake!

^^^ What he's trying to say is that if we assume that planets are giant heavy spinning balls in a vacuum that orbit and, are illuminated by a million mile wide Sun that's both a giant spinning ball and a thermonuclear bomb (just plain old fire in Galileo's day) that never stops exploding then, the phases of Venus can be misconstrued as supporting this ridiculous model. Galileo observed that Venus had phases and proved nothing.

The Earth is flat, motionless and covered by an electrified and optically reflective golden dome. We are inside a high-tech engineered structure and, the celestial objects Sun, Moon, stars, etc.., are close, small projected lights that are nothing but holograms.

Galileo proved nothing, prove me wrong!

1. With respect to the static aether.
2. The attempt to explain the results with relativity were falsified by the Sagnac experiment, more specifically the Dufour & Prunier replication in which a rotating frame of reference was accounted for. So yes, a motionless Earth with a static aether have been proven experimentally.

We've been going around the merry-go-round riding a dead horse for 132 years, have you seen the Monty Python episode with the parrot? The globe hasn't been a viable scientific argument since the 19th century!

^^^ A maximum displacement of 0.02 is a negative result no matter how you skin it. You're obviously some kind of animal if you can't accept this result; rejection of imperial measure does not follow from logic.


you: "The readings are non-zero!"

me: "The interferometer is so ridiculously sensitive that it's picking up the motion of the stars sweeping past us. The cycle measured is 23h 56m (sidereal time), does the Earth no-longer rotate once every 24 hours?"

you (I know you're too much of an animal to articulate this so I'll help you out): "the Earth rotates once every 24 hours with respect to the Sun and, once every 23h 56m with respect to the stars."

me: "You've already deviated from logic when you rejected the direct measurement made by the Michelson interferometer, it's little wonder you claim the Earth rotates twice with two separate periods."

you: [NO RESPONSE]

me: A fatal flaw in the heliocentric model exposed i.e the requirement of a single physical object to make two separate rotations simultaneously, on top of showing the model is falsified by direct measurement.

you: [NO RESPONSE]

me: "He's dead Jim."

Jim: "The NPC was never truly alive."

^^^ We're going to use the fact my sandals adhere with Velcro to discredit the M&M experiment are we?

   The M&M experiment was reproduced with modern equipment by the UASF in 1984 and the results are still negative. The Earth is motionless and yet we have shitheads running around screaming the displacement measured and I quote, "The expected deviation of the interference fringes from the zero should have been 0.40 of a fringe – the maximum displacement was 0.02", the same displacement (aether drift) measured by modern fiberoptic and ring-laser gyroscopes somehow proves Earth's rotation?

I've got an idea, how about the liars go rope themselves instead of asking money for a shitty documentary that's intended to slander the truth?

Albert Michelson is the man, Albert Einstein was the Jew! Your fucking smartphone wouldn't be smart if it didn't use aether displacement in it's Sagnac interferometer, just FYI.



Bonus:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.flatearthsun ($4.09)

Vs.

https://itunes.apple.com/movie/behind-the-curve/id1439651893?ls=1 ($9.99)

Vs.

Dr. Scholl's Men's Gaston Fisherman Sandal Brown ($55.01)

... [VOMIT REDACTED] ...


How about I show the findings of the Michelson–Morley experiment instead of giving money to Jews for a documentary intended to slander the truth?

"The Experiments on the relative motion of the Earth and aether have been completed and the result decidedly negative. The expected deviation of the interference fringes from the zero should have been 0.40 of a fringe – the maximum displacement was 0.02 and the average much less than 0.01 – and then not in the right place. As displacement is proportional to squares of the relative velocities it follows that if the ether does slip past the relative velocity is less than one sixth of the earth’s velocity." -- Albert Abraham Michelson, 1887

This "displacement" with "the average much less than 0.01" is what fiber-optic and ring-laser gyroscopes are measuring. It was first measured by Michelson by in 1887 and constitutes a NULL "decidedly negative" result, it's too small! The Earth is motionless!

^^^ When something is purposefully labeled science in order to trick a stupid animal it's called pseudoscience. An animal doesn't possess the critical thinking skills need to debunk the shit he's being fed and just eats it up.

^^^ Face it you're a confused NPC i.e. a goyim, most likely a shitty one.

They're asking for money (fiat for a digital product?) to watch a shitty "hit piece" documentary and I'm, neither subscribed to any of the above video on demand services, nor am I willing to pay, especially in fiat.

---

---

The Netflix documentary Behind the Curve isn't available to me.

Netflix: nope,
iTunes: nope,
Prime Video (Amazon): nope,
Youtube (paid): nope,
Google Play: nope.

Bonus:


Trinity and Beyond: The Atomic Bomb Movie (1995) -- https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114728/

^^^