Chomsky  Which one is it, corporatism needs the nanny state? Or keeping the nanny state small leads to corporatism? Neither, he's Libertarian Socialist. I think opposition to privately owned business property might be barking up the wrong tree, but at least that Chomsky guy seems to give morality priority ahead of political ideology. I'm not so sure. RP treated people with no insurance. Noam's lectures however, aren't exactly open to the public. |
|
|
|
I feel something in the air.
I don't know what it is, but it feels "different".
I feel like we are about to experience a paradigm shift.
We need a trailer park boys clip here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pvm-n6gwPCY |
|
|
|
Here in New Zealand, police corruption is getting worse by the month.
Im a victim myself of corruption/brutality.
During a police pursuit of which, yes I initiated in my WRX... I lost control of the wrx, jumped out and ran down the highway and into some bushes.
Ok, I don't think I care what you wrote afterwards. And good luck having any business here with a such attitude. You can tell where these guys are from. You say you run into the bushes, they say you are guilty for anything else uniformed gang members choose to do to you later. |
|
|
|
https://quantiger.wordpress.com/2012/06/29/why-bitcoin-is-doomed/tl;dr : Suppose I have 10 bitcoins. If I want to loan you money, I have to actually give these coins to you! Where's the profit in that? Ridiculous. Note to quantiger: you can still defraud investors. Happy now? haha! [/captain haddock] reposted here for the lulz
|
|
|
|
|
Good points.
It's not all doom and gloom however.
These problems mean that when an operation gets too big, cold wallets get too large, it presents a target (from the outside and the inside). Such operations will have trouble getting new customers to leave funds there as customers are wary of this risk. Thus, these bugs with bitcoin (too much like a suitcase of money) are really another feature: to encourage a healthy ecosystem with many players and nobody getting too large.
Sadly we are also going to see a lot people getting suckered by spam extortion.
BTW I will destroy the entire bitcoin network unless there are 100 coins at this address by noon tomorrow:
1dontbeasucker123456789
|
|
|
|
being an Anarchist/Social Libertarian
so you aren't shocked of savage (Bitcoin powered) free markets like Chomsky is? OMG!! Chomsky Which one is it, corporatism needs the nanny state? Or keeping the nanny state small leads to corporatism? Well we all have off days, lets hope it's not senility or blind obeisance by his groupies. Or maybe I am missing the subtext and he is deliberately contradicting himself to make some kind of point? |
|
|
|
|
I go for instant buyout at 21 million bitcoins.
They are yours already.
You must now accept the religion which is the one in which you already believed.
Enjoy!
|
|
|
|
the lack of any blast sound on recordings pretty much conclusively rules that possibility out. The video evidence of possible demolition charges on WTC 7 is more compelling than NIST's explanation. NIST had to change it's story when a sizable number of physicists and engineers questioned their original report. How do you explain the absence of a blast sound? And what's wrong with NIST changing their explanation when made aware of facts that contradict their previous explanation? Isn't that what they should do? Just curious, what spooks are we trying to impress here? Help me out please I'm not getting it. Countless examples of blast sounds which were reported on the news that day and described ad nauseum by eyewitnesses as I'm sure you know, one example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=IzRnjHfMyc0#t=27sIt's not like stating the obvious (controlled demolition) goes against the official story, after all the official story is that it was terrorists, nobody has been charged, nobody has lost their job, investigations of foreknowledge (financial / SEC / Able danger / NIST) have completely destroyed all evidence and its time to move on and do better in the future with a strong fatherland security force right? I mean, it's not like I have a clue who was involved and what happened when, but somebody please let me know if it help me somehow to act like a total fucking idiot. Thanks! |
|
|
|
@ OP, You could have taken random video from a "9/11" youtube search and you'd have come up with better content. For fuck sake have you every heard of "Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth" movement ? "...Israeli cameramen likely ... were caught cheering..." ... SO FUCKING WHAT !,,, This is the most relevant information you've manage to come up with on this 11 year old event ? And you felt that was worthy of making a new topic on a Bitcoin related forum ? +1 |
|
|
|
SAN FRANCISCO—With CEO Tim Cook stating that desperate customers would surely “line up like idiots” to purchase the offensive product anyway, Apple announced today the release of the company’s new iPhone 5, which features the word “nigger” boldly embossed on its back. “Sure, the new iPhone has the word ‘nigger’ printed right on it, but we all know you pathetic losers will still buy it in droves, because, hell, you’ll buy anything we put out,” Cook said in a press conference, describing the lightweight smartphone that will include a larger high-resolution display and have the racial slur printed in 36-point Helvetica font directly on its back, as well as on every accessory sold for the product. “Our technology ensures the word will brightly light up through whatever cover or sticker you may use in an attempt to obscure it, so don’t even try. You are all very stupid and sheeplike, and I will enjoy watching this play out.” Cook followed the iPhone 5 announcement with a brief preview of the company’s updated iPad, which will feature a loud, unchangeable ringtone of Roseanne Barr repeatedly yelling “faggot.” Read More http://www.theonion.com/articles/apple-announces-new-iphone-with-nword-on-back-know,29531/ |
|
|
|
Cue cut and paste response  Wow! That's great. I can put my mind to rest now.
I was almost convinced by thousands of pilots, architects, metallurgists, scientists of all kinds with evidence of thermite residue at ground zero and the laws of physics on their side.
But now, there's a couple of guys who like fixing cars and played with mechano when they were young.
They've explained the whole thing to me.
I can see now that all the other engineers and scientists and the evidence of my very own fucking eyes cannot be believed.
|
|
|
|
Just one word: Namecoin
+1 Whether it's corrupt tables, NSA op, or anonymous script kiddie, the solution is the same. Namecoin peeps, get your DNS servers and websites running please!! We're counting on you when for when the shit hits the routing table. |
|
|
|
Sorry if I am missing sarcasm yet again, but that is total bullshit. What on earth would make you think that? Remember Bin Laden's "Mountain Fortress"? Bush and Rumsfeld fed that shit to Americans and they ate it up like candy. That's just one example. I'll give you more if you like. Obviously you ain't from around here, son. And you eating some effed up candy, if you think people bought that shit for a nanosecond. |
|
|
|
Almost the entire country believed George W. Bush without question for a couple of years.
?? Sorry if I am missing sarcasm yet again, but that is total bullshit. What on earth would make you think that? -- In other news, so as not to be left out of the circle jerk, here's my youtube link. 9-11 Explained in 5 minutes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLXyB5GtfBU |
|
|
|
Let me guess, Rupert Murdoch told you so? Murdoch is banker scum. He pushed the Officially Sanctioned Conspiracy Theory as hard as any of them. Can be annoying when people judge the US populace based on what they hear Sky news telling them. There's plenty to complain about but pick something that has some truth behind it. Baywatch is not really so popular in the USA, and most new yorkers know it was more than planes and relatively small fires that brought those three steel framed buildings down. |
|
|
|
And still doesn't explain building 7.
Building 7 was supposed to be hit by Flight 93, the plane that went down in Pa. They pulled the building anyway and got away with it. Modern Americans are the most gullible people to ever walk the face of the earth. How do you figure Americans believe that shit? Let me guess, Rupert Murdoch told you so? Wait a minute, who is gullible? |
|
|
|
who buys an iPhone here? anyone that is even slightly technical, would avoid the iPhone like a plague.
The grown ups, that run businesses, and furnish employees with tools that get that job done and integrate painlessly with their technology stack. Sounds enterprisey! |
|
|
|
|
try prosper.com or similar services
|
|
|
|
That conclusion is just silly.
The iPhone uses a custom processor. So the company patents a phone based on prior work of Apple, which contains none of the components of the iPhone and you honestly thing this two bit nothing company will keep Apple from launching their product. As much as I hate Apple for closed systems they have on the most impressive legal departments in the world. Apple probably spends more on lawyers in a year than "GooPhone" takes in annual sales.
Yet another reason to not give these sheep herders a bitcent. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
