Dear Nemo, Those pictures shock me deeply, however thank you for posting them. As I told you all of this is pay back for the special group of Russians not wanting to leave the Mena. So don't think for one second alone that I support what was done there by the Soviets and then Russians since a long time. However I don't like to see People being annihilated by wars. Anywhere. I just repeat to be clear. So, what is the solution to this complex problem? I understand that it's relatively (understand the squaring behind this word, those that will stand in this path) easy to evacuate everyone that want to live back to the safety of the Motherland, and then... until there is no life on the soil that once was soviet or Ukrainian, to the borders, conventional or not. ICC will never touch you anyway. But it will not change the root problem: Russians in the MENA. Furthermore what do you think the guys in kiev hold against the eurocrats in terms of sexcrimes? Just asking. Ahh don't forget you don't really know which factions are really in control in the us... long term. If you want to know just read the US Constitution and bills of rights, remember that every time you heard anyone speaking against it, this citizen is just a tool for a specific purpose. Once the purpose is achieved the tool is stored (but we aren't speaking of tools). Personally, and even if I think that Russia or China gov have still progress to make toward a more compatible State with the US constitution. I think most of the People there have a perception closer to those of the USDS&USMIIC than most Europeans People do. They have surrendered. Thank you anyway for keeping this topic updated, even if I would prefer to see peace, prosperity and harmony (and why not people smoking weed, but I digress). And finally and it's maybe the most horrible thing I will write, but those People that you show here aren't Americans. Otherwise who ever, that did that to them would be dead. And that's why risk tolerance level isn't the same (and so that can't happen to Americans) the Russian have to leave the MENA. Nuclear Iran, okay, but fully transparent, one sin, and they get nuked, all of them, to glass and hash. sorry. there will be no peace anywhere as long as all plants aren't recognized as part of the Creation. |
|
|
|
|
ahh okay I get your point... for me a tribe implies a tribe leader that can be killed and would then precipitate the downfall of said tribe. And again I come back to war, but a tribe due to it's inherent structural undiveristy is always at the mercy of the Empire Forces. Why? In the Empire, the Talents or Skills at the Arts Of Wars primes any others consideration, like who is your mom or dad... in short are you good? and are you with us or against? Sideliners fine... but don't move.
|
|
|
|
Mentally it was not easy to say the least to accept reality... however I found a really simple and positive attitude to handle psychologically the situation... In short Zuckerberg is very close to the truth... why hide? So my simple solution is to consider my computer like a screen in a local market... I write what I think, what I assume when I write it, but the next sec... who knows I may have changed my mind... or it may have been trolling  . Some people will hate what I write, others will love it... Then as your freedom of speech is guaranteed by the same Faith shared by the USMIIC, those that will stand in your path of expression will discover that their only outcome is their own death. 101: I don't believe in screen based love. Or you are with or you aren't 101. and they emits electro magnetic field...  but yes a laptop with wifi physically removed + emf shielded + battery charger and then only plug in the battery to the laptop shall do it for a secure cold wallet? |
|
|
|
watching... I am sure it will be fun  . What's cool about electronic argumentation is that normally no ones get hurt (or rephrased it's only possible to self hurt) , and there is time to think to the best appropriate answer. |
|
|
|
the Soviet leadership (which wasn't the same as leadership of Russia, RSFSR, as it was known back then) It's interesting to see that it's a common association made, USSR = RUSSIA... my opinion on this: it's a very common held belief in the west, is that in the satellite annexed states all decisions and orders to follow or die came from Moskow (which is Russian, even if occupied by Soviet), and most of the soldiers when trouble arise came from today Russia (and spoke Russian, not polnish or lavitanian)...  interesting picture about... as always... Vodka! For me the biggest structural problem of USSR was the absence of check and balances... so when an idea was decided to be implemented... don't stand in the path... until the cliff. it was like obamacare on steroid... for everything... |
|
|
|
... In a world where the things we need and use go bad, sharing comes naturally. The hoarder ends up sitting alone atop a pile of stale bread, rusty tools, and spoiled fruit, and no one wants to help him, for he has helped no one. Money today, however, is not like bread, fruit, or indeed any natural object. It is the lone exception to nature’s law of return, the law of life, death, and rebirth, which says that all things ultimately return to their source. Money does not decay over time 1, but in its abstraction from physicality, it remains changeless or even grows with time, exponentially, thanks to the power of interest.
2. The U.S. Government perpetuates the existence of state, money, ownership, and tribalism2. There is nothing else one need note regarding its functions. 1. In USA, this practice continued through the 19th Century, where at one time there were more than 5000 different types of bank notes issued by various commercial banks in America. Only the notes issued by the largest, most creditworthy banks were widely accepted. The script of smaller, lesser known institutions circulated locally. Farther from home it was only accepted at a discounted rate, if it was accepted at all. The proliferation of types of money went hand in hand with a multiplication in the number of financial institutions. the problem of money is that it doesn't buy virtue, and it's at the core of War since the beginning.  2. where did you get this idea? frankly, I would appreciate if you could elaborate on this point... frankly you can accuse the USA of everything you want, but tribalism... how did you get this idea? what are the fact supporting that thought? I am really curious... |
|
|
|
I don't know, but it's so cool . afterward we have the 1M topic and then the big step the 100M posts . If it only was readable ... but guess that is technically post 10 mill. ... undeniable, my 0.00000002 |
|
|
|
My privately funded screen has some difficulty with the yellow... but thank you for this new word: Heterarchy, which is if I understood well the horizontalization of the different components? I prefer Homeostasis... Abolishing Ownership? You own nothing? Not even the Rights given to you by God when you were born? So your question has no meaning. it's like asking is it possible to breath with out air... the Problem of the FCC, is they don't understand a basic, simple and essential principle... K.I.S.S. why change what's working? Don't get stupid it has nothing to do with taxes... but like in the U.K. a defective, corrupted, spreading group(s) is trying to censor Freedom of Speech... taxation is a collateral damage... (did you know that these people are even mentioned in the Constitution and in the Oath of Everyone involved in the Complex). |
|
|
|
Is Twitter allowing their harassment tools to be used to silence dissenting voices? Since when is tweeting a journalist’s words back at her harassment?
Yes, because the CEO and his team are fucking enemy of the Spirit of America... but it's their private propriety, they can rule it as their cluster fucked patriarchal terroristically oriented propaganda tools for their aims. However those subtrashs must understand that :  look closely on the deck, what do you see... So dear Costello, be aware, we are, fully. What most people fail to understand is that NOTHING IS FREE, but TRUE LOVE and of course IN GOD WE TRUST. so they traded ease of use, for censorship, why can't they learn to use bitmessage? or a competing opensourced uncensorable system? it's too hard? As if Liberty was easy to attain and maintain... Don't use it. Lena Dunham’s Republican rapist turns out to be none of those things
I write badly, but this one... it's a new level in unintelligible writing...
This Is What Happens When A Woman 'Manspreads' On The Subway
... 
Tell that to the man bitch with the vag that had her legs spread on the subway today. She tipped the scales at around 300.
You saw Mark Karpeles? Gem of Freedom of Expression, not everyone will like but it made me . Frankly that's the point of my human frame picture : who chose the wideness of the seat? the majority? the authority? who ever... did they took into account that each frame is unique? |
|
|
|
If state, money, and ownership would be abolished, would “pay[ing] a tax” (Wilikon) even be possible?
Go to a tribal area anywhere in the world and enjoy untaxation from the State - remember everything will belong to the leader, you, your wife, your children, your possession, everything at his/her mercy. In China a big Wall was build against them, and in Rome wars were waged almost continuously. Collective defense has a cost, but the cost of not collectivizing defense means living under the authority of Barbarians (and if barbarians takes control it will become RUINS). |
|
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PravdaWhat most fail to understand is that what ever is said, reality can't be changed. You don't believe me? A few letters to prove my point : F.U.K.U.S.H.I.M.A. Reality is a "Wall" so hard that it's only possible to get trough it trough D.E.A.T.H. Nothing else. And apparently for 99.999999999999999% of us since the beginning of time, a one way street. State Media = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musicians_of_the_RMS_TitanicUnderstand that those under influence of what isn't real will end up doing - saying - believing tragic things for themselves first and foremost, example : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let_them_eat_cakeBut State Media doesn't have to be in reality denial... and who forces you to take their input for facts? In the United States of America, IN GOD WE TRUST, but the press benefits from A1 too. And more generally on the topic, bitcoin what ever the trust, is still as an innovation way way behind the Constitution of the United States of America and it's Bill of Rights.
|
|
|
|
Delusional to think a new technology can destroy a government.
printing press. |
|
|
|
I love reality. |
|
|
|
|
Hello,
What is the best way to use a coin mixer? How shall I proceed to avoid most stupid mistakes? Is it working? Did you try it? In short, I don't know anything about the mixing services, and was looking for some recommendations... btw it's for 0.01 btc, is it possible, with the fees and co? thank you a lot for your sharing help.
|
|
|
|
Not joining to eu sounds like a good reason to be invaded by nato-us empire judging by recent events.  pathetic Tanzania is part of the Australia common wealth... and to may be help you free yourselves from this inept path, why wasn't Iceland invaded for example? On Nemo and his compatriot, I think that when 2 Russians (admittedly or not) argue, a policy of non interference is always the best option ( I would personally add, a swift and discreet tactical removal of yourself of the path of anything that maybe related to the escalation of said argumentation... who knows  ). (as a tip, always propose a vodka competition... the first to finish his bottle... ((at least afterward they will be quiet, (for a while))). |
|
|
|
sad. What is more interesting is to see how the James Bonds of the UK were implicated (I hope they clean their house by now (and if they didn't it's too late), but who knows, it's not like their 007 was a role model in this regard). In China everyone implicated would be dead by now, and others happy receivers would be able to enjoy life with their loved ones, safely, because of them. win-win. It seems like any British celeb from the 80s was a paedo. Interesting to see what comes of the Prince Andrew Windsor allegations that came out very recently. Could be a shitstorm brewing.
corrected it for you... Do you know his ssn? and my post about it https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=914907.0edit: a question, on which Island was the orphanage, with the journalist that was harassed for exposing the story? |
|
|
|
To clarify, let me break it down into a few separate points, I'll attempt to illustrate my opinion in a comprehensible manner. Liberty is based on "rights" and "wrongs." To forcibly impose liberation on another person who has actively chosen to live as a slave is a violation of that persons naturally existing rights, until such time as they no longer wish to be enslaved and express their desire for liberty. Liberty exists as an intangible thought and does not require an acknowledgement to exist, if a person makes a poor choice and denies themselves of liberty, it's wrong to act in a manner which infringes on that persons right to choose however they want for themselves. It's not your right or any others' to force them to change, but it's their right to change themselves or seek for a change if they so desire. Wrong, if the said mentally prisoner slave work to projects that may be nefarious to the security of the Empire, it's the Duty of the Empire Forces to annihilate such threat, and if the people under his rule decide to fight for their pharaoh they will face their destiny. Or at least refrain from opposing the Empire Forces, as such the collateral damage of the annihilation of their master is their liberation. But I agree it goes against their will of being slave. I don't believe in the free will of being a slave.When I referred to another country, I meant any other area outside of the borders of the United States and her territories. The US has no business interfering in the affairs of other sovereign nations. Answering a call for help from an oppressed society isn't the same as inserting ourselves for a disagreement of their laws or ways. If you pose a threat to the Empire, you will face the Empire.By lawful right, I'm referring to those natural human rights which were referenced in the US Constitution under the Bill of Rights. The US Constitution acknowledged them as the Laws of God and declared itself "a nation under God." This statement ceded the power of any law which conflicts with those natural rights inherent to all human beings. "Human nature" exists, and these laws are a culmination of universal truths based on human nature. Therefore, regardless of where human nature exists, these truths will be evident. For instance, no rational person with the ability and opportunity to enact a positive outcome would spare a violent murderer at the cost of losing a loved one, especially to a violent or horrible death. No rational person would choose by in-action that their child, mother, themselves, or other loved one should unjustly suffer. A rational person would weigh the value of life heavily in favor over the risk that they may be imprisoned for acting within that natural right to protect life by force. There are many other natural rights including the right of freedom of thought, will, and expression. Since any rational human being has it in their nature to think, decide, and express themselves, it is a natural right to do so freely so long as exercising this right doesn't unduly restrict the rights of others; but I won't go into more detail on that now. Basically, natural rights are supported by evidence that human nature shares certain fundamental bonds in the ways of which rational people act and the choices that they make when confronted with the same problems. You are not aware of the Messianic nature of America? IN GOD WE TRUSTGovernment is the next level of authority over that of the individual, governments can only exercise powers ceded by the people who are being governed. Governments built upon liberty will actually define powers in their Constitutions that cannot be ceded by the people. Enumerating these powers creates a clear and unbreachable boundary. A government cannot by definition act unlawfully, and in the presence of liberty, cannot enforce laws above or over the "Law of God" also known as "natural human rights." If the government breaches this trust of the people, it's no longer considered legitimate, and people are collectively and individually responsible for reforming or abolishing it. If the people allow for themselves a tyrannical government, then they will live in tyranny. If a farmer is lazy and chooses not to plant food for his family, but rather enjoys lazy complacency; he and his family will starve to death when the crops he never planted provide no food. If the people of society choose not to hold accountable the actions of government, either by complacency, or fear; they will not enjoy the benefits of liberty, nor do they deserve it. The people of a society choose for themselves the outcome by their decision to act, or not to act; it's wrong to place undue burden on your neighbors by choosing in-action. Shifting the risks of maintaining liberty onto the shoulders of others while you're still able to act responsibly will always lead to an eventual loss of liberty. Annihilation of the threat... in truth at the end of the first night it was already over for them...It's for this reason listed above that I would disagree with any military intervention until such a time as enough people are willing to work towards liberty for themselves. If even a small portion of society is unwilling to take on the burden of action, how can they be expected to adequately maintain it? Only when people are willing to die for liberty are they capable of attaining it. Liberty is a restriction of government powers, and restricting the powers of government is like restricting the freedom of a powerful beast, the governed must be willing to oppose the subversion of liberty with great force if necessary, even at great cost...
the subversion of liberty? you mean that through freedom The People went to the Moon? This is a general message addressed to all: If you enjoy liberty, please understand that the liberty you enjoy was paid for in advance with the lives of countless fathers, brothers, sons, husbands, and friends. Every single one of them were genuinely good and virtuous people who had valuable lives filled with the same feelings and emotions that we do today. They left behind families, and loved ones that they wished to return safely home to, but instead gave their lives to provide you with the choices you have today. Anyone who would take it upon themselves and choose to stand in the face of death so that their children, and their unborn grandchildren might get to live a joyful life is remarkable. Years of complacency has allowed society to reach the precipice of the following question, "Am I to sacrifice my life for the mere chance that my children and grandchildren might afford to enjoy a life of liberty, or am I to suffer until death at the understanding that my children and grandchildren will likely know suffering and oppression in their lives because I chose not to act?" Please use what remaining power you have left to act while you still can; write your congressman even when you don't think it matters, protest the laws you disagree with, vote Libertarian even if you don't think they can win the election, and hope that the government doesn't fail the test of legitimacy... It's perhaps too late to prevent tragic events in the future, but to stop trying only guarantees them. I can't agree more with the 2 last paragraphs... but it still doesn't answer anything about limiting anyone freedom of expression, and particularly about this girl... I would like to report that this represents little more than an idle threat, or, perhaps, that it is merely the product of a rogue and overzealous intern. But, alas, I cannot. As The Independent’s James Bloodworth noted this week, this is in fact rather typical. “Around 20,000 people in Britain have been investigated in the past three years for comments made online,” Bloodworth confirms, “with around 20 people a day being looked into by the forces of the law, according to figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.” Worse, some of these people have actually been imprisoned: among them, a “woman found guilty of a public order offence for saying that David Cameron had “’blood on his hands,’” a man named “Azhar Ahmed, who was prosecuted for an online post mocking the deaths of six British soldiers killed in Afghanistan,” and a young man named Liam Stacey who tweeted something unprintable at a top-flight soccer player and was incarcerated for two months in consequence. http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/katie-hopkins-views-are-now-considered-matters-for-law-enforcement-and-it-is-utterly-terrifying-9953339.html------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- And people around the world wonder why so many try so hard to live and just be alive in the USA... INSANE... so I can't go to the UK... and me that wanted to see the country side, me that wanted to eat lamb with mentol, me that wanted to eat a fish and chips with nice beers in a pub, me that wanted to eat real Indian and Pakistani food (almost forget, A nice real English Pudding), me that wanted to see Brighton, me that wanted to enjoy Scotland... sadly, I will have to wait for the US invasion to be able to visit... Why did England chose the path of censorship? are they on the road of the movie the last child of man? I hope you all realize that there is nothing strange about this law. The 'laws' get tighter and more restrictive year by year, this has been the case since the dawn of man. With every new clause they add, a portion of your 'freedom' is taken away. You don't necessarily always feel this incessant constriction but now and again you get a reality check.
Some smart People said that for every new law 3 must be removed... Scotland looking to imprison government for offensive human rights violations
Until the Imperial Forces enter the Battlefield and eliminate the threat, they can enjoy their privileges... then :  like a rat and as always surrender or die  last question, who is going to be next? Ahh and little disclamer to uk authorities, please be aware, 0 American Citizen. let's keep it this way... otherwise... |
|
|
|
First - the BBC has lost all credibility in my eyes. First they cover, hide, support and provided mr saville... now we can see that the systemic problem at this public organization are still recurring. Again there is no presumption that the girl may say the truth. No direct, nothing she is a slut in for the money... step 1. time to sell off the BBC to the market. there is no more space for such an infamous organization in the UK. we, market participants, will be able to clean this house fast, swiftly, and of course brutally, as we always do when the situation requires it. but as we see, it may be a losing battle, why because like most of them are psychological subjects of the queen, I am not sure it's worth it... but let's have some quotes, and what ever the truth, we (the horses riders), take her testimony with very serious consideration... so yes mr Dershowitz and A. Windsor, we are going to get to the bottom of the story. but (3 ain't never enough), I can't believe that a man can be friend with the sex trafficker that was exposed in the us, without knowing what was going on... maybe we finally got the top of this uk scandal... it was from the house itself... nice... Now and however, you subjects members of mi5,6 and electronically inferiors of the gchq, understand, on this issue, we click, click, click, and silent click... we will now the truth, stand on our path... and you will learn... and it will not be about playing guitar like a trash bag... So yes Alan Dershowitz "My goal is to bring charges against the client and require her to speak in court" I was thinking everyone to a Polygraph under the supervision of the Imperial American Forces... let's see... but you know it's just a part of the signal... we know already. Now about the victim, I hope she understand that what ever (lie or not) we are with her... and when I said that, I didn't came alone... In America we hate rapist, In China we kill them (big worry for me this story, I don't want that primitiveness in China, and that's why we extract), In Russia (we ghost), and finally in Isreal we do the job. Why? because if her story isn't true, ring of sex slaves exists. We are going to find them, save the girls, and (kill) put to justice and extract all of those implicated, including boat, plan, car drivers, valets, everyone that should have spoken will become an enemy of the 4. it will be very unfair, like detaining a girl against her will and using her as sex slave. but dear sinners you will not suffer (it impact the organ quality). So dear cunt : "the cunt declare before you all that my whole life, whether it be long or short, shall be devoted to your service and the service of our great imperial family to which we all belong". Understand that you never gave back what you stole from China. We can't ever forget. WE ARE FEED UP, your constant attack are very dangerous, for your house, we will try our best to spare the children, including the unborn, we have no beef against any of them. However they must be smart, and chose carefully, their side, because on this issue there is no way back. Or you put the family first, like the cunt do, meaning that the truth and justice are just tools to seize and consolidate and keep power, or you chose the side of the righteous. So in short we fucking don't care of who you are, in our World it has 0 meaning... thank you to cnn for their fairer coverage on this issue. I remove the bbc for my tv receiver, and I will not be back, unless it's privatized and clear. as final note, I hope that contrary to ISIS you will present yourself before the American Justice System. Your court are void before ours. The decontamination process of England, is getting in it's hardest phase... it's like what happened to the Vatican... only they started to act... this time it's just different, why? because it ain't an infiltration, but may be a popper in the family (you see presumption of innocence, meanwhile taking care of the allegations)... let's see if the king shit is just a façade for luxury... what I strongly believe. And without the PR machine of the BCC it will get tougher. The United Chimeras (on this issue, at least;), U and you write Russia). olala. |
|
|
|
People have already gotten criminal records in the UK for offensive tweets and Facebook statues, this isn't really anything new.
To me it all depends on the severity. Should you be imprisoned for calling the Prime Minister or Queen a cunt? No. Should you be arrested for making death threats or threatening to rape someone. Quite possibly, yes. for example my post on this topic? should I have to go to jail for it? Making a though an offense... one step closer... On the other hand I completely agree with you threatening people of what ever isn't great... again I wrote I am gonna rape you... (I don't even know if you are human or rapeable), but was speaking about poker... jail or no jail? the danger with electronic communication is deniability. Can you guarantee that your computer will only send clean unfalsifiable signals? I don't... But in said case the girl did something much much worst than threatening anyone... she said what she thinks... and that is the biggest crime. 1 she has a thought 2 she expresses it... Electronic Mind Readers (accurate or not) + though offenses = no more opponents... if only the planners of obamacare had that... You have successfully raised good question on the topic at large that put me at unease, about trigger event for crime, but none about the case sadly... And when you think seriously about what you said about threats, in what way jailing will solve the situation? because you can't put on a life time, some one who said... blah blah... It's quite ironic that your superb deviation fall that flat... What do you think about the case anyway? Good girl? Bad girl? Shall spend some formative time behind bars (to use the irrespectfullest way)? for disclosure I never read about her, just the little extract in the post, and the "ebola to Glasgow" tips me enough on why they want her arrested... too much freedom in this young mind, for presumably destroyed by alcohols and co old men... Reminds me of all the cyber bullying acts/laws... Nothing new, some people need to learn how to keep their mouths shut, while others need to learn to not take virtual entities and their "offensive" content to heart. But this is the world today...
this level of acceptance toward evil is pathetically lethargic... Happily the former slaves of Pharaoh didn't see thing like you do. IN GOD WE TRUST. And sadly even if this sentence is more violent for more people than any other post, I ever wrote... the enemy of the Empire will not be merciful if the Empire is hit. planed accordingly it was.
and this one is for my personal pleasure and to respond to the author of this magnificent topic and particularly to his last lines, you know what will be done of the PC crowd as you called it once usefulness is reached :  always. Катынский расстрел Why because at the end it's them or us, who are going to be in the coming graveyard (or jail first). I have chosen. Without Mercy, Using Deception when needed, no chance, no bet, safety first. they all start the same way, first the speech, then the gun, then your possession and finally your live. always. we remember. |
|
|
|
While I too agree that freedom of speech is more accurately "freedom of opinion and expression" I wouldn't want to forcibly spread my opinion to another country who has the lawful right to decide for themselves what type of government they wish to live under. If enough citizens of said country were willing to request military assistance in order to exercise these rights, I would think it reasonable to offer military assistance to achieve these ends. It's estimated that only 3% of the colonists fought in the Revolutionary war, 3% seems a fair number of a population willing to take the risk of life for liberty to justify actions.
Forcibly asserting our opinion on a population that has no desire or lacks the responsibility to maintain liberty is a waste of life, a waste of time, and a waste of resources.
P.S.
3% doesn't refer to the percentage of the population that desires liberty, it refers to the percentage of the country willing to die for it...
Hello pungopete468, What I don't understand in your post is what I underlined, what's the differences between country, themselves, government and citizen. For example we can say that the woman in question is a citizen subject of the Uk, however we can't say that her government represent her (a part if she wants to be self-jailed) as such is she really part of the country? And there need absolutely 0 legal basis for Freedom of Speech, why because it's a God Given Tool to his Children, use it or don't be. It's not about spreading your opinions, it's like in the case of medicinal drug, be able to visit who ever you want outside of the border of the Empire, without having the risks of being arrested for what ever, who ever wrote on a account pretended to be yours... to high risk to be assumed, I prefer annihilation (and contrary to your opinions it could be a net positive for the USMIIC). Next step is censoring anyone that would say something bad about the finance (or what ever) of a country? lol... Monster Joke will be called... What people don't understand about my very aggressive vision of the enemy of America, is that if or when a big incident strike the US mainland, will the enemy show mercy? I don't bet. and I am not alone...p.s. it must be a life extinction event otherwise... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_military_bases no bet (or no base left uncovered). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
