As far as I know, that's a name that someone has already taken and has been reserved^[1] or restricted^[2] by the admin.

Edit: added some links
1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5216451.msg53569598#msg53569598
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5361620.msg58012303#msg58012303

Does this mean you have ample opportunity to implement or propose these changes, or are you actually involved in the government system?
You likely need more serious advice and discussion from several professionals. This is a very large and multidisciplinary goal; you can't work alone. Some role I think you should have on your team:
- Governance & Public Administration Law Expert (The Gov. Insider)
- Crypto Economist & Tokenomics Designer
- Tech Developer (especially Smart Contract and Blockchain)
- Auditor

I doubt many people will give you sensible advice here. But I'd be happy if your journey begins in this forum and you're updated on its progress. I'll be following it; this is my first time in eight years.

^^^
Just a guess, this means a display failure bug for usernames that use special characters.

Tokenize everything? I have to go slowly, or this will get even more messy and just tokenize corruption. Maybe I'll start tokenizing the systems that least hinder GDP growth. But this isn't as easy as it seems; the hardest part is getting the basics in place, especially the legal issues that can't be ignored. I mean, does my country allow a city to have its own "currency"? If I want to play it safe, I'll involve higher levels of government.

Apart from that, I'll likely face lobbying and friction from various political interests that have been hidden so far.

I wondered what the benefit was in developing a new stablecoin variant whose sole purpose was to peg the value of fiat currency. Creating "another one" without significant advantages is hardly relevant to the industry's overall needs. At best, the code is expanded for greater control.

Ledger simply integrates the Changelly service without switching tabs (well, they probably share some of the profits from each exchange). As I understand their T&C^[1][2], Ledger explicitly limits its liability to the hardware wallet and Ledger Live itself, not necessarily covering the user's risk caused by Changelly.

1. https://shop.ledger.com/pages/ledger-live-terms-of-use?srsltid=AfmBOooX-Zm0jXugy1znRQX90Duwg8Wa7EK-yhdNIBnIAwqIhdh27aLX
2. https://support.ledger.com/article/4404381458065-zd

Yeah, this feeling may have arisen in the early days of Bitcoin's launch as if it were a beacon of hope, until the top 1% began to see it, study it, and assess it as either a threat or simply another opportunity to gain greater profits.

If it's a threat, ban it entirely (happened in China).
If it's an opportunity, allow it and play around with regulations and see if the lobbyists need some leeway for their businesses (ETFs, large institutions, etc.).
The Bitcoin code isn't subject to a rigged system; you probably are still.

Bitcoin can offer equality in use, not a fair return or any related to limited supply. To answer the title, yes. I don't want to convince you that Bitcoin's value will continue to grow, but if it does, you could be even lower than those who are lower than you currently are.
The equality aspect: Bitcoin is the largest financial network for all levels, requiring no privileges like entering a 5-star restaurant. You earn it, and you use it as you please. Fees depend on network congestion; there are no VIP fees offered for large holdings or the most active users.

So, it depends on which perspective you view bitcoin from.

So what's your priority option, doing business with random guys? I think this is the opposite of what most people do. Dealing with people you know isn't about trust; you simply have a greater chance of recovering your losses because you can identify them better.

Yes, it seems like it would be nice to have such thread on the Collectibles board. Let me know if you also need a more organized thread display and a little polish to make it look like a gallery or catalog space.

Next time, check a few points to determine if the service is legitimate or a scam.
1. Registrar Status: The domain was registered in 2015. At first glance, it appears to match the claim that they were founded in 2015.
2. Web Archive: If you check this domain on a web archive site, as of July of this year, the domain is listed as "for sale." This means they aren't actually from 2015; they've only been "operational" for two months after successfully purchasing the domain.
3. Social Media: Scam services typically don't have many updates about internal activities.

Feels sorry for your losses.

They will still have limited space and, of course, high costs, because the inscription is attached to each sats. Let's say someone wanted to create an inscription with 100 million supply units, they would need 1 Bitcoin (excluding fees).

And where they are now, they're dead. So, there are still technical limitations to using the Bitcoin protocol to create such "tokens." The orientation is simply different from altcoins.

I think Binance is only a viable alternative for you because, based on other posts, you've had a new exchange for a year. Surely you've adapted to the new one.
Only use Binance if there's a promotion that entices you to participate. And remember their alarm triggers: don't accept direct deposits unless it's from your own personal wallet.

Maybe your address is one of the ones referred to in the list in this news. Contact Tether as the publisher or holder of the smart contract administration rights to unlock it, there is no other option.

It's a native coin, there's no external TRX freeze mechanism. You can still do whatever you want with it.

If you were more aware of the complex problems of the digital economy, you wouldn't consider altcoins are generally bad. There are some use cases that Bitcoin can't solve due to its inherent characteristics; then altcoins offer diverse solutions. If you're an anonymity maximalist, you'd use XMR more than BTC; if you want to leverage your stock market without starting from scratch, you need the Ethereum network to represent your stock prices.

However, many people have higher expectations in this industry. Those seeking instant change are slowly entering the game and dominating the game role. Meanwhile, "businessman" see this as a limitless opportunity. That's why shitcoins also dominate the list anywhere.

I think you need to draw a line between education and degrees, and what "education" isn't important. Other forms of knowledge you don't get from school are informal forms of education.
Well, the world is changing so rapidly these days that, even within a matter of months, some school curricula are so specific and late to update that they seem outdated. It's another student's responsibility to absorb the most basic and contemporary academic knowledge.

The requirements for these types of events are generally based on volume, and I've noticed that winners far exceed these requirements. This is certainly not a requirement that all users can afford.
I've never seen the main winners make a special ann about their achievement, or they simply don't want to. Only occasionally does the last-place winners do so.

This hinges on their integrity and transparency, as they maintain a high level of audit transparency. In this regard, USDC provides the most detailed audit results based on US auditing standards (known to be the most stringent). USDT also has past "sins" that have undermined public trust, although they're working to improve.

OP, why did you open a thread on the "Scams" board just to find out how to decrypt it? And you mention several casino companies, which I don't think is justified. You should be clear about who's scammed you and how it happened.

Most have slowly shifted their function, and scarcity explains everything. Time preference isn't a matter here, as people share almost the same goal: "benefit".
In fact, a more practical approach is generally used to play with volatility. This is evidenced by how much supply is distributed across centralized exchanges. Traders also have the same future economic orientation as holders.
So, yeah, Bitcoin can shift people's preferences toward saving rather than consuming. But will it only shift to that pattern? The answer is no.