Any idea some tips ?
So, that's one of the important points that you have to pay attention to when choosing coin pairs and exchanges. You should not simply trust the liquidity information provided by an exchange without testing it with one small trade. This is usually done by shady exchanges to increase the visibility of newly listed coins. |
|
|
|
Imagine If the non tested CBDC will fail something happens and all your wealth is gone.
I have no idea how that loss will happen, but I believe CBDC will be full government control. Tracking, transaction reversal won't be separated from its characteristics. The actual loss may not be due to the efforts of criminals, but by the authorities, for example to recover your "lost" funds, you have to pay some % in terms of "recovery fees/taxes" or something like that. |
|
|
|
In the interim, I'll keep updating this thread with my frozen withdrawals so we can all watch the seizure occur in slow motion.
Lemme guess early. "Finally, they released my withdrawal, it's legit." I think so.  |
|
|
|
How much is the loss? It's just monopoly money and we know where they live. No loss at all. A win. Most services like this are scams or Ponzi schemes in disguise. Do you know of any legit ones at all? I hadn't played around with crypto for years and decided to try this service on a whim, blindfolded, mostly for fun, just to see what would happen. Still knee deep in scamcoin, I see!  So you know the game? you shouldn't open this topic because (I think) you know how you'll end up. Plus, people here wouldn't bother seeking experience with shady companies like you did if they knew. |
|
|
|
What do you mean by: go through an instant exchange?
Exchange alt to bitcoin to use with LN across Europe. If you want to withdraw via LN like Binance, find here for DEX, instant btc><alts exchange that supports bitcoin LN. https://cointastical.github.io/Exchanges-With-LN/I don't think European regulations can prevent you from withdrawing Bitcoin LN via DEX. |
|
|
|
The accumulation of 70% of Bitcoin remaining stationary for over a year is a significant milestone. Just think despite Bitcoin's rise from $15,700 to around $37,000 in the last 12 months, a vast majority hasn't budged. I vividly recall the November 2022 FTX crisis when Bitcoin's price plummeted, critics predicted its demise, and the media celebrated prematurely.
Holders of 70% of bitcoin seem to realize that it is better to HODL without worries, rather than getting involved in centralized service bullshit schemes. Besides, I remember what CZ said after the FTX crash more or less: "Your keys your coins". This is a scary statement for a centralized business owner but it seems to have changed the way of thinking of many people who are looking for the safe way. |
|
|
|
I think this might be a bluff from Sun's part.
Sending messages openly isn't objective at all (if I were the hacker I wouldn't even feel threatened). If it turns out there are no positive updates after the message, the community perspective instead considers the message to be BS. And yeah JS seems to be getting played with this 2nd hack. Let's see if other open messages will be sent as well. |
|
|
|
How much is the loss? Most services like this are scams or Ponzi schemes in disguise. The site details on Whois are hidden, my assumption is that this is a new cloudmining that started latest September 27 based on the first review on Trustpilot [1]. If I pay attention to the one of 1-star reviews [2], this con seems quite selective. You are left to withdraw several times for small amounts before users deposit larger ones. 1. https://trstp.lt/LUwfU6AZP2. https://trstp.lt/x-1GGPFsJ |
|
|
|
|
Baru lewat di tiktok FYP tadi siang dari negara tetangga (Malaysia) kalo mereka melakukan demo menuntut pemerintah lokal sebuah wilayah yang mereka tempati selama mengungsi agar menjadi hak mereka, dari videonya seperti mencapai ribuan pendemo. Dan diketahui juga kalo sebuah pasar didaerah situ telah didominasi oleh pedagang dia golongan mereka. Netizen malaysia banyak mewanti-wanti Indonesia khususnya Aceh tentang kelakuan etnis ini. Kalo boleh bilang, mereka minoritas yang pemberani.
|
|
|
|
He said that now many people are investing in it for more money. In such cases, if these people suddenly withdraw from the market, many will be in danger.
People have repeatedly withdrawn from this market on several occasions, as they find the economic situation pressing. This is no longer about making a profit, but how to survive because their financial level no longer helps. |
|
|
|
if government ask for less tax we could have pay happily bus 30% tax is alot.
Until the latest information (as of June 6, 2023) that I read [1], tax on Bitcoin is not (yet) specifically regulated. I think there are many loopholes there, for example trading offline and/or not involving local currency. This at least reduces the tax rate to lower than 30%. 1. https://cleartax.in/s/bitcoins-taxes-india |
|
|
|
CZ, on the other hand, is also fined $50 million. And he also paid a bail bond of $175 million.
Yeah about the personal fine, it doesn't seem like a significant amount. Btw, does Forbes accurately summarize the wealth of the richest peopleon real time? Once again I checked the forbes page, I was surprised that the numbers were that volatile. CZ's net worth increased by 50%. That additional amount is even enough to cover corporate and personal fines. Wth is this... Changpeng Zhao| $15B | Real Time Net Worth
as of 11/24/23
#188 in the world today |
https://www.forbes.com/profile/changpeng-zhao/?sh=4d63d9a46277 |
|
|
|
|
Siapa objek pertanyaannya, penyelenggara pemilu atau para calon? Masalahnya, keduanya tidak menutup kemungkinan melakukan kecurangan.
Akhir-sangat terlihat jelas beberapa kubu sudah saling memanas, mulai dari black campaign, saling lapor, dll. Ini adalah upaya menjatuhkan rival mumpung belum naik ke "kursi" kandidat. Begitu pula penyelenggara itu sendiri terutama setelah di TPU, contohnya manipulasi surat suara.
|
|
|
|
|
Trading is an attempt to make money, so it doesn't make sense if it is without any risk at all even if you are in the spot market.
If it were me, I would start gradually from the smallest leverage (1x), choose low volatility pairs like BTC><USD and start with small amounts.
|
|
|
|
But even a $5 fee to make a simple transaction seems high. Even if it was only $1 it would be high.
If Bitcoin is meant to be an alternative to fiat, wouldn't the fees need to be only a few tenths of a cent to make it an everyday currency to use?
Yes, initially it is fine for small transactions, however bitcoin is not always a suitable alternative when it comes to amount of transaction. Actually you have 2 sending solutions here, using LN or a centralized wallet. Bitcoin has been dollar indifferent since its inception, the famous term is "1 BTC=1 BTC". $5 satoshi today was only worth a few cents 7 years ago. |
|
|
|
Let's highlight CZ's net worth, https://www.forbes.com/profile/changpeng-zhao/?sh=37da17bf6277Changpeng Zhao| $10.2B | Real Time Net Worth
as of 11/22/23
#188 in the world today |
That's an abundance of wealth to spend the rest of his life in any country. If we talk about ethics, CZ got this wealth from the company he has controlled for 7 years (including profits from the alleged illegal activities). Unless CZ only cares about herself afterwards, then he won't contribute even $1 towards the $4.3b fine. |
|
|
|
We can see a lot going round about Binance. You mean something they named it SAFU? What you need to know is that CZ is now leaving the company as per today. I don't understand how you will follow in the footsteps of an exchange that is even more frequently threatened with regulation. is Bitget
I've heard of that exchange, yeah here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5472656 |
|
|
|
from your explanation it means the rule is self contradicting and should be looked into for a rephrase. Because if its not illegal to own multiple accounts then banning all multiple accounts linked to a faulty user should be put in view. The rule can be rephrased to say one account to one user and owning multiple accounts at owners risk. Otherwise this rule is just self contradicting and should be open for review.
Creating multiple accounts is not illegal, and having multiple accounts does not increase or decrease your chances of being banned. The main and alternative accounts are one unit of you personally, and the object of the forum rules is you, not each account. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
