 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
|
I only have 3 s7s running. To reduce my variance I have them set to different pools. Because of this I'm not passing the 0.01 threshold daily. It is every 2 days for me.
|
|
|
|
Has anyone received a payout from here?
I'm over the .01 threshold and i've been waiting 3 days for a payout.
I moved my miners elsewhere until this gets resolved.
When I first started on this pool they were supposedly in beta mode, so payment took a while. They seem to have gotten it together. I just received a payout this morning. I would suggest giving it another day. If you don't receive payout, email the manager that is on the home page. From my personal experience they seem to be fairly receptive. Good luck! |
|
|
|
The biggest problem is they do NOT pay. I threw a s7 on their pool for about a week. Still waiting on .05 btc to be paid. Support is non existent. Use caution is all I can say.
Hello, Our pool was in Beta Phase. Please allow us two days and we will clear out all the payouts. From now on we are doing daily payouts. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thanks, Sahil Been three days, still no payment. Just use caution. Or mine with kano, johnny, bitminter or even slush. All of which are reputable. EDIT: 10/24/16 I have received my payout. |
|
|
|
|
The biggest problem is they do NOT pay. I threw a s7 on their pool for about a week. Still waiting on .05 btc to be paid. Support is non existent. Use caution is all I can say.
|
|
|
|
|
Just need the address to send payment.
|
|
|
|
i still have 4 of these avail
in your pm your wanting 1 and on this your wanting 2
Sorry about that. Originally was only thinking about one. But at 8 bucks a pop might as well get 2. If you care to sell, I'll buy two. |
|
|
|
|
PM sent. Interested in 2 of these.
|
|
|
|
|
That really long one was like 8 days long. But the pool was still around 3 ph if i recall correctly. I wonder what the cdf would be with an 8 day block at current hash rate? Hopefully we will never find out. Taking a shot of whiskey to salute this soon to fall block.
|
|
|
|
Your case A is obviously stealing because of your evil intention.  You do everything just to gain something even if you know that it is from the other person. You exerted effort just to have bitcoins that is not yours. In case B it is just pure luck. You have not done anything wrong as it is already in that bitcoin wallet. But would that happen? I mean having already a fund with the wallet address that is newly generated? Are you saying that not having evil intentions makes it not illegal? If my family is starving and I rob a bank it isn't illegal because I am doing it for good? but i think the band is not responsible for your family, bank is holding the people money and when you will robed it then who will pay to them and the second thing is that the state have the responsibility to provide basic necessity to the people free fo cost therefore you will not be doing right if you are going to robbed a band just for your family. I agree with the first part of your statement but where do you get your logic for the statement i marked in bold? |
|
|
|
|
Okay. Maybe legit. But I am wondering what they are copyrighting? That surely is not their design or anything else. Enough from this peanut gallery. Let's see some more green blocks!
|
|
|
|
Hmm.? It seems they cloned kano.is to the T. Even their payout page goes to kano's wallet address. Is this legit? Seems kinda fishy to me. |
|
|
|
...
From kano.is block stats
Description Time MeanTx% Diff% Mean% CDF[Erl] Luck%
...
Last 25 Blocks 7.5days 103.8% 129.08% 129.08% 0.9190 77.47%
Last 50 Blocks 13.5days 103.6% 115.96% 115.96% 0.8687 86.23%
Last 100 Blocks 25.3days 103.0% 104.70% 104.69% 0.6899 95.52%
...
They're the numbers I'm worried about. Mainly 25 and 50, since a CDF[Erl] of 0.6899 on 100 isn't in any way an unexpected value. A whole week of that sort of bad luck sux and annoys me just as much as anyone else. The main issue is that to actually cause a swing in luck that bad (and for it to not be just bad luck) would require a large hash rate. Of course no single miner on the pool has a hash rate that big and also has that sort of bad luck. So I've been working on the 'keysummary' stats and the luck reports (as mentioned before) and working on getting more history, from before I added the 'keysummary' change. Those stats I showed the other day were from 'keysummary', but as I said then, there's not enough history yet to come to any conclusions, so I'm working on generating history. That's why this pool is the best. The operator is always operating! Hopefully the next diff adjustment helps a lot. |
|
|
|
Hope y'all are being facetious...'cuz I was...  Anyway...I've got enough data now to figure how things are going to look, at least for me. I've got three S7s in Labrador that are running at a 50% overhead, including power and psu's, based on the pool's production since the halving. Those particular units were ROI already, so that's a moot question in this instance. An S9 would run at the same absolute overhead as an S7, but produces around 12THs, v. 4THs. The math isn't complicated. It will make money on a monthly basis, as do the S7s. The problem, of course, is in the ROI. Until Bitmain gets the cost down on the S9, I'm looking at running A6s instead. If I ran an S9 at the datacentre, it would take (given spot staying stable) around ten months for ROI. From kano.is block stats Description Time MeanTx% Diff% Mean% CDF[Erl] Luck% Last 5 Blocks 2.1days 104.9% 187.78% 187.78% 0.9568 53.25% Last 10 Blocks 4.8days 104.6% 206.85% 206.85% 0.9967 48.34% Last 25 Blocks 7.5days 103.8% 129.08% 129.08% 0.9190 77.47% Last 50 Blocks 13.5days 103.6% 115.96% 115.96% 0.8687 86.23% Last 100 Blocks 25.3days 103.0% 104.70% 104.69% 0.6899 95.52% Last 250 Blocks 8.4wks 102.2% 95.47% 95.11% 0.2222 105.14% Last 500 Blocks 16.9wks 101.7% 96.27% 96.15% 0.1954 104.01% 2 x this is 33.8 weeks that is 8 monthsLast 1000 Blocks 63.4wks 101.4% 93.61% 93.08% 0.0128 107.44% this is 14 monthsAll - Last 1232 Blocks 97.2wks 101.2% 94.01% 94.24% 0.0200 106.11% she may have extrapolated 10 months based on those 2 stats. it is reasonable to think it could be 10 monthsJust thought I missed something. Though if we would start hitting 10+ blocks a day regularly it could be done in ~4 months. That would be great. Let's see some bright bright green! |
|
|
|
Hope y'all are being facetious...'cuz I was... Anyway...I've got enough data now to figure how things are going to look, at least for me. I've got three S7s in Labrador that are running at a 50% overhead, including power and psu's, based on the pool's production since the halving. Those particular units were ROI already, so that's a moot question in this instance. An S9 would run at the same absolute overhead as an S7, but produces around 12THs, v. 4THs. The math isn't complicated. It will make money on a monthly basis, as do the S7s. The problem, of course, is in the ROI. Until Bitmain gets the cost down on the S9, I'm looking at running A6s instead. If I ran an S9 at the datacentre, it would take (given spot staying stable) around ten months for ROI. Am I missing something in my math? S9s run ~$2000. 13T/s gets you ~.003/block. That's ~1000 blocks for roi. Where do you get your 10 months from? |
|
|
|
Will an S9 be able to pay for itself under its lifetime ?
I might be stupid, but when I count on it I come to the conclusion that an S9 is so expensive and produces to little so it wont be able to pay for itself for a very long time.
At current prices, not considering electric cost it's almost 1000 blocks to pay itself off. If you look at our block history that should only take about 64 weeks. So barring a nice btc price increase it doesn't look very promising. |
|
|
|
|
The same reason they do everything else they do. They can. Before the halving I was fairly certain most all personal miners would have found a different pool to mine with because they lost exactly half of their revenue. I mean sure everyone did but the pools that pay tx to miners offset that halving at least somewhat. I believe most people mining here have no idea exactly how much they get per block and think, look we did 25 blocks today and I am waiting on all this BTC. If they realized they could be making much more per block at a smaller pool they'd be fools to stay here. But we are talking about people.
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the reply.
In the mean time I Googled it and found the answer.
It adjusts after every 2016 blocks are mined.
So the next adjustment in difficulty should be in approximately 2 weeks.
Just a small correction. |
|
|
|
Not saying fair. Superior. What software does your miner run? BFGminer or CGminer? Who created it? Questions you should ask yourself. From personal experience, kano is superior! Do what you want but kano and ck are the best options you have. No questions asked. (but if you do have a question, they will answer them again.!)
I'm running an S5. So, I don't know the answer to your question: the s/w is whatever is on the miner. Why is kano superior? This is the question I'm asking I choose slush with vey little information to go on based on a compromise of size vs block solutions (not really relevant as bigger payouts come less frequently with smaller miners and vice versa), their interface (dashboard), and support for noobs like me. Bitmain uses cgminer. Try kano, whom happens to be one of the developers, and you won't regret it. As far as your earlier question about %, no kano is not 100%, we are over 105% overall. Try to find a pool that can beat that  ! |
|
|
|
|
