What is the average flight speed of an unladen swallow?
|
|
|
Not bad dispersal but some very large bagholders.If one of them squats over an exchange and takes a big dump price will also go down the shitter with it.What is position on buy support when this thing hits an exchange to stop all noobs and moonmonkey from pooping all over the place?
That would be great, would love to increase my position in this. Tokens with a dividend, passive income at its finest. The devs have their funding, so it's up to them to make this a success, token price doesn't matter at all to the project now. People selling tokens are just playing with funny money until the project is complete. They want to buy high and sell low, let 'em. I'm sure I'm not the only one with their fingers on the buy trigger.
|
|
|
Why are other planets spherical but the earth is supposedly flat? Research Real Science! Venus transit across the sun in 2012, taken at the epi-center of all evil, NASA's Johnson Space Center. Basic hobbyist level telescope, a sunfilter, and a basic point&click digital camera. No photoshop. No CGI. Those sunspots are the size of the earth or larger.
|
|
|
Bought more today, will continue to accumulate.
|
|
|
Yet another fake CGI multilayered image. You are new here, so please learn about nasa fakery.
I'm always curious where these nutty ideas about NASA come from. With the thousands of NASA employees and contractors there is no way someone would get away with faking the data for any length of time. Too many within the organizations would call them out on it, there is no secret conspiracy all NASA people adhere to, that's just complete tin foil hat territory. As for evidence of a spherical earth, there are thousands of pictures from orbit. If the only way you conspiracy theorists can "debunk" all those pics is to claim: 1. a massive NASA/gov't/contractor conspiracy at all levels to fake data 2. that we've never gone to space ...then you really aren't debunking anything, just denying the life's work of generations of engineers and scientists. Apply Occam's Razor. Which is more likely, thousands of people all working together to deceive you or that you just don't grasp basic science concepts? That belongs to the level of critical thinking that also thinks scientists are in it for the money and fat gov't grants. I know I'm drivin' around in my Maserati from those juicy space research proposals, I feel sorry for those investment bankers and lawyers and medical doctors, they are really missing the gravy train, lol. https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ezgif.com-resize-6.gifYou make very good sense here. The problem with most FE people is that they have been hurt by the "system," somehow. Or at least that is what they think, though it is probably they that have hurt themselves. So, they poo, poo anything that the system says or does. Because of this, these FEers have turned FE into a cause for themselves, even a religion for those who are really hung up on it. The rest of the FE people are the few who are promoting the FE idea for whatever purposes. They know GE is reality. They know the earth is a globe. But they have an agenda. It might only be to ferret out some statistics. It might be to start a religion of sorts. It might be to get minority status with Government so that they can get special grants offered only to minorities. Whatever it is, they know that the earth is not flat. But they don't really even care, as long as they can promote their FE fiction. +1 Now let's hope that NASA quits sending children to Mars to be sex slaves. Proof: https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2017/06/29/alex-jones-guest-children-have-been-kidnapped-and-sent-slave-colony-mars/217109 Venus already took our best women -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUAx5C0CO7A http://nasawatch.com/archives/2017/06/goofy-mars-cons.html
|
|
|
Yet another fake CGI multilayered image. You are new here, so please learn about nasa fakery.
I'm always curious where these nutty ideas about NASA come from. With the thousands of NASA employees and contractors there is no way someone would get away with faking the data for any length of time. Too many within the organizations would call them out on it, there is no secret conspiracy all NASA people adhere to, that's just complete tin foil hat territory. As for evidence of a spherical earth, there are thousands of pictures from orbit. If the only way you conspiracy theorists can "debunk" all those pics is to claim: 1. a massive NASA/gov't/contractor conspiracy at all levels to fake data 2. that we've never gone to space ...then you really aren't debunking anything, just denying the life's work of generations of engineers and scientists. Apply Occam's Razor. Which is more likely, thousands of people all working together to deceive you or that you just don't grasp basic science concepts? That belongs to the level of critical thinking that also thinks scientists are in it for the money and fat gov't grants. I know I'm drivin' around in my Maserati from those juicy space research proposals, I feel sorry for those investment bankers and lawyers and medical doctors, they are really missing the gravy train, lol.
|
|
|
If you are in there, the data record will look like: NVO user id# (listed on nvo.io site); eth escrow address; eth amount you put in; similar for other altcoins going down the list ... last two entries... amount of bitcoin your funds add to amount of nvot you'll be getting
|
|
|
Creationism is testable... You can test whether the universe is older than 6,000 years... turns out, it is You can test whether god could create light before creating the sun and stars... or creating plants before the sun (bad idea; god didn't really think this creation plan through) We have artifacts from civilizations older than 6,000 years! We have artifacts from Egypt dating across the entire period where a "global flood" is claimed to have killed everyone (i.e. the flood didn't happen either) We have fossils that are millions of years old! You can test many aspects of the creation hypothesis, and it fails every test
I disagree that creationism is testable, though I do agree with everything else you say. Perhaps it is splitting hairs but since we are trying to be precise in our language I would argue that yes the *arguments* that creationists often use some are testable but the actual one and only hypothesis of creationism, that God created everything, is absolutely untestable. We can debunk every strawman or logical fallacy that creationists throw up but they will just move the bar, because it's not reasoned discovery of the truth that they are interested in, it's confirmation of already held beliefs only. Their arguments are shields, not real scientific discourse. That's the point, creationism is in no way shape or form science.
|
|
|
Thanks all, I've managed to open a paypal case, we'll see how far it gets.
|
|
|
Human evolution is a theory there's no proof that we really came from monkeys. either our source of water, how water came up in our planet if the planet was made base on big bang theory explaining.
Words and phrases must have precise operational definitions. All hypotheses must be testable. Evolution is testable. Creationism is not. If you have a "theory" as you say (what you really mean is "hypothesis" NOT "scientific theory") then it must be testable by others independently.
|
|
|
Where is the burden of proof? Who must prove what? The person making an extravagant claim must prove, via experiments and evidence, that the new claim is actually more valid than current ideas. The new hypotheses must make better predictions and successfully explain more phenomena better than current theory. The current experts are not obligated to prove that their idea is better.
|
|
|
Thanks all, unfortunately I sent funds as specified in his pm, so no chance of recovery. Hopefully others can learn from my mistake and steer clear of this guy or any like him.
You said that you've used PayPal to send the funds. Contact PayPal and recover your money. PayPal is a reversible payment method, so this should not be all too difficult. Not reversible when sent as "friends and family" instead of "goods & services". That's on me.
|
|
|
The fact is that the theory of evolution is just a theory.
|
|
|
Thanks all, unfortunately I sent funds as specified in his pm, so no chance of recovery. Hopefully others can learn from my mistake and steer clear of this guy or any like him.
|
|
|
|