Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 12:10:21 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 »
1141  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: My (and many others') rant about Bitcoin-QT on: April 24, 2013, 06:06:19 AM
John could you help answer this question on stackexchange?

http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/10117/are-change-addresses-visible-from-the-gui-in-the-bitcoin-qt-client/10140?noredirect=1#comment13366_10140
1142  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Butterflylabs Huge SCAM on: April 24, 2013, 05:55:50 AM
Quote
Hey if you want to follow it to the tee. They take new investors money to keep operations going for more than 1 year. Have you run a business for a year with zero income? Have they created any products and shipped out to pay bills, employees, taxes, electricity, supplies?

NO

When I worked in the oil and gas business, we would sometimes have wells that took years to develop. No income on the well and lots of investor money in the project. Then you have the prospect of a dry hole. High risk. High returns.

Quote
They took and used pre-order money to supplement their operation FOR A YEAR!!!! and when someone asks for their money back they get more pre-orders letting them off the hook for the older pre-orders and that tends to dry up capital. So now they raise the prices to compensate for the lack of fund.

You cannot definitively know that. Price increases corresponded with the massive value increase of bitcoins. It's logical to assume a price increase especially considering relatively weak competition.

Quote
Now they could be at the end of their R&D and about to ship products now or soon in the future but why was I told in October many times that my pre-order was estimated for delivery in the last weeks of Dec 2012 and they purchased a new location and were expecting benches for assembling the units in Feb 2013? Is that a lie? or a stretching of the truth?

They could have run into issues with the near impossible wattage benchmark and delayed the product because of weak competition.

Quote
So the ponzi scheme here is the perpetual lying of estimated ship dates. To look at their website and watch the dates of estimate shipping being changed from March to April and soon it will be changed to May. This has been going since October and from what I hear before that.

I will agree with you that it was a very poor business decision to move these dates without a great degree of transparency why. They should have opened their lab to a media source.

Quote
So its not a investment ponzi scheme, its a pre-order scheduled ponzi scheme all the same a lie and a fraud.

In these kickstarter days, I really don't distinguish between the two other than saying that we have more protection as consumers than investors.

Quote
I would say check the forums but as BFL is a great advertising payer (more money from products they have not sold) they have been removed from here.

as you put it rant over

That doesn't give this forum the right to promote fraud. We as a community must actively seek it out and punish those responsible. Bitcointalk cannot turn a blind eye to this for much longer. But we need to be patience and see what and when BFL delivers. They have a lot of questions to answer even if they deliver.
1143  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Butterflylabs Huge SCAM on: April 24, 2013, 05:47:30 AM
Quote
They won't tell you anything. They will send your money back and just take other peoples money and drag this to October. Watch

If they do, then I will still report them and also mount a campaign for a class action lawsuit. I will also petition for all BFL ads on bitcointalk to be removed.
1144  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Criticize my tamper-proof paper wallet design... and steal 0.1 BTC if you can. on: April 24, 2013, 05:46:07 AM
Quote
No (good) reason at all! My generator is based on GitHub fork of bitaddress.org from about 2 weeks ago, so whatever bitaddress.org was using back then I'm still using now. I haven't folded in any recent developments (including BIP38 which I'm considering implementing.) I'll have to ask if pointbiz/bitaddress.org are using the older crypto for compatibility reasons or if it just needs refreshing.

The only reason I mentioned is that Jeff worked pretty hard to speed up the code in version 3.0.

Quote
I've also been thinking about building in some very human random input other than mouse movement... like an option to flip coins or throw dice or something...

Mouse movements are likely to be a more random express than such inputs. JS-Crypt's implementation has not been vetted as a CSPRNG, but it seems sufficiently good. You could always implement a proof of work style random generation and then hash the solution and select the first few bits of output as your seed. All hardware will have different solution time and the randomness of network latency would also add a slight stochasticism even on the same configuration. Combined with a hash, you would have a totally random seed.

Quote
I'm enormously grateful for any source code checking anyone wants to do, especially for a forthcoming live bootable CD I intend to distribute. (Someone generously ported my design to their own linux-based command line generator which uses an in-memory filesystem and PDF generation to circumvent issues with cached print files ending up on the hard drive, etc.)

If I can find the time, then I'd be happy to help. Shoot me an email. And any course suggestions you would recommend, I'd greatly appreciate.
1145  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Butterflylabs Huge SCAM on: April 24, 2013, 05:21:51 AM
Quote
So, it's not a huge breakthrough but it's still better than a lot of you people thought.  BFL started shipping yesterday and even though it was one unit yesterday and three today, the point is: THEY STARTED SHIPPING!  So for all you people saying this is a ponzi scheme (which is a retarded thought because they didn't promise ANY kind of return, just a product, which they started to ship) or a scam, here you go: https://forums.butterflylabs.com/blogs/bfl_jody/136-shipping-update.html

I hope you enjoy the lost BTC because of your skepticism (especially those that got a refund, thanks for moving me up in line).

I ordered one. When it is connected to Slush's pool and I see 5 G/hashs of sweetness, then I will be happy. Until then:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbcctWbC8Q0
1146  Other / Off-topic / Re: Mr. Zhou Tong on: April 24, 2013, 04:47:18 AM
That's a good first start, but let's not be naive to believe that bitcointalk is universally read. I was talking about an initiative through the foundation or another org with media distribution.
1147  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Criticize my tamper-proof paper wallet design... and steal 0.1 BTC if you can. on: April 24, 2013, 04:43:04 AM
He is using crypto-js https://code.google.com/p/crypto-js/downloads/detail?name=Crypto-JS%20v2.5.4.zip&can=2&q= Simon Greatrix and Jeff Mott. Yes the implementation looks fine.

Canton any reason you didn't use the newer implementation?

https://code.google.com/p/crypto-js/
1148  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Criticize my tamper-proof paper wallet design... and steal 0.1 BTC if you can. on: April 24, 2013, 04:33:05 AM
Quote
Insert Quote
Excuse me if this seems unappreciative (I think your design is awesome and have printed out 3 wallets for my family).  But has anyone verified the Javascript in the Zip download?  I'm just wanting to make sure that the random mouse movements are actually seeding the RNG and we aren't all just making the largest Bitcoin donation in history. ;-)

If someone is paranoid and is going to go through the extra effort of doing this completely offline, it would help to have 100% confidence in the RNG.

I looked through the javascript and it seems to be legit; however, I have not invested a huge amount of time verifying this claim. The random movements are seeding the PRG; however, I have not verified that he has implemented a CSPRNG.
1149  Other / Off-topic / Re: Mr. Zhou Tong on: April 24, 2013, 04:23:15 AM
Quote
Zhou Tong,

You've posted all sorts of explanations on this forum in an attempt to establish your credibility, since you're about to start a "new project".

It appears thus far that you have zero credibility right now.

Post a youtube video (a nice long one so we can that it's you speaking from the heart/head and not some kid you hired to read from a cue card) explaining what happened with the theft.

And while you on there explaining why you aren't the one that stole, please present your passport for all to see that it was your actual passport that you copied and posted in your thread "I'm back".

If you fail to do this then we'll all know that you're an outright CONMAN who was looking to perpetrate another scheme (new project).

Or Skype a trusted well known member of this forum and have them ask you the questions posted in the thread "I'm Back".  We'll then post that Skype conversation for all to see.  We'll then know that all the skeptics were wrong about you and that you were/are an honest man.

Well, we're waiting!!!

Has anyone attempted to create some sort of awareness network for scams related to bitcoin projects or ventures? This and the issues with BFL seem to suggest that our community needs to invest more time in prevention. This isn't eve online. This is real money.
1150  Other / Off-topic / Re: Mr. Zhou Tong on: April 24, 2013, 04:11:21 AM
thx
1151  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Forbes - baseless Bitcoin hate generator on: April 24, 2013, 04:06:21 AM
Doesn't forbes feel like this sometimes?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WCTn4FljUQ
1152  Other / Off-topic / Re: Mr. Zhou Tong on: April 24, 2013, 04:04:48 AM
Would anyone be willing to give me the executive summary of what happened?
1153  Economy / Economics / Re: A long term fundamental analysis of bitcoin on: April 24, 2013, 04:02:57 AM
This thread is really near and dear to my heart. I've spent a huge sum of time trying to decide how to even begin to analyze the fundamentals of a currency like Bitcoin. It behaves like a commodity money in terms of a finite backbone, yet is entirely indexed to user supply and demand. It has enormously compelling features like pseudo-anonymity and a decentralized infrastructure, yet only a few actors have huge control over the network.

We would need some sort of Bitcoin CPI to decide the rate of deflation, yet without a more diversified distribution of the money supply and financial products like options, the volatility of Bitcoin would mask any regular measurement. I've resigned myself to just attempting to develop a probabilistic measure for when a coin has been lost of near permanently removed from circulation.   
1154  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Criticize my tamper-proof paper wallet design... and steal 0.1 BTC if you can. on: April 24, 2013, 03:46:28 AM
Canton I did a lecture today on your wallet. I recommended it to my students seeking a paper backup:

https://www.udemy.com/bitcoin-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-crypto/
1155  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoins.info - What to do on: April 24, 2013, 03:45:22 AM
I will be sure to look for them. Thank you for doing this for the community. I deeply appreciate it.
1156  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Butterflylabs Huge SCAM on: April 24, 2013, 03:36:27 AM
Quote
Except we aren't investors in their company (or in financial assets managed by their company) and we receive no dividends/interest/return and were promised none. We are customers who pre-ordered products that haven't been delivered yet.

We are and we aren't. From a legal sense we are not, but the purpose of this product is to generate revenue. Therefore, the only reason we are purchasing it is because we have made a decision our net ROI will be positive. If we were fed knowingly misleading information about the product, then this would be equivalent to a company telling its shareholders something untrue to maintain share price (convince us our ROI will still be positive).

We actually have more protection as consumers in that we can legally request a refund and involve paypal in this process. That said, I have become increasing more interested with how BFL has handled our money. And I am starting to see a very valid concern. If I do not receive a ship date for my BFL asic by the end of april, then I will email and post here a list of questions for BFL management to answer. Depending upon their answers, I will request a refund and contact the necessary parties within the government.
1157  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoins.info - What to do on: April 24, 2013, 03:29:52 AM
Thanks I donated a small sum (47c32a6235de4fe4f22bdb0ec6196e4159042cb1676e6217db2758818b9e096a). Let me know if there is anything I can do to help you. I'm also trying to get Jon and Roger to do some skype interviews for my class. I'd like new people who enter the bitcoin world to get their perspective on both the history and the future of bitcoin. If there anyone else that you suggest I try to approach for an interview?
1158  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: My (and many others') rant about Bitcoin-QT on: April 24, 2013, 03:20:52 AM
Quote
No I was very happy you changed it from that greedy $9 to free, and even gave it to some friends. But now your just saying the software has weaknesses it clearly doesn't have a weakness, if it did I be the first one on a soapbox screaming about it. Weakness in software development means that it can be hacked. This is an inconvenience that is necessary so a hacker couldn't take advantage. So I think you need more refinement and more information before making insane comments, that discredit you and your course.

You know you're right. How about I explain the formal definition as described by CWE -[http://cwe.mitre.org/] for a mainstream course designed for average everyday people. Let's spend hours using highly technical language and very precise definitions so everyone can be an armchair software engineer by the end of the course. Yes you are correct about your use of weakness. I fundamentally disagree with weaknesses being used in this sense and some members of the software development community agree with a broader notion. If I engineer my UI in a way that encourages the user to do something that could result in a hacker exploiting the software, then it is a weakness. It is not in a technical sense you are correct. But the end result is the same, the user gets screwed. Look at windows vista and UAC. Go ahead and google it. This is a the very first result: http://www.petri.co.il/disable_uac_in_windows_vista.htm. UAC was meant to correct issues windows xp had and it was so poorly designed that users turned it off. All that code was wasted.

I will not use the term nor did I intend to do so in a technical sense here. I was merely trying to collect people's frustrations with bitcoin-qt so I could make sure new users don't experience the same problems you had. Get off your damn high horse and stop being an ass. I'm trying to help this community.
1159  Other / Off-topic / Re: Mr. Zhou Tong on: April 24, 2013, 03:11:54 AM
I suspect there is an interesting backstory here
1160  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Butterflylabs Huge SCAM on: April 24, 2013, 03:03:59 AM
Again you are not in a position to determine the profitability of the ASICs. We could estimate a point at which profitability is probabilistically unlikely and then say they have committed fraud unless they refund the difference after shipping. But if they:

A) Deliver a real product as promised to the vast majority who pre-ordered
B) The product performs as the community expected or decided to agree upon revision (as indicated by their lack of cancellations of the preorder)
C) The company is capable of funding future operations based solely upon profits and debt explicitly solicited for operational capital.

Then no they are not a ponzi scheme. If BFL delays for another window without a partial refund, then you are correct that investors will likely not be able to recover their capital. In this case, they have committed fraud.

I will agree that they are poorly managed and have made bold promises that in hindsight were impossible to deliver. However, they have admitted to the revised numbers and the community who preordered has continued to maintain their orders. If BFL had continued to assert both the wattage and performance numbers and could not refund the money if requested, then yes they are a ponzi scheme.



Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!