|
761
|
Other / Meta / Re: @mods - coming back after a 7 days block. afraid to post now. asking for advice
|
on: October 14, 2014, 11:23:24 AM
|
I'm not going to nitpick over specific posts, but my advice is to look at your posts objectively (no matter your intentions), keeping in mind that you are including advertising with all your posts, and on top of that you are being paid per post. We don't judge people based on one or two posts, there are several things I look at to make my determinations.
well, while "unsubstantial posts" is allready subjective, what you say is even more. I actualy looked at my post objectivly, and the only thing I see is "this guy doesn't write long texts" |
|
|
|
|
764
|
Other / Meta / Re: @mods - coming back after a 7 days block. afraid to post now. asking for advice
|
on: October 13, 2014, 02:02:37 PM
|
For a post to be substantial, it has to contribute to a discussion in a meaningful way. It contributes nothing to merely say you agree or disagree with a post; everybody already knows that a given post will be agreed with by some people and disagreed with by others, so saying so doesn't provide any new information. It is more meaningful to say why you agree or disagree with a post, or how it relates to your own situation or experiences. Here's another post I would consider insubstantial: signing up!
address: 18JGX59bChbNUt762HLk9dQcpFSjc3pNeH
This is your only post until now?  lol. funny guy I'm sure everyone with a sense of humour can see for themselves exactly how funny or unfunny this guy is. You saying so contributes nothing to the conversation. His funny comment is not even directed at you or involves you in any way. And another: following
This isn't even an actual response to the topic. Literally nobody needs or wants to read it. If you want to be notified of new responses to a thread, click the watch button at the page. I'm actually surprised this post wasn't deleted on sight. I've also noticed that most of your posts, while not completely insubstantial, don't have much substance. You might want to try elaborating on your opinions more. I agree with the first one. I actually wasn't aware that I can't coment freely at this time. I always thought: If i'm not spamming or being offtopic, i'm ok....now i know better the second one: why did I post this? it was just to give the dev a feedback that i'm interested. I followed a link to this post in another topic. but yea, now I understand the strict rules I see the insusbstantialness. do you think "hey dev, i'm very interested in this project..keep the work going" would be sustantial? you see my problem? I'm not sure if it would be or not substantial anyway, as I'm now allowed, I thank you for your help |
|
|
|
|
765
|
Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: trading Forex with Bitcoin deposit/withdraw
|
on: October 13, 2014, 01:38:54 PM
|
Hey capoeira
Which one is currently your favourite?
Do you have to supply any personal info and photo ID to verify the accounts before they allow you to cash out?
Thanks
currently imo only FxOpen is secure to use. the problem there is the big spread when you deposit coins and have to sell them there for $s, since you can't trade Forex with a crypto-account, only cryptos and IDing is standard in Forex, since brokers are regulated |
|
|
|
|
766
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: LottoShares - Dice 0% Edge - 80LTS Airdrop to all DOGE owners
|
on: October 13, 2014, 01:25:21 PM
|
Update:
I've been trying to resolve two problems with LottoShares but have not managed to do so.
The first is a forking problem when the checkpointing server is running. The checkpointing server allows draws to take place but causes forks to take place when checkpoints aren't accepted by some clients.
The second is decentralizing the draw/random number generation. Using the block hash and a private key to generate unpredictable randomness is centralized and ultimately unsatisfactory. I think the second problem may only be resolvable in the context of a (bitshares style) delegate model.
Unfortunately I've been unable to resolve these problems in LTS despite a huge amount of effort. I have now decided to redirect my efforts to other projects.
Thanks to everybody who took part and I'm sorry it didn't turn out as well as we had all hoped.
Does that mean project is over? as you see... well, network is still working here. perhaps a dev can make a fork and take out the game component? |
|
|
|
|
768
|
Economy / Services / Re: ➫ ➬ Lucky Bit Signature Campaign ★ Earn up to 0.1BTC every month ★ Open Now!
|
on: October 02, 2014, 03:36:51 PM
|
^ if there is one, that wouldn't be on it. It's too slow!! xD The best I've seen was 90 seconds by panju1 Today's payments have been sent.
lepirate - 0.1BTC - 392b575118e4618d3758d08ccfd70cc5759a6cbcef14c7b3fbbc79a05336fce1
ajw7989 - 0.1BTC - c9c3b998b9aa581359808a981f782ddb880bcceb167d33a45176380fc120e694
KIRAZ - 0.05BTC - 2889e1c282d18d640eb9ed34aed0670cb2b43ca792e20176fdace06b62b26771
The user Gimmelfarb requested to be removed from the program, so that slot has also been vacated.
It might be some time before I update this thread - I have a busy schedule today. Keep the applications coming, I'll process everything this evening.
I would like to join this campaign
Activity: 70
Current Post Count: 101
Bitcoin Address: 12PWbAzjWhz4vWrKWM3q9oFi77TMwVK6XL
damn....that guy had his post in the paste allready ready lol |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
