|
Claymore only display GPU temperatur for GPU 0. I want to see or log temperature for all GPU
How to do so?
|
|
|
|
|
How much will autoexchange cost?
And how much time it would take?
|
|
|
|
'SSLEAY32.dll' and 'LIBEAY32.dll I got that error sometimes too. I wonder where I can get those 2 files? It seems that I got it by installing open SSL on windows. Is there a better way to do so? Currently I am able to mine using sgminer. I basically changed the sgminer with nicehash sgminer sgminer-5.6.1-nicehash-51-windows-amd64 However, if I run powershell -version 5.0 -noexit -executionpolicy bypass -windowstyle maximized -command "&.\multipoolminer.ps1 -username pornluver -workername multipoolminer -interval 60 -location europe -ssl -type amd,cpu -algorithm groestl -poolname miningpoolhub -currency btc,usd -donate 0 your miner seems to try to mine groestl using some nvidia miner. I removed nvidia option and your miner no longer run sgminer. I wonder why? It used to correctly points to sgminer. |
|
|
|
I noticed that claymore sometimes fail When it fails it will restart and fail again at the same card So sometimes I see: 04:56:49:166 f04 em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 16,
04:56:49:166 f04 watchdog - thread 0, hb time 250
04:56:49:182 f04 watchdog - thread 1, hb time 78
04:56:49:182 f04 watchdog - thread 2, hb time 79172
04:56:49:182 f04 WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
04:56:49:182 f04 watchdog - thread 3, hb time 79016
04:56:49:197 f04 WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
04:56:49:197 f04 watchdog - thread 4, hb time 78
04:56:49:197 f04 watchdog - thread 5, hb time 250
04:56:49:197 f04 watchdog - thread 6, hb time 250
04:56:49:197 f04 watchdog - thread 7, hb time 94
04:56:49:213 f04 watchdog - thread 8, hb time 78
04:56:49:213 f04 watchdog - thread 9, hb time 250
04:56:49:213 f04 watchdog - thread 10, hb time 16
04:56:49:213 f04 watchdog - thread 11, hb time 188
04:56:50:353 f04 Restarting OK, exit...
Then it restart again and I got this 04:56:54:572 f14 OpenCL platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
04:56:54:572 f14 OpenCL initializing...
04:56:54:588 f14 AMD Cards available: 6
04:56:54:588 f14 GPU #0: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 36 compute units
04:56:54:588 f14 GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480
04:56:54:588 f14 GPU #1: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 36 compute units
04:56:54:588 f14 GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 480
04:56:54:604 f14 GPU #2: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 36 compute units
04:56:54:604 f14 GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 480
04:56:54:604 f14 GPU #3: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 36 compute units
04:56:54:604 f14 GPU #3 recognized as Radeon RX 480
04:56:54:619 f14 GPU #4: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 36 compute units
04:56:54:619 f14 GPU #4 recognized as Radeon RX 480
04:56:54:619 f14 GPU #5: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 36 compute units
04:56:54:619 f14 GPU #5 recognized as Radeon RX 480
04:56:54:635 f14 POOL/SOLO version
04:56:54:635 f14 b255
04:56:54:635 f14 Platform: Windows
04:56:54:901 f14 start building OpenCL program for GPU 0...
04:57:03:792 f14 done
04:57:03:917 f14 start building OpenCL program for GPU 1... So definitely GPU 1 is problematic. However, if I wait a few minutes and run it works. I wonder what's the problem? Is it temperature? Is there a way to log temperature? Is there a way to tell claymore to wait for 1-2 minutes before restarting? I am not the only one with the problem https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/10243/claymore-crashing-watchdog-hang-error |
|
|
|
|
If I start multipoolminer I often got message that I do not have this dll and that dll. I got that in pretty much every new rig I made.
I wonder.
What libraries I should install so I can easily run all the miners out there in multipoolminer?
|
|
|
|
|
If I start multipoolminer I often got message that I do not have this dll and that dll. I got that in pretty much every new rig I made.
I wonder.
What libraries I should install so I can easily run all the miners out there in multipoolminer?
|
|
|
|
hi, i have a problem with musicoin ! i mine ethash algo on port 17020 and when its musicoin my miner said "user not authorized". i have try all individual port 20535 20555 20585 and 20565, only with 20585 musicoin i can't mine. i have add my worker on musicoin manually but always it's don't work. please help me  What host are you mining? FYI, If you mined at hub.miningpoolhub.com, you should move to appropriate nearest region server. hub.miningpoolhub.com is backup server for ethash algo, does not support musicoin yet. That's probably why I kept failing mining goerstl coins. Where should I mine anyway? Also I wonder if I should donwload certain libraries before doing multipoolminer. I know I got to download c++ redistributable. Then I also know that I got to do OPEN SSL. What else should I download? Any lists? Otherwise, most miner don't work. |
|
|
|
Claymore's sequence is finicky, it doesn't always show the order correctly. For GPU-z and Watttool, they should both show the same order, and NORMALLY, it's the order that they're plugged into the mobo, but again, I'd suggest just using what I said to make sure.
These are the order for 2 of my rigs GPU-z Wattool Watttool Index PCI-e Claymore power voltage mem voltage 1 0 0 1 75 910 900 4 1 2 3 910 900 2 2 4 5 910 900 3 3 6 2 910 900 0 4 8 4 910 900 5 5 24 0 910 900 How do I find out? I change frequency in watttool from say 2125 to 2126. Then I look around at GPU-z to see which changes. Then I jot that down. Then I turn off some card in claymore. Finally, I turn off some card in claymore and go look at the machine. After a WHILE, the card that is off will have the fan stop working. The order is always the same for both of my rigs. The only things that changes is the watttool indexes. It's 0 2 4 6 8 24 In others it's 0 20 8 14 2 36 Also the 5th card in wattool is always the card that is on PCI-e 16x. It has samsung memory that should have 30.5 mh/s. However, it only clocks 28.5 mh/s I have no idea how. If I get rid the 4 hynix card, the one with samsung will give 30.5 mh/s for ethash as expected. Put 4 hynix memory and that card performance drop ETH - Total Speed: 170.771 Mh/s, Total Shares: 391, Rejected: 0, Time: 02:48 ETH: GPU0 29.342 Mh/s, GPU1 30.586 Mh/s, GPU2 23.229 Mh/s, GPU3 29.316 Mh/s, GPU4 28.970 Mh/s, GPU5 29.328 Mh/s ETH: 04/23/17-10:55:09 - New job from europe.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17020 ETH - Total Speed: 176.632 Mh/s, Total Shares: 391, Rejected: 0, Time: 02:49 ETH: GPU0 29.299 Mh/s, GPU1 30.540 Mh/s, GPU2 29.306 Mh/s, GPU3 29.329 Mh/s, GPU4 28.865 Mh/s, GPU5 29.295 Mh/s |
|
|
|
No such "latest version" because there is no "official fork".
You need to do a little research based on the algorithm you are going to mine.
I want to mine groestl Plus I want to know typical one line start command to mine groestl. |
|
|
|
Hi
i got a request
I want to mine quark on my GPU. i have Geforce 840M...download link here doesnt work...please can somebody help me with downlod a miner and set it to my pool?
thank you so much
1 - don't use this software, it's old and there are much better sgminer versions around. 2 - don't mine quark with your gpu, there are ASICs for that. Actually what's the latest sgminer version? |
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me how can someone paying 110% pps?
How do they make more than 100%?
You already asked in another thread and I answered. How the hell they pay 110% PPS? Pool hoping?
Basically they're using it to attempt to fund a Bitcoin Unlimited takeover of the network by making people mine on a BU pool at the pool's loss; it's Roger Ver's owned pool and he's going to great lengths to garner support for BU. Yes you did. However, this guy said that it's wrong How the hell they pay 110% PPS? Pool hoping?
Offtopic for this thread, but basically they're using it to attempt to fund a Bitcoin Unlimited takeover of the network by making people mine on a BU pool at the pool's loss; it's Roger Ver's owned pool and he's going to great lengths to garner support for BU. Firstly, Bitcoin is peer2peer. If the vast majority of bitcoin wants something, then that is what bitcoin now is. Be that segwit, BU or some other better option than either of those two poor quality offerings. Secondly, Roger Ver's ckpool/ckdb pool is making an expected profit paying out 110% PPS as I explained in his pool thread, since miners are currently expected to get around 112% PPS on a zero fee pool due to transaction fees. If you wish to delete this post for being OT, then also delete yours since it contains false information. Basically I want to know 110% relative to what? Say block rewards for bitcoin is 12.5. Then? He pay 13.75. How did he get the 1.25 BTC? |
|
|
|
It doesn't have anything to do with the motherboard, it has to do with the cards.
If you're running RX 480s, you'll need a dummy plug or monitor plugged in for them to be fully recognized. If you're running older cards, a dummy plug or monitor is not required.
What's magical is I need only one dummy plug on one of the card and all the cards are fully recoqnized. Can anyone explains why? |
|
|
|
Can anyone explain this pictures: https://i.stack.imgur.com/VpzFO.pngI mined at 179-180 mh/s And yet I got a mere 140 mh/s at miningpoolhub I should test other pools too. I noticed it today. The pool is just measuring what it receives over 5 minutes (submitted shares); it doesn't actually know your hashrate. Never mind. It's fixed. Hmm the problem is the opposite now. https://i.stack.imgur.com/cTn0M.pngThe pool knows my hashrate. It's pretty exact. Why it says I make .02 shares /s though is beyond me. Yes, it will go up and down because it doesn't have access to the hashrate; it works out the same. It's a 0.02% share of the pool; if it was 100% then you would be the only person in the pool and would own everything that is found. What do you mean it doesn't have access to my hashrate? Oh I see. It only knows the number of valid shares and the stratum difficulty of my miner. So that's why it went up and down. It estimates my hashrate based on that. |
|
|
|
Can anyone explain this pictures: https://i.stack.imgur.com/VpzFO.pngI mined at 179-180 mh/s And yet I got a mere 140 mh/s at miningpoolhub I should test other pools too. I noticed it today. The pool is just measuring what it receives over 5 minutes (submitted shares); it doesn't actually know your hashrate. Never mind. It's fixed. Hmm the problem is the opposite now. https://i.stack.imgur.com/cTn0M.png----- The pool knows my hashrate. It's pretty exact. Why it says I make .02 shares /s though is beyond me. The new screenshot is even amazing. Miningpoolhub says I am sending 212mh/s. I know that the only machine points to that account produces constant 180 mh/s  Also what is this: Round Shares [Submitted shares since last found block (ie. round shares)] Est. Shares 20,150,275 (done: 0%) Your Valid 0.0000 Your Invalid 0.0000 (0.00%) So since last found block I haven't submitted any valid shares? It doesn't make sense. Also in worker configuration there is a switch called "monitor" what is it? Worker Configuration  |
|
|
|
Can anyone explain this pictures: https://i.stack.imgur.com/VpzFO.pngI mined at 179-180 mh/s And yet I got a mere 140 mh/s at miningpoolhub I should test other pools too. I noticed it today. |
|
|
|
|
I've been mining with multipoolminer for quite a while.
I wonder if there is a way to check hash at miningpoolhub? For example, say I am connected. Can I look at miningpoolhub and see ah, this rig is producing this much that rig is producing that much?
How much money we lost on "autoexchange"? Just curious.
|
|
|
|
I saw this table at miningpoolhub Equihash Zcash 17023 6,362.14238 703.63K 2
Cryptonight Monero 17024 1,732.88262 2.45M 1
Yescrypt Myriadcoin-Yescrypt 17021 78.42032 133.00K 2
NeoScrypt Feathercoin 17012 1.76224 309.16M 3
Lyra2z Zcoin 17025 1.54223 13.59G 1
Ethash Ethereum 17020 0.06424 1.67T 3
Lyra2RE2 Vertcoin 17018 0.05724 3.86G 1
Scrypt Gamecredits 17001 0.05640 567.43M 4
Qubit Digibyte-Qubit 17014 0.05438 6.40G 2
Groestl Groestlcoin 17004 0.04902 380.95M 1
Myriad-Groestl Myriadcoin-Groestl 17005 0.04031 2.23G 2
X11 Dash 17007 0.02006 706.00G 8
Skein Digibyte-Skein 17016 0.00890 29.66G 2
Sia Siacoin 17022 0.00057 2.32T 1
Keccak Maxcoin 17003 - 2.85G 1 So equihash is 6362 and ethash is .064 I think that's why miningpoolminer uses ethash However, when ratio between hash between ethash and equihash is 30Mh/s per 300h/s so that means 100k times, whattomine would recommend equihash right now Oh no. Still ethash. Hmmmm... Musiccoin though. Zclassic is not avaialable either in miningpoolhub. Groestl is on top again. Hmm your miner selection is correct then. Nvm. Whattomine shows list sorted by average profitability for last 24 hours. But miningpoolhub shows sorted by realtime, current profitability. I sometimes check whattomine and find myself confused by this little difference. You sure? Whattomine display 4 numbers. Current, last 24 hours, 3 days and 7 days I think. I always select current. I sorted by current Hey, then that's not the problem. Both profitability thing doesn't need to match same because hardware normalization is manually set. FYI, Zclassic was already listed, Musicoin is newly added on miningpoolhub now. I know what you mean. The number in whattomine presume that an RX 480 will produce 300h/s equihash or 30mh/s ethash. I took that into account. Also, besides at miningpoolhub front page, where else can we see un normalized BTC/GH/s/day? Just curious. The current ones. The number in miningpoolhub doesn't take into account miningpoolhub "luck" right? It's exact number that should be universal based on difficulty etc. I |
|
|
|
Just use a pool with e-mail alerts.
Your rigs should run for weeks/months without needing attention.
Current software is very stable.
such as? Which pool have email alerts? If we do not use their pool how do they "know" our hashrate, etc. |
|
|
|
What they said. Make every rig a different worker at the pool and set up alerts.
I use minerstat.com to keep tabs on my rigs so I'm not remoting in all the time.
minerstat.com is good? So do we have to use their pool? Is this the same with http://minerstat.xyz/ |
|
|
|
legend says...  Can't do 32. 28.7 is nice for hynix. Well, the one with samsung can do 30.7 mh/s some says hynix is the best I think they are just bragging. I haven't been able to go over 29 with hynix, while is easy to obtain 30Mhash with samsung. So Samsung is better. Ha ha ha I've heard people say hynix is the best for mining Well I can use 1500 memory strapp for hynix. For samsung I use 1750 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
