Thanks Sgt. Spike and Shorena. Think I went down a rabbit hole. As far as I can remember everything was handled by EC. Now they say they don't know where the coins are. I have pushed every button tried every address since Sept 25 and my eyes are crossed. Don't think this was meant to happen. Lesson learned! Does this help to see this???...... /Users/lauren/Desktop/Screen Shot 2014-10-17 at 7.09.44 PM.png Go here: http://imgur.com/Click on "upload images", then "browse your computer". Find the image, click "Open", then "Start Upload". And finally, copy and paste the resulting web address (in your browser's address bar) here. Then we'll be able to see the image you are trying to post.
|
|
|
This is the wallet address you provided: 35mYvUjMqiAYeobVhLc85PtHCmZKGeZ9Bi
Everything hinges on this. WHERE did you get that address (the 35mYvUjMqiAYeobVhLc85PtHCmZKGeZ9Bi)? A bitcoin address is sort of like a bank account number. You bought bitcoins and told them to send it to a particular bank account number. They sent the bitcoins, and now you are asking them where your bitcoins are. Well, they don't have them, because they sent them to the bank account number you gave to them. They are now in that bank account number. You need to remember where or how you created that bank account so you can log in and use the coins.
|
|
|
Working on sendmany for implementation on MC-CC? Hah, yep that's exactly what it was for!
|
|
|
Easy sendmany bash script #!/bin/bash #Guid gu="xxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxx" #Blockchain password pas="xxxxxxxxxx" green="1LuckyG4tMMZf64j6ea7JhCz7sDpk6vdcS" yellow="1LuckyY9fRzcJre7aou7ZhWVXktxjjBb9S" red="1LuckyR1fFHEsXYyx5QK4UFzv3PEAepPMK" BTCg="250000" BTCy="150000" BTCr="100000" echo "" curl "https://blockchain.info/merchant/$gu/sendmany?password=$pas&recipients=%7B%22$green%22%3A$BTCg%2C%22$yellow%22%3A$BTCy%2C%22$red%22%3A$BTCr%7D&shared=false&fee=10000"
Bash Script + Curl + Blockchain API Source:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=806051. Thanks for contributing, even though the bounty is over. I'm sure this will be helpful to someone!
|
|
|
Why is a single bitcoin in the form of a coin with a hologram sticker suddenly worth $1000 MORE than 1BTC?
Is the coin minted in 18k gold? Is it gold plated? Is the hologram printed on the SS Enterprise holodeck?
It looks cool, but the packaging alone does not justify 2.5BTC aka $1000+ USD!!!
Why?
They're collectibles. Why are old spanish gold coins worth many times their melt value?
|
|
|
Hi there,
i want to add 2011 casascius coin to my collection. Would prefer MS65, not interested if lower than MS63. Might be with ~casacius~ error. Post here or pm me. if we agree the trade, escrow from a white list is a must.
not interested in redeemed coins, only loaded and untouched coins please.
Thanks for reading this
I have an MS64 I'll sell for 3.5 BTC.
|
|
|
There's nothing to stop you from claiming the account was stolen and getting it right back.
I know. Is there any other way I can sell an Origin account so I can't claim it back? None that I am aware of. If you can prove original purchase, they'll give you the account back every time. You could always rent it out. In effect, say "I will guarantee this account for a year" while agreeing to keep the money in escrow the whole time. Then again, the buyer could simply play on it for nearly a year, claim that the account has been taken back, and try to get the escrow money back that way. There's not really a good solution for selling accounts online.
|
|
|
It's funny how much this mimics the sort of talk that was going around in 2011. I feel like I am reading those posts as if it were yesterday.
Here's the thing: the utility of bitcoin is essentially the same as 2011. Sure, you can spend them online with some actual, real merchants now, but nobody gives a shit about that, except for holders who are looking to buy electronics and taking advantage of the short term promotions. But the general public still does not want bitcoin. Yes, the distributed ledger is wonderful, we get that. But for Joe Q Public, there is no point in converting to bitcoin. Really none at all. The difference between now and 2011 is, bitcoin is valued much higher due to a speculative frenzy. We're still crashing down from the last bubble, that much should be obvious to anyone with the cognitive ability to see more than +/- one week. Mark my words, we are going straight down to final capitulation. 2011 prices will be returning to a shady, uninsured and overseas bitcoin exchange near you. Well, now that's just simply not going to happen.
|
|
|
So you are gemmintscom?
BTW, someone else DOES have a PSA10 graded of the same card on eBay right now, for less than $400.
|
|
|
I'll trade you a BFL mug for one.
|
|
|
People are collecting these things now?? I think I have one... but heck, holding on to it for now. I want to see where the market settles on a price for them.
|
|
|
It's funny how much this mimics the sort of talk that was going around in 2011. I feel like I am reading those posts as if it were yesterday.
|
|
|
There's nothing to stop you from claiming the account was stolen and getting it right back.
|
|
|
more proof of british background I integrated the hashmeter idea into the SVN version. It displays khash/s in the left section of the status bar.
Two new log messages: 21/06/2010 01:23 hashmeter 2 CPUs 799 khash/s 21/06/2010 01:23 generated 50.00
grep your debug.log for "generated" to see what you've generated, and grep for "hashmeter" to see the performance. On windows, use: findstr "hashmeter generated" "%appdata%\bitcoin\debug.log"
I have the hashmeter messages once an hour. How often do you think it should be?
The automatic adjustment happened earlier today.
24/02/2010 0000000043b3e500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
24/02/2010 3.78 +49%
I updated the first post.
14/02/2010 0000000065465700000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2009 1.00 30/12/2009 1.18 +18% 11/01/2010 1.31 +11% 25/01/2010 1.34 +2% 04/02/2010 1.82 +36% 14/02/2010 2.53 +39%
Another big jump in difficulty yesterday from 1.82 times to 2.53 times, a 39% increase since 10 days ago. It was 10 days apart not 14 because more nodes joined and generated the 2016 blocks in less time.
the date is in UK format DAY/month/year we know you americans love it as month/day/year, thus satoshi's computer is set as UK not US You know, that's a very good catch. That's enough for me to say that he probably wasn't from the US.
|
|
|
That chart is shown in whatever your local timezone is, not UTC.
wrong.. im british so UTC is our time zone, and the graph on satoshi's profile matches mine. thescreen grab chart you posted is not UTC. here is UTC as for the being asleep from 6pm till midnight makes no sense (american time), it fits no social standard of employed or unemployed. so due to the post counts fiting in with a UK nightcrawler coder life style and his british grammar of his posts.. im sticking with british based Good point... I think I subtracted 7 hours when I should have added 7 hours. Will revise the chart.
|
|
|
He is gonna wait until it gets dropped, so he can pick it up at registration price!
Oh there's no way I'm dropping this one... but nice thought anyway.
|
|
|
im from the UK. and the lowest number of posts of mine also correspond with the lowest post numbers of satoshi....
which coders in the UK recognise this same sleep pattern
real life 9-5, (bit of sleep either side), then nightcrawl the web/code/forum stuff evening night time
My speculation is either east-coast US with a fairly normal sleep schedule or western Europe with a coder sleep schedule. Either way, certainly not Japan.
|
|
|
That's pretty good offer.
This new extension are like .info .me not very good with search engines.
Not really. Google has said it on multiple occasions that domain extension does not matter as per their algo... though a few free domains like .tk are blacklisted as they generally associate with scam. There is no problem at all with .me or .info. One of the biggest example to support this claim is if u search Google with the keyword 'about', U'll get about.me among top 5 natural listing. Had an offer via email, but he stopped responding. Not sure about that one. Anyway, domain is still up for sale. Still willing to accept 3 BTC!
I'd prefer to wait till January 31, 2015 Why's that?
|
|
|
That chart is shown in whatever your local timezone is, not UTC.
|
|
|
|