It's only an announcement type of channel with Claymores download URLs around. Suspicious. A discussion type channel would be better IMO. especially since there are not many new versions coming out  Yeah that's what I meant indirectly. Including links to the miner looks like a cheap ass trick to get someone hacked in the future by replacing the URL with the phishing one after gaining some trust.  I'm sorry 4ward if you don't have any intention like this. Your announcement channel does not make any sense. you meants taras700 )) |
|
|
|
It's only an announcement type of channel with Claymores download URLs around. Suspicious. A discussion type channel would be better IMO. especially since there are not many new versions coming out |
|
|
|
|
C31 on 1660ti doesnt hash.
at start GPU load is high for a few seconds, but then drops to 0 and miner continues to run without errors
|
|
|
|
Has Nanominer some parameters to start via cmd file like many other miners? This would be useful for me, because i use your miner with NemosMiner
lol same question as me 2 posts before Has Nanominer some parameters to start via cmd file like many other miners? This would be useful for me, because i use your miner with awesomeminer and i want to configurate every rig from main Aweseomeminer computer and donīt want to config every rig with the config file.
We will add appropriate info to readme file on GitHub ASAP thanks Try Forager, it's already supported: https://github.com/yuzi-co/Forager/releasesWhy? I will use it with awesomeminer. Why? I will use it with nemosminer. im after cuda cmd comands.. Forager is running nanominer for cpu Best Regards Nemo Is if the performance is good enough? I can't test on NVIDIA, but AMD performance is better with other miners, so I only have CPU RandomHash Answer to myself since I got an NVIDIA card... Performance is not as good as other miners |
|
|
|
Forager 19.04.1 releasedhttps://github.com/yuzi-co/Forager/releasesChangelog: - Fix Autoexec - Add error checking for unpacking miners - Remove most custom intensities - Custom intensities can be set in /Config/MinerParameters.json - Enable nvidia-smi on Linux (power usage) - CPU power estimation on Linux - Fix start process in folder with spaces Miners: TeamRed 0.4.4 lolMiner 0.8.1 GrinPro 2.1 WildRigMulti 0.15.5 preview (Honeycomb algo) TTMiner 2.2.2 NanoMiner 1.2.1 CCMinerMTP 1.1.17 NBMiner 22.3
|
|
|
|
|
Forager-v19.04.7z and Forager-v19.04.exe were re-uploaded with hotfix for Console resize with non-core Powershell and Spaces in folder name issues.
The issues are non relevant for Linux users
|
|
|
|
Forager 19.04 releasedhttps://github.com/yuzi-co/Forager/releasesChangelog: - Initial Linux support. See Linux.md for details - Tested on HiveOS, Ubuntu, Mint - Move configs to /Config (Existing Config.ini will be copied automatically) - Support custom parameters for miner (override default intensity) - Add Acc/Rej shares - Support Merge Mining (LOKI+Turtle) on MinerRocks - ReportStatus in background job to not stall interface - Update AMD miner with mem requirements for old cards - Lot of core updates and fixes Miners - GMiner 1.38 - NanoMiner 1.2.0 - SRBMiner 1.8.3 - NBMiner 22.1 - LukMiner 0.15.12 (linux only) - CpuMinerRplant 4.0.4 - WildRigMulti 0.15.4p18 - MiniZ 1.2m - GrinPro 2.0rc - CryptoDredge 0.18 - XMRig NVIDIA 2.14.3 - RHMiner 1.5 - XMR-Stak 2.10.4 - CCMinerMTP 1.16.1 - MultiMiner 1.2 (linux only) - BMiner 15.4 - TeamRed 0.4.3 - CpuMinerBF 3.8.11 - NHeqVerus 0.7.2 - TTMiner 2.2.1 - Phoenix 4.2c - AMD VerusMiner 2.0
|
|
|
|
Has Nanominer some parameters to start via cmd file like many other miners? This would be useful for me, because i use your miner with NemosMiner
lol same question as me 2 posts before Has Nanominer some parameters to start via cmd file like many other miners? This would be useful for me, because i use your miner with awesomeminer and i want to configurate every rig from main Aweseomeminer computer and donīt want to config every rig with the config file.
We will add appropriate info to readme file on GitHub ASAP thanks Try Forager, it's already supported: https://github.com/yuzi-co/Forager/releasesWhy? I will use it with awesomeminer. Why? I will use it with nemosminer. im after cuda cmd comands.. Forager is running nanominer for cpu Best Regards Nemo Is if the performance is good enough? I can't test on NVIDIA, but AMD performance is better with other miners, so I only have CPU RandomHash |
|
|
|
Has Nanominer some parameters to start via cmd file like many other miners? This would be useful for me, because i use your miner with NemosMiner
lol same question as me 2 posts before Has Nanominer some parameters to start via cmd file like many other miners? This would be useful for me, because i use your miner with awesomeminer and i want to configurate every rig from main Aweseomeminer computer and donīt want to config every rig with the config file.
We will add appropriate info to readme file on GitHub ASAP thanks Try Forager, it's already supported: https://github.com/yuzi-co/Forager/releases |
|
|
|
Forager 19.03.2 releasedhttps://github.com/yuzi-co/Forager/releasesChangelog: - Phoenix 4.2a - NBMiner 21.2 - GMiner 1.36 - TeamRed 0.4.2 - WildRigMulti 0.15.4p7 for (Rainforest) - CpuMinerMulti 1.3.6.1 (Rainforest) - XMRig 2.14.1 - CCMinerVerus 3.3 - TTMiner 2.1.17 - NanoMiner 1.1.1 - XMR-Stak 2.10.1 - BMiner 13.3 - SRBMiner 1.8.0 - WildRig 0.10.5 (WildKeccak) - RHMiner 1.4 Core fixes Pool updates CnR, CnGpu, CnRwz, Rainforest and Verushash support
|
|
|
|
I have a quick question about the following API call: https://miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=api&action=getminingandprofitsstatisticsThis API call returns some great information about each pool. I would like clarification on what the units and time frame are for the following fields? "normalized_profit": 0.05755849, "normalized_profit_amd": 0.0281461, "normalized_profit_nvidia": 0.08190574, "profit": 0.05755849, It seems from some previous conversations, the profit is "per 24 hour period" - is this correct? Also, is the profit in units of $$, coin, percentage of coin? Any ideas? Finally, is there an individual "profit" per USER available in another call? It does not look like it. Thank you!! its currently estimated profit |
|
|
|
|
What is there to mine with Rainforest?
Only thing I found is MBC, and it's not that profitable
Is there anything else?
|
|
|
|
|
--cgpuintensity value (gpu intensity, comma separated values)
--cgputhreads value (number of gpu threads, comma separated values)
--cgpuworksize value (gpu worksize, comma separated values)
do those need to always be comma separated values or a single value will be used for all cards?
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
I've also noticed that the reported hashrate varies by quite a bit. Is this calculated based on actual results or something else? Here's an example:
Looks like you are mining x16 family algo, or similar(bitcore, timetravel and x21s). Each of these algorithms have hashorder thing. By simply saying, more green there - higher hashrate  To my understanding, variance is and should be happening only on x16r and x16rt since the used algos vary, for others just the order changes so it should be stable No, hashorder is order of different amount of hash functions(each is a separate algorithm), and if it vary - hashrate vary too. So not only x16r and x16rt have jumping hashrate. Lets say it takes 10ms to calculate a slow algo and 1ms a fast one, so if you do slow first then the fast one, its 10 + 1 = 11ms And if the order is reversed then its 1 + 10 = 11ms again... Just that you eventually do it with more algos. x16r and x16rt the algos used are random (from a given set) so it varies, but for example x16s, its same algos but different order, so it remains stable maybe I miss something, but this logic supports my own experience mining them |
|
|
|
Thanks.
I've also noticed that the reported hashrate varies by quite a bit. Is this calculated based on actual results or something else? Here's an example:
Looks like you are mining x16 family algo, or similar(bitcore, timetravel and x21s). Each of these algorithms have hashorder thing. By simply saying, more green there - higher hashrate To my understanding, variance is and should be happening only on x16r and x16rt since the used algos vary, for others just the order changes so it should be stable |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
