bitcoinunlimited.support 4 sale
make offer
Dude, you've just registered that domain name, it doesn't worth shit... Don't waste your money registering worthless domains. Not true, it might be worth a couple bucks if the Hardfork from the BitcoinUnlimited is going to push, otherwise, yeah this domain is completely useless. Haha, even so. Look, bitcoincore.support is still available.  There is a domain for "support"? That won't sell. It is not common and ungodly ugly to have at the send of your website's name. Keep it two character is the norm now not going backwards with three characters. That is so .com!  Now there are hundreds of terminations, think about something and there's probably a gTLD for that. |
|
|
|
bitcoinunlimited.support 4 sale
make offer
Dude, you've just registered that domain name, it doesn't worth shit... Don't waste your money registering worthless domains. |
|
|
|
so why are we talking about fork leading to two versions of bitcoin, if BU gets 75% concensus then logically BU should be the only bitcoin and the other fork should be killed, just the mining logic of adding to the longest chain.
No, it's not logic, Chinese miners may not be proceeding in good faith, bitcoin is widely used in China to evade capital controls, that is not something the Chinese government is very fond of, so Chinese miners may be being subsidized to take more control over the network in order to control transactions. This is the kind of state sponsored attack we've been talking for years, if more states around the world begin to subsidize bitcoin mining we might be able to compete with Chinese and keep bitcoin decentralized. BTW, only 40.6% of hashrate is signaling for BU and only 11.32% nodes are BU, can't see where you get the idea the majority supports BU... |
|
|
|
ok suppose what you are saying is true and no one supports BCU, suppose by some miracle in few months majority of miners like whatever percentage value they have decided supports BCU then in that case bitcoin core developers must support BCU and BCU must be BTC or will there be a different excuse then.
Then BCU and BCC goes live everywhere and let the market decided, but don't forget Metcalfe's law, the two chains together will be worth less than one chain, a split will be bad for everyone. |
|
|
|
|
Because S9 is a computer specifically made for bitcoin mining, it is highly efficient and has an enormous processing capacity (hashing) when compared to graphic cards.
You can still mine bitcoin with graphic cards but you'll need to spend a lot of more money to achive the same results as dedicated hardware.
|
|
|
|
So apparently the core developers want to change bitcoin POW, I want to ask that when the majority of the bitcoin community is slowly reaching a consensus on BTU then instead of supporting the consensus why are they hell bent on destroying btc?
Is bitcoin no longer a decentralized system where everyone can decide for themselves and then the majority wins?
Finally, if the majority of the bitcoin miners and bitcoin users seem to favor BTU then why they dont support it?
I believe you're making some assumptions that may be false. How do you know the majority of miners supports BCU? How do you know the majority of users supports BCU? Are you basing your assumptions on any kind of reality based information? |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Ticker Widget and Blockfolio are all you need.
You can set alerts with Blockfolio for a shit load of altcoins also, and keep track of your trades.
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't planning on selling for long time, unless I really needed the money, but with current events I think I'm going to sell all my bitcoin, just keeping some altcoins.
If a split happens in the network value will drop a lot, just the uncertainty about this event may crash the price.
Miners/developers war will be our doom.
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't the threshold for no verification $2000?
Did you went above this number?
You said a 'fair amount of BTC'...
|
|
|
|
|
Time to dump all the coins, too much uncertainty about the future of bitcoin, hostile takeovers, splits, change in PoW, value is going down, time to take profits and wait for some stability.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm like 50% in, bitcoin around 12%, it has been a much better store of value than if I had cash or any other bank savings products.
It has been quite a journey.
|
|
|
|
By chance, I share your point of view. There are many coin with potential X2 at the moment, but AMP has a greater growth potential, at least X30 in a longer term. The extreme fall that happened is very good news for the future.
Going by my username I think you should know that I don't like small profits. 100% profit is like breakfast for me. I am looking for 2000-3000% profits with AMP, this will be a big fish once it is released and starts growing. Imagine Twitter 2.0 for only 4500 satoshi. Is that a good investment? You decide. Dude, Twitter is a money burner since the beginning, it was never profitable, still isn't and its shares are consistently losing value for the past 3 years... |
|
|
|
Whichever fork is adopted by the majority, bitcoin will probably split, plan accordingly, a pump and dump battle may be on the horizon where Core proponents dump Unlimited bitcoins and Unlimited proponents dump Core bitcoins they will also buy their chosen bitcoin, fun times ahead. Yesterday was crazy, you could see the capital fleeing away from bitcoin to Ethereum, as bitcoin's market cap was decreasing Ethereum's was increasing, amazing stuff.
People are starting to vote with their money on the development team's choices, Segregated Witness and Lightning Networks have been controversial since the beginning and eventually it will reflect on the price.
Bitcoin's market cap and trade volume dominance have never been lower, and they will go lower.
Why dont you spread youre ETH FUD pump talk in the Alt-section? Never had Ethereum, still have none, although I could have been amongst the first investors, sadly I passed that opportunity. Why don't you go fuck yourself? |
|
|
|
|
Yesterday was crazy, you could see the capital fleeing away from bitcoin to Ethereum, as bitcoin's market cap was decreasing Ethereum's was increasing, amazing stuff.
People are starting to vote with their money on the development team's choices, Segregated Witness and Lightning Networks have been controversial since the beginning and eventually it will reflect on the price.
Bitcoin's market cap and trade volume dominance have never been lower, and they will go lower.
|
|
|
|
|
The article is crap and tries to induce in error less savvy readers.
There are a lot of bitcoin forks, litecoin and dogecoin are examples of such forks the same way Joomla! is a fork of Mambo, Bitcoin Unlimited is a protocol upgrade.
In bitcoin development what is called a fork, hard or soft, is different from what the author is trying to compare with.
BTW, the same claim can be made about the changes Bitcoin Core team is trying to introduce.
|
|
|
|
I thought it would be cool if the domain becomes .btc  I see this as identity khusu for site owners bitcoin at least it was more cool in my opinion Just what I wanted to say, it would be cool to have a .btc for all known Bitcoin sites to "isolate" them from the rest. Most early adopters have already taken the cool names. Yes, scammers will take advantage of this by spoofing the sites, but it will also be beneficial if you want to make Bitcoin sites special. ..... It will be a mad rush to get Freebitco.btc and Bitcointalk.btc I'm not sure that .bitcoin or .btc or anything actually fits with anything. Freebitco.in works but Freebitco.btc is just weird. That would be the same for any Bitcoin related sites - there's no point saying Bitcoin a hundred times in the site's title. Just because we have a topic to talk about doesn't mean we need a domain for it. Amazon isn't Amazon.fiat. But free.bitcoin and buy.bitcoin would be awesome domains, probably premium and very expensive to own. |
|
|
|
Extension is way too long...this is not needed.
Yup thats exactly my thinking, .bitcoin seems too long a standard 2 to 4 letter extension seems neat and professional. Now, in this case, a .btc might be a good alternative to .bitcoin No, .bitcoin is not too long for a gTLD, don't know which one is biggest, but there are some quite big: https://www.namecheap.com/domains/new-tlds/explore.aspx?page=2The issue with a bitcoin gTLD is who owns the rights to the name, you cannot simply register a gTLD, it has to be generic or you need to own the rights to the name! |
|
|
|
Interesting stuff, last time litecoin was used in a pyramid scheme value increased 4x, even scammers now choose other currencies over bitcoin, bitcoins dominance as never been lower than todays.
Ethereum may become the dominant currency in the coming years.
you clearly don't understand what the purpose of choosing altcoins is. bitcoin isn't an asset that can increase in value like 3-4× within a very short amount of time due to its size. and that's exactly why altcoins are a preferred option for whatever 'high level' scam artist. what matters for them are the profits, and that's it. More like nobody wants to deal with "my transaction doesn't confirm" avalanche of users complaining. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
