It's not a big deal, but is anyone else getting 2 emails anytime you get a payout notification? Just wish I would get double paid like the double emails.  occasionally I do. I get the double emails most the time. Today's payout I only got a single email notification. I got 1 normal and 2 dual today. just seems random. |
|
|
|
hello all
Im sorry but I have another question about Antminer S1 Im a bit of PC noob. I have noticed that there are two 6 pin power connectors on Antminer I have two Corsair CX 430 could I plug 1 PSU in one board and the other PSU in other board thats 2 x 430 PSU for one Antminer would that work Im only asking because I have them already.
Once again Many Thx for any Advice
Steve
It should. Others use 2 different 750's in this way to power 3 S1's. |
|
|
|
It's not a big deal, but is anyone else getting 2 emails anytime you get a payout notification? Just wish I would get double paid like the double emails. occasionally I do. |
|
|
|
|
blah what a waste of 1day 5+ hours!!
It didnt seem to shave off the ones that jumped on from our crazy luck the previous days!!!
|
|
|
|
That means that you missed a few commands. I made a sure-fire way to get it done every time. Try this: cd /usr/bin/
wget http://kano-kun.net/AntS1/cgminer-ants1-4.3.2a-85fcf0c
chmod +x cgminer-ants1-4.3.2a-85fcf0c
mv cgminer cgminer.original
rm cgminer
ln -s cgminer-ants1-4.3.2a-85fcf0c cgminer
reboot
I got to wget part after entering still says wget: can't open 'cgminer-ants1-4.3.2a-85fcf0c': file exits [/quote] FYI: instead blind faith, doing a ls -lsart /usr/bin/cgminer-ants1-4.3.2a-85fcf0c would have confirmed the directory actually had files in it. If you thought maybe the download did not complete you could have renamed or deleted the cgminer-ants1-4.3.2a-85fcf0c directory. |
|
|
|
Ive had two of the stock fans die on my miners. I put the fans I use to push hot air out on the otherside of the miner, but they do not cool nearly as well as stock. Any idea where I can replace these?
Dell precision 390/380/t3400 etc main case fans are the same as the S1 2014 models use. you need to adjust the wiring pins to match the color of the s1 and note 1 empty slot will hang off. These will hit the 2800RPM speeds unlike the junky 2013 S1 fans |
|
|
|
Can anyone answer my question. What is an acceptable top range for the temp on Antminers??
Under 79 F is perfect I recommend not over 90 F Juan wait 79F?? that is impossible to have an S1 run at 90F that is 26C. Unless I am missundertanding which temp you are referring too with 2 fans and a 72F server room mine sit at 42-44C aka 107.6f 111.2f out of the server room they sit at 46c-48c aka 114.8f 118.4f I wouldnt run these over 50C 122F |
|
|
|
I have noticed that since around the time the total average hash rate changed to the last 60 minutes, the shares per worker display has become erratic. It used to show any change at each page refresh, and the number of shares always increased steadily until a round ended; now the number updates only after an interval (I have not yet determined how long) and the number of shares sometimes falls: for instance, just now when I refreshed the page one of my workers fell from 1933 to 1931 shares. Some minutes earlier it had dropped from 2053 (and now I see it has fallen again to 1905). The round and block number (299880) had not changed, the Mhash/s for each worker is within the expected range, and the time since the last share is usually zero. The estimated reward also fluctuates wildly: while I have been writing this it has varied between .00002876 and .00007421. Could this be anything to do with the high variance in payments per round that I am experiencing? Has anyone else seen similar behaviour?  I dunno something odd always goes on with Slush Pool.... I periodically see my miners showing their hashrate 10% lower than their true hashrate. My miners do not fluctuate below 200 mh/s so there is absolutely no reason why an hour would show 10% less. some sit at 210 some sit at 202. so the average should always be 206ish. not 195 once in awhile. in all reality it doesnt matter, maybe someone is skimming, maybe there was network issues (which is bs cuz that would clear up after 1 hour), there are much better things to worry about. the block ends and it goes back to normal. I could complain and whine and maybe it will get tracked down and fixed but most likely not. |
|
|
|
"This is not a valid Bitcoin address. Please install Bitcoin client or register some web wallet to get one." I had this once and it cleared after I forced a page update (F5). I hope that works for you. No idea what caused it in the first place. [Edit] There was a flurry of these last September. It seems to have been fixed promptly, although I could not see an explanation. Maybe my page refresh was just a coincidence. Yeah it isnt doing it anymore. just odd. |
|
|
|
|
Why is this showing up on the My Account page? and no I didnt change my address and yes my payouts are working fine.
"This is not a valid Bitcoin address. Please install Bitcoin client or register some web wallet to get one."
|
|
|
|
One of the recent batch (ordered at the first recent sales day) S1 works for 5 min, then disconnects, then in a few seconds beeps, then reconnects.
This cycle repeats all day long. What could be the cause?
i tried to reboot multiple times, switched off power supply, then back on-no cure. I have a feeling that I have a rare faulty unit. Thanks for any suggestion.
70% likely its your power supply. after 3min or so the antminer is at full speed and after a minute or two of this your PSU is finally overloaded and switches off. a lot of power supplies will attempt to restart themselves when this happens My problem is apparently solved (fingers crossed). It was, actually, quite interesting. A combination of two factors: 1. this particular miner has a bit slower fan speed at higher temperatures. In my previous machines, they go to 2700-2800 rpm when temperatures rise to ~49-50, but the problematic unit stays at ~2100-2300 rpm. 2. The construction of the unit changed just a bit. On my March units, PWM fan cords hang by the side, but now they decided to tuck them inside of a plastic rail in from of the fan (I don't know how to post non website pictures here), which restricts the airflow toward the top left of the unit somewhat (when facing the fan from the exhaust direction). As a result of both factors, on this particular unit, the airflow toward the inside (top part, where circuits are) of the unit was significantly restricted with chips located there being very hot on touch. I used a medium size Vornado fan, directing additional air flow toward the "hot" zone. No more disconnects overnight. Happy hashing! I've found all 11-12/2013 S1 models have fans that dont go higher than 2100 rpm. I replace them with fans out of Dell 390/380/t3400 etc... that fan is the one on all the units that go to 2800 rpm. the pins on the dell fans need to be moved to match the S1 fan pin 1 Blue/Yellow/Red/black/empty I put 2 of these fans on and my units sit at 41-42 in a server room 43-45 out of server room |
|
|
|
Hi jimrome, the temperature is lowered about 2 or 3 degrees, but in the interface Fan1 rpm is 2080 and Fan2 rpm is 0. The fan that I have added is PWM with rpm sensor but no rpm (zero) is showed in the interface.
W_M
as far as I know it will never display the 2nd fans speed. and using 2 fans will NEVER interfere with the other fan as these are not ENCLOSED, the air goes mostly down so adding a 2nd fan gets the other half of the boards cool and like u know 2-3 cooler. mine go from 48+ to 42ish so 6+ cooler |
|
|
|
You've been around long enough to know you'll check back at the pool and cry about all the blocks you missed the moment you leave.  I will cry no more than 3 pages I promise I'm still waiting on the answer of how to fix LUCK. I got the coin in my hand now please tell me how to make it always land heads up without modifying its physical properties |
|
|
|
|
where is all the drama?
did everyone jump to another pool from the long blocks? OMG!
why havent we had an orphan or an invalid in awhile! something must be wrong! slush is causing this!
|
|
|
|
Each PCIE connection on the S1 miner requires a separate cable, try it that way also. (no splitters)
No it doesn't. What makes you think that? definitely doesnt... However I prefer my wires to not be hot to the touch, slightly warm is better. but either way the same amps are getting there. |
|
|
|
|
We are due for an ORPHAN...
so we are also due for 5 people declaring something is wrong and they are moving their miners.
and go...
|
|
|
|
Mine varied like that. I think if you go back a couple of pages Luke Jr explained it as, it is an estimated position in the payout after x blocks. So whatever the software uses to work that out has variables that change slightly. The main thing is Eligius pays out. It gets there it just takes time LOL.
Edit: It's half way down page 55.
ah ok... I'm not worried about payout, just thought it was odd. |
|
|
|
Just want to point out that we're about 7 hours into this DDoS. (Started at a little before 6AM my time and its 1PM now...)
They continue to just concentrate their firepower on one or two nodes and are just causing a nuisance to some miners who get forced onto other nodes.
Sorry about this. While my DDoS protection automation is pretty good, this attack is actually giving me a chance to test some new methods and I'm improving things as we go.
Hopefully either they give up or I make my protections just that much tougher.
I'll note that this attack really hasn't had a huge impact and note that we've found a good amount of blocks while it's been happening.
-wk
Just as an FYI I have 3 miners on 2 different networks. The 1 miner on cable (Optimum Online) cannot get to you. The other 2 which are on my own IP block can. -Dave yeah I had an optimum unable to get there also. seems ok now but its shotty |
|
|
|
|
how does "putting this user's payout after a 35 block delay." increase instead of decrease over time?
24 hours ago that was 32 block delay.
It was 35 like 10 hours ago. You would think it would decrease by now, but it seems I should expect it to increase instead.
Just seems odd, are others payouts at elite status to mine?
|
|
|
|
Once the PSU gets sorted then it will be quieter than a gen 1 Avalon, louder than my cooling modded gen 1 Avalon but potentially the same noise level as an Antminer.
We're checking the PSU fans issue. If possible, we'll release firmware upgrade reducing the fans speed. The PSU has a thermal sensor, so we might be able to have a control loop in firmware through the I2C. WIP looks like a standard server power supply, so if you accounted for that with fan control pinouts to the circuit board i'de think it would be a simple firmware update. assuming of course that was done, no clue why it wouldn't be done with all the other build out and planning. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
