|
...but when the stars were wrong, they could not live.
anybody here?)
|
|
|
|
good morning, I have bad news !!! Superblocks dont work
I need to know how to solve this problem !!! only SENTINEL update will solve? do you have to work on any programming thing? can someone guide me !!!
the community is not interested, unfortunately. once again, majority of the hashrate pushing old proto, so theres not much to expect. |
|
|
|
Good morning everyone, we already got 517 votes to test the superblocks, according to Charlie the superblocks has already been repaired but it doesn't work 100% because of the SENTINEL update and so we would need more votes than the minimum needed so let's wait on March 3rd to see the result and know what the next step is going to be, we need the whole community to come together to solve all the problems so that AXE can move forward
testnet is dead from what I remember so no one had a chance to even test them - not sure if you guys are not wasting your time with this on mainnet. |
|
|
|
Hello, Charlie, have any plans on the 2021 code for Axe coin? Will there be a new wallet version in the future and the code still follow the footsteps of Darkcoin? zero plans. most of the hashrate is still on old proto and vast majority of operators would not update. so ask the community about future versions) |
|
|
|
What do we have here? Is the political effect affecting the external? In my opinion, Axe history is great and has its qualities and defects...
So why did they get to that point?
Axe was to be on the path of moon...
Its zero-involvement effect, can’t think of anything else)) and also can’t remember any moment regarding the moon path ahahah. besides me nobody else wants to build gitians, so what moon lol?)))))))) moon of embarrassment - maaaybe https://github.com/AXErunners/gitian.sigsbut idk what kind of moon anybody could think of if theres just me and ddude pushing. theres been some heavy shillers in recent years years who mined huge piles and then tried to work it like any other legacy MN fork. but no shit they failed - you still have to read docs)) |
|
|
|
Old discord is closed since it wasn’t helping the network and I don’t have time keeping it in shape. Its a community project, anyone is free to start another discord server or two. Network performance is more important than centralized chats, but extensively being ignored.
No, it is not a community project. It is effectively a Charlie project, not even a tweet escaped your narrow view, both I and wang had our tweets deleted. The discord had all history to search back on for every community member, and several from the community offered to take over control to keep it, you refused. These chats are centralized by one reason, they are on platforms that people use. Noone use IRC for these purposes. It is not your lack of time being the problem, it is your centralized control over every aspect. The most valueable aspect of a community project is network performance of the communities, NOT network performance of the code. Communities want a place to commute, not a place to be ranted on. Treating people as bad as you do you can't expect any community member to step up making any community chat. It would also not be included in the site or anywhere else you control. For AXE to move on you must give up control over the site, twitter, reddit and every other communities we have/had as you have shown no knowledge of running any community. I warned for a looong time network stability is nowhere. Theres no support for maintenance and development. Look how busy this thread)) Or github.. Besides ddude idk any other contributors to offer reddit or twitter or domain creds, but I hope somebody would step in here. And now you saying I controlling things ahahah. Thats exactly why this thread is non OP-moderated))) wow Sounds like mutiny to me, Charlie. If you’re a real dev you can do it. Ignore the naysayers - just let them dump. i really dont care))) the only thing that matters for me is codebase) all you need to work with codebase is codebase itself. Theres also irc if github/gitlab/local repo workflow is not sufficient enough. the rest - with 70+ repos in the library, i dont care about anything else for a long time due catastrophic lack of time, only one set of eyes and no live interest in testing rollouts |
|
|
|
Old discord is closed since it wasn’t helping the network and I don’t have time keeping it in shape. Its a community project, anyone is free to start another discord server or two. Network performance is more important than centralized chats, but extensively being ignored.
No, it is not a community project. It is effectively a Charlie project, not even a tweet escaped your narrow view, both I and wang had our tweets deleted. The discord had all history to search back on for every community member, and several from the community offered to take over control to keep it, you refused. These chats are centralized by one reason, they are on platforms that people use. Noone use IRC for these purposes. It is not your lack of time being the problem, it is your centralized control over every aspect. The most valueable aspect of a community project is network performance of the communities, NOT network performance of the code. Communities want a place to commute, not a place to be ranted on. Treating people as bad as you do you can't expect any community member to step up making any community chat. It would also not be included in the site or anywhere else you control. For AXE to move on you must give up control over the site, twitter, reddit and every other communities we have/had as you have shown no knowledge of running any community. I warned for a looong time network stability is nowhere. Theres no support for maintenance and development. Look how busy this thread)) Or github.. Besides ddude idk any other contributors to offer reddit or twitter or domain creds, but I hope somebody would step in here. And now you saying I controlling things ahahah. Thats exactly why this thread is non OP-moderated))) wow |
|
|
|
|
Old discord is closed since it wasn’t helping the network and I don’t have time keeping it in shape. Its a community project, anyone is free to start another discord server or two. Network performance is more important than centralized chats, but extensively being ignored.
|
|
|
|
It says "there arent any discussions". Are u sure the chat boards are precisely this sought after feature everyone wants to have baked in? Chat boards. What are these boards, where are they? How are u supposed to chat? If I were to chat with anybody I would simply open my mouth wherewith I normally propagate the tokens of utterance - successions of hoots, howls and grunts. yea thats my question too. you wanna talk adult stuff but everybodys always on “magic candles” and other shit like tokens and pos ahahqh |
|
|
|
awesome! lets vote, operators!! |
|
|
|
How many AXE for a masternode? What’s the lock-up period? Thanks.
1000 AXE, you should see first mined coins in around 4 days now So there’s no fixed lock-up period like 6 months for example? technically, the node needs to go thro the queue to get a reward. one could interpret the time needed to pass the queue as locking period. |
|
|
|
How many AXE for a masternode? What’s the lock-up period? Thanks.
1000 AXE, you should see first mined coins in around 4 days now |
|
|
|
Please vote for the superblock test proposal!
 |
|
|
|
|
just upgraded to v0.3 and noticed that history was cleaned up and everything was deleted prior october 2020. Is this some cap on the history or undocumented changes in mechanics? There was one tx that failed and recover call returns an empty error. I thought to resolve this after production release but can not see/access that tx anymore on current build.
|
|
|
|
and what about pre-bip47 and rest legacy utxos?  while theoretically any coin inside a script containing hash of the public key is safer but you have to keep in mind that any weakness in any part of the bitcoin protocol, specially in something so fundamental such as ECDSA will affect the entire bitcoin system the same way. BTW BIP-47 (ie. reusable payment codes for HD wallets) is irrelevant here. O yea you right, that would be number 16 i thought about. Is it?) Trying to figure which one started the script flow |
|
|
|
Not just sha, ecdsa is also not quantum-resistant, so what could be mechanics if all crypto is being replaced?)
While elliptic curve multiplication is vulnerable to quantum attacks, SHA256 isn't. At best, SHA256 being attacked with a quantum computer still requires 2 128 operations, which would take trillions upon trillions of years. so does this mean that coins that arent moved from legacy address would be “recovered” during such transition?))
Coins sent to a brand new legacy P2PKH address would be safe from quantum attacks. Coins on any P2PKH address which has previously moved coins out of it would be vulnerable. and what about pre-bip47 and rest legacy utxos? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
