Am i defending Lauda?
You literally are.There are no facts to which you have said,Lauda will give you neg if you oppose her idea/way thats lauda's thing together with his gang you will notice if lauda has negged you,2nd and 3rd the notion will come  |
|
|
|
But you have still abused the DT rating in the past Tagging Non-English speaking people I see that as out of Anger of Foreigners and clear abuse.
Yes, I was doing that before the merit system came into existence, and yes I did indeed criticize shitposters with no command of the language trying to post in the English sections and thereby making them unreadable. I don't regret any of that, because it was far different pre-merit system. Those feedbacks should all be gone, because I was asked to remove them when I got put on DT last year and I don't leave trust like that anymore, nor do I even criticize people for their horrible English much, because the merit system sorts all of that out naturally. All of those feedbacks were a poor use of the trust system, and I've admitted that. They were left out of pure frustration at how bad the forum had deteriorated, and there were no tools at the time to deal with it--but now there is, and I'm a lot less frustrated. And yes, it's easier if someone has a problem with a trust I've left to contact me but I'll see what I can do about reviewing the trust I've left. Contrary to what you might think, I'm not unapproachable. You have changed your Ratings for the better NO doubt about it at all but you destroyed so many accounts out of Rage and i witnessed those people begging to have the Neg removed as you and some others just shrugged it off and laughed. You say your going to look into your past Negs and remove the Abusive ones? You should get to work you have A LOT of work to do. Nope he wont remove the past negs he had,because his gang wont allow it,merit abuse doesnt exist,alt accounts are allowed but you see? most of the cases with alts account caught are negged,even if they arent abusing any bounties nor campaigns whatsoever..unluckly people are more aware that this guy wont change the way he runs things here,ThePharmacist has his own rules of tagging so badluck for most of the fellow member here |
|
|
|
Lauda is Lauda, that's how she/he rolls. What I support is the anti-spam/anti-shitposting/anti-forum pollution attitude and actions. Nothing else. I don't support scams or extortion or even abusive feedback, which is why I haven't given cryptohunter or any of these other guys a neg. Do I trust them? Not really. But as Theymos said, this is just forum politics and isn't worthy of negative trust. You can quote me on this and delete the post, I don't care, but that's what's in my mind. Edit: I took that thread as a joke on Lauda's part, though I'm sure he/she does want people to make that trust list into their own. There's not an actual cult or gang, but there's obviously a divide between a lot of senior members here. I'm starting to gravitate toward the middle instead of digging in my heels. If you arent supporting abusive feedbacks,are you will willing to exclude foxup,lauda and others or give them negative trust? im sure you arent because you are leech whom sucking other's blood just to keep yourself alive. You see? you have tagged a lot of people from the past with alts accounts,shitposters etc. which doesnt violate any forum rules according to theymos.You are abusive with your position,either way your gang's time will come you can deny that you arent part of this hierarchy but the people here knows who's part of lauda's ring like what you have said to your negative trusts,acc farmers/alts,merit abusers whatever BS. |
|
|
|
they are going to silence everyone that has gotten their way @Theymos you should listen to the people,we are not the only ones who wants to take these cult down theres a lot but we are the only ones who are brave to do it because they dont want to get red tagged here.Trust system is the main reason why most of the people quits after these abusers gave them inappropriate reds..
There's no frigging cult, and it's not a gang. You're bitching about Lauda and Lauda alone. Who else are you afraid is going to leave a neg for personal grudges? Who else in what you perceive as a gang does that consistently? I sure as hell don't, and yet I keep getting lumped in with the so-called "cult". I think Vod is in there as well, but it's never exactly clear who you're talking about. Once again, I wish you'd stop spreading this BS that members are going to get negged by the Lauda gang. Either way, take me off the list. What a pussy,are you afraid of being overthrowned by the people here?you're a cancer which should be killed immediately..Lauda is your friend,and the friend of OUR enemy is not our friend FYI. |
|
|
|
you should include lauda and his gang or else,you will get red tag  That isn't true, and I wish that line would stop getting repeated. Welcome back, Joel_Jantsen. Long time, no see and I was wondering where you were at. You can include whoever you want, though you'll probably get shit for it however you choose. I can't even imagine taking a break from bitcointalk and then coming back right after the trust system changes happened--it's been like a madhouse around here lately. Stay sane, keep calm. Looks true to to me,if you dont want red trust include the gang and follow lauda's order and be an ass kisser, if you want to be excluded from DTList oppose them. |
|
|
|
Which is more important in your endeavor, a net-positive outcome for the forum and community, or removing Lauda from DT?
Taking a look through all of the people you're seeking to exclude, you're going to be doing a LOT of damage if you are successful. I'm just wondering if you believe the ends justify the means?
They don't give a shit about Lauda or anyone. They just want to get rid of their red trust so that they could go on scamming. Proof of scam please. Blatant lies are not acceptable. It is so strange that lauda continues to accuse people of lying although he is a proven liar. Huge Black Woman aka the pharmacist continues to lecture on financially motivated shit posting although he got busted hard for sneaky greedy racist troll spamming under a sock puppet? Are these people really fucked up or do they think people are going to stand for this hypocrisy and double standards? Most of DT sadly need to be removed. If you see wrongdoing and are in a position to do something about it but choose not to - - then you have no place on DT. DT members are actually refusing to look at evidence and proof that demonstrate wrong doing of other DT members. They are in public refusing to even look at the evidence because they say they choose not to get involved. Red tags are for issues directly related to trading and scams. Not to be used to silence people and try to crush freedom of speech on this board. So that they could go on scamming? look at my fucking red tag...did i scam?? FUCK YOU and your cult.,did you read what theymos said?the thread looks like politics ..why did retaliatory neg is given?fuck off.. |
|
|
|
Just 3 days ago, you had a completely different list:
Yep, and I had Default DT on the list as well. (which I've taken out now) I was going to show post the same thing  It's a good way to get a feel of who trusts who's judgement. That's nice! I have no idea that I'm distrusted by the people I've never interacted before. Anduck is quite a case because I wasn't really supporting him in regards to his argument with Vod but that's a different story. The changes in DefaultTrust have increased the extremes indeed. Have you considered changing your settings to DT1 instead of DT2?
I've removed the default trust settings completely. I'd rather add only the people whose judgments I can trust (there are very few tbh). Nothing against the DT-1 members but someone of them are proved to be undeserving on multiple occasions. you should include lauda and his gang or else,you will get red tag |
|
|
|
|
i love you lauda,i will miss you.
|
|
|
|
What I am doing, i.e. rewriting old ratings to improve them is absolutely allowed and by the guidelines. If it it wasn't I would expect someone to contact me already OR introduce the edit feature - neither of which has happened; besides counters are appropriate anyways. rmcdermott927 continues proving that he is shady/untrustworthy as long as he keeps lying. It is simple really. You can keep screaming at everyone, at theymos at me; theymos can blacklist me, can blacklist everyone that doesn't trust you, but the fact is that rmcdermott927 will remain a liar.
You copy/pasted your trust on rmcdermott927. You didn’t rewrite anything. You are the liar, not rmcdermott927. Anyone who reads your statement and looks at my post can see that. 10/06/18: Lauda noticed that rmcdermott927 was no longer showing a red trust rating so he once again removed/replaced his rating:  01/15/19: Lauda noticed that rmcdermott927 was no longer showing a red trust rating so he once again removed/replaced his rating:  Do we really as a community feel this sort of behavior has a place in the default trust network? Hell no,if we have a forum poll here which questioned who should be blacklisted DT member definitely Lauda,and the gang will be excluded..If i am Theymos i will ask the whole community who should get blacklisted,remember the voice of of the people is the voice of God.Anyone who commits crime will sooner or later be.......hHmmm. |
|
|
|
since when its not allowed to have alts?
It's perfectly allowed for untrustworthy users to have alts; that's why I only gave them negative trust instead of reporting the tell-tale PMs and getting them both banned.  Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.
So why did he get tagged ? If you tagg him you should also tagg the accounts of suchmoon such as glem or tagg any other known alt. Also who are you to decide if somebody is untrustworthy or not ?Based on what evidence are you making these taggs ? Cause currently i can only see that you are abusing the trust system which has been confirmed by theymos. because he only wants to silence the critics of the cult that hes in he's a pussy not tagging his colleague's account.Dont worry his time will come to an end together with his cult. |
|
|
|
Check out the latest trust rating Lauda has left me.  The reference thread takes you to a complaint from minifrij where he was upset that I pointed out he removes/replaces feedback when he doesn't get his way. Today I also pointed out that Lauda has engaged in this same behavior against user rmcdermott927 on this forum. Anybody know how me pointing out that minifrij is attempting to bully me into removing my feedback by misusing the trust network equates to me being a scammer? How does this fit into a reasonable DefaultTrust network rating? I do not view it as appropriate for trust ratings to relate primarily to non-trust matters. By giving someone negative trust, you're basically attaching a note to all of their posts telling people "warning: do not trade with this person!". If we can get DT working well enough, in the future I'd like to prevent guests from even viewing topics by negative-trust users in trust-enabled sections, so you have to ask yourself whether your negative trust would warrant this sort of significant effect.
I've got a popular escrow service on this site, am the OP of a longstanding community organization as well as a proof of concept Green Energy Project, sell lots of different products, & regularly try to help newbies with their issues here. Is it right that guests should no longer be able to view my posts because I stood up to the bullying of Lauda & friends?
EVIDENCE OF LAUDA BULLYING RMCDERMOTT927Are we seeing a pattern yet with these users? 8/23/18: Lauda left this retaliatory trust rating:  10/06/18: Lauda noticed that rmcdermott927 was no longer showing a red trust rating so he once again removed/replaced his rating: 01/15/19: Lauda noticed that rmcdermott927 was no longer showing a red trust rating so he once again removed/replaced his rating: LOL..her dog has given me redtrust for conspiring with you guys,what else can you expect to these abusers? they are going to silence everyone that has gotten their way @Theymos you should listen to the people,we are not the only ones who wants to take these cult down theres a lot but we are the only ones who are brave to do it because they dont want to get red tagged here.Trust system is the main reason why most of the people quits after these abusers gave them inappropriate reds.. |
|
|
|
Damn... You really got flamed for your opinion here. I guess if you aren't part of the "Cult of Lauda" (what they're calling themselves now) then you aren't allowed to have an opinion about other people's trust lists. Only the "Cult of Lauda" is allowed to publicly post trust suggestions without retaliation. While it is admirable to point out their abuse of the trust network as they try and undermine what theymos is trying to accomplish, allowing them to continue to rack up 'violations' of the system will only benefit the end goal of having them permanently blacklisted. I'm just wondering who is going to be blacklisted first... I would have thought for sure TMAN, but now Lauda is throwing his hat in the ring. I'm just leaving this here: - It is absolutely not appropriate to give someone negative trust because you disagree with them. I'm disappointed in the reaction to this post. That's how most of us likely found our way here... I would rather be accused a criminal than be part of that cult.They are enjoying the days with trust system but im sure something will happen if Theymos reconstruct how the forum works.We should have atleast one big poll asking which DTmembers should be blacklisted numbers wont lie,if they are good as you OgNasty they wont be removed.I just supported someone with good advocate and i immediately got negative trust funny asf. |
|
|
|
I don't think it matters who makes the thread. If you still trust Lauda after the extortion of zeroxal for joining a community organization Lauda wanted to see fail, or the non-transparent escrow where he unilaterally decided to release a huge portion of funds to the scammer behind the failed project that cost users millions of dollars, or him constantly promoting one scam after another with his signature, or his removing/replacing feedback on rmcdermott927's profile so it is always at the top to punish him for standing up for what's right, then nothing is going to convince you what he is or all the wrongdoing that has been done. One thing I'm certain of, this community has lost far more $ as a result of Lauda's activities than any scam attempt he's ever thwarted. LOL. I made my comment about Lauda being untrustworthy and he retaliated instantly with negative trust. This is actually great news for the forum, as I suspect the sooner theymos blacklists Lauda/TMAN for their trust abuse, the better off this forum will be. ~
I am glad that you are back on the DT1 list,shouldnt be excluded in the first place.The gang's hierarchy will end soon.Theymos wont allow these abuse and unrightful feedbacks to those who oppose other's opinion. Looks like someone  got to Gunthar and had him remove me from his inclusion list so I'd be off again. The desperation grows... Definitely Theymos sooner or later will blacklist people from the list.I just disagree with what you have said if a newbie will create a thread like to exclude the gang from the list there will be a big difference if someone like OgNasty will create one remember cats has only 9 lives  |
|
|
|
~
I am glad that you are back on the DT1 list,shouldnt be excluded in the first place.The gang's hierarchy will end soon.Theymos wont allow these abuse and unrightful feedbacks to those who oppose other's opinion. |
|
|
|
|
I just wanted to try out some new trust features,but what did i get ?redtrust by just customizing my own trustlist,even theymos was excluded few days ago.Does it mean trust is being controlled by these DT members? if you dont want to be painted dont to exclude the Godly DT's here.This looks like politics,not conspiracy to me between i strongly agree that my red trust is inapproriate .Who are these people to control which people you wanted to exlude/include to your list?doesnt make sense.
Its like senatorial elections thus the voting machines are getting tapped by those with the power to do that so they will remain with their position.
|
|
|
|
However if he tried to actually "game" the system to his advantage (not saying he did) should THAT be tagged?
With gaming the system I mean influencing DT list for his own sake or agenda and not for legitimate reasons. See Thule et al.
If the "gaming" takes the form of strategically sending a lot of merit, creating sockuppets, and stuff like that, then no. That sort of gaming might get me to blacklist people, in fact. But if it looks more like politics, then that's OK, and that's what H8bussesNbicycles's thread looks like to me. Look at my trust right now,does their feedback appropriate? accused me of conspiracy by distrusting people that i wanted to? looks like they are abusing the trust system..I am not active for months but i logged in everyday and read some useful threads and then by customizing my trustlist gives me a redtrust? |
|
|
|
|
Would be better if you choose ADA,XRP isnt a cryptocurrency in my humble opinion because it is being backed up by the banks and it means these people has control to what will be the value of this shitcoin a very centralized shitcoin,on the other hand ADA or Cardano has some great features which as a good platform i personally hate these centralized cryptocurrencies which is why i invest more on ADA.
|
|
|
|
|
#PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION
Signature Campaign & Twitter Campaign
|
|
|
|
|
Proof of joined post
Bitcointalk username: ac2eugenio
Campaign in which you participate: (twitter)
ETH address: 0xb2b7c3529FFbfcD447035aBF99C5c17CEDf3861a
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
