Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 03:41:53 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 99 »
261  Other / Meta / Re: Changing the login on: July 23, 2017, 08:30:49 AM
This topic is currently in the Bitcoin Wiki board, so in case you were wondering about your wiki username, yes, it can be changed for free. If not, please move this thread to Meta
262  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The superiority of Bitcoin on: July 22, 2017, 09:10:56 AM
There are alternatives to bitcoin, and some of them are very big, like Ethereum or Litecoin. However, no such alternative has matched the value of bitcoin, in terms of market cap. Bitcoin shares much less of the total cryptocurrency cap now than it did a while ago, but I do not think it will be overtaken for some time, if ever.

Forget about ethereum, forget about litecoin, marketcap? People didn't intrigue by those factors, the main thing maybe how valuable and what benefits that people could get from those coins, refers to its price.
What I mean is, look at this coin http://coinmarketcap.com/assets/coeval/ > $1208 right now.
I didn't notice about it, but yesterday it appeared, out of nowhere, suddenly take the second position of the highest price of cryptocurrencies.
It seems that I'm missing something about this coin, FYI : it got 95% increased (pumped) yesterday.

Market cap is a much better indicator of a cryptocurrency's performance than price. Sure, maybe 1 "CoEval" is $1200, but how many are there? Less than 50,000! Bitcoins are $2750, but there are 350 times as many bitcoins as there are CoEval tokens. If you made a currency with only 10 units in the world, and the price got to $100k, the market cap is still only $1m, 46,000 times smaller than bitcoin's market. So just because you pay more for 1 unit doesn't mean it's a bigger. That's like saying bitcoin is bigger than the euro because 1 BTC costs more than 1 EUR.
263  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The superiority of Bitcoin on: July 21, 2017, 09:03:45 PM
There are alternatives to bitcoin, and some of them are very big, like Ethereum or Litecoin. However, no such alternative has matched the value of bitcoin, in terms of market cap. Bitcoin shares much less of the total cryptocurrency cap now than it did a while ago, but I do not think it will be overtaken for some time, if ever.
264  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: mining bitcoins manually on: July 21, 2017, 09:00:11 PM
Mining by hand would have been prohibitively impractical even back when the project first started and blocks were very easy to solve.
265  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: What happen to my wallet if I have an unconfirmed transaction (August 1st) on: July 21, 2017, 06:58:15 PM
If the other bitcoins in your wallet have confirmed already, they won't be threatened by the existence of an unconfirmed transaction coming in.
266  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Alternative Bitcoin transaction accelerator? on: July 21, 2017, 09:57:09 AM
Is it still an accelerator if every transaction is going through it? And what if there's another service like it, or many accelerator services, such that more transactions are going through accelerators than not? Are we just back to normal then?
267  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The OFFICIAL SegWit2x Lock-in Thread on: July 21, 2017, 12:04:14 AM
One block to go. That was fast! This has been fun to watch and I'm looking forward to seeing what comes next
268  Economy / Speculation / Re: Vote on price in 24 hours on: July 20, 2017, 11:26:42 PM
High of $2938 on BitStamp today! Now $2750, quite a roller coaster ride with bip 91 lock-in waiting at the end
269  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: WHY BITCOIN MINING IS NOT A PROFITABLE OPTION NOW? on: July 20, 2017, 08:39:32 AM
Bitcoin mining can be profitable, otherwise nobody would do it. You might have heard it is not profitable if you tried doing it with, say, a graphics card, or your laptop processor. That would definitely not be profitable.
270  Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here on: July 20, 2017, 08:15:55 AM
I wasn't very active last year, so to kill any doubt that I'm the person I say I am I'll sign a message with my original address:

1TarasQyKwPJRuod6qwh7n8BjMHC49ZNY
Playing with formatting  Smiley

Code:
I'm Taras, the same person that registered the BitcoinTalk account Taras (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=125747) and I am still in control of this account as of 7/20/2017

HFwQtNh7xu7lP9IC5opx7iB9MF7jnNm2JsUsdbQWgD4QSlHsu36HdB7o/mCIp7s288N5eSd1xeJpHpxMA5IQROk=
271  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How About this kind of "Physical Bitcoin"? on: July 20, 2017, 07:32:26 AM
Physical bitcoin has an advantage over paper - it's very expensive to make coins! Anyone can print out a slip with a barcode. Not anybody can afford 5000 custom hologram security stickers. It would be far easier to scam people by manufacturing paper bitcoins than brass or silver struck coins!

Not saying it's impossible. But physical bitcoins have proven to be a pretty legitimate area so far.
272  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi's Vision: What would Satoshi do? on: July 20, 2017, 06:41:38 AM
Everybody wants to hear from Satoshi. But is he really the wise and powerful wizard we make him out to be? He made something really amazing, but that doesn't mean every choice he's ever made has been a good one. If he came back and advocated for this BIP or that chain, we can't be certain that he'll be making the absolute right choice.
273  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: How to create your own pool ? on: July 20, 2017, 06:06:29 AM
The duties of a mining pool operator are critical to the funds and mining power of their users. If a slip-up in code or uptime leads to losing a block, that is an instant $30,000 loss. In this day and age dealing with bitcoin blocks should be left only to those who know the protocol inside and out.

It probably isn't the answer you were looking for, but in this situation, if you have to ask how to do it, you definitely should not be doing it. Undecided

There may be other safer ways to use your datacenter.
274  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: ItsUnholy [IUY]: Your Claim on Wall Street's Assets & U.S. Social Taxes on: July 20, 2017, 01:09:49 AM
ItsUnholy is the first cryptocurrency backed by all the assets of Wall Street and half the tax revenues of U.S social service programs.  This is over $25 trillion that must be divided by only 22 million ItsUnholy tokens.  Help free our country of these unholy institutions by claiming their wealth and power with your ItsUnholy coins today.  Thanks to the blockchain, your claim cannot be counterfeited at a later date.
How it works: The coin will create decentralized political power that will force a constitutional amendment transferring the payoff to the coinholder.  Decentralized political action will work the opposite of centralized political action of traditional politics.  Isn't this the ultimate dream of blockchain technology?  Political power is owned individually by each coin holder and is not dependent upon or contribute to a centralized authority. Traditional political requirements such as broad public and main stream media support and citizen action groups are not primary factors nor are campaign contributions or donations. Virtually no effort is required other than holding and trading the ItsUnholy token.  The distribution of these coins is being managed to maximize decentralized political action.
Let me get this straight... Your plan is to take "all the assets of Wall Street and half the tax revenues of U.S social service programs", and redistribute them among... Let's see, 22 million tokens, and you're giving 1,000 to each participant...

You want to take $25,000,000,000,000 from "all the assets of Wall Street and half the tax revenues of U.S social service programs" - and give it to 22,000 people? That's your idea of heaven on earth? Thank goodness it's impossible, otherwise you might bring about the apocalypse. You claim to want to free the country from "unholy institutions", but the cement of this plan just looks like it wants to increase the number of billionaires in the United States from 565 to 22,000.

And you still want to make this transaction, and mandate it with a constitutional amendment that you plan to pass using a "decentralized political power" with 22,000 participants, which is completely impossible. Step 1 of any constitutional amendment - 2/3 majority in the house of representatives. The representative from the least populated congressional district in the entire country was elected with 130,000 votes. So, even if all users of this coin lived in that district, they would not be able to elect a single congressman to say yes to your amendment. And since it is such a ridiculous amendment, it will most likely not get any yes votes, unless some high-up politician wants to destroy their career.

But let's say, somehow, you get the amendment ratified. Now, the 6,000 or so listings that make up "Wall Street" must be dissolved, and all their assets seized. The 401ks, IRAs, investments, and employers of millions of people just got wiped out, completely gone. Many ISPs and water companies shut down, disconnecting the world and making cities more like Flint in terms of drinking water. The economy enters a depression unlike any other because all of the money is gone. People will probably rise up against the government, which no longer has enough money to do anything about it. The US dollar is no longer considered to be of any value - the credibility of the currency was just completely ruined. And the new elite you created won't be able to protect their non-monetary assets, so they will be broke in a few months when the masses finish raiding them. So all the wealth in the country was redistributed, not just the wealth of Wall Street. Lots of people will probably die over a combined lack of insurance, materials, equipment, and labor. Heaven on earth.

I think that this would be a good plot for a science fiction book. But right now, you are just injecting people with false hopes. Maybe this is a scam, though I don't see how you could possibly gain from this. The system as it is now has no value or potential whatsoever, even to a scammer.
275  Economy / Speculation / Re: What will be the maximum cost of bitcoin in 2017? on: July 19, 2017, 11:05:31 PM
Drop Bitcoin below 2K again and from then on it will take a long time for Bitcoin to go back to where it is, or maybe it won't recover and Bitcoin will just die.
I don't think so. Where do you draw the line from Bitcoin being alive and Bitcoin being dead? If the market goes back to mid 2013 levels, has it died? I for one would still be using it in that scenario. So it would have at least 1 user.
276  Other / Bitcoin Wiki / Re: Request edit privileges here on: July 18, 2017, 05:35:56 AM
Done up to this point
277  Other / Bitcoin Wiki / Re: CryptoPayment Privileges on: July 15, 2017, 02:26:54 AM
CryptoPayment isn't being used anymore. You can use the instructions on this page to activate your account: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin_Wiki:Editing_privileges
278  Other / Bitcoin Wiki / Re: Request edit privileges here on: July 15, 2017, 02:25:45 AM
All accounts up to this point are activated!


Do editing privileges also allow page creation?
Yes

Will I get an email that confirms editing status?
No, but you will see a message on the main page that looks like this:


Ethyl2017
for Darcourse
umenk
I couldn't find your accounts on the wiki. You have to register them before requesting they be activated: https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&returnto=Main+Page&type=signup
279  Other / Bitcoin Wiki / Re: Is Bitcoin.it a real wiki ? on: May 27, 2017, 07:29:24 AM
You don't have to pay a fee to activate your account anymore. You just have to ask to be activated
280  Other / Meta / Re: April fool by theymos :P on: April 01, 2017, 03:54:00 AM
I got the good one, you all have fun with your play money Grin

edit: it was bitcoin by the way, obviously you all could infer that from "the good one"
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 99 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!