Not possible running a trial. Middlecoin creator said that 512 difficulty is hardcoded. Is higher difficulty favourising faster miners over slower? Answer is on the middlecoin.com main page. Just calculate rejected over accepted MH/s as a percentage and it will come that percentage is raising going down the table... 

Of course You can. It will do it if You are doing following movements in parallel:
-right hand on top of the head with repeated vertical movement
-left hand circular movements around belly
-eye balls moving as fast as possible (faster movement -> faster hash rate) in a way of forming layed down number 8 representing infinity of scrypt mining

Sorry,... i couldn't resist...

chup; 1; 0.55; 19QP9LkcgZvvUUf9ACYbiCVfmqiE13Resd

Short back to the history and I could roughly calculate that with 1600 BEs half of the GB 11 and later GBs will get chance for USB BE for 0.15BTC. Since I'm GB7 I don't believe I would get the chance if 30% purchasers were picked starting from the oldest ones (IMHO it would be more fair, but it's only my opinion). Anyhow, I'll keep 0.15 in my BTC wallet from now on...

I think You will have problem obtaining user criticall mass for testing with this moment winminer capabilities. Right now scrypt mining is 70% more profitable for GPU than bitcoin mining. So Your first step should be adding scrypt mining. Second step should be adding ASIC devices support but with migration to linux, I believe that mostly of ASIC hardware owners are using energy efficient, linux powered boxes (raspbery pi or WiFi routers) for mining .
What I would like to have in the future from mining software is possibility of making selection of pools and crypto-coins I would like to mine and software would mine the most profitable coin at the moment.
Keep the faith and good work in the future too.

Voila:
What graphics card(s) and XP64 or 32?

Reminder:
Still waiting (from 30/06/13 post #193) for following order to be included in second batch orders list:

"<chup>; <1>; <0.085>; <19QP9LkcgZvvUUf9ACYbiCVfmqiE13Resd>"

Transaction ID: e6132ad9daa89eb9612f89a5d7715014cc2467a6451f1fc5e70831b1de85f0a1

Is there any problem, because I allready asked and PM-ed You and You made at least three batch list revisions in the meantime? So this is the "lucky" (third) reminder...
Thank You.
Chup
PS I'll appreciate if You include it at position 8 on the second batch order list, I did both payments from the same address.

Please take into account small increase of order No.8 according post #193.
Thank You.
Chup

Quote
<chup>; <1>; <0.085>; <19QP9LkcgZvvUUf9ACYbiCVfmqiE13Resd>

I was little bit late with digging for one more chip, but here it is - second batch is still open. Race is still on, let's see how much can I dig till closing... So quantity on position 8 of second batch list is now 4 instead of 3.

Chup

Quote
<chup>; <3>; <0.255>; <19QP9LkcgZvvUUf9ACYbiCVfmqiE13Resd>

I'll try to dig for one more till tomorrow closing of the group buy...

Chup

chup;1; 1.2518; 19QP9LkcgZvvUUf9ACYbiCVfmqiE13Resd

PM follows with signed mailing address.

Chup

At this moment FTC is most profitable? How come after exchange to BTC? Where is the place to do the exchange with lowest provision?

OK

I believe that there is way of reducing power consumption of other system parts so 800W PSU would be enough to run both graphics cards.

Hi is the way out of absolute newbie status.

Hi newbie...