Li, Please check system statistics. Last three days miner is working as it should at the pool, and Your statistics is showing as it is offline: Thx, chup I can confirm that 17, 18 and 19-th of November were "false positive" downtimes. The rest (before and after those three days) of the time statistics is real.
|
|
|
According to this calculator You should be earning around 20$ a month with one card, so same situation. No profit, but fun. So mine what You believe in, for support, for fun...
|
|
|
The last BFG version not support latest bitcoin wallet because of block version 4
3 X selffacepalm I pulled my hair for solo not working blaming OSX El Capitan upgrade I did... Forgot that in the same time I upgraded Bitcoin wallet.
|
|
|
I would like to have option ordering without cooler just because of delivery expenses to EU. Ordering more than one pod without cooler will not have significant impact on delivery price. I believe it will not be the same if it would be with cooler.
|
|
|
Li, Please check system statistics. Last three days miner is working as it should at the pool, and Your statistics is showing as it is offline: Thx, chup
|
|
|
Li, Thanks for the action. I'm online again. Sorry for my impatience...
|
|
|
Li, When someone with stats like mine is asking for info update via PM and e-mail, find a time to respond. I believe You have no time, but reading BITMAIN warranty conditions and not having any response from You makes me feel totally screwed. Thx in advance for any type of info. Li, What is the status with S7 repair? Am I the only one with defective S7 till now? Do You know what was the defect? If it was because of small heatsinks falling other users are reporting, maybe You should think of positioning S7s in Your farm in a way that board with glued heatsinks will be at the horizontal top position. Thank You in advance,
|
|
|
Li, What is the status with S7 repair? Am I the only one with defective S7 till now? Do You know what was the defect? If it was because of small heatsinks falling other users are reporting, maybe You should think of positioning S7s in Your farm in a way that board with glued heatsinks will be at the horizontal top position. Thank You in advance,
|
|
|
Yay, Couple of hours after payment (only because of time zone difference) and S7 is happy hashing... Li is again highly recommended.
|
|
|
Great. Going step by step to the point. The point is that GPL license was created by very bright people, clever enough not to prohibit something that can not be enforced: distribution of binaries over private channels without source code. You can assume that I'm asking djm34: "Hay djm, please look at this source code, please compile and make it faster for me, I will pay You 10BTC.
you got a deal actually the article says clearly than in case of public distribution of the binaries the code has to be given on request... (hence our concerns) ^^^^ Of course. If published, obligation for source code on request. Deal is a deal. Short at the moment for about 9 BTC but I'll do my best at exchanges.
|
|
|
Yup, actually went and looked it up... You can charge for it, whether it's private or open. So CCminer could easily add a fee to it and it wouldn't violate a GNU license as long as a source is included (which goes for private and public versions, private miners are required to provide source if they're built off of any GNU licensed material). DJM was spouting BS and I followed along with it without reading through the entire license agreement (my bad for believing DJM knew what he was talking about). So there is no problem with adding a fee to CCminer, it doesn't violate a GNU license. So by all means SP, fee away dude. Helpful link: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.en.htmlGreat. Going step by step to the point. The point is that GPL license was created by very bright people, clever enough not to prohibit something that can not be enforced: distribution of binaries over private channels without source code. You can assume that I'm asking djm34: "Hay djm, please look at this source code, please compile and make it faster for me, I will pay You 10 BTC. I don't need source code and I will not publish binaries, because I know that I will have to publish source code too, that costs 100 BTC to buy it from You. Thank You." No license break.
|
|
|
Before continuing Your accusations, please provide GPL license text that is violated when sending binaries over private channels. You can assume that user is asking and paying developer to make better code for him from open source code. Can You make citation from GPL license that is broken with this?
Oh yeah? He's making better open source code, so he can then open source it? Using a loophole doesn't make it right. You're not supposed to be able to profit off other persons open work without their permission, that's the way it works. Just because you do it in private doesn't mean you aren't violating it. It's like doing something illegal profit still makes it illegal even if you more then likely wont get caught. Your freewill understanding of GPL license doesn't count at all. If You can not provide citation of GPL license that is broken with before mentioned case than You should stop Your false accusations.
|
|
|
I think you don't understand the license if you think you can profit off someones work as long as it's not 'public'. It still counts, its just not enforceable in anyway unless someone who receives the miner initiates it. When they talk about 'private work' that means you don't share it with anyone, not you don't share it with anyone publicly. Open licensing mainly refers to profiting off other peoples work though. That still happens even if it's not public, developers with private miners who sell them are already violating the open license, but this obviously isn't their area of forte, the only reason it's come up recently is because people are looking to use it as a excuse.
As I mentioned already, it's pretty easy to include more people with a fee schedule and this is a non-issue as this sort of stuff happens all the time in the mining community. No one is going to sue anyone else, nothing is going to happen, especially if you include all the main parties that created the work... That's mainly where I think people starting to poopoo on this. If DJM doesn't get any bit of the L2V2 fees, even though he developed most of the work for the initial miner. All of that could easily be programmed in, it's just someones address, or it could divy it up on the receiving end of the payments, which would probably be easiest.
Before continuing Your accusations, please provide GPL license text that is violated when sending binaries over private channels. You can assume that user is asking and paying developer to make better code for him from open source code. Can You make citation from GPL license that is broken with this?
|
|
|
Oh yeah? The whole thing stopping this is a license agreement the majority of developers don't even respect as they take the code from open source miners and use it in their private ones anyway? ...
bensam, if "private miner" is not published, than it is not violating open source license. As soon it is published in any way, than source code should be published as well. Nobody is breaking rules here sending closed binaries over private channels. BTW, I'm also for optimized miner with fee, but devs already declared it's too much hassle doing it from scratch.
|
|
|
end of the rope.
I removed all software.
Two instances of the ethminer are messing with the same DAG folder. AFAIK one developer made custom version with different DAG folders in order to run ethminer on Nvidia and AMD in parallel. I don't believe You will gain something if You manage to do the same with CPU and GPU in parallel. Usually GPU is way better than CPU, so decrease in GPU-miner because of bussy CPU is bigger than gain from CPU-miner.
|
|
|
are those hosted miner in our farm? the internet connection is not very stable today, our main network is broken so we have to switch to back up one, the accident last for 5 hours and is restore already
My S5 (..XX.XX) didn't restored properly, showing as two workers at pool, one with 0 hash, so hashing on half than usual: Can You see what's going on? Thx.
|
|
|
Great, now it worked to mine LTC, but when I use it in dual mode, one of the gridseed stays with "A: 0" See the print: 800 is quite high frequency for dual mode. I don't think You can be successful in dual mode with frequencies higher than 650. You can expect 60W power draw in dual mode for each gridseed.
|
|
|
Bitladen asset? Crowetic are You reading what You are proposing? Giving money to wannabe 51% attacker to expand portion of mining volume he is controlling right now? Yeah, sure... I'm switching to solo-mining just to prevent this "greedynitis" spread to pool owners... Did you forget to read the part that this would also include bit agreeing to revoke his 'threat' and no longer be someone we'd have to worry about attacking the network? Is this not a good thing? Did You forget the part when Bit said that he was already been there (attacked other coins)? And I should believe in "revoking threats"? No, it will not be threat, it will happen. Sorry, I can see at least two pool owners here that are good with Bit's proposal to change reward schema in a way of rewarding more bigger players, but I still believe that successful coin needs no centralization. Therefore, I'm calling all miners to move away of those pools, at least temporary...
|
|
|
Hi guys need help how can automaticly ccminer restart if the miner stops is there a program or a comand to control that?
Thx in advance
I want a program like cgwatcher Since t-nelson fix for ccminer CTRL-C stop without error, I believe that You can use Crypto miners in Tray https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=149442.0Not as easy to setup like Cgwatcher, but can be done.
|
|
|
Bitladen asset? Crowetic are You reading what You are proposing? Giving money to wannabe 51% attacker to expand portion of mining volume he is controlling right now? Yeah, sure... I'm switching to solo-mining just to prevent this "greedynitis" spread to pool owners...
|
|
|
|